This is an important discussion paper about “boosters”.
Personally, having looked at some of the VAERS reports, it’s clear that there is a dose-response relationship, with autoimmune harms being 5-10X more common after the 2nd than the 1st dose.
Doesn’t it seem LIKELY to you, (absent a compelling explanation why not), that 3rd doses (& increasingly any Nth vaccination, is going to result in medical atrocities.
I’m expecting this outcome.
To date, the clinical, evidential case for “boosters” has simply not been made.
Best wishes
Mike Yeadon
FDA VAX ADVISERS reportedly RESIGNING over booster issue, say COVID-19 vaccine boosters unnecessary for most, ask for time to review - denied by Biden
So a group of them wrote an op ed in the Lancet. Here's part of it:
"Although the benefits of primary COVID-19 vaccination clearly outweigh the risks, there could be risks if boosters are widely introduced too soon, or too frequently, especially with vaccines that can have immune-mediated side-effects (such as myocarditis, which is more common after the second dose of some mRNA vaccines,3 or Guillain-Barre syndrome, which has been associated with adenovirus-vectored COVID-19 vaccines4). If unnecessary
boosting causes significant adverse reactions, there could be implications for vaccine acceptance that go beyond COVID-19 vaccines. Thus, widespread boosting should be undertaken only if there is clear evidence that it is appropriate."
https://www.thelancet.com/pb-assets/Lancet/pdfs/S0140673621020468.pdf
This is actually quite huge. They cannot and likely will not just come out and say bluntly that the clot shots are dangerous. Their words are carefully chosen, and this is in my opinion a huge admission.
.
Personally, having looked at some of the VAERS reports, it’s clear that there is a dose-response relationship, with autoimmune harms being 5-10X more common after the 2nd than the 1st dose.
Doesn’t it seem LIKELY to you, (absent a compelling explanation why not), that 3rd doses (& increasingly any Nth vaccination, is going to result in medical atrocities.
I’m expecting this outcome.
To date, the clinical, evidential case for “boosters” has simply not been made.
Best wishes
Mike Yeadon
FDA VAX ADVISERS reportedly RESIGNING over booster issue, say COVID-19 vaccine boosters unnecessary for most, ask for time to review - denied by Biden
So a group of them wrote an op ed in the Lancet. Here's part of it:
"Although the benefits of primary COVID-19 vaccination clearly outweigh the risks, there could be risks if boosters are widely introduced too soon, or too frequently, especially with vaccines that can have immune-mediated side-effects (such as myocarditis, which is more common after the second dose of some mRNA vaccines,3 or Guillain-Barre syndrome, which has been associated with adenovirus-vectored COVID-19 vaccines4). If unnecessary
boosting causes significant adverse reactions, there could be implications for vaccine acceptance that go beyond COVID-19 vaccines. Thus, widespread boosting should be undertaken only if there is clear evidence that it is appropriate."
https://www.thelancet.com/pb-assets/Lancet/pdfs/S0140673621020468.pdf
This is actually quite huge. They cannot and likely will not just come out and say bluntly that the clot shots are dangerous. Their words are carefully chosen, and this is in my opinion a huge admission.
.
https://www.gov.uk/government/consultations/making-vaccination-a-condition-of-deployment-in-the-health-and-wider-social-care-sector
Govt is pulling legs, suggesting that widening the vaccination mandate to all health & social care staff is a normal part of developing a public health policy using a pair of die & of red (or blue).
Since none of the available vaccines have been shown to attenuate virus transmission, and the vast preponderance of the vulnerable (residents & staff) are already vaccinated, I can’t see any basis for widening the vaccine mandates at this time.
Cheers
Mike
Govt is pulling legs, suggesting that widening the vaccination mandate to all health & social care staff is a normal part of developing a public health policy using a pair of die & of red (or blue).
Since none of the available vaccines have been shown to attenuate virus transmission, and the vast preponderance of the vulnerable (residents & staff) are already vaccinated, I can’t see any basis for widening the vaccine mandates at this time.
