Courts will generally back the State in big decisions for any agenda. They might allow some small wins but not big ones that cause embarrassment to them or that break an agenda. The only solution is a marketer's approach to break the demand for all vaccines. the indoctrination of 'vaccines saved us from polio' narrative underpins all the madness of vaccine romanticism not science. Any one who has researched knows it is the same as 'tobacco science' (Dissolving Illusions by Suzanne Humphries MD) ... Robin Monotti, Dr Mike Yeadon, please take a look at the video on the www.freedomtribe.net site and if any of it makes sense, please do get in contact. Last chance to end the narrative before the rollout to 12-15 (and then younger as we know). Best Regards Yogi(Founder of freedomtribe.net app). Email admin@freedomtribe.net or message here.

Average age of “Covid death” is greater than the average life expectancy. The average age of a “Covid death” in the UK is 82.5 years. In Italy it’s 86. Germany, 83. Switzerland, 86. Canada, 86. The US, 78, Australia, 82.
In almost all cases the median age of a “Covid death” is higher than the national life expectancy.
As such, for most of the world, the “pandemic” has had little-to-no impact on life expectancy. Contrast this with the Spanish flu, which saw a 28% drop in life expectancy in the US in just over a year. 
The risk of death “from Covid” follows, almost exactly, your background risk of death in general.
The small increase for some of the older age groups can be accounted for by other factors - @OffGuardian

30 facts you NEED to know: Your Covid Cribsheet
https://off-guardian.org/2021/09/22/30-facts-you-need-to-know-your-covid-cribsheet/

Lithuania - how the Covid Pass is already being used to control every aspect of peoples lives

“We live in the small European country of Lithuania. In the last few months, strict Covid Pass restrictions have been introduced which represent a fundamental transformation in society. we're banned from shopping centers, non-essential stores, and restaurants. And my wife and I were both were suspended from our jobs without pay…. it's not just Lithuania. Covid Pass restrictions are being imposed throughout Europe….
Some of the restrictions include:
• You cannot visit any cafes or restaurants.
• You cannot enter any non-essential stores.
• You cannot enter any shopping center or large store.
• You cannot receive beauty services (hair, nails, salons, etc).
• You cannot use repair services which last longer than 15 minutes.
• You cannot enter public indoor spaces.
• You cannot enter a fitness center, gym, or sauna.
• You cannot attend outdoor events which have more than 500 people.
• You cannot sit and read in libraries. You may only use the library to pick up and return books.
• You cannot travel by train….
• You cannot enter banks or insurance agencies unless the purpose is to receive pensions or social benefits where the service lasts no more than 15 minutes.
• Students cannot enter university without the Pass….
• You cannot visit patients in medical facilities or senior care/residential homes. The only exception terminally-ill patients and children under 14 years of age if the doctor gives advance permission.
• Regarding medical care:
--- You may receive emergency care without the Opportunity Pass.
--- For scheduled inpatient medical care, you must have the Covid Pass or Covid certificates.
--- For outpatient services, the medical care must be conducted "in a safe environment" and will require testing "depending on the epidemiological situation"….
Opposition:
• In our country, opinion polls show that 70-80% of people support vaccine mandates and the exclusion of unvaccinated people from various aspects of society.
• There is no unified opposition to restrictions.
• The only socially-acceptable opposition is to nitpick about the details of each particular regulation. That's led to some minor loosening of rules, e.g. giving university students an extra few weeks to get vaccinated.
• But in general, there isn't much mainstream condemnation of the entire Covid Pass regime as a fundamental violation of human rights. Voices of principled opposition are rarely featured in our country's media. Opposition is usually ignored by the mainstream, and when mentioned, those who oppose mandates are caricatured by both the government and the media as far-right, anti-LGBT, conspiracy theorists, and neo-Nazis”

Link to the full article: https://txti.es/covid-pass/images

"The gleam of vaccination’s triumphal ascent to the pinnacle of medical science is often predicated on the smallpox eradication program. Thus you will often hear a retort to any covid vaccine scepticism inferring you are anti-science given smallpox's successful eradication. Ergo, as smallpox was eradicated all vaccines are therefore uncritically a good thing, a priori.

