BAT VIRUS GOF MAXIMALISM
Horseshoe bat with Shi Zhengli and Wuhan colleague. Gain of function experiments in Wuhan have been going on for YEARS, labs inaugurated in 2015 then new Wuhan lab inaugurated by French politicians in 2017. It's just that 2020 was an election year so they called it/released a few more then.
They simply called different viruses "variants".
The "variants" were real viruses, yet they were not the products of natural selection, but gain of function experiments, therefore they could lead to new infections.
Covid was the name attributed to any coronavirus infection, some of which attributable to gain of function viruses, others not. In some cases, especially statistical, it was also influenza, but it was not only illness from influenza infection.
In fact, what we called influenza before 2020 was also coronavirus infections, GOF too, so it's the other way round too.
@RobinMG
NEW STUDY CONFIRMING PRE-EXISTENCE OF "VARIANTS":
https://t.me/robinmg/29494
https://t.me/robinmg/29495
Horseshoe bat with Shi Zhengli and Wuhan colleague. Gain of function experiments in Wuhan have been going on for YEARS, labs inaugurated in 2015 then new Wuhan lab inaugurated by French politicians in 2017. It's just that 2020 was an election year so they called it/released a few more then.
They simply called different viruses "variants".
The "variants" were real viruses, yet they were not the products of natural selection, but gain of function experiments, therefore they could lead to new infections.
Covid was the name attributed to any coronavirus infection, some of which attributable to gain of function viruses, others not. In some cases, especially statistical, it was also influenza, but it was not only illness from influenza infection.
In fact, what we called influenza before 2020 was also coronavirus infections, GOF too, so it's the other way round too.
@RobinMG
NEW STUDY CONFIRMING PRE-EXISTENCE OF "VARIANTS":
https://t.me/robinmg/29494
https://t.me/robinmg/29495
Scientist admits the 'overwhelming consensus' on the climate change crisis is 'manufactured'
“I was adopted by the environmental advocacy groups and the alarmists and I was treated like a rock star,” Curry recounts.
“Flown all over the place to meet with politicians.”
But then some researchers pointed out gaps in her research — years with low levels of hurricanes.
“Like a good scientist, I investigated,” says Curry..
https://nypost.com/2023/08/09/climate-scientist-admits-the-overwhelming-consensus-is-manufactured/
“I was adopted by the environmental advocacy groups and the alarmists and I was treated like a rock star,” Curry recounts.
“Flown all over the place to meet with politicians.”
But then some researchers pointed out gaps in her research — years with low levels of hurricanes.
“Like a good scientist, I investigated,” says Curry..
https://nypost.com/2023/08/09/climate-scientist-admits-the-overwhelming-consensus-is-manufactured/
New York Post
Scientist admits the 'overwhelming consensus' on the climate change...
Climate scientist Judith Curry says climate change is a "manufactured consensus."
https://youtu.be/PMN00XcjYrU
People often ask who are the perpetrators. I don’t know. They’ll be the wealthiest people across the world.
Some of the actors in preparation of a depopulation plan are clear to see and Henry Kissinger is one of them.
Best wishes
Mike
Ps: if you’ve not read his report to the President in around 1974, declassified in the 1980s, you can read his Malthusian arguments. They’re not convincing unless your objective is to remain effectively in charge of what happens in the world, in which case it becomes easy to be persuaded.
People often ask who are the perpetrators. I don’t know. They’ll be the wealthiest people across the world.
Some of the actors in preparation of a depopulation plan are clear to see and Henry Kissinger is one of them.
Best wishes
Mike
Ps: if you’ve not read his report to the President in around 1974, declassified in the 1980s, you can read his Malthusian arguments. They’re not convincing unless your objective is to remain effectively in charge of what happens in the world, in which case it becomes easy to be persuaded.
Karen Kingston poisoned?
https://rumble.com/v35xb3i-karen-kingston-has-been-poisoned-and-calls-out-robert-malone-and-others..html
https://rumble.com/v35xb3i-karen-kingston-has-been-poisoned-and-calls-out-robert-malone-and-others..html
Rumble
KAREN KINGSTON HAS BEEN POISONED AND CALLS OUT ROBERT MALONE AND OTHERS.
AmericanEducationFM https://www.bitchute.com/channel/americaneducationfm/ https://www.bitchute.com/video/SYeftkBM1zPT/
Forwarded from River of Freedom film
🎥 AUCKLAND PREMIERE TICKETS ON SALE NOW 9am 💥
Don’t hesitate to grab yours now, because the interest in this event is HUGE... Grab your $20 ticket today! Buy one for a friend!!
