"In this next section, I want to look at how the Government has extended the UK ‘vaccination’ programme to these children, when they are even less capable of meeting the legal requirements and practical definition of consent to medical treatment under UK law. In the last section I quoted the first standard of the Nuremberg Code, laying out the conditions under which consent can be said to be voluntary; but there are, in addition, two other standards relevant to the UK ‘vaccination’ programme, and in particular to its imminent extension to children between 12 and 15 years old. These are standards 5 and 6, which require that:
5 ‘No experiment should be conducted where there is an a-priori reason to believe that death or disabling injury will occur.
6 ‘The degree of risk to be taken should never exceed that determined by the humanitarian importance of the problem to be solved by the experiment.’
I’ll come back to why the UK ‘vaccination’ programme fails to meet both these standards; but in addition to being a signatory of the Nuremberg Code, the UK Government is also beholden to the
United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child
which it ratified in December 1991. These include the following rights (quoted from both the full convention and its summary) most relevant to the extension of the UK ‘vaccination’ programme to children:
** ‘Article 3. In all actions concerning children, whether undertaken by public or private social welfare institutions, courts of law, administrative authorities or legislative bodies, the best interests of the child shall be a primary consideration.’ **
‘Article 6. Every child has the right to life. Governments must do all they can to ensure that children survive and develop to their full potential.’
‘Article 17. Ensure that the child has access to information and material from a diversity of national and international sources, especially those aimed at the promotion of his or her social, spiritual and moral well-being and physical and mental health.’
** ‘Article 36. Governments must protect children from all other forms of exploitation, for example the exploitation of children for political activities, by the media or for medical research.’ **
In addition to this UK data showing the almost total absence of threat COVID-19 presents to the health and lives of British children, the growing data from the US and other countries injecting their children with COVID-19 ‘vaccines’ showing the greatly increased risk of myocarditis and pericarditis in ‘vaccinated’ children and young adults and the tiny absolute risk reduction of developing symptoms of COVID-19 these ‘vaccines’ actually confer, provides strong evidence for concluding that:
• Contrary to Article 3 of the UN Conventions on the Right of the Child, ‘the best interests of the child’ are not a primary consideration in the UK ‘vaccination’ programme;
• Contrary to Article 6, the UK Government is not doing all it can do ‘to ensure that children survive and develop to their full potential’;
• Contrary to Article 17 and 36, the UK Government is not promoting the ‘physical and mental health’ of our children or protecting them from ‘exploitation’ for ‘medical research’;
• Contrary to Standard 5 of the Nuremberg Code, there is ‘reason to believe that death or disabling injury will occur’ following ‘vaccination’;
• Contrary to Standard 6 of the Nuremberg Code, the ‘degree of risk’ of injury or death outweighs the purported ‘humanitarian importance’ of injecting our children with these experimental and dangerous drugs, about whose long-term consequences we know almost nothing, but whose immediate dangers to the health of those on whom they are being tested are becoming more apparent with each child that falls ill or dies following injection.
5 ‘No experiment should be conducted where there is an a-priori reason to believe that death or disabling injury will occur.
6 ‘The degree of risk to be taken should never exceed that determined by the humanitarian importance of the problem to be solved by the experiment.’
I’ll come back to why the UK ‘vaccination’ programme fails to meet both these standards; but in addition to being a signatory of the Nuremberg Code, the UK Government is also beholden to the
United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child
which it ratified in December 1991. These include the following rights (quoted from both the full convention and its summary) most relevant to the extension of the UK ‘vaccination’ programme to children:
** ‘Article 3. In all actions concerning children, whether undertaken by public or private social welfare institutions, courts of law, administrative authorities or legislative bodies, the best interests of the child shall be a primary consideration.’ **
‘Article 6. Every child has the right to life. Governments must do all they can to ensure that children survive and develop to their full potential.’
‘Article 17. Ensure that the child has access to information and material from a diversity of national and international sources, especially those aimed at the promotion of his or her social, spiritual and moral well-being and physical and mental health.’