However what is never mentioned is that the smallpox eradication program depended on surveillance–containment and not through the act of carpet bombing billions of people in world with vaccinations.

“The population of eastern Nigeria was about 12 million at that time and Foege and his colleagues stopped the outbreaks across the vast region by vaccinating only 750 000 of them. It was a remarkable achievement.
Foege was not the first to argue that eradication based on surveillance– containment could work. A similar approach had been used to control out- breaks in England in the 19th century. The approach, known as the Leicester system, relied on the same isolation or ring-fencing of known smallpox cases from the general population to break the chain of transmission.
But Foege succeeded in providing convincing evidence of how effective surveillance– containment could be in field conditions. Perhaps even more extraordinary and significant was the work of Dr A. Ramachandra Rao in the Indian state of Tamil Nadu a year later. With funds from WHO, Rao led a single team in surveillance–containment work across the state. Within six months they had halted smallpox transmission among its 41 million inhabitants. The eastern Nigeria experiment and the experience in Tamil Nadu pointed the way forward and set WHO’s global eradication campaign on a new course. As Henderson puts it: “Even though we had been talking about surveillance–containment in 1966, we hadn’t realized how effective it could be in the field.”

https://www.who.int/about/bugs_drugs_smoke_chapter_1_smallpox.pdf

Smallpox had a fatality rate of up to 30%. The disease consists of an acute infection caused by variola virus, one of the Orthopoxviruses, with skin eruption and marked toxemia had an average case fatality rate of 30%

Whereas covid, “In people < 70 years, infection fatality rates ranged from 0.00% to 0.31% with crude and corrected medians of 0.05%.” Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) is an infectious disease caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus.

Most people infected with the virus will experience mild to moderate respiratory illness and recover without requiring special treatment." - @Credalytica

It's also much more likely the vaccinations for those programs prevented transmission and infection.

These injections are known not to. - Ad

Protest next Wednesday 29th September 2021

2pm at Australian Embassy
49 Stephen Green, Dublin 2

In solidarity with our Australian Brothers & Sisters

Against the Global Tyranny imposing Forced Vaccinations & Medical Apartheid on Healthy People

Be There, Bring Banners, Whistles
& Spread the Word!

#EveryDay #Australia #NoMedicalApartheid
#NoToTheNewWorldOrder

🇦🇺💪

Cases of Guillain-Barre reported by the MHRA (UK) to 8th September, 4 of these cases resulted in death.

Note: The number of injuries /deaths reported are dependent on many factors including numbers of injections administered, how many of these have been second doses along with the age groups of those who have received these doses and when and indeed the work of the MHRA in ensuring all cases by all manufacturers get investigated and reported in a timely and consistent manner.

Link: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/coronavirus-covid-19-vaccine-adverse-reactions

On spike protein shedding post injections in schools and why you should publicly quit Facebook and direct people to Telegram instead.

Letter to schools on shedding:
https://t.me/robinmg/8937

Facebook works with the US government to limit your freedoms: https://rumble.com/vkmh3t-uk-column-bites-fact-checkers.html [I just posted this on my FB]

THE DEPOPULATION QUESTION

As the adverse reaction injection deaths reported are in the region of 1-10% of the actual numbers, and as the reported deaths following Covid injections across the UK, EU & US are more than 40,000, then it follows that the theory of depopulation via injections is no longer a conspiracy theory, but an evidence based fact.

Whether this injection depopulation is intentional or collateral damage to the project of full financial control is a different question we can still leave hanging, however the Kissinger Report of 1974 speaks clearly.