(Ticket cost is $20+booking fee)
https://www.ticketmaster.co.nz/event/24005F0777950A1A
Don’t hesitate to grab yours now, because the interest in this event is HUGE... Grab your $20 ticket today! Buy one for a friend!!
(Ticket cost is $20+booking fee)
https://www.ticketmaster.co.nz/event/24005F0777950A1A
THE THREE RULES OF GROUPTHINK
1. ILLUSION
A group of people come to share a belief that is not based in reality: an illusion.
2. CONSENSUS
As the belief does not match external reality, the group of people resort to hanging onto the only thing they have, a consensus between them that the illusion is reality. From this point, the illusion's main justification becomes this "consensus".
3. INTOLERANCE
Any external person to the groupthink with a different view needs to be silenced because the "consensus" becomes the only defence of the illusion. Therefore the groupthink group resorts to censorship, intimidation, and "cancelling" all critical opinions.
@RobinMG
https://twitter.com/robinmonotti/status/1689875616156270592
1. ILLUSION
A group of people come to share a belief that is not based in reality: an illusion.
2. CONSENSUS
As the belief does not match external reality, the group of people resort to hanging onto the only thing they have, a consensus between them that the illusion is reality. From this point, the illusion's main justification becomes this "consensus".
3. INTOLERANCE
Any external person to the groupthink with a different view needs to be silenced because the "consensus" becomes the only defence of the illusion. Therefore the groupthink group resorts to censorship, intimidation, and "cancelling" all critical opinions.
@RobinMG
https://twitter.com/robinmonotti/status/1689875616156270592
Big Pharma Harms Patients for Profit but Doctors Must Also Share the Blame
"Only 11% of 3,000 health interventions have good evidence to support them, with 80% of new drugs copies of old ones and 153 million euros a day being lost through corruption in health systems.
In his book Bad Pharma, Ben Goldacre has eloquently drawn attention to how drug companies mislead doctors and harm patients, and is rightly calling for the industry to publish all their trial data. But many of the corporate crimes committed by the pharmaceutical industry wouldn't happen if an influential minority of doctors weren't complicit or wilfully blind to these misdemeanours. Leading clinicians often compromise medical ethics and integrity by lending their name to ghost written articles published in academic journals that may support the approved use of a drug for unlicensed conditions, either for financial gain or greater kudos amongst peers.
Peter Gotzsche, director of the Nordic Cochrane centre says " the consequences of these crimes are huge, including the unnecessary deaths of thousands of people and many billions in losses for our national economies every year."
Dr Aseem Malhotra (2013)
https://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/dr-aseem-malhotra/big-pharma-harms-patients_b_2871035.html
https://twitter.com/robinmonotti/status/1689888573439307776
"Only 11% of 3,000 health interventions have good evidence to support them, with 80% of new drugs copies of old ones and 153 million euros a day being lost through corruption in health systems.
In his book Bad Pharma, Ben Goldacre has eloquently drawn attention to how drug companies mislead doctors and harm patients, and is rightly calling for the industry to publish all their trial data. But many of the corporate crimes committed by the pharmaceutical industry wouldn't happen if an influential minority of doctors weren't complicit or wilfully blind to these misdemeanours. Leading clinicians often compromise medical ethics and integrity by lending their name to ghost written articles published in academic journals that may support the approved use of a drug for unlicensed conditions, either for financial gain or greater kudos amongst peers.
Peter Gotzsche, director of the Nordic Cochrane centre says " the consequences of these crimes are huge, including the unnecessary deaths of thousands of people and many billions in losses for our national economies every year."
Dr Aseem Malhotra (2013)
https://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/dr-aseem-malhotra/big-pharma-harms-patients_b_2871035.html
https://twitter.com/robinmonotti/status/1689888573439307776
HuffPost UK
Big Pharma Harms Patients for Profit but Doctors Must Also Share the Blame
I believe I speak for the overwhelming majority of doctors in the NHS when I say I went into medicine to practice evidence based, not corporate-influenced medicine.
The Climate Crisis Frenzy Is a Mass Hysteria Movement
"Once an infected group is in a state of mass hysteria, the government can “impose measures on the rest of the population, inflicting almost unrestricted harm,” including abrogating and trampling on civil liberties, all of it justified by assertions that it’s necessary to prevent a catastrophe.