Cheers
Mike
GOV.UK
Making vaccination a condition of deployment in the health and wider social care sector
The government is seeking views on whether or not to extend vaccination requirements to other health and care settings for COVID-19 and also for flu.
Forwarded from The Exposé News (Official)
13 reasons why you should not allow your child to get the Covid-19 Vaccine
For a child to be competent enough to make the decision to have the vaccine they should be made aware of all the facts before they reach their decision, and the same can be said for parents who wish to consent to their child having the jab. So we’ve compiled 13 factual reasons why you should not allow your child to get the Covid-19 vaccine…
https://theexpose.uk/2021/09/14/13-reasons-why-you-should-not-allow-your-child-to-get-the-covid-19-vaccine/
Follow The Exposé
Join The Exposé Chat Group
For a child to be competent enough to make the decision to have the vaccine they should be made aware of all the facts before they reach their decision, and the same can be said for parents who wish to consent to their child having the jab. So we’ve compiled 13 factual reasons why you should not allow your child to get the Covid-19 vaccine…
https://theexpose.uk/2021/09/14/13-reasons-why-you-should-not-allow-your-child-to-get-the-covid-19-vaccine/
Follow The Exposé
Join The Exposé Chat Group
Everyone taking a "vaccine" which does not prevent infection or transmission or even death during an epidemic, is a bit like everyone taking antibiotics for one or two days just in case during a mass infection but nobody finishing the full course..
Robin Monotti
Robin Monotti
Forwarded from Knowledge Channel
Conservative MP calls for resignation of England's Chief Medical Officer Chris Whitty who wants to inject children with the COVID Vaccines
If you support his resignation then show your support on Twitter.
https://twitter.com/MarcusFysh/status/1437525038903840768
If you support his resignation then show your support on Twitter.
https://twitter.com/MarcusFysh/status/1437525038903840768
Forwarded from Oracle Films
The UK Government has launched a public consultation on whether it should require frontline health and social care staff to be vaccinated against both Covid-19 and the flu.
The requirement would apply to any health or care worker that works face-to-face with patients, and people receiving social care.
Read a summary of the proposals, and share your views:
https://www.gov.uk/government/consultations/making-vaccination-a-condition-of-deployment-in-the-health-and-wider-social-care-sector
The consultation is open until 22 October.
The requirement would apply to any health or care worker that works face-to-face with patients, and people receiving social care.
Read a summary of the proposals, and share your views:
https://www.gov.uk/government/consultations/making-vaccination-a-condition-of-deployment-in-the-health-and-wider-social-care-sector
The consultation is open until 22 October.
GOV.UK
Making vaccination a condition of deployment in the health and wider social care sector
The government is seeking views on whether or not to extend vaccination requirements to other health and care settings for COVID-19 and also for flu.
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
As we have always said: asymptomatic people are healthy people who are immune, they very rarely transmit any respiratory disease, if at all.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=NQTBlbx1Xjs
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=NQTBlbx1Xjs
OFFICIAL PUBLIC RECORD OF VACCINE DEATHS IN UK PARLIAMENT 10th September 2021
Sir Christopher Chope: Essentially, what the yellow card scheme shows—from the most recent report, which came out on 9 September and covers the period from 9 December to 1 December [1st September, this is a mistake on the transcript]—is that there have been 435 reports of major blood clots and low platelet counts, including 74 deaths. It shows that there have been 767 cases of inflammation of the heart, a condition that is almost unheard of in medicine on a normal day-to-day basis. It shows that there have been some 35,000 reports of menstrual disorder, and there are all sorts of other effects set out in the comprehensive report. 👉Very worryingly, it says that there are 1,632 reports of deaths having taken place shortly after vaccination.👈
If we are trying to build vaccine confidence, we need to ensure that we are open with the public about the facts. That is why I was very disappointed when I asked the Secretary of State on 7 July
“what information his Department holds on the number of deaths that have been reported of people who have died within (a) one month, (b) two months and (c) three months of having received a covid-19 vaccination since 1 January”.
