Forwarded from Dr. Simon
If we were really in a pandemic, hospitals wouldn't be firing qualified staff for declining a shot. ☝🏻️
https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/around-3000-health-workers-suspended-france-over-vaccination-minister-2021-09-16/
https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/around-3000-health-workers-suspended-france-over-vaccination-minister-2021-09-16/
Reuters
France suspends 3,000 health staff as Europe targets vaccine refusal
Hospitals, care homes and health centres have suspended around 3,000 workers across France for failing to comply with mandatory COVID vaccination, the government said on Thursday, as countries around Europe weigh how far to go to combat the pandemic.
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Where are all the people who "clapped for the NHS" now that healthcare workers are losing their jobs?
Forwarded from K Caz
I’ve seen 4 suicides, 3 attempted suicides. I’ve seen a mental health crisis in children and young people. I’ve seen businesses collapse. I’ve seen elderly locked up terrified to go outside. I’ve seen agoraphobia develop in previously confident people. I’ve seen 20 redundancies. I’ve seen education disrupted and children left to their own defences. I’ve seen music, art and dancing criminalised. I’ve seen child abuse increase, disability hates crimes surge. I’ve seen the NHS decimated and GP care removed from the elderly, children forced and shamed into wearing masks that make them ill, feel powerless and panicked. I’ve seen alcoholics and drug addicts relapse. I’ve seen cancer diagnosis missed. I’ve seen children treated like infectious vermin, no voice. I’ve seen people bed ridden for weeks from vaccinations that make rich people richer and lie under oath. I’ve seen risk assessments completely ignored. I’ve seen proportionate responses, open debate, asking questions, data and logical reason delegated to the realm of conspiracy theory. I’ve seen animals slaughtered unnecessarily. I’ve seen elderly die alone from a sense of abandonment in despair and isolation. I’ve seen hunger and fuel poverty surge. I’ve seen major operations, weddings, proms, funerals cancelled. I’ve seen children turned against adults. I’ve seen doctors and nurses ignore informed consent and codes of ethics. I’ve seen babies cry in pain from swabs thrust up their noses. I’ve seen sycophants worship at the altar of the C virus word. I’ve seen flu deaths disappear. I’ve seen evidence based science made farcical. I’ve seen wildly exaggerated graphs and predictions. I’ve seen politicians jump to the beat of the IMF. I’ve seen the elimination of human rights and civic freedoms. I’ve seen the fortunes of billionaires double.
What are the Long Covid symptoms you are experiencing?
What are the Long Covid symptoms you are experiencing?
On Rolling Stone & RT disinformation about Eric Clapton's concert in New Orleans
The title of Rolling Stone's article & RT's post on Telegram claims that the venue in New Orleans required a vaccine mandate for entry. This is DISINFORMATION. The venue did not require exclusively a "vaccination" as condition for entry. Rolling Stone's article & RT's Telegram post go on to contradict the title on the body of the text. This is simply bad sensationalist journalism. No wonder the Robin Monotti + Dr Mike Yeadon + Cory Morningstar (and Mairead) channel [ @RobinMG ] run by a handful of people is slowly catching up with their subscriber numbers..
This was Eric Clapton's original Press Release:
"PRESS ANNOUNCEMENT FROM ERIC CLAPTON
Following the PM’s announcement on Monday the 19th of July 2021 I feel honour bound to make an announcement of my own:
I wish to say that I will not perform on any stage where there is a discriminated audience present. Unless there is provision made for all people to attend, I reserve the right to cancel the show. Eric Clapton."
The title of Rolling Stone's article & RT's post on Telegram claims that the venue in New Orleans required a vaccine mandate for entry. This is DISINFORMATION. The venue did not require exclusively a "vaccination" as condition for entry. Rolling Stone's article & RT's Telegram post go on to contradict the title on the body of the text. This is simply bad sensationalist journalism. No wonder the Robin Monotti + Dr Mike Yeadon + Cory Morningstar (and Mairead) channel [ @RobinMG ] run by a handful of people is slowly catching up with their subscriber numbers..
