FDA: Dr Peter Doshi: Pandemic of the Unvaccinated?

FDA: Kim Witczak: Moving the Goalposts

This is a very good presentation from the team lead by Dr Steve Kirsch.
Steve was initially convinced by the narrative to the extent he even got vaccinated. He’s no ‘anti-vaxxer’.
He’s interested in the best way out of our appalling predicament.
Stop vaccination against covid19. They kill more people than they save. The younger the recipient, the worse this ratio gets. There’s no age group who do better with vaccines than not.
Suppression of effective, safe & early treatments is a crime against humanity but it’s not uniformly applied. Some Central American countries have handed out packs with ivermectin, Vit C, Vit D & hydroxychloroquine. Other places are making major use of ivermectin, like Uttar Pradesh. Others, like Kerala, are leaning heavily & exclusively on vaccination and their path looks like Israel, U.K. & some US states.
You need to do some of the work yourself when understanding these slides. The presenter was given little time, but all that’s needed to underwrite the claims made is available at the links provided.
Please, please: make as many people aware of this as you can.
It literally might save lives.
Best wishes
Dr Mike Yeadon

https://www.skirsch.com/covid/All.pdf

FDA: Steve Kirsch: Elephant in the Room

https://youtu.be/sb5LHEH4b8Q

BREAKING NEWS WALES:

It’s absolutely CRUCIAL for the very survival of free humanity that EVERYONE declines to accommodate this EVIL scheme.
I promise you this: if this is accepted for ANYTHING, it will in due course be made mandatory for every important activity.
Run this thought experiment: you’re required to show your VaxPass “just to get into a tiny number of events, what’s the harm?”
Well, step by step, they’ll add more & more things for which a VaxPass is required.
Eventually, you WILL NOT BE ABLE TO BUY FOOD WITHOUT YOUR THEN EFFECTIVELY MANDATORY VAXPASS.
Now “Mr Global” has you entirely in their totalitarian tyrannical control.
If you’re instructed to come & get your 4th, 7th, 13th shot, you’ll have absolutely no choice. Comply or go hungry.
And if food won’t do it, think about denial of banking services. They’re doing that ALREADY in Lithuania.

What to do? Simple.

UNITED NON-COMPLIANCE. That’s it. Boycott absolutely everything & every business that makes VaxPass a condition. Doesn’t matter what it is. Destroy them by withholding your support, your business. Even at considerable disadvantage to you.

If you cooperate with this EVIL PLAN, not only will you end the long era of free humanity, but it will not be possible to recover it, ever.

That’s enough. Please give this some thought. It’s a bright line which we MUST NOT CROSS.

Dr Mike Yeadon

Very clear reasoning for why that FDA Advisory Committee voted 16:2 AGAINST the idea of a “3rd shot” or “booster” for so-called “covid19 vaccines”.
Without any question, even if these gene-based products protect anyone in the real world, they kill far more people than they save.
I think the saves / deaths ratio is rationalised based on the assumption that the vaccines do exactly what we’re told.
Because they really don’t prevent 95% of “cases”, the actual number of killed to save one life is large. It’s not arguable. All these agents should be withdrawn & offered to no one.
Cheers,
Dr Mike Yeadon

https://theexpose.uk/2021/09/18/fda-experts-reveal-the-covid-19-vaccines-are-killing-2-people-for-every-1-life-saved/

Worth paying attention to this from ivermectin champion, Dr Pierre Kory:

https://theexpose.uk/2021/09/18/the-pandemic-has-ended-for-much-of-india-how-did-they-do-it-not-with-covid-injections-but-a-drug-that-costs-less-than-2-per-person-ivermectin/

These below are key separate testimonies from the FDA zoom meeting held with the FDA advisory committee on approval of Pfizer booster shots.

FDA: Professor Letser Levi: Israel

FDA: Dr Joseph Fraiman: Hesitancy

FDA: Steve Kirsch: Elephant in the Room

FDA: David Wiseman: PCoVs Post Covid Vaccine Syndromes

FDA: Dr Peter Doshi: Pandemic of the Unvaccinated?

FDA: Kim Witczak: Moving the Goalposts

VITAMIN D: 50ng/ml minimum target

"Ferira puts it this way: "I personally don't like to confuse folks by even mentioning 30 ng/ml in the same breath as 'vitamin D sufficiency.' I prefer to think of 30 as the risk or warning zone. It's the cutoff for inadequacy, so you don't strive for it, you avoid it with intention."

"This is the bare minimum level to avoid major issues known to occur with vitamin D deficiency, including bone issues and poor thyroid health," explains board-certified endocrinologist Brittany Henderson, M.D., who specializes in hormones (including vitamin D) in her clinical practice. That said, "higher levels of serum 25(OH)D have consistently been associated with improvements in mood, enhancement of the immune system, and more." 
Unfortunately, a large chunk (41%) of the U.S. adult population is in the "warning zone" (< 30 ng/ml), and they probably don't even know it. This means they are vitamin D insufficient. Another term used is hypovitaminosis D. To make it simple, not enough vitamin D.

Pharmacokinetic research shows that it takes 1000 IU of vitamin D to increase a normal-weight adult’s serum D levels by about 10 ng/ml.

So, that means that in order to achieve 50 ng/ml, you need 5,000 IU of vitamin D per day."

