This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Wonderful parents, brilliant job.
They serve notice on health workers who want to jab kids.
Despite the fact the parents are there the health workers still try to bypass the parents and seek ‘GILLICK competency’ from the child to get her jabbed despite their objections.
They deserve that notice.
Absolutely disgusting, they should be ashamed of themselves
They serve notice on health workers who want to jab kids.
Despite the fact the parents are there the health workers still try to bypass the parents and seek ‘GILLICK competency’ from the child to get her jabbed despite their objections.
They deserve that notice.
Absolutely disgusting, they should be ashamed of themselves
THIS IS THE STRONGEST WARNING FROM THE MOST CREDIBLE PHYSICIAN IN THE WORLD RIGHT NOW.
Please read & share. Note that a link is provided to Dr PETER MCCULLOUGH’s slides used in a very recent presentation.
He also calls what’s happening a totalitarian takeover.
I don’t think he can become more specific about his concerns.
Best wishes
Mike
Dr Mike Yeadon
https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/covid-expert-dr-peter-mccullogh-urges-unbreakable-resistance-to-vaccines-for-kids/
Please read & share. Note that a link is provided to Dr PETER MCCULLOUGH’s slides used in a very recent presentation.
He also calls what’s happening a totalitarian takeover.
I don’t think he can become more specific about his concerns.
Best wishes
Mike
Dr Mike Yeadon
https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/covid-expert-dr-peter-mccullogh-urges-unbreakable-resistance-to-vaccines-for-kids/
LifeSite
COVID expert Dr. Peter McCullough urges ‘unbreakable resistance’ to vaccines for kids - LifeSite
This ‘can’t be about COVID at this stage,’ he said. It’s about ‘some type of totalitarian takeover that’s occurred all over the world. Something very dark is going on.’
90 second video which may reflect well your thoughts too.
It’s spot on.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/6tLTy0vEKJkP/
Mike Y
Ps: if it amuses you, please pass it on.
It’s spot on.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/6tLTy0vEKJkP/
Mike Y
Ps: if it amuses you, please pass it on.
Bitchute
This is the attitude needed to beat this CRAP
This is Amandha Vollmer. Amandha eloquently puts a positive spin to our present day NWO trials and tribulations, and shoves it all back into the globalists' faces. Watch!!
Original Source : https://twitter.com/ProKlausSchwab/status/1444046118128607241…
Original Source : https://twitter.com/ProKlausSchwab/status/1444046118128607241…
Forwarded from Dr. Vladimir Zelenko (Zelenko Protocol) (Zev Zelenko)
I would like to acknowledge and thank the efforts of the Dr Peter McCullough. He is a warrior and professional mentor to me. His courage, integrity, and faith are a light in a world of terrible darkness. May God protect him and his family.
Vladimir Zev Zelenko MD
Vladimir Zev Zelenko MD
Dr. Vladimir Zelenko (Zelenko Protocol)
I would like to acknowledge and thank the efforts of the Dr Peter McCullough. He is a warrior and professional mentor to me. His courage, integrity, and faith are a light in a world of terrible darkness. May God protect him and his family. Vladimir Zev…
I second Dr Zekenko’s words & feelings.
Dr Peter McCullough is a courageous person & leader of the highest order.
Best wishes
Mike
Dr Peter McCullough is a courageous person & leader of the highest order.
Best wishes
Mike
Max praise to those who wrote, performed & edited this funny, accurate rap video on pro-Vax vs ‘Vax hesitant’.
Plus a comment below, which will probably get deleted!
Dr Mike Yeadon
https://youtu.be/_3oOXnO61yk
Plus a comment below, which will probably get deleted!
Dr Mike Yeadon
https://youtu.be/_3oOXnO61yk
We’re not surprised. We’ve looked at the clinical data. In fact, we KNEW this would happen.
Kids aren’t at risk from this virus so mass vaccination is sadly only going to add injuries & deaths and could never save anyone.
WORST OF ALL: every public health doctor knows this yet almost no one said a peep.
All respect for them is gone.
Dr Mike Yeadon
Kids aren’t at risk from this virus so mass vaccination is sadly only going to add injuries & deaths and could never save anyone.
WORST OF ALL: every public health doctor knows this yet almost no one said a peep.
All respect for them is gone.
Dr Mike Yeadon
A decent summary of public linkages between WEF, BMGF, WHO, various government agencies. What they share among other things is “DIGITAL BIOMETRIC ID” is necessary.
For children, it was previously proposed that their initial vaccinations be the entry point to such a digital ID.