This was Eric Clapton's original Press Release:
"PRESS ANNOUNCEMENT FROM ERIC CLAPTON
Following the PM’s announcement on Monday the 19th of July 2021 I feel honour bound to make an announcement of my own:
I wish to say that I will not perform on any stage where there is a discriminated audience present. Unless there is provision made for all people to attend, I reserve the right to cancel the show. Eric Clapton."
Forwarded from Mike Yeadon
Email to Dr John Ioaniddes of Stanford.
While it’s fair to say that he’s made major contributions particularly in challenging the ridiculous levels of fear mongering about the threat from this “virus”. As Ioaniddes peer reviewed journal articles show, consistently, SARS-CoV-2 is NOT A THREAT TO THE VAST MAJORITY OF THE POPULATION.
Only those close to the end of their lives, because of advanced years &/or multiple, serious illnesses, are at undeniably elevated risk of severe outcomes including death if infected.
But where the author & indeed myself get upset is Dr Ioaniddes seemingly unqualified support for population-wide vaccination with these gene-based, spike protein encoding products, which we know beyond a shadow of doubt triggers multiple, sometimes serious adverse events, mostly relating to clotting & bleeding.
Why is he recommending this?
If it’s that he knows he’ll be dismissed or starved of grant funding if he doesn’t toe the line, there are ways to do it that come with quite acceptable reservations.
Best wishes
Mike
Subject: John Ioannidis urges Australia to "push for vaccination very fast..." Why?
Please see below my email to John Ioannidis, a professor at Stanford University, who is renowned for his work in evidence based medicine, and his goal to "optimize the chances of getting more reliable, trustworthy and useful research".
I question John Ioannidis about him urging Australia to "push for [covid] vaccination very fast", as this appears to contradict his research which indicates people <65 have a very low risk of covid associated death, and that strategies focusing specifically on protecting high-risk elderly individuals should be considered in managing the pandemic.
This is an important matter as all Australians are now under intense pressure to submit to covid-19 injections, despite covid-19 not being a serious risk for most people. We have no idea of the long-term consequences of these injections, which could potentially be pressed upon people for life.
This email is also publicly accessible via this link, please feel free to share: https://bit.ly/3CzkAOC
Elizabeth Hart
Independent person investigating the over-use of vaccine products and conflicts of interest in vaccination policy.
vaccinationispolitical.net
(PS: If you don't want these updates in this group, please respond to me personally with 'unsubscribe' in the subject line.)
---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: Elizabeth Hart <...>
Date: Fri, Sep 17, 2021 at 5:44 PM
Subject: John Ioannidis urges Australia to "push for vaccination very fast..." Why?
To: John Ioannids
Cc: Jodie McVernon, Neil Ferguson, Patrick Vallance, Chris Whitty, Fiona Godlee, Sharon Davies, Peter Doshi, Kamran Abbasi, Theodora Bloom, Allyson Pollocki, Simon Wain-Hobson, Richard Ebright, Marc Lipsitch, Michael Osterholm, Tom Inglesby, Carl Heneghan, Michael Levitt, Martin Kulldorff, Jayanta Bhattacharya, Sucharit Bhakdi, Gus Dalgleish, Karol Sikora, Anders Tegnell, Johan Giesecke, Ian Frazer, Peter Doherty, Peter Collignon, Roy Anderson, Peter Openshaw, Adrian Smith, David Cannadine, Venki Ramakrishnan, Andrew Goddard, Chris Conlon, Dan Sumners, Robert Clancy, Sunetra Gupta, Heidi Larson, Graham Medley, Melinda Mills, John Bell, David Kennedy, Andrew Read, Peter A. McCullough, Nick Hudson, Andrew Pollard, James McCaw, Tom Kompas, Zoe Hyde, Quentin Grafton, Emma McArthur, Anthony Harnden, Adam Finn, Adrian Hill, Sarah Gilbert, John Shine
For the attention of:
John Ioannidis
Meta-Research Innovation Center at Stanford
Stanford University
John Ioannidis, in an article in The Australian on 10 May 2021, you urged Australia to "push for vaccination very fast (given) you have very few people infected. Otherwise I don't see another way out. You will get your wave sooner or later".[1] (See copy attached.)
