Forwarded from BREAK THE CODE Channel
Protest next Wednesday 29th September 2021
2pm at Australian Embassy
49 Stephen Green, Dublin 2
In solidarity with our Australian Brothers & Sisters
Against the Global Tyranny imposing Forced Vaccinations & Medical Apartheid on Healthy People
Be There, Bring Banners, Whistles
& Spread the Word!
#EveryDay #Australia #NoMedicalApartheid
#NoToTheNewWorldOrder
🇦🇺💪
2pm at Australian Embassy
49 Stephen Green, Dublin 2
In solidarity with our Australian Brothers & Sisters
Against the Global Tyranny imposing Forced Vaccinations & Medical Apartheid on Healthy People
Be There, Bring Banners, Whistles
& Spread the Word!
#EveryDay #Australia #NoMedicalApartheid
#NoToTheNewWorldOrder
🇦🇺💪
Cases of Guillain-Barre reported by the MHRA (UK) to 8th September, 4 of these cases resulted in death.
Note: The number of injuries /deaths reported are dependent on many factors including numbers of injections administered, how many of these have been second doses along with the age groups of those who have received these doses and when and indeed the work of the MHRA in ensuring all cases by all manufacturers get investigated and reported in a timely and consistent manner.
Link: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/coronavirus-covid-19-vaccine-adverse-reactions
Note: The number of injuries /deaths reported are dependent on many factors including numbers of injections administered, how many of these have been second doses along with the age groups of those who have received these doses and when and indeed the work of the MHRA in ensuring all cases by all manufacturers get investigated and reported in a timely and consistent manner.
Link: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/coronavirus-covid-19-vaccine-adverse-reactions
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
On spike protein shedding post injections in schools and why you should publicly quit Facebook and direct people to Telegram instead.
Letter to schools on shedding:
https://t.me/robinmg/8937
Letter to schools on shedding:
https://t.me/robinmg/8937
Forwarded from Fergy
Facebook works with the US government to limit your freedoms: https://rumble.com/vkmh3t-uk-column-bites-fact-checkers.html [I just posted this on my FB]
THE DEPOPULATION QUESTION
As the adverse reaction injection deaths reported are in the region of 1-10% of the actual numbers, and as the reported deaths following Covid injections across the UK, EU & US are more than 40,000, then it follows that the theory of depopulation via injections is no longer a conspiracy theory, but an evidence based fact.
Whether this injection depopulation is intentional or collateral damage to the project of full financial control is a different question we can still leave hanging, however the Kissinger Report of 1974 speaks clearly.
Injection deaths across UK+EU+US
https://t.me/robinmg/8491
The Kissinger Report (1974)
https://t.me/robinmg/8098
As the adverse reaction injection deaths reported are in the region of 1-10% of the actual numbers, and as the reported deaths following Covid injections across the UK, EU & US are more than 40,000, then it follows that the theory of depopulation via injections is no longer a conspiracy theory, but an evidence based fact.
Whether this injection depopulation is intentional or collateral damage to the project of full financial control is a different question we can still leave hanging, however the Kissinger Report of 1974 speaks clearly.
Injection deaths across UK+EU+US
https://t.me/robinmg/8491
The Kissinger Report (1974)
https://t.me/robinmg/8098
Telegram
Robin Monotti + Dr Mike Yeadon + Cory Morningstar Channel
EU/USA /UK– 40,666 Covid-19 injection related deaths, reported, accepted and input (September 2021)
Table shows the analysis of all deaths reported in EU, US and UK by injection manufacturer for early September
Link to US ADR Data : https://www.openvaers.com/covid…
Table shows the analysis of all deaths reported in EU, US and UK by injection manufacturer for early September
Link to US ADR Data : https://www.openvaers.com/covid…
Forwarded from A Gog
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Dr Mahathir Mohamad former (and longest serving) Prime Minister of Malaysia who for over over 40 years as a world leader would have been privy to the highest level international meetings warning at a conference in 2015 of the global elite's The New World Order and depopulation agenda. Full conference here. https://youtu.be/1-2V3F4AQF8
I make no apology for sharing this again. The team working with entrepreneur & medical philanthropist, Dr Steve Kirsch, have updated their analyses of the most likely number of people killed by Covid19 vaccines. Importantly, these analyses are so robust that, even if they’ve over estimated the scale of the problem substantially, there is still no case to support mass vaccination.