It’s important that people understand that there is no common format, interoperable, editable, digital ID anywhere. Not at the moment.
The childishness with which people conflate driving licenses with biometric digital ID is just maddening.
The whole point of the digital ID is it’s interoperability & editability.
Interoperability means I could wave my digital ID across a reader & the algorithm might allow or deny me access or getting a service.
You might do the same & get a different result. The ID is interacting in real time with both the global database, your data & whatever decision tree arises from the algorithms.
Nothing we’ve ever experienced comes close. It’s NOT simply an ID. It’s a decision making system.
Dr Mike Yeadon
Ps: please share this perspective- thanks!
https://swprs.org/the-wef-and-the-pandemic/
For children, it was previously proposed that their initial vaccinations be the entry point to such a digital ID.
It’s important that people understand that there is no common format, interoperable, editable, digital ID anywhere. Not at the moment.
The childishness with which people conflate driving licenses with biometric digital ID is just maddening.
The whole point of the digital ID is it’s interoperability & editability.
Interoperability means I could wave my digital ID across a reader & the algorithm might allow or deny me access or getting a service.
You might do the same & get a different result. The ID is interacting in real time with both the global database, your data & whatever decision tree arises from the algorithms.
Nothing we’ve ever experienced comes close. It’s NOT simply an ID. It’s a decision making system.
Dr Mike Yeadon
Ps: please share this perspective- thanks!
https://swprs.org/the-wef-and-the-pandemic/
Swiss Policy Research
The WEF and the Pandemic
How is the Davos World Economic Forum involved in the coronavirus pandemic?
My single London school survey: spike injection uptake in the 12 year olds around 20%.
Are the Injections working?
Cases are considerably higher than they were in 2020 and indeed are nearly 4 times higher in the UK in the last 10 months than the first 9 months of the “pandemic” before the injections started to be rolled out
Link to data: https://coronavirus.data.gov.uk/details/cases
Cases are considerably higher than they were in 2020 and indeed are nearly 4 times higher in the UK in the last 10 months than the first 9 months of the “pandemic” before the injections started to be rolled out
Link to data: https://coronavirus.data.gov.uk/details/cases
Are the Injections working?
Hospitalisations with Covid are considerably higher than they were in 2020 and indeed are 1.5 times higher in the UK in the last 10 months than the first 9 months of the “pandemic” before the injections started to be rolled out.
Link to data: https://coronavirus.data.gov.uk/details/healthcare
Hospitalisations with Covid are considerably higher than they were in 2020 and indeed are 1.5 times higher in the UK in the last 10 months than the first 9 months of the “pandemic” before the injections started to be rolled out.
Link to data: https://coronavirus.data.gov.uk/details/healthcare
Are the Injections working?
Deaths with Covid are also considerably higher than they were in 2020. We also saw a huge spike in deaths in the quarter to February 2021 when the injections began their roll out
Link to data: https://coronavirus.data.gov.uk/details/deaths
Deaths with Covid are also considerably higher than they were in 2020. We also saw a huge spike in deaths in the quarter to February 2021 when the injections began their roll out
Link to data: https://coronavirus.data.gov.uk/details/deaths
Excellent speakers, making deductions & predictions.
Mike
https://drtrozzi.com/2021/10/the-coming-pandemic-of-the-vaccinated/
Mike
https://drtrozzi.com/2021/10/the-coming-pandemic-of-the-vaccinated/
Very important though, for most, long lost in the wake of human rights abuses, is the ever-present issue of “what are the operational false positive rates” of the various tests to which we’ve been subjected?
I’ve often been quoted as estimating the oFPR of U.K. mass PCR screening to have been in the 90s%.
We were using cycle thresholds in the high 30s.
Here you see a calculation by one of the few, truly expert proponents of this test, Dr Sin Lee.
Even using CT27+ the FPR in a retrospective actual study is 75%.
If using <CT27, the FPR is still an unacceptable 5% (imagine being 1 in 20 being told to isolate, wrongly?).
No: the whole testing charade was set up to generate positive test results, which gave officials all they needed to point to alarming graphs.
They had another use: to falsely assign this virus as the cause of many more deaths than was true.
I’d argue that, if a person dies ‘of covid19’, they should minimally have had classical symptoms of respiratory viral infection.
Dying “with covid19” is a useless measure. Why not test to see if the ill were positive for E. coli? If they then died, would it be reasonable to state they’d died “with E. coli”, impliedly in some way because they carried that bacterium?
Of course not. Similarly there are scores of respiratory viruses. Not testing for those means we missed hundreds of thousands of other causes of death !