In Australia, people aged 12 and over are now under intense pressure to submit to covid-19 injections.
While it’s fair to say that he’s made major contributions particularly in challenging the ridiculous levels of fear mongering about the threat from this “virus”. As Ioaniddes peer reviewed journal articles show, consistently, SARS-CoV-2 is NOT A THREAT TO THE VAST MAJORITY OF THE POPULATION.
Only those close to the end of their lives, because of advanced years &/or multiple, serious illnesses, are at undeniably elevated risk of severe outcomes including death if infected.
But where the author & indeed myself get upset is Dr Ioaniddes seemingly unqualified support for population-wide vaccination with these gene-based, spike protein encoding products, which we know beyond a shadow of doubt triggers multiple, sometimes serious adverse events, mostly relating to clotting & bleeding.
Why is he recommending this?
If it’s that he knows he’ll be dismissed or starved of grant funding if he doesn’t toe the line, there are ways to do it that come with quite acceptable reservations.
Best wishes
Mike
Subject: John Ioannidis urges Australia to "push for vaccination very fast..." Why?
Please see below my email to John Ioannidis, a professor at Stanford University, who is renowned for his work in evidence based medicine, and his goal to "optimize the chances of getting more reliable, trustworthy and useful research".
I question John Ioannidis about him urging Australia to "push for [covid] vaccination very fast", as this appears to contradict his research which indicates people <65 have a very low risk of covid associated death, and that strategies focusing specifically on protecting high-risk elderly individuals should be considered in managing the pandemic.
This is an important matter as all Australians are now under intense pressure to submit to covid-19 injections, despite covid-19 not being a serious risk for most people. We have no idea of the long-term consequences of these injections, which could potentially be pressed upon people for life.
This email is also publicly accessible via this link, please feel free to share: https://bit.ly/3CzkAOC
Elizabeth Hart
Independent person investigating the over-use of vaccine products and conflicts of interest in vaccination policy.
vaccinationispolitical.net
(PS: If you don't want these updates in this group, please respond to me personally with 'unsubscribe' in the subject line.)
---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: Elizabeth Hart <...>
Date: Fri, Sep 17, 2021 at 5:44 PM
Subject: John Ioannidis urges Australia to "push for vaccination very fast..." Why?
To: John Ioannids
Cc: Jodie McVernon, Neil Ferguson, Patrick Vallance, Chris Whitty, Fiona Godlee, Sharon Davies, Peter Doshi, Kamran Abbasi, Theodora Bloom, Allyson Pollocki, Simon Wain-Hobson, Richard Ebright, Marc Lipsitch, Michael Osterholm, Tom Inglesby, Carl Heneghan, Michael Levitt, Martin Kulldorff, Jayanta Bhattacharya, Sucharit Bhakdi, Gus Dalgleish, Karol Sikora, Anders Tegnell, Johan Giesecke, Ian Frazer, Peter Doherty, Peter Collignon, Roy Anderson, Peter Openshaw, Adrian Smith, David Cannadine, Venki Ramakrishnan, Andrew Goddard, Chris Conlon, Dan Sumners, Robert Clancy, Sunetra Gupta, Heidi Larson, Graham Medley, Melinda Mills, John Bell, David Kennedy, Andrew Read, Peter A. McCullough, Nick Hudson, Andrew Pollard, James McCaw, Tom Kompas, Zoe Hyde, Quentin Grafton, Emma McArthur, Anthony Harnden, Adam Finn, Adrian Hill, Sarah Gilbert, John Shine
For the attention of:
John Ioannidis
Meta-Research Innovation Center at Stanford
Stanford University
John Ioannidis, in an article in The Australian on 10 May 2021, you urged Australia to "push for vaccination very fast (given) you have very few people infected. Otherwise I don't see another way out. You will get your wave sooner or later".[1] (See copy attached.)
