A very dry mocked up exchange between the U.K. prime minister & his CMO & CSA.
Mike

http://www.drdavidgrimes.com/2021/09/covid-19-vitamin-d-how-do-we-get-out-of.html?m=1

MASS VACCINATIONS DURING AN EPIDEMIC IS NOT FOLLOWING THE SCIENCE, IT'S GOING AGANIST IT

"Their simplistic reasoning make them conclude that vaccinating the unvaccinated (i.e., younger age groups and children) is going to solve the problem, whereas each and every independent (!) knowledgeable expert understands that this is only going to further raise the population-level immune pressure on viral infectiousness and, therefore, promote the adaptation of additional mutations that will eventually enable full neutralization escape of circulating, highly infectious variants (Vanden Bossche, June 2021)."

https://www.geertvandenbossche.org/post/the-last-post

⬆️ SHARE ON ALL PLATFORMS

I would like to report the appeal of the lawyer Mauro Sandri (https://santalex.eu/notizie-e-video), promoter of a request to the General Court of the European Union against the European health passport, i.e. Green Pass (see https://www.euractiv.fr/section/justice-affaires-interieures/news/recours-devant-la-justice-de-lue-contre-le-pass-sanitaire-europeen/)

URGENT CALL FOR MEDICAL-STATISTICAL-SCIENTIFIC COLLABORATIONS AND CHORAL PARTICIPATION IN CASES BEFORE THE EUROPEAN TRIBUNAL

I consider those who merely speak, without directly participating in the causes against compulsory vaccination and the so-called green certificate, direct accomplice of the tellers of lies. The word does not respond and does not intend to waste time because they are useless and harmful. Who understands the reality knows that before the European Court will decide the fate of all those who oppose any discrimination determined by the self-styled green certificate before the same court will decide on compulsory vaccination administration. The domestic judiciary will adapt, as indeed is obligatorily required to do, the European one. There will be no more possible to avoid the vaccination requirement if you lose the European cases. The echo aroused by the one against the green pass, not only in Europe, where it is discussed in all major venues but also throughout the world, is significant. To pursue and try to prevail seriously, it is necessary to numerically increase participation in these causes to become a mighty mass of shock and provide scientific support from those with statistical, clinical, and scientific material. In particular, I need materials that prove that it is false that vaccines are helpful for:
Reduce the virus's circulation, reduce the development of variants, and effectively prevent the onset of severe disease and death.
I need this material and collaboration immediately at the highest possible medical-scientific and statistical levels. Activate IMMEDIATELY those who claim to be "experts". It is the last definitive call for each of us, but also for those who "claim to know". Suppose those who oppose the narrative do not pour their theses into the concrete context of the European Court, where these documents will be examined. The direction our lives will take in practice will be decided in the two legal battles in progress in Europe that will be discussed in a few weeks. It is essential that whoever will help me, attaching material inherent to the three profiles above, release a summary of the theme of the paper.
Write to the following email: documentazione.cause@gmail.com

www.euractiv.fr
Recours devant la justice de l'UE contre le pass sanitaire européen
Un recours a été introduit devant le Tribunal de l'Union européenne pour obtenir l'annulation du règlement instaurant le passe sanitaire européen, selon le site de cette juridiction et un document du Conseil de l'UE.

Watch "Online Safety Bill is a Fundamental Threat to Free Speech & Must Be Opposed." on YouTube
https://youtu.be/C5ZDGWk3E9U

In-Protection-of-Freedom-of-Speech_1429_1607.pdf

Please share everywhere

Parents, teachers, parent groups, concerned members of the public:

We need your attention and energy for the next five days:

Chris Whitty and team are due to make an announcement about the nationwide child vaccination programme roll out in schools for 12-15 year olds.

We sent a letter to the heads of OFSTED & HSE (copying many others) here: https://bit.ly/hse-ofsted, to explain:

1. This announcement is in direct opposition to the guidance from the Joint Committee on Vaccinations and Immunisations on 12-15 year olds issued on 3 Sept 2021.

2. JCVI guidance makes it clear that some children will be harmed and that “the margin of benefit... is considered too small to support universal vaccination [of this age group]”

3. It puts teachers and staff into the firing line with potential legal, health & safety and safeguarding issues.

4. This is a political decision, not made in the best interests of children.

We need your help to notify the schools, local authorities and governors of this update, please:

A. Follow this post - we will post new action steps for the next 5 days

B. Share and copy this message with/ to 10 other parents by phone, email etc.

C. Ask those 10 parents to:

a. Follow A & B

b. Go here: https://bit.ly/schooljabs to let your school, local authority, governors or trustees know about the safeguarding and safety issues*

GROUPS
Are you a like-minded group? Want to support this campaign? Join us.

Share in your group. Share with other like-minded groups.

Send us a logo to: lawyersforliberty@protonmail.com

Covid jabs for 12- to 15-year-olds ‘set to start in weeks’ across UK
NHS leaders understood to have been briefed on plans to vaccinate children, beginning from 22 September https://www.theguardian.com/society/2021/sep/11/covid-jabs-for-12--to-15-year-olds-set-to-start-in-weeks

NOTICES OF LIABILITY FOR SCHOOLS AVAILABLE ON https://ukfreedomproject.org/campaigns/preventing-covid-19-vaccination-of-children/

Please share this far and wide to help protect as many children as possible. https://t.me/ukfreedomproject

But if you are anti-vaxx you are welcome here. We don't believe the Covid injections are vaccines therefore the pro- vs anti-vaxx debate is yet another divide & conquer red herring.

MASS VACCINATIONS DURING AN EPIDEMIC IS NOT FOLLOWING THE SCIENCE, IT'S GOING AGAINST IT

"Their simplistic reasoning make them conclude that vaccinating the unvaccinated (i.e., younger age groups and children) is going to solve the problem, whereas each and every independent (!) knowledgeable expert understands that this is only going to further raise the population-level immune pressure on viral infectiousness and, therefore, promote the adaptation of additional mutations that will eventually enable full neutralization escape of circulating, highly infectious variants (Vanden Bossche, June 2021)."

Watch "The insidious face of a pandemic of variants" on YouTube
https://youtu.be/vGBDETOPAJA

https://www.geertvandenbossche.org/post/the-last-post

⚠️ UK's Chief Medical Officers Give Green Light To Covid "Vaccines" For All 12 To 15-Year-Olds

Why don't they name them? Hiding them behind their titles? If they really believe in this they should put their names to this. And photos at the top of all the articles. Why is the media protecting them from public scrutiny? Who pays their salaries, the public or Big Pharma?

Let's name them:

CHRIS WHITTY
GREGOR SMITH
FRANK ATHERTON
MICHAEL MCBRIDE

https://www.politicshome.com/news/article/uks-chief-medical-officers-give-greenlight-to-covid-vaccines-for-all-12-to-15yearolds

UK's Chief Medical Officers Give Green Light to Covid Vaccines for All 12 To 15-Year-Olds.
https://www.politicshome.com/news/article/uks-chief-medical-officers-give-greenlight-to-covid-vaccines-for-all-12-to-15yearolds

If you wish to contact them here are their details:

England
Chris Whitty
Telephone: 020 3447 9645
Email: c.whitty@nhs.net
Twitter: @CMO_England

Scotland
Gregor Smith
Email: cmo@gov.scot
PA: Rebekah.carton@gov.scot

Wales
Frank Atherton
Tel: 0300 0257 028
Email: PSChiefMedicalOfficer@wales.gsi.gov.uk

Northern Ireland
Michael McBride
Tel: 028 9052 0563
Email Michael.McBride@health-ni.gov.uk

Masking Schoolchildren is Institutional Child Abuse | The BMJ

"Not only is physical health harmed but also the psychological and emotional development of the child is inevitably affected by inhibiting normal communication via speech and facial expression, risking mental health problems and underdeveloped social skills, including empathy.

Those individuals who mandate or enforce such irrational and harmful policies are guilty of nothing less than Institutional Child Abuse.

Anyone in a position of responsibility is legally obliged to prevent harm to those in their care and failure to do so represents a dereliction of duty.

So, when is the Medical Profession going to speak out and take action to prevent harm to child patients?

In the absence of medical ethics, let us hope that parents can find the courage to protect their offspring from those who continue to undermine the younger generation by means of reckless and unjustifiable policies."

Janet Menage
GP (retired)
None
Wales, UK

https://www.bmj.com/content/374/bmj.n1730/rr-2

Dear Head Teacher,

I am the parent/guardian/advocate for …………………………(child at your school).

I have sought expert advice and established that my child named above is at unacceptable risk of suffering a life threatening adverse event following the Covid-19 vaccination.

As a result of this I demand you do not allow anyone to vaccinate my child at any time.

The JCVI advice upon which the decision to proceed with the vaccine rollout is generalised for all children, and has NOT BEEN INDIVIDUALISED FOR MY PARTICULAR CHILD and I will not permit you to risk ENDANGERING his/her health, or even his/her life in the interests of society at large. You should be aware that there is an injunction application currently under way to the courts https://www.laworfiction.com/2021/09/injunction-application-made-to-court-to-pause-roll-out/.

With the help of our advisors, we have investigated the various risk factors that pertain to this injection including excipient allergens, and other components. The detailed assessment has been made on an individual basis for my child and his/her health history, medication history and diet, as well as predisposition to health issues within our family .

As the parent/guardian for my child I am ultimately responsible for their safety and wellbeing and do not delegate this to you in this regard as you cannot possibly be expected to have the time to explore to this level of detail for each and every individual child in your care.

Based on the detailed findings of this risk assessment, I expressly forbid this vaccination to be given to my child and will hold you PERSONALLY both civilly and criminally responsible for any harm that arises in either the short term (anaphylactic shock) medium term or long term, including myocarditis, pericarditis, blood clotting abnormalities, neurological injury such as transverse myelitis, Bell’s palsy, damage to fertility, ovarian damage(delete if male) and impact on puberty, physical maturation etc.
Information about the uneven distribution of this novel medicine within the bodies of children has not been sufficiently considered in the decision to extend to their age group, as per Pfizer’s own pharmacokinetics data, the risk of puberty blocking and the high rates of heart inflammation in young people especially boys, as reflected in the MHRA yellow card system all of which I consider negligent, so to proceed is failing YOUR DUTY OF CARE TO MY CHILD. The concept of using ‘Gillick competency’ which was established for fully reversible contraception, has been superseded by the 2020 case Bell v. Tavistock NHS Trust, which ruled that children DO NOT HAVE CAPACITY to decide about any experimental medical treatment that has permanent life altering impact. https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/Bell-v-Tavistock-Clinic-and-ors-Summary.pdf

An individual’s rights cannot be set aside for the benefit of society, and the welfare of the child is PARAMOUNT; yet this seems to be the intention here. Children seldom experience severe illness if they catch the infection; injecting them with a medicine that has to date killed over 1600 and caused in excess of a million injuries in the UK alone, for minimal benefit to them personally is indefensible.
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/coronavirus-covid-19-vaccine-adverse-reactions

Where there are conflicting human rights; the welfare of the child is paramount and enshrined in law.

My child is not deemed mature enough to purchase alcohol or cigarettes, yet you expect him/her to decide about a medical treatment that could irreversibly damage his/her health.
I will be taking civil action against YOU personally if you FAIL TO protect my child from this medical procedure which has now been clearly identified as dangerous to MY CHILD.

Date:………….. …….………………………….. signed Parent of ……………………………..