Packed it all in one tweet, and added the sense or urgency. Well done: https://twitter.com/mulroneyb/status/1364141247745699840?s=19
Twitter
Ben Mulroney
The Green Revolution, 4th Industrial Revolution and Great Reset are all massive frauds to create a series of monopolies, cartels and oligopolies that govern food, energy, healthcare and the most basic parts of our lives. We must fight this or we will never…
"Schools told they cannot force pupils to wear masks:
Government says children should not be 'denied education' for non-compliance with measures that are voluntary" https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2021/02/24/schools-told-not-punish-pupils-refuse-wear-masks/
Government says children should not be 'denied education' for non-compliance with measures that are voluntary" https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2021/02/24/schools-told-not-punish-pupils-refuse-wear-masks/
The Telegraph
Schools told they cannot force pupils to wear masks
Government says children should not be 'denied education' for non-compliance with measures that are voluntary
Contamination by respiratory viruses on outer surface of medical masks used by hospital healthcare workers
"Overall virus positivity rate was 10.1% (15/148). Commonly isolated viruses from masks samples were adenovirus (n = 7), bocavirus (n = 2), respiratory syncytial virus (n = 2) and influenza virus (n = 2). Virus positivity was significantly higher in masks samples worn for > 6 h (14.1%, 14/99 versus 1.2%, 1/49, OR 7.9, 95% CI 1.01–61.99) and in samples used by participants who examined > 25 patients per day (16.9%, 12/71 versus 3.9%, 3/77, OR 5.02, 95% CI 1.35–18.60). Most of the participants (83.8%, 124/148) reported at least one problem associated with mask use. Commonly reported problems were pressure on face (16.9%, 25/148), breathing difficulty (12.2%, 18/148), discomfort (9.5% 14/148), trouble communicating with the patient (7.4%, 11/148) and headache (6.1%, 9/148).
Conclusion
Respiratory pathogens on the outer surface of the used medical masks may result in self-contamination. The risk is higher with longer duration of mask use (> 6 h) and with higher rates of clinical contact. Protocols on duration of mask use should specify a maximum time of continuous use, and should consider guidance in high contact settings. Viruses were isolated from the upper sections of around 10% samples, but other sections of masks may also be contaminated. HCWs should be aware of these risks in order to protect themselves and people around them."
https://bmcinfectdis.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12879-019-4109-x
"Overall virus positivity rate was 10.1% (15/148). Commonly isolated viruses from masks samples were adenovirus (n = 7), bocavirus (n = 2), respiratory syncytial virus (n = 2) and influenza virus (n = 2). Virus positivity was significantly higher in masks samples worn for > 6 h (14.1%, 14/99 versus 1.2%, 1/49, OR 7.9, 95% CI 1.01–61.99) and in samples used by participants who examined > 25 patients per day (16.9%, 12/71 versus 3.9%, 3/77, OR 5.02, 95% CI 1.35–18.60). Most of the participants (83.8%, 124/148) reported at least one problem associated with mask use. Commonly reported problems were pressure on face (16.9%, 25/148), breathing difficulty (12.2%, 18/148), discomfort (9.5% 14/148), trouble communicating with the patient (7.4%, 11/148) and headache (6.1%, 9/148).
Conclusion
Respiratory pathogens on the outer surface of the used medical masks may result in self-contamination. The risk is higher with longer duration of mask use (> 6 h) and with higher rates of clinical contact. Protocols on duration of mask use should specify a maximum time of continuous use, and should consider guidance in high contact settings. Viruses were isolated from the upper sections of around 10% samples, but other sections of masks may also be contaminated. HCWs should be aware of these risks in order to protect themselves and people around them."
https://bmcinfectdis.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12879-019-4109-x
BioMed Central
Contamination by respiratory viruses on outer surface of medical masks used by hospital healthcare workers - BMC Infectious Diseases
Background Medical masks are commonly used in health care settings to protect healthcare workers (HCWs) from respiratory and other infections. Airborne respiratory pathogens may settle on the surface of used masks layers, resulting in contamination. The main…
A video is worth a million words
Face masks to protect against aerosol transmitted respiratory viruses are a con. Bad science.
https://t.co/k0gR4nQ5g1
Face masks to protect against aerosol transmitted respiratory viruses are a con. Bad science.