Injection deaths across UK+EU+US
https://t.me/robinmg/8491

The Kissinger Report (1974)
https://t.me/robinmg/8098

Dr Mahathir Mohamad former (and longest serving) Prime Minister of Malaysia who for over over 40 years as a world leader would have been privy to the highest level international meetings warning at a conference in 2015 of the global elite's The New World Order and depopulation agenda. Full conference here. https://youtu.be/1-2V3F4AQF8

I make no apology for sharing this again. The team working with entrepreneur & medical philanthropist, Dr Steve Kirsch, have updated their analyses of the most likely number of people killed by Covid19 vaccines. Importantly, these analyses are so robust that, even if they’ve over estimated the scale of the problem substantially, there is still no case to support mass vaccination.

https://downloads.regulations.gov/CDC-2021-0089-0024/attachment_1.pdf

The findings in this & related analyses are on the front page of the Daily Expose.

https://theexpose.uk/2021/09/22/over-150000-people-have-died-due-to-the-covid-19-vaccines-in-the-usa/

Best wishes

Dr Mike Yeadon

What the heck is going on, Robin? This doesn't make any sense and yet they're spreading such bullshit...

Logical reasoning in 2021.

"In this next section, I want to look at how the Government has extended the UK ‘vaccination’ programme to these children, when they are even less capable of meeting the legal requirements and practical definition of consent to medical treatment under UK law. In the last section I quoted the first standard of the Nuremberg Code, laying out the conditions under which consent can be said to be voluntary; but there are, in addition, two other standards relevant to the UK ‘vaccination’ programme, and in particular to its imminent extension to children between 12 and 15 years old. These are standards 5 and 6, which require that:
5 ‘No experiment should be conducted where there is an a-priori reason to believe that death or disabling injury will occur.
6 ‘The degree of risk to be taken should never exceed that determined by the humanitarian importance of the problem to be solved by the experiment.’
I’ll come back to why the UK ‘vaccination’ programme fails to meet both these standards; but in addition to being a signatory of the Nuremberg Code, the UK Government is also beholden to the

United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child

which it ratified in December 1991. These include the following rights (quoted from both the full convention and its summary) most relevant to the extension of the UK ‘vaccination’ programme to children:

** ‘Article 3. In all actions concerning children, whether undertaken by public or private social welfare institutions, courts of law, administrative authorities or legislative bodies, the best interests of the child shall be a primary consideration.’ **

‘Article 6. Every child has the right to life. Governments must do all they can to ensure that children survive and develop to their full potential.’

‘Article 17. Ensure that the child has access to information and material from a diversity of national and international sources, especially those aimed at the promotion of his or her social, spiritual and moral well-being and physical and mental health.’

** ‘Article 36. Governments must protect children from all other forms of exploitation, for example the exploitation of children for political activities, by the media or for medical research.’ **

In addition to this UK data showing the almost total absence of threat COVID-19 presents to the health and lives of British children, the growing data from the US and other countries injecting their children with COVID-19 ‘vaccines’ showing the greatly increased risk of myocarditis and pericarditis in ‘vaccinated’ children and young adults and the tiny absolute risk reduction of developing symptoms of COVID-19 these ‘vaccines’ actually confer, provides strong evidence for concluding that:
• Contrary to Article 3 of the UN Conventions on the Right of the Child, ‘the best interests of the child’ are not a primary consideration in the UK ‘vaccination’ programme;
• Contrary to Article 6, the UK Government is not doing all it can do ‘to ensure that children survive and develop to their full potential’;
• Contrary to Article 17 and 36, the UK Government is not promoting the ‘physical and mental health’ of our children or protecting them from ‘exploitation’ for ‘medical research’;
• Contrary to Standard 5 of the Nuremberg Code, there is ‘reason to believe that death or disabling injury will occur’ following ‘vaccination’;
• Contrary to Standard 6 of the Nuremberg Code, the ‘degree of risk’ of injury or death outweighs the purported ‘humanitarian importance’ of injecting our children with these experimental and dangerous drugs, about whose long-term consequences we know almost nothing, but whose immediate dangers to the health of those on whom they are being tested are becoming more apparent with each child that falls ill or dies following injection.