https://downloads.regulations.gov/CDC-2021-0089-0024/attachment_1.pdf
The findings in this & related analyses are on the front page of the Daily Expose.
https://theexpose.uk/2021/09/22/over-150000-people-have-died-due-to-the-covid-19-vaccines-in-the-usa/
Best wishes
Dr Mike Yeadon
https://downloads.regulations.gov/CDC-2021-0089-0024/attachment_1.pdf
The findings in this & related analyses are on the front page of the Daily Expose.
https://theexpose.uk/2021/09/22/over-150000-people-have-died-due-to-the-covid-19-vaccines-in-the-usa/
Best wishes
Dr Mike Yeadon
Forwarded from Simon Goddek
What the heck is going on, Robin? This doesn't make any sense and yet they're spreading such bullshit...
"In this next section, I want to look at how the Government has extended the UK ‘vaccination’ programme to these children, when they are even less capable of meeting the legal requirements and practical definition of consent to medical treatment under UK law. In the last section I quoted the first standard of the Nuremberg Code, laying out the conditions under which consent can be said to be voluntary; but there are, in addition, two other standards relevant to the UK ‘vaccination’ programme, and in particular to its imminent extension to children between 12 and 15 years old. These are standards 5 and 6, which require that:
5 ‘No experiment should be conducted where there is an a-priori reason to believe that death or disabling injury will occur.
6 ‘The degree of risk to be taken should never exceed that determined by the humanitarian importance of the problem to be solved by the experiment.’
I’ll come back to why the UK ‘vaccination’ programme fails to meet both these standards; but in addition to being a signatory of the Nuremberg Code, the UK Government is also beholden to the
United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child
which it ratified in December 1991. These include the following rights (quoted from both the full convention and its summary) most relevant to the extension of the UK ‘vaccination’ programme to children:
** ‘Article 3. In all actions concerning children, whether undertaken by public or private social welfare institutions, courts of law, administrative authorities or legislative bodies, the best interests of the child shall be a primary consideration.’ **
‘Article 6. Every child has the right to life. Governments must do all they can to ensure that children survive and develop to their full potential.’
‘Article 17. Ensure that the child has access to information and material from a diversity of national and international sources, especially those aimed at the promotion of his or her social, spiritual and moral well-being and physical and mental health.’
** ‘Article 36. Governments must protect children from all other forms of exploitation, for example the exploitation of children for political activities, by the media or for medical research.’ **
In addition to this UK data showing the almost total absence of threat COVID-19 presents to the health and lives of British children, the growing data from the US and other countries injecting their children with COVID-19 ‘vaccines’ showing the greatly increased risk of myocarditis and pericarditis in ‘vaccinated’ children and young adults and the tiny absolute risk reduction of developing symptoms of COVID-19 these ‘vaccines’ actually confer, provides strong evidence for concluding that:
• Contrary to Article 3 of the UN Conventions on the Right of the Child, ‘the best interests of the child’ are not a primary consideration in the UK ‘vaccination’ programme;
• Contrary to Article 6, the UK Government is not doing all it can do ‘to ensure that children survive and develop to their full potential’;
• Contrary to Article 17 and 36, the UK Government is not promoting the ‘physical and mental health’ of our children or protecting them from ‘exploitation’ for ‘medical research’;
• Contrary to Standard 5 of the Nuremberg Code, there is ‘reason to believe that death or disabling injury will occur’ following ‘vaccination’;
• Contrary to Standard 6 of the Nuremberg Code, the ‘degree of risk’ of injury or death outweighs the purported ‘humanitarian importance’ of injecting our children with these experimental and dangerous drugs, about whose long-term consequences we know almost nothing, but whose immediate dangers to the health of those on whom they are being tested are becoming more apparent with each child that falls ill or dies following injection.
