Worth paying attention to this from ivermectin champion, Dr Pierre Kory:

https://theexpose.uk/2021/09/18/the-pandemic-has-ended-for-much-of-india-how-did-they-do-it-not-with-covid-injections-but-a-drug-that-costs-less-than-2-per-person-ivermectin/

These below are key separate testimonies from the FDA zoom meeting held with the FDA advisory committee on approval of Pfizer booster shots.

FDA: Professor Letser Levi: Israel

FDA: Dr Joseph Fraiman: Hesitancy

FDA: Steve Kirsch: Elephant in the Room

FDA: David Wiseman: PCoVs Post Covid Vaccine Syndromes

FDA: Dr Peter Doshi: Pandemic of the Unvaccinated?

FDA: Kim Witczak: Moving the Goalposts

VITAMIN D: 50ng/ml minimum target

"Ferira puts it this way: "I personally don't like to confuse folks by even mentioning 30 ng/ml in the same breath as 'vitamin D sufficiency.' I prefer to think of 30 as the risk or warning zone. It's the cutoff for inadequacy, so you don't strive for it, you avoid it with intention."

"This is the bare minimum level to avoid major issues known to occur with vitamin D deficiency, including bone issues and poor thyroid health," explains board-certified endocrinologist Brittany Henderson, M.D., who specializes in hormones (including vitamin D) in her clinical practice. That said, "higher levels of serum 25(OH)D have consistently been associated with improvements in mood, enhancement of the immune system, and more." 
Unfortunately, a large chunk (41%) of the U.S. adult population is in the "warning zone" (< 30 ng/ml), and they probably don't even know it. This means they are vitamin D insufficient. Another term used is hypovitaminosis D. To make it simple, not enough vitamin D.

Pharmacokinetic research shows that it takes 1000 IU of vitamin D to increase a normal-weight adult’s serum D levels by about 10 ng/ml.

So, that means that in order to achieve 50 ng/ml, you need 5,000 IU of vitamin D per day."

"This Is The Vitamin D Level We Should All Really Be Striving
http://mindbodygreen.com/articles/optimal-vitamin-d-levels-for-health-are-higher-than-you-think

Prevailing Vitamin D Status

"Several population-based studies have reported vitamin D status in age groups from children to centenarians, as well as in isolated groups of individuals with discrete diseases (11–15). Individuals who would otherwise be considered healthy typically have serum 25(OH)D levels averaging in the range of 50 to 65 nmol/L, and from 65 to 100% of such populations have levels <80 nmol/L. As just noted, values of ≥80 nmol/L are necessary to optimize the canonical role of vitamin D. Outdoor workers in the tropics typically have serum 25(OH)D levels ranging from 120 to 200 nmol/L. These observations suggest that vitamin D deficiency is perhaps the most widespread deficiency condition in developed nations. It is important also to understand that the term “deficiency” in this sense does not necessarily connote clinically explicit disease (as would the term “deficiency” for nutrients such as vitamin C [scurvy] or thiamin [beriberi]). Rather it connotes an increase in risk for certain untoward outcomes, such as those reviewed briefly below in Vitamin D and Chronic Disease. This explains the seeming paradox that individuals who are ostensibly healthy today may nevertheless be “deficient.”


https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4571146/

VITAMIN D:
4,000 IUs daily metabolic use. Toxicity: considered safe up to 10,000 IU per day for extended periods of time, no intoxication at levels of 30,000 IUs per day for extended periods of time

"Quantitative studies performed since the publication of the these recommendations have made it clear that at a presumably optimal level of ≥80 nmol/L, daily metabolic utilization of vitamin D is on the order of 4000 IU (18). Because dietary sources account for typically for no more than 5 to 10% of that total, the rest must be coming from skin or, lacking that, must result in a suboptimal 25(OH)D concentration.

A recent publication, reviewing the totality of the toxicity data, concluded that there were no cases of intoxication reported for daily intakes of <30,000 IU/d for extended periods (50) and no cases of vitamin D intoxication for serum 25(OH)D levels <200 ng/ml (500 nmol/L). Thus, it was concluded that a daily intake of 10,000 IU should be considered the tolerable upper intake level. There is no known medical reason for dosages approaching that level; hence, there is a comfortable margin of safety between therapeutic and toxic intakes."

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4571146/

CONCLUSION: You don't need any "vaccines" or "boosters" but you do need vitamin D supplementation: will help with all respiratory diseases, prevent rather than cause heart issues including myocarditis, and prevent rather than accelerate cancer development.