Sally-Ann Hart
(Hastings and Rye) (Con)
Will my hon. Friend give way?
Sir Christopher Chope:
Yes, but perhaps it would be more convenient if I actually read out the answer that we received from the Minister. He said:
“Data on the number of deaths reported of people who have died within one, two and three months of having received a COVID-19 vaccination since 1 January 2021 is not available in the format requested.
Public Health England (PHE) monitors the number of people who have been admitted to hospital and died from COVID-19 who have received one or two doses of the vaccine and will publish this data in due course.”
That data has not yet been published. It is very important that we are able to put this issue into context. There is a lot more damage being done to our citizens as a result of covid-19 vaccinations than in any other vaccination programme in history."
https://hansard.parliament.uk/Commons/2021-09-10/debates/9DC43CAE-0728-4000-8AB7-7B2B8156DAA3/Covid-19VaccineDamageBill#contribution-0DA921B9-ABA9-4D8C-9528-266449CA67FA
Sir Christopher Chope: Essentially, what the yellow card scheme shows—from the most recent report, which came out on 9 September and covers the period from 9 December to 1 December [1st September, this is a mistake on the transcript]—is that there have been 435 reports of major blood clots and low platelet counts, including 74 deaths. It shows that there have been 767 cases of inflammation of the heart, a condition that is almost unheard of in medicine on a normal day-to-day basis. It shows that there have been some 35,000 reports of menstrual disorder, and there are all sorts of other effects set out in the comprehensive report. 👉Very worryingly, it says that there are 1,632 reports of deaths having taken place shortly after vaccination.👈
If we are trying to build vaccine confidence, we need to ensure that we are open with the public about the facts. That is why I was very disappointed when I asked the Secretary of State on 7 July
“what information his Department holds on the number of deaths that have been reported of people who have died within (a) one month, (b) two months and (c) three months of having received a covid-19 vaccination since 1 January”.
Sally-Ann Hart
(Hastings and Rye) (Con)
Will my hon. Friend give way?
Sir Christopher Chope:
Yes, but perhaps it would be more convenient if I actually read out the answer that we received from the Minister. He said:
“Data on the number of deaths reported of people who have died within one, two and three months of having received a COVID-19 vaccination since 1 January 2021 is not available in the format requested.
Public Health England (PHE) monitors the number of people who have been admitted to hospital and died from COVID-19 who have received one or two doses of the vaccine and will publish this data in due course.”
That data has not yet been published. It is very important that we are able to put this issue into context. There is a lot more damage being done to our citizens as a result of covid-19 vaccinations than in any other vaccination programme in history."
https://hansard.parliament.uk/Commons/2021-09-10/debates/9DC43CAE-0728-4000-8AB7-7B2B8156DAA3/Covid-19VaccineDamageBill#contribution-0DA921B9-ABA9-4D8C-9528-266449CA67FA
Forwarded from Lorna
Good Morning Britain (@GMB) are doing a poll on Twitter.
"If you have a 12 to 15 year old child, are you happy for them to receive the COVID vaccine?"
Go vote no!
https://twitter.com/GMB/status/1437656320941993986?s=20
"If you have a 12 to 15 year old child, are you happy for them to receive the COVID vaccine?"
Go vote no!
https://twitter.com/GMB/status/1437656320941993986?s=20
Twitter
If you have a 12 to 15 year old child, are you happy for them to receive the COVID vaccine?
The Double Ethical Mistake Of Vaccinating Children Against COVID-19
Alberto Giubilini
Oxford Uehiro Centre for Practical Ethics
University of Oxford
"A recent study suggests that at a time of ‘moderate’ rate of COVID-19 hospitalizations, teenage boys are 6 times more likely to suffer from heart problems after the vaccine than to be hospitalized for COVID-19 related complications.
Vaccinating children might give us (adults and more vulnerable people) some more peace of mind, but we are not entitled to peace of mind if it comes at significant cost to children.
This is the first ethical mistake: we are (once again) treating children as mere means.