5 ‘No experiment should be conducted where there is an a-priori reason to believe that death or disabling injury will occur.
6 ‘The degree of risk to be taken should never exceed that determined by the humanitarian importance of the problem to be solved by the experiment.’
I’ll come back to why the UK ‘vaccination’ programme fails to meet both these standards; but in addition to being a signatory of the Nuremberg Code, the UK Government is also beholden to the
United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child
which it ratified in December 1991. These include the following rights (quoted from both the full convention and its summary) most relevant to the extension of the UK ‘vaccination’ programme to children:
** ‘Article 3. In all actions concerning children, whether undertaken by public or private social welfare institutions, courts of law, administrative authorities or legislative bodies, the best interests of the child shall be a primary consideration.’ **
‘Article 6. Every child has the right to life. Governments must do all they can to ensure that children survive and develop to their full potential.’
‘Article 17. Ensure that the child has access to information and material from a diversity of national and international sources, especially those aimed at the promotion of his or her social, spiritual and moral well-being and physical and mental health.’
** ‘Article 36. Governments must protect children from all other forms of exploitation, for example the exploitation of children for political activities, by the media or for medical research.’ **
In addition to this UK data showing the almost total absence of threat COVID-19 presents to the health and lives of British children, the growing data from the US and other countries injecting their children with COVID-19 ‘vaccines’ showing the greatly increased risk of myocarditis and pericarditis in ‘vaccinated’ children and young adults and the tiny absolute risk reduction of developing symptoms of COVID-19 these ‘vaccines’ actually confer, provides strong evidence for concluding that:
• Contrary to Article 3 of the UN Conventions on the Right of the Child, ‘the best interests of the child’ are not a primary consideration in the UK ‘vaccination’ programme;
• Contrary to Article 6, the UK Government is not doing all it can do ‘to ensure that children survive and develop to their full potential’;
• Contrary to Article 17 and 36, the UK Government is not promoting the ‘physical and mental health’ of our children or protecting them from ‘exploitation’ for ‘medical research’;
• Contrary to Standard 5 of the Nuremberg Code, there is ‘reason to believe that death or disabling injury will occur’ following ‘vaccination’;
• Contrary to Standard 6 of the Nuremberg Code, the ‘degree of risk’ of injury or death outweighs the purported ‘humanitarian importance’ of injecting our children with these experimental and dangerous drugs, about whose long-term consequences we know almost nothing, but whose immediate dangers to the health of those on whom they are being tested are becoming more apparent with each child that falls ill or dies following injection.
UNICEF UK
What is the UN Convention on Child Rights?
The United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child (UNCRC) is the basis for all of UNICEF's work and upholds the rights of ever child.
In support of this conclusion, on 3 September the Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation (JCVI), citing ‘evidence of an association between mRNA COVID-19 vaccines and myocarditis’, released a statement in which they concluded that ‘the margin of benefit is considered too small to support universal vaccination of healthy 12 to 15 year olds’. This appeared, initially, to have undermined the Government’s plans to inject UK children under 16 with the Pfizer/BioNTech ‘vaccine’.