The Covid-19 Vaccines have harmed and killed more children in the USA than all other vaccines combined according to official data

New figures from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC) Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) show that children are suffering after having a Covid-19 vaccine, with many severely ill, disabled, and in some cases, dead…

https://theexpose.uk/2021/09/20/covid-19-vaccines-have-killed-more-children-than-all-other-vaccines-combined/

Follow The Exposé
Join The Exposé Chat Group

REMEMBER REMEMBER THE 20th OF SEPTEMBER

Remember remember the 20th of September,
Child poisoning treason & plot.
I see no reason why child poisoning treason
Should ever be forgot..

(The toxin injections are rolled out today in the UK for the age group of 12-15 year olds..)

How you can help
It’s not too late to have your views considered. Please write, urgently, to your MP using the letter below, and copy in:

nadhim.zahawi.mp@parliament.uk
sajid.javid.mp@parliament.uk
leader@labour.org.uk
leader@libdems.org.uk
info.request@childrenscommissioner.gov.uk

Dear [name of MP],

I am appalled at the news that, despite the JCVI’s advice that ‘that there are insufficient grounds to offer mass vaccination’ for otherwise healthy 12- to 15-year-old children, the government are choosing to roll out the vaccination programme to this age cohort. It is an unprecedented step for the JCVI’s advice not to be followed and leaves many parents deeply uneasy that this was a purely political decision – which would be deeply unethical.

There is also doubt that the stated marginal benefits have been accurately presented. According to the Government’s own modelling, vaccinating 60 per cent of 12- to 15-year-olds would prevent the loss of about 110,000 days of school in the six months between October and March 2022. This works out to 41 days per thousand pupils or just 15 minutes per child over the full six months modelled. This modelling has already been criticised by a number of commentators and experts. For example David Paton, Professor of Industrial Economics, Nottingham University Business School, suggests that the actual disruption saved could be negative – i.e. more disruption – once you factor in prior infection and the time spent on the vaccination programme itself.

Importantly, the JCVI also noted ‘considerable uncertainty regarding the magnitude of the potential harms’. In particular, the uncertainty over potential long term heart changes has been raised by Professor Adam Finn of the JCVI in a number of TV interviews.
Further, as pointed out by Christopher Chope MP in a Parliamentary Debate on 10th September 2021, the Yellow Card reporting system is showing a deeply worrying list of adverse reactions:

‘Essentially, what the yellow card scheme shows, from the most recent report, which came out on 9 September, is that there have been 435 reports of major blood clots and low platelet counts, including 74 deaths. It shows that there have been 767 cases of inflammation of the heart, a condition that is almost unheard of in medicine on a normal day-to-day basis. It shows that there have been some 35,000 reports of menstrual disorder, and there are all sorts of other effects set out in the comprehensive report. Very worryingly, it says that there are 1,632 reports of deaths having taken place shortly after vaccination.’
It is also difficult to see how under the current proposals this programme can fulfil the requirements for truly informed and voluntary consent, free from peer pressure, while taking place on school premises.

While I appreciate there are strongly held views on all sides, our children have already carried a greater burden than they ever should have been asked to bear over the last 18 months and we owe it to them to get this right by ensuring parliamentary scrutiny.
Over the last week questions have been raised in the press and Parliament and on Tuesday September 21, 9.30am, Westminster Hall, there is an urgent debate to discuss the issues surrounding the extension of the vaccination programme to children.
Please, will you attend this debate and raise the uncomfortable but necessary questions?
Best wishes,

[Name and address]


https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/usforthems-urgent-call-to-action-on-covid-jabs-for-children/

Camille Paglia: 'Universities Are an Absolute Wreck Right Now'

Shared by a colleague.

Some passages relevant to the dominant Pandemicist regime that rules over university campuses today:

04:28 “This generation of young people have been trained throughout middle school and high school and college to be subservient to authority. There is no questioning of authority whatever. They want an expansion of authority….”

05:25 “They [faculty] are passive worms not to fight back against the bureaucrats….”

