Face Mask Discrimination Letter
https://democracydeclaration.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/Face_masks_discrimination_template_letter-1.pdf

Testing in Schools Open Letter to MPs
https://democracydeclaration.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/Testing-in-Schools-Open-Letter-to-MPs.pdf

The PCR test at 35 cycle thresholds or over does not detect a Covid19 case. It detects inactive SARSCoV2 (if not any SARS or coronavirus) viral fragments, up to two months old. If there are symptoms, they could simply be symptoms of any influenza, common cold, rhinovirus, or any other respiratory disease. The same goes for deaths counted within say 28 days of a positive PCR test at over 35 cycle thresholds. SAGE minutes in comments below indicate live viral load which is high enough for transmission is only found at 24 cycle thresholds or under.

Steve Baker: "👀An outline of a new Public Health Act ⤵️

Thank you Lord Sumption for your assistance 👏 "

"A recent study in the journal Cancer Discovery found that inhalation of harmful microbes can contribute to advanced stage lung cancer in adults. Long-term use of face masks may help breed these dangerous pathogens.
Microbiologists agree that frequent mask wearing creates a moist environment in which microbes are allowed to grow and proliferate before entering the lungs. Those foreign microbes then travel down the trachea and into two tubes called the bronchi until they reach small air sacks covered in blood vessels called alveoli."
https://geopolitic.org/2021/02/04/long-term-mask-use-may-contribute-to-advanced-stage-lung-cancer-study-finds

How face masks increase Covid19 risks: Nebulization may "result in viral particles lingering longer and traveling farther in airspace from a masked person than exhaled respiratory droplets falling close to the body from the orifices of an unmasked person."
https://pdmj.org/papers/masks_false_safety_and_real_dangers_part4/

aaqr-20-07-covid-0403.pdf

Concentrations of carbon dioxide measured for all three types of face masks while working on the computer, remaining
seated all of the time and breathing through the nose
https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.2020.07.0403

"Concentrations [of carbon dioxide when wearing any type of face mask] in the detected range can cause undesirable symptoms, such as fatigue, headache, and loss of concentration":
"Effect of Wearing Face Masks on the Carbon Dioxide Concentration in the Breathing Zone
Special Issue on COVID-19 Aerosol Drivers, Impacts and Mitigation (X) 2021 - Volume 21 Volume 21, Issue 2, February 2021"
https://aaqr.org/articles/aaqr-20-07-covid-0403

Luke Freeman - ‼️BRITISH POLICE BULLYING THE PUBLIC FOR...
https://m.facebook.com/100061361442974/videos/115004257221622/

UK government science is wrong. What do they pay SAGE for? The dangerous SARSCoV2 spread is by fine aerosols, NOT droplets! WRONG: "The reason for using face coverings Coronavirus (COVID-19) usually spreads by droplets from coughs, sneezes and speaking."
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/face-coverings-when-to-wear-one-and-how-to-make-your-own/face-coverings-when-to-wear-one-and-how-to-make-your-own

Exemption from face covering badge (for mobile phone)
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/903452/Exemption_from_face_covering_badge_for_mobile_phone.pdf

GUIDANCE is not LAW
"Police forces should be enforcing law, not the guidance
Ambiguity over the boundary between law & guidance creates important risks.
First, there is a risk that the police act beyond their powers and interfere unlawfully with people’s liberty.
They have powers to enforce the law and maintain public order, but they are not empowered to enforce the government’s guidance where it is more demanding than the law. If police forces do act beyond their powers, they are vulnerable to judicial review (or, civil claims). Any overreach also makes it more likely that the regulations themselves will be challenged in court – there is some uncertainty as to whether the restrictions are lawful. 
The second risk is that law-abiding people will see police forces and the government using mandatory language to communicate the guidance and be deterred from lawful, harmless excursions for which they have good reasons."
https://www.instituteforgovernment.org.uk/blog/government-law-and-guidance-coronavirus-crisis

Tony Benn called out Bill Gates in 2001:

The elephant in the room of the push for vaccine passports? Natural immunity. Let's just say, to simplify, that natural immunity is the best form of immunity, therefore the best form of "protecting others" from being infected, if that is to be the logic, which of course is wrong. It's wrong because it is not our remit to protect others from something only a combination of their immune system & their personal judgement & lifestyle & access to treatments can protect them from. This protecting others places the ball on the wrong court, & wrong side of it. However, if we decide to entertain the preposterous notion of protecting others from something only they can protect themselves from, then hands down the best way to do this is to have been exposed to SARSCoV2 ourselves so our immune system is already equipped to limit viral load. As Mike Yeadon pointed out "For BOTH flu & covid19, risks of death rise steeply with age & underlying illness.
The line is steeper with covid19 than with flu. The effect of this is as age falls, the risks from covid falls faster than the risks from flu" If you are in age category that has high risks of severe Covid19, have underlying morbidities, are not taking vitamin D & zinc, Omega-3 fatty acids or daily vegetables & fruit then perhaps you should address those aspects before demanding others inject! And even if there was a virus that was so dangerous to warrant such a preposterous measure as immunity passports for public life [there is currently no such virus except perhaps Ebola], the best one of these passports would be, hands down, a natural immunity passport. And guess how we would be able to tell if someone has natural immunity? No not antibody tests, as antibodies recede in months, but T-cell tests. Wonder why you never heard of them? Maybe because vaccine passports are NOT about protecting others after all..
https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/covid-19-how-a-new-blood-test-could-help-speed-up-vaccine-development-and-population-screening