In support of this conclusion, on 3 September the Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation (JCVI), citing ‘evidence of an association between mRNA COVID-19 vaccines and myocarditis’, released a statement in which they concluded that ‘the margin of benefit is considered too small to support universal vaccination of healthy 12 to 15 year olds’. This appeared, initially, to have undermined the Government’s plans to inject UK children under 16 with the Pfizer/BioNTech ‘vaccine’.

However, there is another right in the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child relevant to the ‘vaccination’ of 12-15-year-old children, and that is Article 12, which states:

‘Article 12. State parties shall assure to the child who is capable of forming his or her own views the right to express those views freely in all matters affecting the child, the views of the child being given due weight in accordance with the age and maturity of the child.’"

https://architectsforsocialhousing.co.uk/2021/09/22/the-uk-vaccination-programme-part-2-virtue-and-terror/

Outraged by my school hosting vaccinations for 12 years plus - I have set up a Trust (as we know trusts can be expressed or implied and I have amended a Notice of Liability to include financial concequences for the prinicipal and agents ) please feel free to share and good luck with youer endeavours to stop these sick crimes....

The United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child, or UNCRC, is the basis of all of UNICEF’s work. It is the most complete statement of children’s rights ever produced and is the most widely-ratified international human rights treaty in history.

Article 3
1. In all actions concerning children, whether undertaken by public or private social welfare institutions,
courts of law, administrative authorities or legislative bodies, the best interests of the child shall be a
primary consideration.

Article 6
1. States Parties recognize that every child has the inherent right to life.
2. States Parties shall ensure to the maximum extent possible the survival and development of the child.

https://downloads.unicef.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/UNCRC_PRESS200910web.pdf

Isabella, a 16-year-old student, died 8 days after receiving the Pfizer COVID-19 Vaccine.
Following Isabella’s death, Brazil’s Ministry of Health has suspended the immunisation against COVID-19 of people aged 12 to 17.

"Isabella got her pfizer vaccine on August 25th. She died of heart-related issues on September 2nd.

Isabella had symptoms such as dizziness, headache, shortness of breath and drowsiness a day after vaccination. On Sunday, the 29th, her mother (Cristina) took her to hospital after she complained of tingling in her body. “The attending physician said that these symptoms could be psychological due to the vaccine and that she would be discharged. Before leaving the hospital, Isabelli passed out,” the mother said.

The young student was transferred to a hospital in São Paulo, where it was found that Isabelli extreme low levels of red blood cells and haemoglobin, and that transfusion of eight bags of blood was needed. After a seizure, she was taken to the intensive care unit. She died on September 2nd.

Cristina said Isabella got the Vaccine because it was a required for going to Disney, which was her dream.

“She was always very dedicated. It was just the two of us. She was my life, my reason for living,” said Cristina.

Cristina, says “the death certificate shows that her daughter died from three possible causes: cardiogenic shock, acute myocardial infarction (heart attack) and severe anaemia”

Based on unwanted reactions to the vaccine for people aged 12 to 17 years, the Minister of Health, Marcelo Queiroga, in Brazil has suspended the immunization of this age group and an investigation into her sudden death has started"

https://nomoresilence.world/pfizer-biontech/isabelli-borges-valentim-aged-16-pfizer-vaccine-death/

Question for the Russians 🇷🇺

In the US, with exceptions, the Democrats are overly invested in the fake narrative, so they put the masks on to the point of endorsing double masking and line up for the injections while Republicans are more sceptical at least about the masks.

Is there an equal division in Russia along party or demographic lines? Are Liberals more keen on masks than Nationalists, Communists or Orthodox or Muslims or young versus old for example?

In Ukraine I don't see such clear division, except:
1) those NGO and politicians, financed by globalists - are active pro-maskers.
2) those who a) read books and b) have time for research - are anti-maskers (free time is mandatory!).