In Australia, people aged 12 and over are now under intense pressure to submit to covid-19 injections.
Forwarded from Mike Yeadon
[2] This is in response to modelling from the Doherty Institute, particularly a scenario suggesting a 70/80% vaccine coverage of the population (16+ years) is needed before restrictions are lifted.[3] Emma McArthur has challenged the Doherty modelling and its influence on Australian Government policy, see: Is Australia being held to ransom thanks to 'scientific fiction' by the Doherty Institute? 2 September 2021.
John Ioannidis, it was known from the beginning that most people infected with SARS-CoV-2 will only "experience mild to moderate respiratory illness and recover without requiring special treatment", as acknowledged by the WHO.[4] (See copy attached.)
How can it be justifiable to pressure Australians of all ages and health status, including children 12 years and up, to submit to experimental injections, which apparently don't prevent infection nor transmission, and with unknown duration of 'immunity', for a disease that isn't a serious threat to most people? This is especially concerning for children. Children aren't at serious risk of covid.[5] Why are young people being set up for these medical interventions - with no long-term safety data - potentially for life?
John Ioannidis, can you please clarify why you recommended Australia "push for vaccination very fast..." when your own work shows covid-19 is not a serious risk for most people?
What expertise do you have in viruses and vaccines to support your push for Australia to vaccinate against a disease which you know isn't a serious risk for most people?
You say "you have very few people infected" [in Australia]. Upon what evidence are you basing this opinion? Isn't it likely many people may be protected by cross-immunity from infection with other coronaviruses, and that children are protected by their strong innate immunity? See for example this article: Pre-existing immunity to Covid-19 - Marc Girardot of PANDA unpacks its evolution.[6]
In a paper published in September last year, you said "People <65 years old have very small risks of COVID-19 death even in pandemic epicenters and deaths for people <65 years without underlying predisposing conditions are remarkably uncommon. Strategies focusing specifically on protecting high-risk elderly individuals should be considered in managing the pandemic".[7]
Similarly, your subsequent paper suggests an infection fatality rate of 0.05% for the under 70s.[8]
Given these facts, why is covid-19 being promoted as such a dangerous disease in Australia and around the world?
Why has there not been a proportionate and targeted response to this disease as you suggest, i.e. "strategies focusing specifically on protecting high-risk elderly individuals" for example, quickly developing treatments for the vulnerable, rather than fear-mongering and promoting universal covid vaccination?
John Ioannidis, given you have sought to influence Australia's response to covid-19 by urging Australia to "push for vaccination very fast...", I request your response on this matter.
Sincerely
Elizabeth Hart
Independent person investigating the over-use of vaccine products and conflicts of interest in vaccination policy
References:
1. Lockdowns 'not reason for success', says epidemiologist. The Australian, 10 May 2021.
2. COVID-19 vaccines - Australian Government Department of Health, as accessed 17 September 2021: https://www.health.gov.au/initiatives-and-programs/covid-19-vaccines; Children aged 12 to 15 years now eligible for COVID-19 vaccine, Prime Ministerial Media release, as accessed 17 September 2021: https://www.pm.gov.au/media/children-aged-12-15-years-now-eligible-covid-19-vaccine
3. Doherty Institute Modelling Report for National Cabinet, 3 August 2021 (Revised 10 August 2021): https://www.doherty.edu.au/news-events/news/doherty-institute-modelling-report-for-national-cabinet
4. World Health Organization Coronavirus: https://www.who.int/health-topics/coronavirus#tab=tab_1 (As accessed 17 September 2021.)