https://t.co/k0gR4nQ5g1
Twitter
Sammy Luquion
https://t.co/vOqHTs9gDJ
⚠️THIS MEANS ALL TESTS IN THE UK ARE JUNK SCIENCE ⚠️
https://twitter.com/MartinNeil9/status/1364853620462747651?s=19
https://twitter.com/MartinNeil9/status/1364853620462747651?s=19
Twitter
Martin Neil
1. From Sept 2020 to Jan 2021 up to 35% UK Covid-19 positive cases have only found a single ‘target gene', rather than the two or more required by the PCR kit manufacturer and the WHO. Positive cases may therefore be inconclusive, negative, or caused by competing…
Why it is ESSENTIAL that PCR tests look for 3 genes, not 1. With a low cycle threshold.
https://twitter.com/robinmonotti/status/1331535359851769856?s=19
https://twitter.com/robinmonotti/status/1331535359851769856?s=19
Twitter
Robin Monotti FRSA MA BSc
Stefano Scoglio: swabs look for 3 genes characterizing SARS-CoV-2: E gene, RdRp gene & N gene. "If the virus were present, all 3 would have to be found, because if the virus is intact, the only case in which it can have a pathogenic role & infect, the test…
⚠️ THEY CHANGED TESTING POLICY TO COINCIDE WITH "NEW VARIANT" FEARMONGERING ⚠️
https://twitter.com/MartinNeil9/status/1364853626456391680?s=19
https://twitter.com/MartinNeil9/status/1364853626456391680?s=19
Twitter
Martin Neil
3. Clear shift in testing policy around mid-November, coincident with the reported significant increase in transmission of the new variant B1.1.7 in South East region of UK. Presence of new variant cannot explain why percentage of target gene calls increased…
⚠️THIS MEANS ALL MORTALITY NUMBERS IN THE UK ARE BOGUS - PEOPLE ARE GETTING VACCINATED FOR THIS! BUT IT'S THE CON OF THE CENTURY!⚠️
https://t.co/ooSmXKz6Kf
https://t.co/ooSmXKz6Kf
Twitter
Martin Neil
1. From Sept 2020 to Jan 2021 up to 35% UK Covid-19 positive cases have only found a single ‘target gene', rather than the two or more required by the PCR kit manufacturer and the WHO. Positive cases may therefore be inconclusive, negative, or caused by competing…
Excess deaths:
"First wave"
1 Policy: Covid19 patients in care homes
2 Medical malpractice: early intubations with ODs of sedation. Witholding macrolides treatments
"Second wave"
Lockdowns: delayed cancer screenings, weakened immunity to diseases incl. Covid19, alcohol/drug abuse
"First wave"
1 Policy: Covid19 patients in care homes
2 Medical malpractice: early intubations with ODs of sedation. Witholding macrolides treatments
"Second wave"
Lockdowns: delayed cancer screenings, weakened immunity to diseases incl. Covid19, alcohol/drug abuse
It is not correct to ascribe the hundreds of adolescents who killed themselves during lockdowns as suicides, it was government backed murder. Someone needs to be made accountable for what government & SAGE did to these innocent lives. One of the biggest villains:
https://t.co/zgUSubhZ05
https://t.co/zgUSubhZ05
Twitter
BBC Newsnight
“We now face a choice between lifting restrictions but facing what we had last year… or we open up very gradually.” SAGE member Professor @SusanMichie says we should learn from what didn’t work in lifting lockdown last year in England https://t.co/XDz2JCKLIn…
"Synthetic mRNA Covid vaccines: A Risk-Benefit Analysis – OffGuardian
someone who takes the Pfizer/BioNtech injection, has less than 1% chance of reducing at least one symptom of non-severe “Covid” for a period of 2 months. This means that someone who takes this injection has over 99% chance that it won’t work, regarding the efficacy. Over 100 people have to be injected for it to “work” in one person."
https://off-guardian.org/2021/02/22/synthetic-mrna-covid-vaccines-a-risk-benefit-analysis/
someone who takes the Pfizer/BioNtech injection, has less than 1% chance of reducing at least one symptom of non-severe “Covid” for a period of 2 months. This means that someone who takes this injection has over 99% chance that it won’t work, regarding the efficacy. Over 100 people have to be injected for it to “work” in one person."
https://off-guardian.org/2021/02/22/synthetic-mrna-covid-vaccines-a-risk-benefit-analysis/
OffGuardian
Synthetic mRNA Covid vaccines: A Risk-Benefit Analysis
With a “vaccine” based on untested technology, and safety trials still ongoing, is it safe to take the shot? And does it even work? And does a disease with an IFR of 0.2% even justify that risk?…