Interestingly, the Chief Medical Officers do not deny the points made above. They are not claiming that vaccination is in children’s best medical interest, as they evidently accept the point that the risk of COVID-19 for young people is not sufficiently high for that.
What they claim is that vaccinating children would be overall beneficial to them because it would prevent the side effects of disruption in school education. They state that vaccination in that age group is “an adjunct to other actions to maintain children and young people in secondary school and minimise further education disruption and therefore medium- and longer-term public health harm”.
This is the second ethical mistake: we are assuming that the appropriate, or even inevitable, response to children getting infected is closing schools and isolating children.
This is part of a broader approach to pandemic response measures, where we attribute the harms imposed by the decision to close schools and to lock down society to the virus itself.
There is no reason to simply assume that we should isolate an entire classroom or even school when some child in it tests positive.
Given high rates of vaccination among vulnerable populations, widespread testing facilities, and the recognition of the harm caused to children through online schooling and self-isolation, the response to a positive case among children should arguably be re-assessed.
Isolating healthy children that we have no good enough reason to believe are infected and infectious is a choice we make, it’s not something caused by the virus. We could and arguably we should choose otherwise if we think that the harms to children of isolation and school closure outweighs any harm that COVID-19 poses on them."
http://blog.practicalethics.ox.ac.uk/2021/09/the-double-ethical-mistake-of-vaccinating-children-against-covid-19/
Alberto Giubilini
Oxford Uehiro Centre for Practical Ethics
University of Oxford
"A recent study suggests that at a time of ‘moderate’ rate of COVID-19 hospitalizations, teenage boys are 6 times more likely to suffer from heart problems after the vaccine than to be hospitalized for COVID-19 related complications.
Vaccinating children might give us (adults and more vulnerable people) some more peace of mind, but we are not entitled to peace of mind if it comes at significant cost to children.
This is the first ethical mistake: we are (once again) treating children as mere means.
Interestingly, the Chief Medical Officers do not deny the points made above. They are not claiming that vaccination is in children’s best medical interest, as they evidently accept the point that the risk of COVID-19 for young people is not sufficiently high for that.
What they claim is that vaccinating children would be overall beneficial to them because it would prevent the side effects of disruption in school education. They state that vaccination in that age group is “an adjunct to other actions to maintain children and young people in secondary school and minimise further education disruption and therefore medium- and longer-term public health harm”.
This is the second ethical mistake: we are assuming that the appropriate, or even inevitable, response to children getting infected is closing schools and isolating children.
This is part of a broader approach to pandemic response measures, where we attribute the harms imposed by the decision to close schools and to lock down society to the virus itself.
There is no reason to simply assume that we should isolate an entire classroom or even school when some child in it tests positive.
Given high rates of vaccination among vulnerable populations, widespread testing facilities, and the recognition of the harm caused to children through online schooling and self-isolation, the response to a positive case among children should arguably be re-assessed.
Isolating healthy children that we have no good enough reason to believe are infected and infectious is a choice we make, it’s not something caused by the virus. We could and arguably we should choose otherwise if we think that the harms to children of isolation and school closure outweighs any harm that COVID-19 poses on them."
http://blog.practicalethics.ox.ac.uk/2021/09/the-double-ethical-mistake-of-vaccinating-children-against-covid-19/
blog.practicalethics.ox.ac.uk
double mistake of vaccinating children | Practical Ethics
Alberto Giubilini Oxford Uehiro Centre for Practical Ethics University of Oxford Against the Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation (JCVI)'s advice that did not recommend COVID-19 vaccination for children, the four Chief Medical Officers in the UK…
Forwarded from Dr. Simon
Sustaining the Control Group
Many people keep on asking me: “Dr. Simon, what’s the endgame?” I have been thinking about it a lot, and I must admit that I can only speculate. Based on the available indications, I came up with the following hypotheses:
Every well-designed study should consist of a control group to establish a cause-and-effect relationship by isolating the effect of an independent variable. In this case, the independent variable is “receiving a treatment” (i.e. getting vaccinated). All variables apart from the treatment should be kept constant between the two groups and adequately represent the population. Clinical trials, however, hardly included any people from the risk group.