Lateral flow tests for access to public venues: Let me explain to those who don't get it what this is all about. No it's NOT about keeping others safe, that is a preposterous notion with no immunological basis. It is about TESTING ASYMPTOMATICS TO RAMP UP THE FALSE POSITIVES & INDUCE A PSEUDOEPIDEMIC of false positives. Yes, you got it, it is about..wait for it..wait for it...BAYES THEOREM! https://twitter.com/robinmonotti/status/1336912517642260480?s=19 Which of course Matt Hancock, (and Bill Gates) know very well.
https://twitter.com/robinmonotti/status/1338788051015913472?s=19

Here is some info on Vallance , Whitty , Ferguson and Gates

Sir Patrick Vallance, Government Chief Scientific Adviser, spent 12 years at GSK and was appointed to the Executive Board of GSK in January 2017. He left a year later to take up his role within the UK government. GSK received generous funding from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation during Vallances time at the GSK:
https://www.gatesfoundation.org/How-We-Work/Quick-Links/Grants-Database?fbclid=IwAR2LaKHxfRZlBa8sDtllPTptrmx_CIigJRGQOxLCh3PeEu6YFh4cQmzNFgI#q/k=GlaxoSmithKline
Vallance went straight from this role at GSK to being the Chief Scientific Adviser to the UK Govt
“In 2013, a new partnership between GSK and the Gates Foundation was announced: to “accelerate research into vaccines for global health needs”. (Source UK Column) “
https://www.ukcolumn.org/article/covid%E2%80%9319-big-pharma-players-behind-uk-government-lockdown?fbclid=IwAR1UskYqh4jQjv-yjg9pthggQcA5EhNEpBL8ngF73vhOvuISmyRHylVcxBc

This same UK Column article notes:
“Just as Sir Patrick Vallance was linked to GSK, so Chris Whitty, the UK Government's Chief Medical Advisor, was on the interim board of CEPI until the permanent board was announced in 2018. Should we be surprised that the UK Government has invested £50 million in CEPI while being advised by Whitty?”
https://cepi.net/about/whoweare/?fbclid=IwAR0bJnWdHS6j2lZOK4bgzvDErML89bms5yRi24zGU73frfT0VZj_mdXq-o4
CEPI was launched in Davos in 2017 to develop vaccines to stop future epidemics. Interesting Farrar from the Wellcome Trust is also on the Board of CEPI.
https://cepi.net/about/whoweare/?fbclid=IwAR0bJnWdHS6j2lZOK4bgzvDErML89bms5yRi24zGU73frfT0VZj_mdXq-o4
In July 2020 the UK govt signed a contract with GSK to supply 60 million Covid19 vaccines:
https://www.marketwatch.com/story/sanofi-gsk-to-supply-uk-with-covid-19-vaccines-2020-07-29?fbclid=IwAR2EaRO23fHZKtayfygdQCG73kit36M7a1U4PCEpryB25CpCwMYwLDH_aog
Chris Whitty (Chief Medical Officer), Neil Ferguson (Imperial College) and Jeremy Farrar (Wellcome Trust) are old friends and wrote a paper together as far back as 2014.
https://www.nature.com/news/polopoly_fs/1.16298!/menu/main/topColumns/topLeftColumn/pdf/515192a.pdf?fbclid=IwAR0kU3flb3vdqvsw2MbD56yde0C86nejcX80jqM2u1w2qCEigWOyCOh2zV4
Chief Medical Officer, Chris Whitty who received $40m in research funding from Gates. Whitty is also on the Executive Board of the WHO
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-8077813/Story-Chris-Whitty-Oxford-graduate-leading-Britains-fight-against-coronavirus.html?fbclid=IwAR19mjYFc-ghKXsXhHhzSoCniOqrPlGFm72dz_-QRF3gS5V0u1yEhN84vFY
Bill Gates is also now one of the biggest funder of The World Health Organisation:
https://www.gatesfoundation.org/How-We-Work/Quick-Links/Grants-Database?fbclid=IwAR19mjYFc-ghKXsXhHhzSoCniOqrPlGFm72dz_-QRF3gS5V0u1yEhN84vFY#q/k=world%20health%20organization
Worth a look at this article too : (A different Whitty mentioned but worth a read)
https://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2017/12/06/tom-jefferson-the-uk-turns-to-witty-vallance-and-van-tam-for-leadership-revolving-doors/?fbclid=IwAR0sb-rU6-UmYK9B0K1hBK5AOd9tOyZ8xtBLdjA5x-iMEmR6qKa4fpTVs0w