5. Rita Carsetti et al.
John Ioannidis, it was known from the beginning that most people infected with SARS-CoV-2 will only "experience mild to moderate respiratory illness and recover without requiring special treatment", as acknowledged by the WHO.[4] (See copy attached.)
How can it be justifiable to pressure Australians of all ages and health status, including children 12 years and up, to submit to experimental injections, which apparently don't prevent infection nor transmission, and with unknown duration of 'immunity', for a disease that isn't a serious threat to most people? This is especially concerning for children. Children aren't at serious risk of covid.[5] Why are young people being set up for these medical interventions - with no long-term safety data - potentially for life?
John Ioannidis, can you please clarify why you recommended Australia "push for vaccination very fast..." when your own work shows covid-19 is not a serious risk for most people?
What expertise do you have in viruses and vaccines to support your push for Australia to vaccinate against a disease which you know isn't a serious risk for most people?
You say "you have very few people infected" [in Australia]. Upon what evidence are you basing this opinion? Isn't it likely many people may be protected by cross-immunity from infection with other coronaviruses, and that children are protected by their strong innate immunity? See for example this article: Pre-existing immunity to Covid-19 - Marc Girardot of PANDA unpacks its evolution.[6]
In a paper published in September last year, you said "People <65 years old have very small risks of COVID-19 death even in pandemic epicenters and deaths for people <65 years without underlying predisposing conditions are remarkably uncommon. Strategies focusing specifically on protecting high-risk elderly individuals should be considered in managing the pandemic".[7]
Similarly, your subsequent paper suggests an infection fatality rate of 0.05% for the under 70s.[8]
Given these facts, why is covid-19 being promoted as such a dangerous disease in Australia and around the world?
Why has there not been a proportionate and targeted response to this disease as you suggest, i.e. "strategies focusing specifically on protecting high-risk elderly individuals" for example, quickly developing treatments for the vulnerable, rather than fear-mongering and promoting universal covid vaccination?
John Ioannidis, given you have sought to influence Australia's response to covid-19 by urging Australia to "push for vaccination very fast...", I request your response on this matter.
Sincerely
Elizabeth Hart
Independent person investigating the over-use of vaccine products and conflicts of interest in vaccination policy
References:
1. Lockdowns 'not reason for success', says epidemiologist. The Australian, 10 May 2021.
2. COVID-19 vaccines - Australian Government Department of Health, as accessed 17 September 2021: https://www.health.gov.au/initiatives-and-programs/covid-19-vaccines; Children aged 12 to 15 years now eligible for COVID-19 vaccine, Prime Ministerial Media release, as accessed 17 September 2021: https://www.pm.gov.au/media/children-aged-12-15-years-now-eligible-covid-19-vaccine
3. Doherty Institute Modelling Report for National Cabinet, 3 August 2021 (Revised 10 August 2021): https://www.doherty.edu.au/news-events/news/doherty-institute-modelling-report-for-national-cabinet
4. World Health Organization Coronavirus: https://www.who.int/health-topics/coronavirus#tab=tab_1 (As accessed 17 September 2021.)
5. Rita Carsetti et al.
Forwarded from Mike Yeadon
The immune system of children: the key to understanding SARS-CoV-2 susceptibility? The Lancet Child & Adolescent Health. Volume 4, Issue 6, P414-416, June 01, 2020.
6. See: Marc Girardot. A novel perspective on a not so novel virus, via Nadya Swart. Pre-existing immunity to Covid-19 - Marc Girardot of PANDA unpacks its evolution. BizNews, 16 August 2021: https://www.biznews.com/health/2021/08/16/pre-existing-immunity
7. John P.A. Ioannidis et al. Population-level COVID-19 mortality risk for non-elderly individuals overall and for non-elderly individuals without underlying diseases in pandemic epicenters. Environ Res. 2020 Sep; 188: 10980.
8. John P.A. Ioannidis. Infection fatality rate of COVID-19 inferred from seroprevalence data. Bull World Health Organ 2021;99:19-33F.