** ‘Article 36. Governments must protect children from all other forms of exploitation, for example the exploitation of children for political activities, by the media or for medical research.’ **
In addition to this UK data showing the almost total absence of threat COVID-19 presents to the health and lives of British children, the growing data from the US and other countries injecting their children with COVID-19 ‘vaccines’ showing the greatly increased risk of myocarditis and pericarditis in ‘vaccinated’ children and young adults and the tiny absolute risk reduction of developing symptoms of COVID-19 these ‘vaccines’ actually confer, provides strong evidence for concluding that:
• Contrary to Article 3 of the UN Conventions on the Right of the Child, ‘the best interests of the child’ are not a primary consideration in the UK ‘vaccination’ programme;
• Contrary to Article 6, the UK Government is not doing all it can do ‘to ensure that children survive and develop to their full potential’;
• Contrary to Article 17 and 36, the UK Government is not promoting the ‘physical and mental health’ of our children or protecting them from ‘exploitation’ for ‘medical research’;
• Contrary to Standard 5 of the Nuremberg Code, there is ‘reason to believe that death or disabling injury will occur’ following ‘vaccination’;
• Contrary to Standard 6 of the Nuremberg Code, the ‘degree of risk’ of injury or death outweighs the purported ‘humanitarian importance’ of injecting our children with these experimental and dangerous drugs, about whose long-term consequences we know almost nothing, but whose immediate dangers to the health of those on whom they are being tested are becoming more apparent with each child that falls ill or dies following injection.
UNICEF UK
What is the UN Convention on Child Rights?
The United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child (UNCRC) is the basis for all of UNICEF's work and upholds the rights of ever child.
In support of this conclusion, on 3 September the Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation (JCVI), citing ‘evidence of an association between mRNA COVID-19 vaccines and myocarditis’, released a statement in which they concluded that ‘the margin of benefit is considered too small to support universal vaccination of healthy 12 to 15 year olds’. This appeared, initially, to have undermined the Government’s plans to inject UK children under 16 with the Pfizer/BioNTech ‘vaccine’.
However, there is another right in the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child relevant to the ‘vaccination’ of 12-15-year-old children, and that is Article 12, which states:
‘Article 12. State parties shall assure to the child who is capable of forming his or her own views the right to express those views freely in all matters affecting the child, the views of the child being given due weight in accordance with the age and maturity of the child.’"
https://architectsforsocialhousing.co.uk/2021/09/22/the-uk-vaccination-programme-part-2-virtue-and-terror/
However, there is another right in the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child relevant to the ‘vaccination’ of 12-15-year-old children, and that is Article 12, which states:
‘Article 12. State parties shall assure to the child who is capable of forming his or her own views the right to express those views freely in all matters affecting the child, the views of the child being given due weight in accordance with the age and maturity of the child.’"
https://architectsforsocialhousing.co.uk/2021/09/22/the-uk-vaccination-programme-part-2-virtue-and-terror/
GOV.UK
JCVI issues updated advice on COVID-19 vaccination of children aged 12 to 15
The JCVI has reviewed the evidence on vaccinating children aged 12 to 15 who do not have underlying health conditions that put them at increased risk from severe COVID-19.
Forwarded from Son
Amended - Notice of Liability Schools - TRUSTS.docx
209.6 KB
Outraged by my school hosting vaccinations for 12 years plus - I have set up a Trust (as we know trusts can be expressed or implied and I have amended a Notice of Liability to include financial concequences for the prinicipal and agents ) please feel free to share and good luck with youer endeavours to stop these sick crimes....
The United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child, or UNCRC, is the basis of all of UNICEF’s work. It is the most complete statement of children’s rights ever produced and is the most widely-ratified international human rights treaty in history.
Article 3
1. In all actions concerning children, whether undertaken by public or private social welfare institutions,
courts of law, administrative authorities or legislative bodies, the best interests of the child shall be a
primary consideration.
Article 6
1. States Parties recognize that every child has the inherent right to life.
2. States Parties shall ensure to the maximum extent possible the survival and development of the child.
https://downloads.unicef.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/UNCRC_PRESS200910web.pdf
Article 3
1. In all actions concerning children, whether undertaken by public or private social welfare institutions,
courts of law, administrative authorities or legislative bodies, the best interests of the child shall be a
primary consideration.
Article 6
1. States Parties recognize that every child has the inherent right to life.
2. States Parties shall ensure to the maximum extent possible the survival and development of the child.
https://downloads.unicef.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/UNCRC_PRESS200910web.pdf
Isabella, a 16-year-old student, died 8 days after receiving the Pfizer COVID-19 Vaccine.
Following Isabella’s death, Brazil’s Ministry of Health has suspended the immunisation against COVID-19 of people aged 12 to 17.
