SAVE LIVES, OR MAYBE NOT.

For an injection to be proved to reduce mortality from a virus with a ~99.9% survival rate the injection would need to give a ~100% survival rate. As this is not happening in those who received the injections then it is numerically certain that the Covid injections are NOT saving lives.

SAFE AND EFFECTIVE

It is claimed that the injection will reduce the severity of Covid19 which has a ~99.9% survival rate. Numbers show it is not reducing the risk of death from Covid19, yet it increase the risk of death from blood clots and heart attacks. It is not difficult to see why treatment if and when infected is the safest option by far.

INFORMED CONSENT

If the spike injections require informed consent to be administered, yet there is no long term information as to their adverse effects, then it follows that informed consent is not possible by definition. There is long term information on the treatments, therefore informed consent is only possible for the treatments, not the injections.

Sent to me by colleagues, please examine this FDA letter to Pfizer—it lists the many safety studies yet to be undertaken by Pfizer, and in some cases the completion dates for these studies are in 2025. The list of safety studies to be undertaken begins on page 5, and consists of 13 individual studies.

#covid19 #FDA #Pfizer

Despite 95% vaccination rate, Cornell today has five times more COVID cases than it did this time last year

EXTRACT:

Cornell University has aggressively pushed its students to get vaccinated, announcing a vaccine mandate for the 2021-22 academic year in April and frequently denying religious and medical exemptions.

As a result, 95 percent of the campus population, both students and faculty, is vaccinated.

Despite this, Cornell University has more than five times the amount of confirmed positive cases during its first week of this academic year than it did during its first week of the 2020-21 academic year, according to the Cornell COVID dashboard....

Most students attended in-person classes in the fall of 2020 and were required to wear masks, just like this academic year. The increase in positive cases cannot be attributed to an increase in testing — in fact, more tests were administered in the first week last fall, according to the Cornell COVID dashboard....

CONTINUE HERE:
https://www.thecollegefix.com/despite-95-vaccination-rate-cornell-today-has-five-times-more-covid-cases-than-it-did-this-time-last-year/

#covid19 #universities #mandatory_vaccination

12PM Parliament Square London
8th September 2021

UNESCO UNIVERSAL DECLARATION OF BIOETHICS & HUMAN RIGHTS, 2005.

Article 6:
1. Any 𝗽𝗿𝗲𝘃𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗶𝘃𝗲, 𝗱𝗶𝗮𝗴𝗻𝗼𝘀𝘁𝗶𝗰 & 𝘁𝗵𝗲𝗿𝗮𝗽𝗲𝘂𝘁𝗶𝗰 medical intervention is only to be carried out with the prior, free & informed 𝗖𝗢𝗡𝗦𝗘𝗡𝗧 of the person concerned based on adequate information. The consent should, where appropriate, be express and may be withdrawn by the person concerned at any time and for any reason WITHOUT DISADVANTAGE OR PREJUDICE .

2. Scientific research should only be carried out with the prior, free, express and informed consent of the person concerned. The information should be adequate, provided in a comprehensible form and should include modalities for withdrawal of consent. Consent may be withdrawn by the person concerned at any time and for any reason without any disadvantage or prejudice.

http://portal.unesco.org/en/ev.php-URL_ID=31058&URL_DO=DO_TOPIC&URL_SECTION=201.html

PRO-HUMAN RIGHTS

Universal & inalienable human rights applied to bioethics may not matter to our politicians, lawyers, judges, courts, healthcare workers, teachers or colleagues, but they matter to me.

They are still there though, written in plain English in a clear Declaration approved by almost every country on the planet and are irrefutable with no possibility of misunderstanding or misinterpretation: the UNESCO UNIVERSAL DECLARATION ON BIOETHICS & HUMAN RIGHTS.

That is what I am fighting for: to hold onto and remind everyone else about our inalienable human rights with regards to bioethics. They are there and are set in stone regardless of whether anybody in the legal system is helping us to uphold them or not.

Robin Monotti

The way I understand it, this study yet again indicated, in September 2020, that basing a vaccine on the spike protein would neither be safe, or effective. Yet all we got were spike protein "vaccines". No Western Big Pharma tried and marketed anything else. Coincidence?