Mike
I’ve often been quoted as estimating the oFPR of U.K. mass PCR screening to have been in the 90s%.
We were using cycle thresholds in the high 30s.
Here you see a calculation by one of the few, truly expert proponents of this test, Dr Sin Lee.
Even using CT27+ the FPR in a retrospective actual study is 75%.
If using <CT27, the FPR is still an unacceptable 5% (imagine being 1 in 20 being told to isolate, wrongly?).
No: the whole testing charade was set up to generate positive test results, which gave officials all they needed to point to alarming graphs.
They had another use: to falsely assign this virus as the cause of many more deaths than was true.
I’d argue that, if a person dies ‘of covid19’, they should minimally have had classical symptoms of respiratory viral infection.
Dying “with covid19” is a useless measure. Why not test to see if the ill were positive for E. coli? If they then died, would it be reasonable to state they’d died “with E. coli”, impliedly in some way because they carried that bacterium?
Of course not. Similarly there are scores of respiratory viruses. Not testing for those means we missed hundreds of thousands of other causes of death !
Mike
TRIESTE, ITALY. 🇮🇹
PRESS RELEASE from the Port workers of Trieste. The port will be blocked from the 15th October until the Green Pass is removed for any work related entry for all workers. The port workers found out that the government is attempting to negotiate with their leaders to give them free tests, however the port workers are saying that despite any negotiation at higher level they will not resume operations at the port in order to defend the interests of all workers until the Green Pass is not required for any job.
PRESS RELEASE from the Port workers of Trieste. The port will be blocked from the 15th October until the Green Pass is removed for any work related entry for all workers. The port workers found out that the government is attempting to negotiate with their leaders to give them free tests, however the port workers are saying that despite any negotiation at higher level they will not resume operations at the port in order to defend the interests of all workers until the Green Pass is not required for any job.
Well, this is reputed to be a very interesting conversation
Enjoy 🤗
Mike
https://alexberenson.substack.com/p/the-rogan-conversation-is-up/comments
Enjoy 🤗
Mike
https://alexberenson.substack.com/p/the-rogan-conversation-is-up/comments
Substack
The Rogan conversation is up
Independent, citizen-funded journalism
Well done, senators!
Yes: PCR fraud sits at the centre of the web.
Everywhere I’ve seen the information, far too many cycles of amplification are being used.
Most people don’t know that at 40 cycles (written as Ct 40), the system has ramped up by a TRILLION FOLD the amount of genetic material in the tube.
That’s so much amplification that it’s inventor, Nobel prize winning chemist, Dr Kary Mullis, firmly recommended AGAINST use of PCR to diagnose clinical infection.
Dr Sin Lee earlier today shared the results of a study by Kaiser, a healthcare organisation. Kaiser rechecked samples from people who’d tested positive by PCR.
They used above 27 cycles vs below 27 cycles.
Turned out as I’d previously gone on about last summer & deep into autumn. The higher the Ct, the more likely that the prior positive result was false.
75% of the positive test results were false when 27+ cycles were permitted.
When fewer cycles were used to define a positive, just 5% were false (even that’s WAY too high, as 1 in 20 people given a positive result actually in error).
Now imagine a positive result being allowed after 33 cycles or 39 cycles (I believe U.K. is still using an absurd 39 cycles in PCR).
I had calculated false positives being of the order of 90%+ & 97%+, respectively.
Utterly wasteful & deliberately misleading.
Did you know that in U.K. the testing was swept out of public health labs & into newly set-up private labs?
The effect is that a tiny number of people in U.K. set the conditions under which THE most important diagnostic test ever run in the country. No one inspects them, even Govt safety people. Neither the staff nor the facilities are accredited by the body which sets quality control in these facilities.
Why does this matter? Simple: if there weren’t enough deaths to scare people, roll into “cases” by modulating PCR mass testing conditions.
This cuts across deaths statistics, because absurdly, and for the first time in medical history, a “case” is simply a positive test result even in someone with NO symptoms.
The outright misleading effects carried across to “covid19 deaths”. Most “cases” were false positive too. And these are not really deaths as a consequence of viral infection. Most of the time, the dead person in no way died because of the virus. It’s just overt lying.
Best wishes
Mike
Dr Mike Yeadon
https://m.theepochtimes.com/mkt_breakingnews/oregon-senators-call-for-investigation-into-alleged-covid-19-statistical-manipulation_4044333.html
Yes: PCR fraud sits at the centre of the web.
Everywhere I’ve seen the information, far too many cycles of amplification are being used.