1. I think their main objective is to get rid of the control group. The longer we have a high proportion of the global population that remains unjabbed, the easier it is to see the effects on the treatment group, which is the jabbed people.
2. Currently, we see that global governments do everything they can to prevent the existence of a long-term control group. Potential adverse effects then won’t be attributable to the vaccine anymore. That means that side effects such as cardiovascular diseases, autoimmune diseases such as Alzheimer's, menstrual disorders, and maybe even infertility can be blamed on anything.
3. The main goal to take a vaccine is to protect oneself, not others. I believe that it is no coincidence that the official narrative shifted towards “protecting others”. Without that blatant lie, there’d be no basis to impose an experimental drug on the whole global population.
4. Even though this common cold virus poses no danger to healthy children and young adults, vaccine passports (some countries like Lithuania even call them opportunity passports which makes me throw up) are used to blackmail whole generations to be part of an experiment without a proper control group.
5. Worldwide, lots of data is being manipulated. In many countries, people who get hospitalised are automatically registered as Covid-positive. Also, the fraudulent Drosten-PCR test most likely results in >80-90% false-positive results, which continues to fuel the artificially generated pandemic.
6. They do not have much time to achieve their goal to get >90% vaccinated; otherwise, the difference between the two groups will be painfully evident (even though they’d try everything to cover up the evidence). As we can see, a high degree of compliance is not enough, so billions of tax money are used to intimidate and threaten you so you’ll eventually consent.
7. One last thought - people from South America or Asia who take vaccines such as Sinovac (i.e. non-vector or mRNA vaccines) are not allowed to enter the EU. In my opinion, this is part of the game, and I still don’t dare to let my mind wander along this dystopian train of thought.
Those in power and involved in this global conspiracy are desperate. Some countries such as Israel almost got their whole population vaccinated and even boostered, and their official numbers are worse than last year. The German minister of health even said that vaccinated people should not get tested anymore as otherwise, the pandemic would never end. They are not hiding it anymore, but some people still believe in everything they say. To those still standing firm, I can only give one piece of advice:
“PLEASE REMAIN IN THE CONTROL GROUP.”
This is your contribution to scientific integrity and exposing the truth. And let’s not forget that the claims of the media do not represent the truth but rather empirical evidence that is based on hard data. But that data requires a control group. And that control group needs you.
Thank you with all my heart,
Dr. Simon @Goddek
Many people keep on asking me: “Dr. Simon, what’s the endgame?” I have been thinking about it a lot, and I must admit that I can only speculate. Based on the available indications, I came up with the following hypotheses:
Every well-designed study should consist of a control group to establish a cause-and-effect relationship by isolating the effect of an independent variable. In this case, the independent variable is “receiving a treatment” (i.e. getting vaccinated). All variables apart from the treatment should be kept constant between the two groups and adequately represent the population. Clinical trials, however, hardly included any people from the risk group.
1. I think their main objective is to get rid of the control group. The longer we have a high proportion of the global population that remains unjabbed, the easier it is to see the effects on the treatment group, which is the jabbed people.
2. Currently, we see that global governments do everything they can to prevent the existence of a long-term control group. Potential adverse effects then won’t be attributable to the vaccine anymore. That means that side effects such as cardiovascular diseases, autoimmune diseases such as Alzheimer's, menstrual disorders, and maybe even infertility can be blamed on anything.
3. The main goal to take a vaccine is to protect oneself, not others. I believe that it is no coincidence that the official narrative shifted towards “protecting others”. Without that blatant lie, there’d be no basis to impose an experimental drug on the whole global population.
4. Even though this common cold virus poses no danger to healthy children and young adults, vaccine passports (some countries like Lithuania even call them opportunity passports which makes me throw up) are used to blackmail whole generations to be part of an experiment without a proper control group.
5. Worldwide, lots of data is being manipulated. In many countries, people who get hospitalised are automatically registered as Covid-positive. Also, the fraudulent Drosten-PCR test most likely results in >80-90% false-positive results, which continues to fuel the artificially generated pandemic.
6. They do not have much time to achieve their goal to get >90% vaccinated; otherwise, the difference between the two groups will be painfully evident (even though they’d try everything to cover up the evidence). As we can see, a high degree of compliance is not enough, so billions of tax money are used to intimidate and threaten you so you’ll eventually consent.
7. One last thought - people from South America or Asia who take vaccines such as Sinovac (i.e. non-vector or mRNA vaccines) are not allowed to enter the EU. In my opinion, this is part of the game, and I still don’t dare to let my mind wander along this dystopian train of thought.
Those in power and involved in this global conspiracy are desperate. Some countries such as Israel almost got their whole population vaccinated and even boostered, and their official numbers are worse than last year. The German minister of health even said that vaccinated people should not get tested anymore as otherwise, the pandemic would never end. They are not hiding it anymore, but some people still believe in everything they say. To those still standing firm, I can only give one piece of advice:
“PLEASE REMAIN IN THE CONTROL GROUP.”
This is your contribution to scientific integrity and exposing the truth. And let’s not forget that the claims of the media do not represent the truth but rather empirical evidence that is based on hard data. But that data requires a control group. And that control group needs you.
Thank you with all my heart,
Dr. Simon @Goddek
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
THE BIG LIE: That the disruption to schools is caused by respiratory viruses and not by the GOVERNMENT.
Let's sacrifice the children. After all "the virus" (+midazolam, withdrawal of antibiotics for pneumonia, early intubations, malnutrition, dehydration & psychological warfare) has a whopping 0.096% mortality rate in the population, mainly the frail and elderly..
https://questions-statements.parliament.uk/written-questions/detail/2021-07-12/31381
https://questions-statements.parliament.uk/written-questions/detail/2021-07-12/31381
Here’s a police officer who clearly distinguishes orders from illegal instructions.
Well worth a few minutes of your attention.
Best wishes,
Dr Mike Yeadon
https://rumble.com/vmdy81-time-is-up-retired-police-officer-speaks.html
Well worth a few minutes of your attention.
Best wishes,
Dr Mike Yeadon
https://rumble.com/vmdy81-time-is-up-retired-police-officer-speaks.html
Rumble
TIME IS UP - Retired Police Officer Speaks
A retired Police Officer, David Dickson from Edmonton Alberta, made a speech outside of the Alberta Legislator Building, and he has been doing so every week for the last year. He served 10 years in th
Head teacher 'threatened with legal action' over fears staff will 'advise' parents on jabs
HEAD teacher Nicola Mason admitted she is "worried" about her staff giving advice on vaccines after being "threatened with legal action" if the school tries to promote vaccination among pupils.
https://www.express.co.uk/showbiz/tv-radio/1490870/coronavirus-vaccine-children-legal-action-threat-teachers-covid19-advice-latest-VN
HEAD teacher Nicola Mason admitted she is "worried" about her staff giving advice on vaccines after being "threatened with legal action" if the school tries to promote vaccination among pupils.
https://www.express.co.uk/showbiz/tv-radio/1490870/coronavirus-vaccine-children-legal-action-threat-teachers-covid19-advice-latest-VN
Express.co.uk
Head teacher 'threatened with legal action' over vaccine jabs
HEAD teacher Nicola Mason admitted she is "worried" about her staff giving advice on vaccines after being "threatened with legal action" if the school tries to promote vaccination among pupils.
NOL for headteachers.docx
26.2 KB
Notice of Liability Letters for Headteachers attached.
Get as many people as you can to sign it and video the process of handing it over.
The newspaper article above shows that these can make a difference to what schools do if they are made to see their legal and moral responsibility in protecting children and more importantly it sadly seems; the possible consequences to themselves of failing to do this.
Get as many people as you can to sign it and video the process of handing it over.
The newspaper article above shows that these can make a difference to what schools do if they are made to see their legal and moral responsibility in protecting children and more importantly it sadly seems; the possible consequences to themselves of failing to do this.