"Isabella got her pfizer vaccine on August 25th. She died of heart-related issues on September 2nd.
Isabella had symptoms such as dizziness, headache, shortness of breath and drowsiness a day after vaccination. On Sunday, the 29th, her mother (Cristina) took her to hospital after she complained of tingling in her body. “The attending physician said that these symptoms could be psychological due to the vaccine and that she would be discharged. Before leaving the hospital, Isabelli passed out,” the mother said.
The young student was transferred to a hospital in São Paulo, where it was found that Isabelli extreme low levels of red blood cells and haemoglobin, and that transfusion of eight bags of blood was needed. After a seizure, she was taken to the intensive care unit. She died on September 2nd.
Cristina said Isabella got the Vaccine because it was a required for going to Disney, which was her dream.
“She was always very dedicated. It was just the two of us. She was my life, my reason for living,” said Cristina.
Cristina, says “the death certificate shows that her daughter died from three possible causes: cardiogenic shock, acute myocardial infarction (heart attack) and severe anaemia”
Based on unwanted reactions to the vaccine for people aged 12 to 17 years, the Minister of Health, Marcelo Queiroga, in Brazil has suspended the immunization of this age group and an investigation into her sudden death has started"
https://nomoresilence.world/pfizer-biontech/isabelli-borges-valentim-aged-16-pfizer-vaccine-death/
Following Isabella’s death, Brazil’s Ministry of Health has suspended the immunisation against COVID-19 of people aged 12 to 17.
"Isabella got her pfizer vaccine on August 25th. She died of heart-related issues on September 2nd.
Isabella had symptoms such as dizziness, headache, shortness of breath and drowsiness a day after vaccination. On Sunday, the 29th, her mother (Cristina) took her to hospital after she complained of tingling in her body. “The attending physician said that these symptoms could be psychological due to the vaccine and that she would be discharged. Before leaving the hospital, Isabelli passed out,” the mother said.
The young student was transferred to a hospital in São Paulo, where it was found that Isabelli extreme low levels of red blood cells and haemoglobin, and that transfusion of eight bags of blood was needed. After a seizure, she was taken to the intensive care unit. She died on September 2nd.
Cristina said Isabella got the Vaccine because it was a required for going to Disney, which was her dream.
“She was always very dedicated. It was just the two of us. She was my life, my reason for living,” said Cristina.
Cristina, says “the death certificate shows that her daughter died from three possible causes: cardiogenic shock, acute myocardial infarction (heart attack) and severe anaemia”
Based on unwanted reactions to the vaccine for people aged 12 to 17 years, the Minister of Health, Marcelo Queiroga, in Brazil has suspended the immunization of this age group and an investigation into her sudden death has started"
https://nomoresilence.world/pfizer-biontech/isabelli-borges-valentim-aged-16-pfizer-vaccine-death/
Question for the Russians 🇷🇺
In the US, with exceptions, the Democrats are overly invested in the fake narrative, so they put the masks on to the point of endorsing double masking and line up for the injections while Republicans are more sceptical at least about the masks.
Is there an equal division in Russia along party or demographic lines? Are Liberals more keen on masks than Nationalists, Communists or Orthodox or Muslims or young versus old for example?
In the US, with exceptions, the Democrats are overly invested in the fake narrative, so they put the masks on to the point of endorsing double masking and line up for the injections while Republicans are more sceptical at least about the masks.
Is there an equal division in Russia along party or demographic lines? Are Liberals more keen on masks than Nationalists, Communists or Orthodox or Muslims or young versus old for example?
Forwarded from Sasha Prokopenko
In Ukraine I don't see such clear division, except:
1) those NGO and politicians, financed by globalists - are active pro-maskers.
2) those who a) read books and b) have time for research - are anti-maskers (free time is mandatory!).
1) those NGO and politicians, financed by globalists - are active pro-maskers.
2) those who a) read books and b) have time for research - are anti-maskers (free time is mandatory!).
"The Testimonies Project was created to provide a platform for all those who were affected after getting the covid-19 vaccines, and to make sure their voices are heard, since they are not heard in the Israeli media.