6. See: Marc Girardot. A novel perspective on a not so novel virus, via Nadya Swart. Pre-existing immunity to Covid-19 - Marc Girardot of PANDA unpacks its evolution. BizNews, 16 August 2021: https://www.biznews.com/health/2021/08/16/pre-existing-immunity
7. John P.A. Ioannidis et al. Population-level COVID-19 mortality risk for non-elderly individuals overall and for non-elderly individuals without underlying diseases in pandemic epicenters. Environ Res. 2020 Sep; 188: 10980.
8. John P.A. Ioannidis. Infection fatality rate of COVID-19 inferred from seroprevalence data. Bull World Health Organ 2021;99:19-33F.
BizNews
Pre-existing immunity to Covid-19 – Marc Girardot of PANDA unpacks its evolution
In this article, Marc Girardot - a member of PANDA - explores the extent and evolution of our pre-existing immunity to Covid-19.
With the benefit of hindsight, knowing now that "Vaxx"Pass was the name of the deadly game from day one, it is very clear why the BlackRock & Vanguard owned corporate media sought to discredit one of the few documents which made some logical sense in all this mass hysteria:
The Great Barrington Declaration.
https://gbdeclaration.org/
The Great Barrington Declaration.
https://gbdeclaration.org/
Great Barrington Declaration
Great Barrington Declaration and Petition
As infectious disease epidemiologists and public health scientists we have grave concerns about the damaging physical and mental health impacts of the prevailing COVID-19 policies, and recommend an approach we call Focused Protection
Forwarded from No More Lockdowns UK
BOOM. This video explains Anna De Buisseret's legal plan and campaign in full detail. Please give these guys a Sub on YouTube https://youtu.be/Y7WL96kSVU8
University of Ottawa Heart Institute Retrospective Study Finds 1 in 1,000 mRNA Vaccinations Lead to Myopericarditis
"A research team from the University of Ottawa Heart Institute in Canada recently concluded and uploaded study results investigating the relationship between mRNA COVID-19 vaccinations (Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna) and heart-related conditions of myocarditis/pericarditis diagnosis over a two-month period from June 1, 2021, to July 31, 2021. A prospective study, the Ottawa-based study team, studied the records of patients that received an mRNA vaccine within a month prior to symptom presentation. The study subjects were admitted into the hospital with heart and chest-related symptoms. With data obtained from the Public Health Agency of Ottawa, the study team was able to compare data sets, declaring that this study effort represented the largest case series relating temporal relationship between mRNA COVID vaccination, symptoms, and findings. Study subjects were patients at the Heart Institute. Summarizing the study results, the study authors found that among the subjects, typically, symptom onset commenced during the first few days post-vaccination."
https://trialsitenews.com/university-of-ottawa-heart-institute-retrospective-study-finds-1-in-1000-mrna-vaccinations-leads-to-myopericarditis/
"A research team from the University of Ottawa Heart Institute in Canada recently concluded and uploaded study results investigating the relationship between mRNA COVID-19 vaccinations (Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna) and heart-related conditions of myocarditis/pericarditis diagnosis over a two-month period from June 1, 2021, to July 31, 2021. A prospective study, the Ottawa-based study team, studied the records of patients that received an mRNA vaccine within a month prior to symptom presentation. The study subjects were admitted into the hospital with heart and chest-related symptoms. With data obtained from the Public Health Agency of Ottawa, the study team was able to compare data sets, declaring that this study effort represented the largest case series relating temporal relationship between mRNA COVID vaccination, symptoms, and findings. Study subjects were patients at the Heart Institute. Summarizing the study results, the study authors found that among the subjects, typically, symptom onset commenced during the first few days post-vaccination."