06:44 “So what’s happened, which is extremely pernicious and toxic, in American universities over the last 35-40 years, is this growth of a massive administrator class which never had any teaching experience whatever, and regard themselves as a master race – and I am not kidding, okay – and they force you into all kinds of formulas you have to follow when you deal with the students and every kind of regulation and law, and they’re a bunch of nervous nellies, et cetera. It’s an outrage. The faculty has been reduced to slave status. They’re serfs.”

https://youtu.be/B553na_skKI

#covid19 #universities #censorship

Good to see some anthropology being put to good use (not by an anthropologist, of course):

Covid-19: Fear, Anxiety and Voodoo Death
Ryan Matters

EXTRACTS:

The concept of “voodoo death” or “psychic death” has been observed for hundreds of years. It is a phenomenon whereby a person (often a member of a tribe or primitive community) is brought to death by means of a “spell”, or the use of “black magic”. This phenomenon has been observed by anthropologists, doctors and explorers all over the world, in areas such as Australia, New Zealand, Africa, South America and Haiti....

It could be argued that our modern society is no different from the primitive tribesman, except that we have substituted “evil spirits” for another invisible enemy.

The covid-19 phenomenon has seen the development of a “covidian cult”, with its members obeying senseless “tribal regulations” such as mask-wearing, “social distancing”, mRNA vaccination and the obsessive use of sanitizers.

Seen in this context, the modern-day covidian cult member is no different from the primitive tribesman. He is just as ignorant and just as suggestible. And therefore, he is entirely at the mercy of the sorcerer and his black magic, bone pointing ritual (think positive PCR test).

Dr SD Porteus, studied primitive life extensively in the Pacific Islands and Africa and found that social interaction was of key importance for primitive peoples in rendering themselves resistant to all manner of mysterious and malicious influences. Of course, man’s need for social interaction is well-known, a need (as well as a right) which for many people has been left unfulfilled....

....emotions can impact the sympathico-adrenal system, which, as a consequence of prolonged activation, can cause a major drop in blood pressure, something observed frequently among soldiers during World War One.

The physiological effects of prolonged stress, anxiety and fear are well-known to be destructive and yet this has been downplayed during the last 18 months....

Needless to say, irrational behavior has been one of the hallmarks of the covid scam. Think about restaurants where people enter wearing a mask only to take it off when they sit down at the table. Think of the sanitizers outside shops and malls, the cheap temperature guns from China, the cloth masks with gaping holes in them.

None of it makes logical sense and it’s not meant to. All of these things serve a purpose, which is to establish rituals and “tribal regulations”, that when broken instill fear and anxiety. ‘I forgot to put my mask on when I went outside, what if the virus made its way into my mouth? Oh God, will I get sick? Am I going to die?’

CONTINUE HERE:
https://off-guardian.org/2021/09/18/covid-19-fear-anxiety-and-voodoo-death/

#covid19 #fear #anthropology #bioterror

Why Does No One Ever Talk About Sweden Anymore?
A look into a very confusing development

"Over much of 2020 and into 2021, Sweden was persistently criticized by the media and on Twitter arguments due to comparisons to their neighbors, a standard curiously not applicable to most other countries around the world. Yet as we’ve progressed further into 2021, those same media outlets have suddenly gone quiet as their chosen victors have flailed unsuccessfully against ever increasing outbreaks.

"So let’s see what’s transpired recently which resulted in the deafening silence, and examine what that means for The Science™, shall we?"

https://ianmsc.substack.com/p/why-does-no-one-ever-talk-about-sweden

#covid19 #Sweden

THE CASE AGAINST VACCINE PASSPORTS
by David Cayley
September 16, 2021

EXTRACTS:
How has it been possible to convince a majority of the safety of an experimental vaccine, whose long-term effects cannot, by definition, be known? To answer this question one has to go back to the way in which the pandemic has been presented to the public. From the beginning the pandemic has been called a war, with all the concomitants of war—demonization of enemies, sentimentalization of heroes, constant stoking of fear, and censorship of untoward opinions. It’s this last feature that has been the most shocking, from my point of view. During the last eighteen months, there has been lively scientific disagreement over the character of the new disease, the danger it poses, and the best policy to contain this danger. But barely a breath of these debates has reached the mainstream media. In Canada, for example, a group of public health professionals warned in an open letter, in summer 2020, that a policy of quarantining the entire eligible population, the so-called lockdown, was a radical departure from previous public health practice and might well backfire, doing more harm than good. This group included two former chief public health officers for Canada, three former deputy ministers of health, and three present or former deans of medicine at Canadian universities—a virtual Who’s Who of public health in Canada. Nevertheless, their statement created barely a ripple in the Canadian media that I follow.