However, there is another right in the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child relevant to the ‘vaccination’ of 12-15-year-old children, and that is Article 12, which states:
‘Article 12. State parties shall assure to the child who is capable of forming his or her own views the right to express those views freely in all matters affecting the child, the views of the child being given due weight in accordance with the age and maturity of the child.’"
https://architectsforsocialhousing.co.uk/2021/09/22/the-uk-vaccination-programme-part-2-virtue-and-terror/
However, there is another right in the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child relevant to the ‘vaccination’ of 12-15-year-old children, and that is Article 12, which states:
‘Article 12. State parties shall assure to the child who is capable of forming his or her own views the right to express those views freely in all matters affecting the child, the views of the child being given due weight in accordance with the age and maturity of the child.’"
https://architectsforsocialhousing.co.uk/2021/09/22/the-uk-vaccination-programme-part-2-virtue-and-terror/
GOV.UK
JCVI issues updated advice on COVID-19 vaccination of children aged 12 to 15
The JCVI has reviewed the evidence on vaccinating children aged 12 to 15 who do not have underlying health conditions that put them at increased risk from severe COVID-19.
Forwarded from Son
Amended - Notice of Liability Schools - TRUSTS.docx
209.6 KB
Outraged by my school hosting vaccinations for 12 years plus - I have set up a Trust (as we know trusts can be expressed or implied and I have amended a Notice of Liability to include financial concequences for the prinicipal and agents ) please feel free to share and good luck with youer endeavours to stop these sick crimes....
The United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child, or UNCRC, is the basis of all of UNICEF’s work. It is the most complete statement of children’s rights ever produced and is the most widely-ratified international human rights treaty in history.
Article 3
1. In all actions concerning children, whether undertaken by public or private social welfare institutions,
courts of law, administrative authorities or legislative bodies, the best interests of the child shall be a
primary consideration.
Article 6
1. States Parties recognize that every child has the inherent right to life.
2. States Parties shall ensure to the maximum extent possible the survival and development of the child.
https://downloads.unicef.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/UNCRC_PRESS200910web.pdf
Article 3
1. In all actions concerning children, whether undertaken by public or private social welfare institutions,
courts of law, administrative authorities or legislative bodies, the best interests of the child shall be a
primary consideration.
Article 6
1. States Parties recognize that every child has the inherent right to life.
2. States Parties shall ensure to the maximum extent possible the survival and development of the child.
https://downloads.unicef.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/UNCRC_PRESS200910web.pdf
Isabella, a 16-year-old student, died 8 days after receiving the Pfizer COVID-19 Vaccine.
Following Isabella’s death, Brazil’s Ministry of Health has suspended the immunisation against COVID-19 of people aged 12 to 17.
"Isabella got her pfizer vaccine on August 25th. She died of heart-related issues on September 2nd.
Isabella had symptoms such as dizziness, headache, shortness of breath and drowsiness a day after vaccination. On Sunday, the 29th, her mother (Cristina) took her to hospital after she complained of tingling in her body. “The attending physician said that these symptoms could be psychological due to the vaccine and that she would be discharged. Before leaving the hospital, Isabelli passed out,” the mother said.
The young student was transferred to a hospital in São Paulo, where it was found that Isabelli extreme low levels of red blood cells and haemoglobin, and that transfusion of eight bags of blood was needed. After a seizure, she was taken to the intensive care unit. She died on September 2nd.
Cristina said Isabella got the Vaccine because it was a required for going to Disney, which was her dream.
“She was always very dedicated. It was just the two of us. She was my life, my reason for living,” said Cristina.
Cristina, says “the death certificate shows that her daughter died from three possible causes: cardiogenic shock, acute myocardial infarction (heart attack) and severe anaemia”
Based on unwanted reactions to the vaccine for people aged 12 to 17 years, the Minister of Health, Marcelo Queiroga, in Brazil has suspended the immunization of this age group and an investigation into her sudden death has started"
https://nomoresilence.world/pfizer-biontech/isabelli-borges-valentim-aged-16-pfizer-vaccine-death/
Following Isabella’s death, Brazil’s Ministry of Health has suspended the immunisation against COVID-19 of people aged 12 to 17.
"Isabella got her pfizer vaccine on August 25th. She died of heart-related issues on September 2nd.