Molecular mimicry between SARS-CoV-2 spike glycoprotein and mammalian proteomes: implications for the vaccine | SpringerLink

"Finally, this study once more reiterates the concept that only vaccines based on minimal immune determinants unique to pathogens and absent in the human proteome might offer the possibility of safe and efficacious vaccines"

"The rationale is that, following an infection, the immune responses raised against the pathogen can cross-react with human proteins that share peptide sequences (or structures) with the pathogen, in this way, leading to harmful autoimmune pathologies [3, 4].

Accordingly, lungs and airways dysfunctions associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection might be explained by the sharing of peptides between SARS-CoV-2 spike glycoprotein and alveolar lung surfactant proteins"

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs12026-020-09152-6

Selenium supplementation in the prevention of coronavirus infections (COVID-19) - ScienceDirect

"In view of the facts mentioned above it seems logical to assume that sodium selenite could represent a potential agent for the prevention of viral infections including coronavirus, according to the mechanism suggested for the Ebola virus [21]. In the paper presented by Jayawarden [22], the authors stated that selenium supplementation inhibited the development of polio and influenza virus. Which also agrees with our hypothesis that selenium strengthens the immune system. This element increases the proliferation of natural killer (NK) cells. Selenium also has a positive effect in combination with some vitamins (D, E) as presented in the work Delesderrier et al. [23]. The combination of phytoncides found in onions along with selenium increased T lymphocyte proliferation [24].

In addition, selenium reduces the formation of thrombosis in the blood vessels. According to Fogarty [25], blood coagulation disorders leading to the formation of micro-clots are a significant cause of death in patients with COVID-19.

We believe that the use of sodium selenite in anticoagulation therapy may reduce the risk of blood clots forming (formation of high-molecular polymer - parafibrin) in patients with COVID-19 particularly at risk for its severe course. It should be mentioned that this chemical reagent is rather inexpensive and readily available. It is only unfortunately that physicians, having limited knowledge of this mineral, cannot understand that such a simple chemical substance can have such dramatic health effects."

"Therefore, it is advisable to supplement diet with this element albeit in a proper form. Although blood increased concentrations of Se can be achieved with various pharmacological preparations, only one chemical form (sodium selenite) can offer a true protection. Sodium selenite, but not selenate, can oxidize thiol groups in the virus protein disulfide isomerase rendering it unable to penetrate the healthy cell membrane. In this way selenite inhibits the entrance of viruses into the healthy cells and abolish their infectivity. Therefore, this simple chemical compound can potentially be used in the recent battle against coronavirus epidemic."

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S030698772031104X?via%3Dihub#b0110

"Ethics 101. Dr. Julie Ponesse, professor of Ethics at the University of Western Ontario, provides a lesson in courage and integrity."

On September 7, 2021, Julie Ponesse, Ethics Professor Huron College University of Western, London, ON Canada was dismissed for not submitting to medical experimentation.

This same video of Dr Julie Ponesse - discussing her dismissal - has already been deleted by youtube. So please spread bitchute video widely.

The numbers in the table are based on the official current rates of death and injury in adults following the experimental Covid-19 injections (MHRA (UK) data to 25th August).

For calculations and links to source data see document below 👇👇

The numbers above show the possible impact to children from the Covid injections; this excludes any additional impact to the development of a child and any possible long term implications to their future health and fertility

Contains calculations and source data to table above

Table 1 of 2
Table shows the number of injuries and fatalities reported in adults following the experimental Covid-19 injections as reported, accepted and input by the MHRA (UK) to 25th August 2021.

Additional impact on the development of child and any long terms implications to their future health and fertility are currently unknown

Link to data:
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/coronavirus-covid-19-vaccine-adverse-reactions

Table 2 of 2

Table shows the number of injuries and fatalities reported in adults following the experimental Covid-19 injections as accepted and input by the MHRA (UK) to 25th August 2021.

Additional impact on the development of child and any long terms implications to their future health and fertility are currently unknown

Link to data:
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/coronavirus-covid-19-vaccine-adverse-reactions

Many doctors said that putting "Covid patients" on ventilators was the wrong thing from the start but it hasn’t stopped this happening.

Covid-19 Injections were supposed to reduce symptoms, hospitalisations and deaths

Are they working?

Link to data:
https://www.england.nhs.uk/statistics/statistical-work-areas/covid-19-hospital-activity/