We hope this project will encourage more and more people to tell their story."
https://rumble.com/vmpbh3-38132823.html
To view all the testimonies:
https://www.vaxtestimonies.org/en/
We hope this project will encourage more and more people to tell their story."
https://rumble.com/vmpbh3-38132823.html
To view all the testimonies:
https://www.vaxtestimonies.org/en/
Rumble
The testimonies project - the movie - 523,931 views
The Testimonies Project was created to provide a platform for all those who were affected after getting the covid-19 vaccines, and to make sure their voices are heard, since they are not heard in the
Forwarded from Daniel Hill
Robin & Mike - I am sure that this has already come to your attention but sharing for reach and others to see also.
It is from a German IT project manager who chooses to stay anonymous has dropped this bombshell document exposing the entire covid criminal network.
It connects the complex relationships between Governments, NGOs, big pharma, private companies, documents, universities and key people.
The document is 170 pages long. There are 6,500 objects and over 7,200 links, including the financial flows.
It is from a German IT project manager who chooses to stay anonymous has dropped this bombshell document exposing the entire covid criminal network.
It connects the complex relationships between Governments, NGOs, big pharma, private companies, documents, universities and key people.
The document is 170 pages long. There are 6,500 objects and over 7,200 links, including the financial flows.
Forwarded from Daniel Hill
Netzwerkanalyse-Corona-Komplex (1).pdf
19.7 MB
Forwarded from The Italian Job 🇮🇹🏳️🇮🇪
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
⚠️🚨Goods & Food Processors Warned of Rationing Amid Energy Crisis⚠️
🚨Energy costs 50% increase
• Power blackouts
• Carbon Tax increase
• Issues with supplies of food/goods
• Empty supermarket shelves
• Increase costs of manufacturing
• Computer chip shortages
• Vehicle parts shortages
🚨It's no coincidence all of this is happening- it's mass distraction, has been planned & orchestrated for years
•Their goal is to break people down so we're in complete fear- unable to critically think & make decisions
•Control the food, control the people & you’ll submit to whatever they’re told by the Government- then they will get rewarded with Universal Social Income
🚨The New Normal with the New World Order (NWO)
•They want us to blame eachother, turn on our family & friends- it’s already happening
•Gas prices in Europe have risen than 250%+ this year
🚫I DO NOT CONSENT 🚫
Please share & join our page, we are going to help you to understand how
the system is operating against you.
The Italian Job 🇮🇹🇮🇪
Érinn go Brách🇮🇪
🚨Energy costs 50% increase
• Power blackouts
• Carbon Tax increase
• Issues with supplies of food/goods
• Empty supermarket shelves
• Increase costs of manufacturing
• Computer chip shortages
• Vehicle parts shortages
🚨It's no coincidence all of this is happening- it's mass distraction, has been planned & orchestrated for years
•Their goal is to break people down so we're in complete fear- unable to critically think & make decisions
•Control the food, control the people & you’ll submit to whatever they’re told by the Government- then they will get rewarded with Universal Social Income
🚨The New Normal with the New World Order (NWO)
•They want us to blame eachother, turn on our family & friends- it’s already happening
•Gas prices in Europe have risen than 250%+ this year
🚫I DO NOT CONSENT 🚫
Please share & join our page, we are going to help you to understand how
the system is operating against you.
The Italian Job 🇮🇹🇮🇪
Érinn go Brách🇮🇪
Forwarded from The Light Paper
"All doctors have a duty to raise concerns where they believe that patient safety or care is being compromised by the practice of colleagues or the systems, policies and procedures in the organisations in which they work. They must also encourage and support a culture in which staff can raise concerns openly and safely."
"You must not enter into contracts or agreements with your employing or contracting body that seek to prevent you from or restrict you in raising concerns about patient safety. Contracts or agreements are void if they intend to stop an employee from making a protected disclosure."
Well said! 👏 via @worlddoctorsalliance
https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/medical-associations-back-stripping-covid-19-jab-heretics-of-medical/
The Light Paper Chat • Channel
"You must not enter into contracts or agreements with your employing or contracting body that seek to prevent you from or restrict you in raising concerns about patient safety. Contracts or agreements are void if they intend to stop an employee from making a protected disclosure."
Well said! 👏 via @worlddoctorsalliance
https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/medical-associations-back-stripping-covid-19-jab-heretics-of-medical/
The Light Paper Chat • Channel
LifeSite
Medical associations back stripping licenses from doctors who warn against COVID-19 jabs - LifeSite
The American Board of Pediatrics, American Board of Family Medicine, and American Board of Internal Medicine support the Federation of State Medical Boards’ decision that all boards should revoke or suspend the license and certification of doctors who question…
Forwarded from Robin Monotti + Cory Morningstar
UNESCO UNIVERSAL DECLARATION OF BIOETHICS & HUMAN RIGHTS, 2005.