"This Is The Vitamin D Level We Should All Really Be Striving
http://mindbodygreen.com/articles/optimal-vitamin-d-levels-for-health-are-higher-than-you-think

Prevailing Vitamin D Status

"Several population-based studies have reported vitamin D status in age groups from children to centenarians, as well as in isolated groups of individuals with discrete diseases (11–15). Individuals who would otherwise be considered healthy typically have serum 25(OH)D levels averaging in the range of 50 to 65 nmol/L, and from 65 to 100% of such populations have levels <80 nmol/L. As just noted, values of ≥80 nmol/L are necessary to optimize the canonical role of vitamin D. Outdoor workers in the tropics typically have serum 25(OH)D levels ranging from 120 to 200 nmol/L. These observations suggest that vitamin D deficiency is perhaps the most widespread deficiency condition in developed nations. It is important also to understand that the term “deficiency” in this sense does not necessarily connote clinically explicit disease (as would the term “deficiency” for nutrients such as vitamin C [scurvy] or thiamin [beriberi]). Rather it connotes an increase in risk for certain untoward outcomes, such as those reviewed briefly below in Vitamin D and Chronic Disease. This explains the seeming paradox that individuals who are ostensibly healthy today may nevertheless be “deficient.”


https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4571146/

VITAMIN D:
4,000 IUs daily metabolic use. Toxicity: considered safe up to 10,000 IU per day for extended periods of time, no intoxication at levels of 30,000 IUs per day for extended periods of time

"Quantitative studies performed since the publication of the these recommendations have made it clear that at a presumably optimal level of ≥80 nmol/L, daily metabolic utilization of vitamin D is on the order of 4000 IU (18). Because dietary sources account for typically for no more than 5 to 10% of that total, the rest must be coming from skin or, lacking that, must result in a suboptimal 25(OH)D concentration.

A recent publication, reviewing the totality of the toxicity data, concluded that there were no cases of intoxication reported for daily intakes of <30,000 IU/d for extended periods (50) and no cases of vitamin D intoxication for serum 25(OH)D levels <200 ng/ml (500 nmol/L). Thus, it was concluded that a daily intake of 10,000 IU should be considered the tolerable upper intake level. There is no known medical reason for dosages approaching that level; hence, there is a comfortable margin of safety between therapeutic and toxic intakes."

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4571146/

CONCLUSION: You don't need any "vaccines" or "boosters" but you do need vitamin D supplementation: will help with all respiratory diseases, prevent rather than cause heart issues including myocarditis, and prevent rather than accelerate cancer development.

The Covid-19 Vaccines have harmed and killed more children in the USA than all other vaccines combined according to official data

New figures from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC) Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) show that children are suffering after having a Covid-19 vaccine, with many severely ill, disabled, and in some cases, dead…

https://theexpose.uk/2021/09/20/covid-19-vaccines-have-killed-more-children-than-all-other-vaccines-combined/

Follow The Exposé
Join The Exposé Chat Group

REMEMBER REMEMBER THE 20th OF SEPTEMBER

Remember remember the 20th of September,
Child poisoning treason & plot.
I see no reason why child poisoning treason
Should ever be forgot..

(The toxin injections are rolled out today in the UK for the age group of 12-15 year olds..)

How you can help
It’s not too late to have your views considered. Please write, urgently, to your MP using the letter below, and copy in:

nadhim.zahawi.mp@parliament.uk
sajid.javid.mp@parliament.uk
leader@labour.org.uk
leader@libdems.org.uk
info.request@childrenscommissioner.gov.uk

Dear [name of MP],

I am appalled at the news that, despite the JCVI’s advice that ‘that there are insufficient grounds to offer mass vaccination’ for otherwise healthy 12- to 15-year-old children, the government are choosing to roll out the vaccination programme to this age cohort. It is an unprecedented step for the JCVI’s advice not to be followed and leaves many parents deeply uneasy that this was a purely political decision – which would be deeply unethical.

There is also doubt that the stated marginal benefits have been accurately presented. According to the Government’s own modelling, vaccinating 60 per cent of 12- to 15-year-olds would prevent the loss of about 110,000 days of school in the six months between October and March 2022. This works out to 41 days per thousand pupils or just 15 minutes per child over the full six months modelled. This modelling has already been criticised by a number of commentators and experts. For example David Paton, Professor of Industrial Economics, Nottingham University Business School, suggests that the actual disruption saved could be negative – i.e. more disruption – once you factor in prior infection and the time spent on the vaccination programme itself.

Importantly, the JCVI also noted ‘considerable uncertainty regarding the magnitude of the potential harms’. In particular, the uncertainty over potential long term heart changes has been raised by Professor Adam Finn of the JCVI in a number of TV interviews.
Further, as pointed out by Christopher Chope MP in a Parliamentary Debate on 10th September 2021, the Yellow Card reporting system is showing a deeply worrying list of adverse reactions:

‘Essentially, what the yellow card scheme shows, from the most recent report, which came out on 9 September, is that there have been 435 reports of major blood clots and low platelet counts, including 74 deaths. It shows that there have been 767 cases of inflammation of the heart, a condition that is almost unheard of in medicine on a normal day-to-day basis. It shows that there have been some 35,000 reports of menstrual disorder, and there are all sorts of other effects set out in the comprehensive report. Very worryingly, it says that there are 1,632 reports of deaths having taken place shortly after vaccination.’
It is also difficult to see how under the current proposals this programme can fulfil the requirements for truly informed and voluntary consent, free from peer pressure, while taking place on school premises.

While I appreciate there are strongly held views on all sides, our children have already carried a greater burden than they ever should have been asked to bear over the last 18 months and we owe it to them to get this right by ensuring parliamentary scrutiny.
Over the last week questions have been raised in the press and Parliament and on Tuesday September 21, 9.30am, Westminster Hall, there is an urgent debate to discuss the issues surrounding the extension of the vaccination programme to children.
Please, will you attend this debate and raise the uncomfortable but necessary questions?
Best wishes,

[Name and address]


https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/usforthems-urgent-call-to-action-on-covid-jabs-for-children/