The authors describe how the federal government used lockdowns and social distancing to create greater Covid hysteria, decrease psychological resistance and impose penalties for non-compliance. The government’s actions, combined with news agencies and social media, promoted massive negative news campaigns that further deteriorated psychic health by intentionally scaring already anxious populations.
The authors conclude that government elimination of information that questions, challenges or competes with its preferred narrative – combined with false or negative information spread by news and social media – makes society more prone to developing mass hysteria."
wattsupwiththat.com/2023/08/10/the…
https://twitter.com/robinmonotti/status/1689894419321819136
"Once an infected group is in a state of mass hysteria, the government can “impose measures on the rest of the population, inflicting almost unrestricted harm,” including abrogating and trampling on civil liberties, all of it justified by assertions that it’s necessary to prevent a catastrophe.
The authors describe how the federal government used lockdowns and social distancing to create greater Covid hysteria, decrease psychological resistance and impose penalties for non-compliance. The government’s actions, combined with news agencies and social media, promoted massive negative news campaigns that further deteriorated psychic health by intentionally scaring already anxious populations.
The authors conclude that government elimination of information that questions, challenges or competes with its preferred narrative – combined with false or negative information spread by news and social media – makes society more prone to developing mass hysteria."
wattsupwiththat.com/2023/08/10/the…
https://twitter.com/robinmonotti/status/1689894419321819136
Watts Up With That?
The Climate Crisis Frenzy Is a Mass Hysteria Movement
Climate fear-mongering, eco-anxiety counseling and a rocky road to Third World status
HOW TO DISTINGUISH A CORONAVIRUS FROM A VESCICLE.
In electron microscopy, coronaviruses are often confused with clathrin-coated vesicles (CCVs), normal subcellular organelles involved in intracellular transport, and present in uninfected patients.
This is how to tell the difference:
"Coronaviruses have been carefully described in electron microscopic images of thin sections. In these images of thin sections, coronaviruses appear as spherical structures containing black dots on the inside, which are cross-sections through the helical viral nucleocapsid (Figure 1).
Coronaviruses receive their outer covering by budding into cellular membranes of the rough endoplasmic reticulum and Golgi complex forming a vacuole and are found in the intracisternal space.
The spikes are seen with difficulty in thin sections of infected cells, but a “fuzz” is sometimes visible.
However, note that these spikes face the inside of the vacuole and do not touch the cytoplasm of the cell.
Complete virus particles can also be found at the cell surface, having been extruded when the vacuolar membrane fuses with the plasma membrane and exocytoses them; in this case, the spikes on the virions face the extracellular space, again, not the cytoplasm."
"Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 isolate grown in cell culture showing numerous spherical viral particles (arrows) that are in the cisternae of the rough endoplasmic reticulum/Golgi complex area of the cell. Note the black dots on the interior of the particles, which are cross-sections through the viral nucleocapsid. Scale bar: 400 nm."
https://journals.lww.com/jasn/fulltext/2020/09000/caution_in_identifying_coronaviruses_by_electron.30.aspx
https://twitter.com/robinmonotti/status/1689903508076556288
In electron microscopy, coronaviruses are often confused with clathrin-coated vesicles (CCVs), normal subcellular organelles involved in intracellular transport, and present in uninfected patients.
This is how to tell the difference:
"Coronaviruses have been carefully described in electron microscopic images of thin sections. In these images of thin sections, coronaviruses appear as spherical structures containing black dots on the inside, which are cross-sections through the helical viral nucleocapsid (Figure 1).
Coronaviruses receive their outer covering by budding into cellular membranes of the rough endoplasmic reticulum and Golgi complex forming a vacuole and are found in the intracisternal space.
The spikes are seen with difficulty in thin sections of infected cells, but a “fuzz” is sometimes visible.
However, note that these spikes face the inside of the vacuole and do not touch the cytoplasm of the cell.
Complete virus particles can also be found at the cell surface, having been extruded when the vacuolar membrane fuses with the plasma membrane and exocytoses them; in this case, the spikes on the virions face the extracellular space, again, not the cytoplasm."
"Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 isolate grown in cell culture showing numerous spherical viral particles (arrows) that are in the cisternae of the rough endoplasmic reticulum/Golgi complex area of the cell. Note the black dots on the interior of the particles, which are cross-sections through the viral nucleocapsid. Scale bar: 400 nm."
https://journals.lww.com/jasn/fulltext/2020/09000/caution_in_identifying_coronaviruses_by_electron.30.aspx
https://twitter.com/robinmonotti/status/1689903508076556288
Lippincott®
Caution in Identifying Coronaviruses by Electron Microscopy
We are concerned about the erroneous identification of coronavirus directly in tissues by authors using electron microscopy. Several recent articles have been published that purport to have identified severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS…
What is the CIA psyop technique of controlling both the main narrative and the oppositional narrative while pushing the oppositional narrative to extremes to sound ridiculous and alienate the masses called?
Was it oppositional dialectic?
For example:
Official narrative:
"Viruses will kill everyone as there is no natural immunity"
Oppositional narrative:
"Viruses don't exist and never have."
Official narrative:
"Refugees deserve respect and support. All are welcome."
Oppositional narrative:
"We are being invaded by sub-human rapist hordes."
Both are clearly part of the same psyop, and both are controlled narrratives to polarize, whether people realise it or not: divide et impera.
Was it oppositional dialectic?
For example:
Official narrative:
"Viruses will kill everyone as there is no natural immunity"
Oppositional narrative:
"Viruses don't exist and never have."
Official narrative:
"Refugees deserve respect and support. All are welcome."
Oppositional narrative:
"We are being invaded by sub-human rapist hordes."
Both are clearly part of the same psyop, and both are controlled narrratives to polarize, whether people realise it or not: divide et impera.
They're going to come for us again, probably as early as December. If the best we've got is: "viruses don't exist", then we maybe deserve the Great Reset & CBDCs..
@RobinMG
https://twitter.com/robinmonotti/status/1689962342006579200
@RobinMG
https://twitter.com/robinmonotti/status/1689962342006579200
Twitter
They're going to come for us again, probably as early as December. If the best we've got is: "viruses don't exist", then we maybe deserve the Great Reset & CBDCs..
FAKE BINARY
"A fake binary refers to a situation in which people are presented with only two opposing options, but those options are oversimplified or misleading.
It creates a false dichotomy, making it seem like these two options are the only possibilities when, in reality, there may be more nuanced or diverse perspectives.
For example, imagine a political debate where two candidates are portrayed as representing completely opposite ideologies. The media or public discourse might present them as the only viable options, creating a fake binary.
Such an oversimplification ignores the existence of alternative candidates or positions.
A fake binary can limit critical thinking and understanding by narrowing the discussion to only two choices.
It can hinder meaningful dialogue, suppress alternative viewpoints, and prevent the exploration of more complex and inclusive solutions to societal issues."
@JermWarfare
Eg.:
A. We are powerless against viruses, we need lockdowns, masks, vaccines.
B. Viruses don't exist.
https://jermwarfare.com/podcast/kit-knightly
"A fake binary refers to a situation in which people are presented with only two opposing options, but those options are oversimplified or misleading.
It creates a false dichotomy, making it seem like these two options are the only possibilities when, in reality, there may be more nuanced or diverse perspectives.
For example, imagine a political debate where two candidates are portrayed as representing completely opposite ideologies. The media or public discourse might present them as the only viable options, creating a fake binary.
Such an oversimplification ignores the existence of alternative candidates or positions.
A fake binary can limit critical thinking and understanding by narrowing the discussion to only two choices.
It can hinder meaningful dialogue, suppress alternative viewpoints, and prevent the exploration of more complex and inclusive solutions to societal issues."
@JermWarfare
Eg.:
A. We are powerless against viruses, we need lockdowns, masks, vaccines.
B. Viruses don't exist.
https://jermwarfare.com/podcast/kit-knightly
Jerm Warfare
Kit Knightly on fake binaries and controlling perceptions
Kit Knightly is one of the editors at OffGuardian. OffGuardian publishes independent journalism instead of mainstream propaganda.
Alex Epstein writes well & economically.
You may find this interesting and useful,
Best wishes
Mike
https://open.substack.com/pub/alexepstein/p/howand-whyto-defend-coal
You may find this interesting and useful,
Best wishes
Mike
https://open.substack.com/pub/alexepstein/p/howand-whyto-defend-coal
Energy Talking Points by Alex Epstein
How—and why—to defend coal
4 key practices I shared with the Congressional Coal Caucus
Is this a metaphor for the oligarchy's depopulation plan via the "C19 vaccines"?
@RobinMG
https://twitter.com/robinmonotti/status/1690072187623911425
@RobinMG
https://twitter.com/robinmonotti/status/1690072187623911425