Article 6:
1. Any 𝗽𝗿𝗲𝘃𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗶𝘃𝗲, 𝗱𝗶𝗮𝗴𝗻𝗼𝘀𝘁𝗶𝗰 & 𝘁𝗵𝗲𝗿𝗮𝗽𝗲𝘂𝘁𝗶𝗰 medical intervention is only to be carried out with the prior, free & informed 𝗖𝗢𝗡𝗦𝗘𝗡𝗧 of the person concerned based on adequate information. The consent should, where appropriate, be express and may be withdrawn by the person concerned at any time and for any reason WITHOUT DISADVANTAGE OR PREJUDICE .
2. Scientific research should only be carried out with the prior, free, express and informed consent of the person concerned. The information should be adequate, provided in a comprehensible form and should include modalities for withdrawal of consent. Consent may be withdrawn by the person concerned at any time and for any reason without any disadvantage or prejudice.
http://portal.unesco.org/en/ev.php-URL_ID=31058&URL_DO=DO_TOPIC&URL_SECTION=201.html
Article 6:
1. Any 𝗽𝗿𝗲𝘃𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗶𝘃𝗲, 𝗱𝗶𝗮𝗴𝗻𝗼𝘀𝘁𝗶𝗰 & 𝘁𝗵𝗲𝗿𝗮𝗽𝗲𝘂𝘁𝗶𝗰 medical intervention is only to be carried out with the prior, free & informed 𝗖𝗢𝗡𝗦𝗘𝗡𝗧 of the person concerned based on adequate information. The consent should, where appropriate, be express and may be withdrawn by the person concerned at any time and for any reason WITHOUT DISADVANTAGE OR PREJUDICE .
2. Scientific research should only be carried out with the prior, free, express and informed consent of the person concerned. The information should be adequate, provided in a comprehensible form and should include modalities for withdrawal of consent. Consent may be withdrawn by the person concerned at any time and for any reason without any disadvantage or prejudice.
http://portal.unesco.org/en/ev.php-URL_ID=31058&URL_DO=DO_TOPIC&URL_SECTION=201.html
Forwarded from Robin Monotti + Cory Morningstar
The United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child, or UNCRC, is the basis of all of UNICEF’s work. It is the most complete statement of children’s rights ever produced and is the most widely-ratified international human rights treaty in history.
Article 3
1. In all actions concerning children, whether undertaken by public or private social welfare institutions,
courts of law, administrative authorities or legislative bodies, the best interests of the child shall be a
primary consideration.
Article 6
1. States Parties recognize that every child has the inherent right to life.
2. States Parties shall ensure to the maximum extent possible the survival and development of the child.
https://downloads.unicef.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/UNCRC_PRESS200910web.pdf
Article 3
1. In all actions concerning children, whether undertaken by public or private social welfare institutions,
courts of law, administrative authorities or legislative bodies, the best interests of the child shall be a
primary consideration.
Article 6
1. States Parties recognize that every child has the inherent right to life.
2. States Parties shall ensure to the maximum extent possible the survival and development of the child.
https://downloads.unicef.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/UNCRC_PRESS200910web.pdf
C. What if almost everyone is vaccinated?
"Despite high hopes of gaining transmission-blocking ‘herd immunity’ through mass vaccination, this seems unachievable. In some circumstances, vaccination could promote infection.[23] Vaccinated people transmit the virus. Israel, Iceland, and the UK, with the vast majority of adults vaccinated, record relatively high continuing transmission.[24] Allowing non-vulnerable people to gain broader, longer-lasting post-infection immunity may protect the vulnerable more effectively and safely.