https://trialsitenews.com/university-of-ottawa-heart-institute-retrospective-study-finds-1-in-1000-mrna-vaccinations-leads-to-myopericarditis/
Trialsitenews
University of Ottawa Heart Institute Retrospective Study Finds 1 in 1,000 mRNA Vaccinations Leads to Myopericarditis
A research team from the University of Ottawa Heart Institute in Canada recently concluded and uploaded study results investigating the relationship between mRNA COVID-19 vaccinations (Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna) and heart-related conditions of myocardi…
Forwarded from Robin Monotti + Cory Morningstar
"Myocarditis
Current Trends in Diagnosis and Treatment"
https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/full/10.1161/circulationaha.105.584532
Current Trends in Diagnosis and Treatment"
https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/full/10.1161/circulationaha.105.584532
"The canard, common in some quarters of the vaccine skeptic community, that “No virus for Covid has been isolated and proven to exist according to Koch’s postulates.” While technically true, this represents an impossible demand. Koch’s postulates were formulated for bacteria, which can (often) be grown on a nonliving medium and therefore “purified.” Viruses can be grown only in living cells; therefore any sample with viral particles will also contain cell debris, including non-viral DNA and RNA. That is why combinatoric methods are used to establish the viral genome. To believe that hundreds of thousands of virologists have spent the last fifty years studying a hallucination, one must think they are corrupt fools unable to see the obvious.1 Viewing them that way prevents communication, learning, and a mutual quest for truth. It also draws attention away from more legitimate, more nuanced challenges to conventional paradigms of virology and vaccine science.2 Orthodox scientists, fed up with ignorant challenges, harden their paradigms against more legitimate ones." Charles Eisenstein
https://charleseisenstein.substack.com/p/a-temple-of-this-earth
https://charleseisenstein.substack.com/p/a-temple-of-this-earth
Charles Eisenstein
A Temple of this Earth
Moving Beyond Redemptive Violence
😁1
Giorgio Agamben: A community in society
"Italy, as a political laboratory of the West, in which the strategies of the dominant powers are elaborated in their extreme form in advance, is today a country in human and political ruin, in which an
unscrupulous tyranny determined to do anything has allied itself with a mass in the grip of a pseudo-religious terror, ready to sacrifice not
only what were once called constitutional freedoms, but even every warmth in human relations.
To believe that the GreenPass means a return to normality is truly naive. Just as a third vaccine is already
imposed, new ones will be imposed and new emergency situations and new red zones will be declared as long as the government and the powers it expresses judge it useful. And it is those who have unwisely obeyed who will pay the price.
In these conditions, without laying down every possible instrument of immediate resistance, it is necessary for the dissidents to think of creating something like a society within society, a community of friends and neighbors within the society of enmity and distance.
The forms of this new clandestinity, which will have to become as
autonomous as possible from the institutions, will have to be meditated upon and experimented with from time to time, but only they will be able to guarantee human survival in a world that has devoted itself to a more or less conscious self-destruction."
17 September 2021
Giorgio Agamben
https://www.quodlibet.it/giorgio-agamben-una-comunit-14-ella-societa
"Italy, as a political laboratory of the West, in which the strategies of the dominant powers are elaborated in their extreme form in advance, is today a country in human and political ruin, in which an
unscrupulous tyranny determined to do anything has allied itself with a mass in the grip of a pseudo-religious terror, ready to sacrifice not
only what were once called constitutional freedoms, but even every warmth in human relations.
To believe that the GreenPass means a return to normality is truly naive. Just as a third vaccine is already
imposed, new ones will be imposed and new emergency situations and new red zones will be declared as long as the government and the powers it expresses judge it useful. And it is those who have unwisely obeyed who will pay the price.
In these conditions, without laying down every possible instrument of immediate resistance, it is necessary for the dissidents to think of creating something like a society within society, a community of friends and neighbors within the society of enmity and distance.
The forms of this new clandestinity, which will have to become as
autonomous as possible from the institutions, will have to be meditated upon and experimented with from time to time, but only they will be able to guarantee human survival in a world that has devoted itself to a more or less conscious self-destruction."