This pattern has been repeated again and again. A few months later, on Oct. 26, 2020, three eminent epidemiologists, accredited at Oxford, Harvard, and Stanford, made what they called the Great Barrington Declaration. It called for a policy of “focused protection” for the vulnerable and a return to normality for the majority. This statement too was either ignored or treated with derision in the organs of polite opinion. Dissident doctors have been threatened with discipline. On April 30, 2021, in Ontario, the College of Physicians and Surgeons warned the doctors whom they regulate, by statute, that these doctors would face discipline should they “communicate anti-vaccine, anti-masking, anti-distancing and anti-lockdown statements” or promote “unsupported, unproven treatments for COVID-19.” Such a threat was necessary, the College said, to counteract the spreading, by some doctors, of “blatant misinformation,” the term used to exclude unwanted opinions from journalistic media....

It seems undeniable that these [mandatory vaccination] measures violate the principle of informed consent. This deprivation of the right on which the very legitimacy of contemporary medicine depends is justified by the imminent threat to public health that the unvaccinated are said to pose. But if public health were the primary objective, wouldn’t the natural immunity that many possess as a result of previous COVID infection be recognized as equivalent to or, as a recent Israeli study shows, much better than vaccination? The fact is that in many jurisdictions natural immunity is not recognized. In these jurisdictions, excluding a handful of narrow exemptions, vaccination is required of everyone as a condition of citizenship and social participation, regardless of immune status. This requirement cannot but create suspicion that the vaccine agenda is driven by more than pure public health concern....

....forced vaccination is setting an ominous precedent. The vaccines are untried on the time-scale that would be necessary to establish even their relative safety. The threat of COVID, which pertains mainly to the old, is being aggregated across the entire population in order to impose vaccination on those at negligible risk. Dissident opinions have been censored and vilified, rendering dispassionate and disinterested discussion impossible. And the plurality of views that should properly characterize the sciences has been replaced by a dictatorial oracle called “the science.” All these concerns militate strongly against coercing the consciences of those who oppose vaccination on scientific, philosophical, or religious grounds. Coercion will only compound existing social division. Perhaps it would be better to start a conversation rather than continuing the war.

CONTINUE HERE:
https://www.firstthings.com/web-exclusives/2021/09/the-case-against-vaccine-passports

#covid19 #censorship #bioterror #VaccinePassports

Found this old article that was scrubbed from the internet. The CDC has been inflating the flu numbers for years to increase vaccine uptake. The corruption and manipulation we have experienced over the past 18 months did not happen overnight.

EXTRACTS

Only about 15-20 per cent of people who come down with flu-like symptoms have the influenza virus -- the other 80-85 per cent actually caught rhinovirus or other germs that are indistinguishable from the true flu without laboratory tests, which are rarely done. In 2001, a year in which death certificates listed 257 Americans as having died of flu, only 18 were positively identified as true flus. The other 239 were simply assumed to be flus and most likely had few true flus among them.

Pneumonia, according to the American Lung Association, has more than 30 different causes, influenza being but one of them. The CDC itself acknowledges the slim relationship, saying "only a small proportion of deaths... only 8.5 per cent of all pneumonia and influenza deaths [are] influenza-related."

Because death certificates belie claims of numerous flu deaths, CDC enlisted computer models to arrive at its 36,000 flu-death estimate. But even here it needed to bend conventional medical terminology to arrive at compelling death numbers.

"Cause-of-death statistics are based solely on the underlying cause of death [internationally defined] as 'the disease or injury which initiated the train of events leading directly to death,'" explains the National Center for Health Statistics. Because the flu was rarely an "underlying cause of death," the CDC created the sound-alike term, "influenza-associated death."

The CDC's decision to play up flu deaths dates back a decade, when it realized the public wasn't following its advice on the flu vaccine. During the 2003 flu season "the manufacturers were telling us that they weren't receiving a lot of orders for vaccine,"Dr. Glen Nowak, associate director for communications at CDC's National Immunization Program, told National Public Radio. "It really did look like we needed to do something to encourage people to get a flu shot."

The CDC unabashedly decided to create a mass market for the flu vaccine by enlisting the media into panicking the public. An obedient and unquestioning media obliged by hyping the numbers, and 10 years later it is obliging still.

SOURCE: https://web.archive.org/web/20200203194613/https://www.huffingtonpost.ca/lawrence-solomon/death-by-influenza_b_4661442.html

Sound familiar?