Isabella had symptoms such as dizziness, headache, shortness of breath and drowsiness a day after vaccination. On Sunday, the 29th, her mother (Cristina) took her to hospital after she complained of tingling in her body. “The attending physician said that these symptoms could be psychological due to the vaccine and that she would be discharged. Before leaving the hospital, Isabelli passed out,” the mother said.
The young student was transferred to a hospital in São Paulo, where it was found that Isabelli extreme low levels of red blood cells and haemoglobin, and that transfusion of eight bags of blood was needed. After a seizure, she was taken to the intensive care unit. She died on September 2nd.
Cristina said Isabella got the Vaccine because it was a required for going to Disney, which was her dream.
“She was always very dedicated. It was just the two of us. She was my life, my reason for living,” said Cristina.
Cristina, says “the death certificate shows that her daughter died from three possible causes: cardiogenic shock, acute myocardial infarction (heart attack) and severe anaemia”
Based on unwanted reactions to the vaccine for people aged 12 to 17 years, the Minister of Health, Marcelo Queiroga, in Brazil has suspended the immunization of this age group and an investigation into her sudden death has started"
https://nomoresilence.world/pfizer-biontech/isabelli-borges-valentim-aged-16-pfizer-vaccine-death/
Question for the Russians 🇷🇺
In the US, with exceptions, the Democrats are overly invested in the fake narrative, so they put the masks on to the point of endorsing double masking and line up for the injections while Republicans are more sceptical at least about the masks.
Is there an equal division in Russia along party or demographic lines? Are Liberals more keen on masks than Nationalists, Communists or Orthodox or Muslims or young versus old for example?
In the US, with exceptions, the Democrats are overly invested in the fake narrative, so they put the masks on to the point of endorsing double masking and line up for the injections while Republicans are more sceptical at least about the masks.
Is there an equal division in Russia along party or demographic lines? Are Liberals more keen on masks than Nationalists, Communists or Orthodox or Muslims or young versus old for example?
Forwarded from Sasha Prokopenko
In Ukraine I don't see such clear division, except:
1) those NGO and politicians, financed by globalists - are active pro-maskers.
2) those who a) read books and b) have time for research - are anti-maskers (free time is mandatory!).
1) those NGO and politicians, financed by globalists - are active pro-maskers.
2) those who a) read books and b) have time for research - are anti-maskers (free time is mandatory!).
"The Testimonies Project was created to provide a platform for all those who were affected after getting the covid-19 vaccines, and to make sure their voices are heard, since they are not heard in the Israeli media.
We hope this project will encourage more and more people to tell their story."
https://rumble.com/vmpbh3-38132823.html
To view all the testimonies:
https://www.vaxtestimonies.org/en/
We hope this project will encourage more and more people to tell their story."
https://rumble.com/vmpbh3-38132823.html
To view all the testimonies:
https://www.vaxtestimonies.org/en/
Rumble
The testimonies project - the movie - 523,931 views
The Testimonies Project was created to provide a platform for all those who were affected after getting the covid-19 vaccines, and to make sure their voices are heard, since they are not heard in the
Forwarded from Daniel Hill
Robin & Mike - I am sure that this has already come to your attention but sharing for reach and others to see also.
It is from a German IT project manager who chooses to stay anonymous has dropped this bombshell document exposing the entire covid criminal network.
It connects the complex relationships between Governments, NGOs, big pharma, private companies, documents, universities and key people.
The document is 170 pages long. There are 6,500 objects and over 7,200 links, including the financial flows.
It is from a German IT project manager who chooses to stay anonymous has dropped this bombshell document exposing the entire covid criminal network.
It connects the complex relationships between Governments, NGOs, big pharma, private companies, documents, universities and key people.
The document is 170 pages long. There are 6,500 objects and over 7,200 links, including the financial flows.
Forwarded from Daniel Hill
Netzwerkanalyse-Corona-Komplex (1).pdf
19.7 MB