17 September 2021
Giorgio Agamben
https://www.quodlibet.it/giorgio-agamben-una-comunit-14-ella-societa
Quodlibet
Giorgio Agamben, Una comunità nella società - Quodlibet
Edizioni Quodlibet - Volumi pubblicati, Appuntamenti, Recensioni e Anteprime - Acquista con sconto del 15%, spedizioni gratuite in Italia per acquisti sopra 29 euro.
School enquiry Letter re onsite vaccination.docx
300.2 KB
URGENT QUESTIONS REGARDING SCHOOL COVID-19 "VACCINATION" PROGRAMME
Letter to headteachers kindly put together by a parent with the help of an Insurance Expert. It puts pressure on schools by seeking clarity on health and safety issues, and focusing on the liability to schools given adverse events post injection that are now well known and documented. Please share with others
Letter to headteachers kindly put together by a parent with the help of an Insurance Expert. It puts pressure on schools by seeking clarity on health and safety issues, and focusing on the liability to schools given adverse events post injection that are now well known and documented. Please share with others
"Marcus Fysh the Member of Parliament for Yeovil since 2015 has spoken out against the vaccination of children with the Covid jab as “wrong” and said the fact that the move has been supported by former Prime Minister Tony Blair speaks volumes."
Link: https://unitynewsnetwork.co.uk/marcus-fysh-mp-slams-children-receiving-covid-jab-as-wrong/
Link: https://unitynewsnetwork.co.uk/marcus-fysh-mp-slams-children-receiving-covid-jab-as-wrong/
Unity News Network
Marcus Fysh MP slams children receiving Covid jab as “wrong” and calls on Chris Whitty to resign.
Marcus Fysh the Member of Parliament for Yeovil since 2015 has spoken out against the vaccination of children with the Covid jab as “wrong” and said the fact that the move has been supported by former Prime Minister Tony Blair speaks volumes.
Writing on…
Writing on…
PRESIDENT OF CROATIA: THE MEDIA SPREAD PANIC AND NONSENSE. WE WILL NOT BE VACCINATED ANYMORE.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/8CI2jnXsE08w/
https://www.bitchute.com/video/8CI2jnXsE08w/
Bitchute
Bitchute is a video service that prioritizes creators and champions users' freedoms and privacy.
South Carolina pulmonary nurse confesses:
"I'm the guy who euthanized them..I'm the guy who pushed the button, like in the gas chambers at Auschwitz.."
This is Albert Spence, a 31-year pulmonary nurse veteran, now no longer working as a practising nurse due in large part to the changes in the hospitals' Covid policy. It is chilling to watch how Albert Spence came to realise that he was aiding and abetting the demise of patients under his care, due to the change in Covid policy - specifically the PCR Test.
https://odysee.com/@BannedYouTubeVideos:4/PULMONARY-NURSE-SPEAKS-OUT-HOW-COVID-POLICY-WAS-KILLING-PATIENTS:6
"I'm the guy who euthanized them..I'm the guy who pushed the button, like in the gas chambers at Auschwitz.."
This is Albert Spence, a 31-year pulmonary nurse veteran, now no longer working as a practising nurse due in large part to the changes in the hospitals' Covid policy. It is chilling to watch how Albert Spence came to realise that he was aiding and abetting the demise of patients under his care, due to the change in Covid policy - specifically the PCR Test.
https://odysee.com/@BannedYouTubeVideos:4/PULMONARY-NURSE-SPEAKS-OUT-HOW-COVID-POLICY-WAS-KILLING-PATIENTS:6
Odysee
PULMONARY NURSE SPEAKS OUT HOW COVID POLICY WAS KILLING PATIENTS | SC MEDICAL AFFAIRS COMMITTEE
15th September, 2021 - This is Albert Spence, a 31-year pulmonary nurse veteran, now no longer working as a practising nurse due in large part to the changes in the hospitals' Covid policy. It is chil...
Forwarded from Zweite Deutsche Welle
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM