12PM Parliament Square London
8th September 2021

UNESCO UNIVERSAL DECLARATION OF BIOETHICS & HUMAN RIGHTS, 2005.

Article 6:
1. Any 𝗽𝗿𝗲𝘃𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗶𝘃𝗲, 𝗱𝗶𝗮𝗴𝗻𝗼𝘀𝘁𝗶𝗰 & 𝘁𝗵𝗲𝗿𝗮𝗽𝗲𝘂𝘁𝗶𝗰 medical intervention is only to be carried out with the prior, free & informed 𝗖𝗢𝗡𝗦𝗘𝗡𝗧 of the person concerned based on adequate information. The consent should, where appropriate, be express and may be withdrawn by the person concerned at any time and for any reason WITHOUT DISADVANTAGE OR PREJUDICE .

2. Scientific research should only be carried out with the prior, free, express and informed consent of the person concerned. The information should be adequate, provided in a comprehensible form and should include modalities for withdrawal of consent. Consent may be withdrawn by the person concerned at any time and for any reason without any disadvantage or prejudice.

http://portal.unesco.org/en/ev.php-URL_ID=31058&URL_DO=DO_TOPIC&URL_SECTION=201.html

PRO-HUMAN RIGHTS

Universal & inalienable human rights applied to bioethics may not matter to our politicians, lawyers, judges, courts, healthcare workers, teachers or colleagues, but they matter to me.

They are still there though, written in plain English in a clear Declaration approved by almost every country on the planet and are irrefutable with no possibility of misunderstanding or misinterpretation: the UNESCO UNIVERSAL DECLARATION ON BIOETHICS & HUMAN RIGHTS.

That is what I am fighting for: to hold onto and remind everyone else about our inalienable human rights with regards to bioethics. They are there and are set in stone regardless of whether anybody in the legal system is helping us to uphold them or not.

Robin Monotti

The way I understand it, this study yet again indicated, in September 2020, that basing a vaccine on the spike protein would neither be safe, or effective. Yet all we got were spike protein "vaccines". No Western Big Pharma tried and marketed anything else. Coincidence?

Molecular mimicry between SARS-CoV-2 spike glycoprotein and mammalian proteomes: implications for the vaccine | SpringerLink

"Finally, this study once more reiterates the concept that only vaccines based on minimal immune determinants unique to pathogens and absent in the human proteome might offer the possibility of safe and efficacious vaccines"

"The rationale is that, following an infection, the immune responses raised against the pathogen can cross-react with human proteins that share peptide sequences (or structures) with the pathogen, in this way, leading to harmful autoimmune pathologies [3, 4].

Accordingly, lungs and airways dysfunctions associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection might be explained by the sharing of peptides between SARS-CoV-2 spike glycoprotein and alveolar lung surfactant proteins"

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs12026-020-09152-6

Selenium supplementation in the prevention of coronavirus infections (COVID-19) - ScienceDirect

"In view of the facts mentioned above it seems logical to assume that sodium selenite could represent a potential agent for the prevention of viral infections including coronavirus, according to the mechanism suggested for the Ebola virus [21]. In the paper presented by Jayawarden [22], the authors stated that selenium supplementation inhibited the development of polio and influenza virus. Which also agrees with our hypothesis that selenium strengthens the immune system. This element increases the proliferation of natural killer (NK) cells. Selenium also has a positive effect in combination with some vitamins (D, E) as presented in the work Delesderrier et al. [23]. The combination of phytoncides found in onions along with selenium increased T lymphocyte proliferation [24].

In addition, selenium reduces the formation of thrombosis in the blood vessels. According to Fogarty [25], blood coagulation disorders leading to the formation of micro-clots are a significant cause of death in patients with COVID-19.

We believe that the use of sodium selenite in anticoagulation therapy may reduce the risk of blood clots forming (formation of high-molecular polymer - parafibrin) in patients with COVID-19 particularly at risk for its severe course. It should be mentioned that this chemical reagent is rather inexpensive and readily available. It is only unfortunately that physicians, having limited knowledge of this mineral, cannot understand that such a simple chemical substance can have such dramatic health effects."

"Therefore, it is advisable to supplement diet with this element albeit in a proper form. Although blood increased concentrations of Se can be achieved with various pharmacological preparations, only one chemical form (sodium selenite) can offer a true protection. Sodium selenite, but not selenate, can oxidize thiol groups in the virus protein disulfide isomerase rendering it unable to penetrate the healthy cell membrane. In this way selenite inhibits the entrance of viruses into the healthy cells and abolish their infectivity. Therefore, this simple chemical compound can potentially be used in the recent battle against coronavirus epidemic."

