"What is a rebel? A man who says no, but whose refusal does not imply a renunciation. He is also a man who says yes, from the moment he makes his first gesture of rebellion."
Albert Camus

Contamination by respiratory viruses on outer surface of medical masks used by hospital healthcare workers


"Overall virus positivity rate was 10.1% (15/148). Commonly isolated viruses from masks samples were adenovirus (n = 7), bocavirus (n = 2), respiratory syncytial virus (n = 2) and influenza virus (n = 2). Virus positivity was significantly higher in masks samples worn for > 6 h (14.1%, 14/99 versus 1.2%, 1/49, OR 7.9, 95% CI 1.01–61.99) and in samples used by participants who examined > 25 patients per day (16.9%, 12/71 versus 3.9%, 3/77, OR 5.02, 95% CI 1.35–18.60). Most of the participants (83.8%, 124/148) reported at least one problem associated with mask use. Commonly reported problems were pressure on face (16.9%, 25/148), breathing difficulty (12.2%, 18/148), discomfort (9.5% 14/148), trouble communicating with the patient (7.4%, 11/148) and headache (6.1%, 9/148).

Conclusion

Respiratory pathogens on the outer surface of the used medical masks may result in self-contamination. The risk is higher with longer duration of mask use (> 6 h) and with higher rates of clinical contact. Protocols on duration of mask use should specify a maximum time of continuous use, and should consider guidance in high contact settings. Viruses were isolated from the upper sections of around 10% samples, but other sections of masks may also be contaminated. HCWs should be aware of these risks in order to protect themselves and people around them."
https://bmcinfectdis.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12879-019-4109-x

Masks increase mortality because breathing through them nebulizes aerosols into smaller ones which bypass mucosal immunity & reach all the way into the alveoli, leading to acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS).

A video is worth a million words
Face masks to protect against aerosol transmitted respiratory viruses are a con. Bad science.
https://t.co/k0gR4nQ5g1

⚠️THIS MEANS ALL TESTS IN THE UK ARE JUNK SCIENCE ⚠️
https://twitter.com/MartinNeil9/status/1364853620462747651?s=19

Why it is ESSENTIAL that PCR tests look for 3 genes, not 1. With a low cycle threshold.
https://twitter.com/robinmonotti/status/1331535359851769856?s=19

⚠️ THEY CHANGED TESTING POLICY TO COINCIDE WITH "NEW VARIANT" FEARMONGERING ⚠️
https://twitter.com/MartinNeil9/status/1364853626456391680?s=19

⚠️THIS MEANS ALL MORTALITY NUMBERS IN THE UK ARE BOGUS - PEOPLE ARE GETTING VACCINATED FOR THIS! BUT IT'S THE CON OF THE CENTURY!⚠️
https://t.co/ooSmXKz6Kf

Excess deaths:
"First wave"
1 Policy: Covid19 patients in care homes
2 Medical malpractice: early intubations with ODs of sedation. Witholding macrolides treatments
"Second wave"
Lockdowns: delayed cancer screenings, weakened immunity to diseases incl. Covid19, alcohol/drug abuse

It is not correct to ascribe the hundreds of adolescents who killed themselves during lockdowns as suicides, it was government backed murder. Someone needs to be made accountable for what government & SAGE did to these innocent lives. One of the biggest villains:
https://t.co/zgUSubhZ05

"Synthetic mRNA Covid vaccines: A Risk-Benefit Analysis – OffGuardian
someone who takes the Pfizer/BioNtech injection, has less than 1% chance of reducing at least one symptom of non-severe “Covid” for a period of 2 months. This means that someone who takes this injection has over 99% chance that it won’t work, regarding the efficacy. Over 100 people have to be injected for it to “work” in one person."
https://off-guardian.org/2021/02/22/synthetic-mrna-covid-vaccines-a-risk-benefit-analysis/

"Dr Michael Yeadon, former Vice-President of Pfizer has also stated [emphasis added]:

All vaccines against the SARS-CoV-2 virus are by definition novel. If any such vaccine is approved for use under any circumstances that are not EXPLICITLY experimental, I believe that recipients are being misled to a criminal extent.”

The American Frontline Doctor’s white paper reports,

An Experimental Vaccine Is Not Safer Than a Very Low IFR.”

To exercise informed consent, any recipient of this SGT must be made aware that they are now participating in a clinical trial. There is no claim about reduction of transmission. All risk-benefit analysis must be focused on the individual, as is treatment with a drug therapy.
Therefore, the potential trial recipient must understand IFR, the absolute risk reduction in symptoms, and potential side effects, including ADE as well as efficacious alternatives for treatment if the need arises.
If the potential trial subject is not relayed this information, or does not comprehend the information, it is a blatant violation of Nuremberg code."
https://off-guardian.org/2021/02/22/synthetic-mrna-covid-vaccines-a-risk-benefit-analysis/

There are no longer any mass real positives to one SARSCoV2 protein: only false positives:
https://twitter.com/deeksj/status/1364903269320036353?s=19

This is what Lateral Flow antigen test for: not even a full miniscule virus particle but fragments of the nucleocapsid protein:

Our Society of the Spectacle's High Age of Gullibility is epitomised by vacuous celebrities virtue signalling images of their injections with a non-vaccine which does not work, for a disease that is no longer there, only to profit Big Pharma & the medical-industrial complex.

HUGE: "UK lighthouse laboratories testing for SARS-COV-2 may have breached WHO Emergency Use Assessment and potentially violated Manufacturer Instructions for Use"
https://probabilityandlaw.blogspot.com/2021/02/uk-lighthouse-laboratories-testing-for.html

[2102.11612] Positive results from UK single gene testing for SARS-COV-2 may be inconclusive, negative or detecting past infections: "a large proportion of positive test results are based on the detection of a single gene rather than on two or more genes as required in the manufacturer instructions for use, and by the WHO in their emergency use assessment. The proportion of positives called on single genes increased over time, suggesting a shift in testing policy around mid-November 2020 coincident with the reported significant increase in transmission of the new variant B1.1.7. Without diagnostic validation of the single gene call, for both the original and the B1.1.7 variant it can only be assumed that, in the absence of confirmatory testing, many of the reported positive results may in fact be inconclusive, negative or from people who suffered past infection for SARS-COV-2."
https://arxiv.org/abs/2102.11612

What did I do in 2020-21?
I was fighting an information war against the gullible people with no critical sense or awareness of real human wellbeing who did this to our children:
"Children of The Great Reset"

https://youtu.be/8ncE5yYQvJY