Most people don’t know that at 40 cycles (written as Ct 40), the system has ramped up by a TRILLION FOLD the amount of genetic material in the tube.
That’s so much amplification that it’s inventor, Nobel prize winning chemist, Dr Kary Mullis, firmly recommended AGAINST use of PCR to diagnose clinical infection.
Dr Sin Lee earlier today shared the results of a study by Kaiser, a healthcare organisation. Kaiser rechecked samples from people who’d tested positive by PCR.
They used above 27 cycles vs below 27 cycles.
Turned out as I’d previously gone on about last summer & deep into autumn. The higher the Ct, the more likely that the prior positive result was false.
75% of the positive test results were false when 27+ cycles were permitted.
When fewer cycles were used to define a positive, just 5% were false (even that’s WAY too high, as 1 in 20 people given a positive result actually in error).
Now imagine a positive result being allowed after 33 cycles or 39 cycles (I believe U.K. is still using an absurd 39 cycles in PCR).
I had calculated false positives being of the order of 90%+ & 97%+, respectively.
Utterly wasteful & deliberately misleading.
Did you know that in U.K. the testing was swept out of public health labs & into newly set-up private labs?
The effect is that a tiny number of people in U.K. set the conditions under which THE most important diagnostic test ever run in the country. No one inspects them, even Govt safety people. Neither the staff nor the facilities are accredited by the body which sets quality control in these facilities.
Why does this matter? Simple: if there weren’t enough deaths to scare people, roll into “cases” by modulating PCR mass testing conditions.
This cuts across deaths statistics, because absurdly, and for the first time in medical history, a “case” is simply a positive test result even in someone with NO symptoms.
The outright misleading effects carried across to “covid19 deaths”. Most “cases” were false positive too. And these are not really deaths as a consequence of viral infection. Most of the time, the dead person in no way died because of the virus. It’s just overt lying.
Best wishes
Mike
Dr Mike Yeadon
https://m.theepochtimes.com/mkt_breakingnews/oregon-senators-call-for-investigation-into-alleged-covid-19-statistical-manipulation_4044333.html
www.theepochtimes.com
Oregon Senators Call for Investigation Into Alleged COVID-19 Statistical Manipulation
Oregon state Sens. Kim Thatcher and Dennis Linthicum, both Republicans, have petitioned Acting U.S. Attorney Scott E. Asphaug to launch ...
Here’s Dr Sin Lee’s extract of a study just out:
If you do not know the Ct values, the false-positive rate is (688+1178)/(731+1314)=1866/2045=91%.
On Tuesday, October 12, 2021, 11:27:58 AM EDT, Sin Lee < > wrote:
False positive rates:
Ct <27 = (44+192)/(760+3723) = 236/4483=5.26%
Ct>27 = (349+1452)/(465+1918)= 1801/2383=75.5%
If you use the same ratio to evaluate the Pfizer vaccine clinical trial results, > 75% of the 162 cases would be due to the results of false positives because Pfizer was using >Ct 40 as cutoff.
So, why Pfizer refused to perform a retrospective sequencing testing like Kaiser did?
S. H.
If you do not know the Ct values, the false-positive rate is (688+1178)/(731+1314)=1866/2045=91%.
On Tuesday, October 12, 2021, 11:27:58 AM EDT, Sin Lee < > wrote:
False positive rates:
Ct <27 = (44+192)/(760+3723) = 236/4483=5.26%
Ct>27 = (349+1452)/(465+1918)= 1801/2383=75.5%
If you use the same ratio to evaluate the Pfizer vaccine clinical trial results, > 75% of the 162 cases would be due to the results of false positives because Pfizer was using >Ct 40 as cutoff.
So, why Pfizer refused to perform a retrospective sequencing testing like Kaiser did?
S. H.
If you watched the documentary by German journalist, Paul Schreyer, on “Pandemic Simulations, Preparation For A New Age?”, you’ll already be somewhat familiar with ROBERT KADLEC.
Note Kadlec’s current role, 20 years after operation Dark Winter.
What we are in the midst of has been planned for a considerable time.
Best wishes
Mike
Dr Mike Yeadon
https://unlimitedhangout.com/2020/04/investigative-series/all-roads-lead-to-dark-winter/
Note Kadlec’s current role, 20 years after operation Dark Winter.
What we are in the midst of has been planned for a considerable time.
Best wishes
Mike
Dr Mike Yeadon
https://unlimitedhangout.com/2020/04/investigative-series/all-roads-lead-to-dark-winter/