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S030698772031104X?via%3Dihub#b0110

"Ethics 101. Dr. Julie Ponesse, professor of Ethics at the University of Western Ontario, provides a lesson in courage and integrity."

On September 7, 2021, Julie Ponesse, Ethics Professor Huron College University of Western, London, ON Canada was dismissed for not submitting to medical experimentation.

This same video of Dr Julie Ponesse - discussing her dismissal - has already been deleted by youtube. So please spread bitchute video widely.

The numbers in the table are based on the official current rates of death and injury in adults following the experimental Covid-19 injections (MHRA (UK) data to 25th August).

For calculations and links to source data see document below 👇👇

The numbers above show the possible impact to children from the Covid injections; this excludes any additional impact to the development of a child and any possible long term implications to their future health and fertility

Contains calculations and source data to table above

Table 1 of 2
Table shows the number of injuries and fatalities reported in adults following the experimental Covid-19 injections as reported, accepted and input by the MHRA (UK) to 25th August 2021.

Additional impact on the development of child and any long terms implications to their future health and fertility are currently unknown

Link to data:
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/coronavirus-covid-19-vaccine-adverse-reactions

Table 2 of 2

Table shows the number of injuries and fatalities reported in adults following the experimental Covid-19 injections as accepted and input by the MHRA (UK) to 25th August 2021.

Additional impact on the development of child and any long terms implications to their future health and fertility are currently unknown

Link to data:
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/coronavirus-covid-19-vaccine-adverse-reactions

Many doctors said that putting "Covid patients" on ventilators was the wrong thing from the start but it hasn’t stopped this happening.

Covid-19 Injections were supposed to reduce symptoms, hospitalisations and deaths

Are they working?

Link to data:
https://www.england.nhs.uk/statistics/statistical-work-areas/covid-19-hospital-activity/

The number of people the govt said died with Covid increased dramatically on the roll out of the Covid-19 injections.

In addition the number of people during this period who died outside of hospital (homes and care homes) also dramatically increased.

How did the govt know these people outside of hospital were Covid positive or were they just hiding Covid injection deaths?

To confirm these numbers you need to look at total deaths in England and subtract Covid deaths in hospital

Hospital Deaths England: https://www.england.nhs.uk/statistics/statistical-work-areas/covid-19-daily-deaths/

Total Covid deaths England: https://coronavirus.data.gov.uk/details/deaths?areaType=nation&areaName=England

A recent interview with Dr Peter McCullough

https://rumble.com/vm7orv-the-latest-on-early-treatment-and-vaccine-safety-peter-mccullough-md-mph.html

A very recent official letter to FDA, CDC & NIH from Senator Ron Johnson (R-WIS).

In it a recent preprint paper shows a novel mechanism whereby coronavirus spike protein can injure cells: CD147, which links to a kinase cascade of intracellular signalling.
This pathway is most unlikely to be used during natural infection because it’s uncommon to have much viraemia (virus in the blood in quantity) & most circulating viruses either get gobbled up by defensive white blood cells or manage to infect a lining (or endothelial) cell in the circulation,
It is only when our bodies get hi-jacked to make large amounts of soluble spike protein in random locations that the scenario described in this paper is likely to occur.
Note that there are increasing reports, now officially recognised, of myocarditis. Inflammation of the heart, which though it’s often survived, DOES NOT RECOVER.
When young men get this vaccine side effects, over a third of them will die if they don’t get a heart transplant.
Please share this letter,
Best wishes
Mike

Folks,
I don’t recall where I first saw this panic porn. I’m extremely sceptical.
It wasn’t until mass vaccination that we started to hear of brain blood clots, disseminated intravascular coagulation & myocarditis, let alone pulmonary embolism at 400X higher rates following covid19 vaccination than after any vaccine in the several decades of VAERS.
So I call BS.

I noticed there doesn’t seem to be a link to the claimed “large U.K. study”.

I’d like to show this up as a lie if I can.

If anyone can find the study they’re referring to, please post a link in reply.

Many thanks!
Mike


“According to the large U.K. study, Covid-19 causes thousands more clots compared with shots from AstraZeneca or the partnership of Pfizer and BioNTech. For every 10 million people who receive the first dose of Astra, only 66 people are likely to suffer a rare clotting syndrome, on top of the normal cases expected in that population, the study reported. But in the same number of people who test positive for Covid-19, 12,614 potentially life-threatening clots would be expected”.


https://www.bloomberg.com/news/newsletters/2021-08-31/blood-clot-risk-greater-from-covid-19-than-vaccines