👉This logic underpins the UK's policy of not introducing varicella (chickenpox) immunization, preventing waning vaccine induced immunity from leading to more severe adult infection.👈
D. What about variants?
As vaccinated people become infected with similar viral loads, narrow vaccine-induced immunity against spike protein may favour variant selection. Post-infection immunity is more broadly active against current variants.[25]
👉The argument that unvaccinated drive development of variants has a poor evidence-base."👈
"Covid-19: JCVI opts not to recommend universal vaccination of 12-15 year olds"
BMJ 2021; 374 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n2180 (Published 03 September 2021)
https://www.bmj.com/content/374/bmj.n2180/rr-4
"Despite high hopes of gaining transmission-blocking ‘herd immunity’ through mass vaccination, this seems unachievable. In some circumstances, vaccination could promote infection.[23] Vaccinated people transmit the virus. Israel, Iceland, and the UK, with the vast majority of adults vaccinated, record relatively high continuing transmission.[24] Allowing non-vulnerable people to gain broader, longer-lasting post-infection immunity may protect the vulnerable more effectively and safely.
👉This logic underpins the UK's policy of not introducing varicella (chickenpox) immunization, preventing waning vaccine induced immunity from leading to more severe adult infection.👈
D. What about variants?
As vaccinated people become infected with similar viral loads, narrow vaccine-induced immunity against spike protein may favour variant selection. Post-infection immunity is more broadly active against current variants.[25]
👉The argument that unvaccinated drive development of variants has a poor evidence-base."👈
"Covid-19: JCVI opts not to recommend universal vaccination of 12-15 year olds"
BMJ 2021; 374 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n2180 (Published 03 September 2021)
https://www.bmj.com/content/374/bmj.n2180/rr-4
The BMJ
Covid-19: JCVI opts not to recommend universal vaccination of 12-15 year olds
The UK’s Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation (JCVI) has not recommended that all young people aged 12-15 are given the covid-19 vaccination, and it has instead asked ministers to seek further advice from the UK’s chief medical officers on the…
"She added, “Seventy-two percent of Black people in this city from ages 18 to 44 are unvaccinated. So what is going to stop the Gestapo, I mean the NYPD, from rounding up Black people, from snatching them off the train, off the bus?”
https://m.washingtontimes.com/news/2021/sep/21/black-lives-matter-calls-covid-19-vaccine-mandates/
https://m.washingtontimes.com/news/2021/sep/21/black-lives-matter-calls-covid-19-vaccine-mandates/
The Washington Times
Black Lives Matter calls COVID-19 vaccine mandates ‘racist’ after brawl at NYC restaurant
Black Lives Matter activists demonstrated Monday against
April 2021, "Down With the Lockdowns! The Working Class Must Defend Itself - Break with the Labor Traitors—Reforge the Fourth International!"
"The bourgeoisie always uses supreme moral imperatives such as “saving lives” to justify its crimes. The German and French imperialists use the European Union to plunder the proletariat across Europe in the name of “peace” and “social progress.” The American imperialists and their NATO allies have devastated Libya, Iraq, Afghanistan and many more countries in the name of “democracy” and “freedom.” They invaded Somalia in 1992 to “feed the starving.” When the bourgeoisie urgently cries about “saving lives,” this is always used to instill submission to the ruling class and rally national unity behind its interests."
https://spartacist.org/english/esp/2021-04-lockdown.pdf
"The bourgeoisie always uses supreme moral imperatives such as “saving lives” to justify its crimes. The German and French imperialists use the European Union to plunder the proletariat across Europe in the name of “peace” and “social progress.” The American imperialists and their NATO allies have devastated Libya, Iraq, Afghanistan and many more countries in the name of “democracy” and “freedom.” They invaded Somalia in 1992 to “feed the starving.” When the bourgeoisie urgently cries about “saving lives,” this is always used to instill submission to the ruling class and rally national unity behind its interests."
https://spartacist.org/english/esp/2021-04-lockdown.pdf
Forwarded from Jean
MORE EVIDENCE THAT ‘COVID VACCINE PASSPORTS’ ARE A FRAUD
A recent report from the USA details how in a Texas prison, amongst the 172 ‘’fully vaxed’’ prisoners, 70% (129) of them became infected with Covid.
This again shows that Vaccine Passports are a complete fraud, they are deception. The are not based on science or health, they are just a political tool to divide the population and to increase the profits of the vaccine sellers.
Here’s the study :https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/70/wr/mm7038e3.htm
A recent report from the USA details how in a Texas prison, amongst the 172 ‘’fully vaxed’’ prisoners, 70% (129) of them became infected with Covid.
This again shows that Vaccine Passports are a complete fraud, they are deception. The are not based on science or health, they are just a political tool to divide the population and to increase the profits of the vaccine sellers.
Here’s the study :https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/70/wr/mm7038e3.htm