A new study, involving over 25,000 school-aged children, shows that masks are harming schoolchildren physically, psychologically, and behaviorally, revealing 24 distinct health issues associated with wearing masks.
https://montanadailygazette.com/2021/01/25/new-study-finds-masks-hurt-schoolchildren-physically-psychologically-and-behaviorally/
https://montanadailygazette.com/2021/01/25/new-study-finds-masks-hurt-schoolchildren-physically-psychologically-and-behaviorally/
January 11th, 2020: Where the PCR test assays come from: the internet. No checks, no controls. But is this early article telling us a lot more? Read this carefully: "News about the sequence came from Edward Holmes, a virologist and evolutionary biologist at the University of Sydney, who tweeted the first notice about the availability of what he referred to as an “initial” sequence of the virus early this morning. Holmes is a member of a consortium led by Yong-Zhen Zhang of the Shanghai Public Health Clinical Center & School of Public Health that posted the sequence on an open-access site, virological.org. The consortium said it had also deposited the sequence in GenBank..
Ralph Baric, a coronavirus researcher at the University of North Carolina..After downloading the sequence last night, his lab immediately began to try to reverse-engineer a live virus from the sequence.. “If you want to have a strong public health response, you have to do this quickly,” says Baric, who leads one of the few labs in the world that can re-create coronaviruses just from their sequences. (Bureaucratic hurdles would make it difficult for China to ship the actual virus quickly to other countries, he says.)
https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2020/01/chinese-researchers-reveal-draft-genome-virus-implicated-wuhan-pneumonia-outbreak
Ralph Baric, a coronavirus researcher at the University of North Carolina..After downloading the sequence last night, his lab immediately began to try to reverse-engineer a live virus from the sequence.. “If you want to have a strong public health response, you have to do this quickly,” says Baric, who leads one of the few labs in the world that can re-create coronaviruses just from their sequences. (Bureaucratic hurdles would make it difficult for China to ship the actual virus quickly to other countries, he says.)
https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2020/01/chinese-researchers-reveal-draft-genome-virus-implicated-wuhan-pneumonia-outbreak
Science
Chinese researchers reveal draft genome of virus implicated in Wuhan pneumonia outbreak
Scientists praise decision to make date public; U.S. group sets out to produce live virus from the sequence
40% of first wave Covid cases caught in hospitals:
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2021/02/12/40-per-cent-first-wave-covid-cases-could-have-caught-hospitals/
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2021/02/12/40-per-cent-first-wave-covid-cases-could-have-caught-hospitals/
The Telegraph
Up to 40 per cent of first wave Covid cases could have been caught in hospitals
Hospital-acquired infections may have had 'high impact' on mortality and prolonged initial wave by several weeks
Mike Yeadon adds context to the vaccination question:
"For context to consideration of risks, I think it relevant to examine risks from flu & whether vaccination makes sense.
For both flu & covid19, risks of death rise steeply with age & underlying illness.
The line is steeper with covid19 than with flu. The effect of this is as age falls, the risks from covid falls faster than the risks from flu.
I think this is a reasonable position: those who aren’t at sufficient risk from flu to seek vaccination should not seek covid19 vaccination, because the risk for them from covid19 is lower than from flu. Yet they didn’t think of the flu risk was sufficiently great to warrant reducing it via vaccination.
I hope these ramblings are of interest, even if you disagree with them, which you’re wholly entitled to!
Best wishes, Mike"
"For context to consideration of risks, I think it relevant to examine risks from flu & whether vaccination makes sense.
For both flu & covid19, risks of death rise steeply with age & underlying illness.
The line is steeper with covid19 than with flu. The effect of this is as age falls, the risks from covid falls faster than the risks from flu.
I think this is a reasonable position: those who aren’t at sufficient risk from flu to seek vaccination should not seek covid19 vaccination, because the risk for them from covid19 is lower than from flu. Yet they didn’t think of the flu risk was sufficiently great to warrant reducing it via vaccination.
I hope these ramblings are of interest, even if you disagree with them, which you’re wholly entitled to!
Best wishes, Mike"
Karl Popper's Falsification Principle: how to divide science from non-science. Science: For a theory to be considered scientific it must be able to be tested (for medicine this means with evidence) and conceivably proven false. "The science" is only what could be proven false.
For Popper, science should always attempt to disprove a theory, rather than attempt to continually support theoretical hypotheses (eg that epidemiological modelling based on limited data & possibly flawed assumptions is a reflection of reality despite evidence to the contrary).
Scientific progress happens through proving theories wrong or partially wrong. The moment something is declared outside the boundaries of being able to be proved wrong (eg lockdowns, face masks & vaccines) then it is no longer science but a faith based set of unmovable beliefs.
The true scientist will always seek to find out how a PCR test can't possibly diagnose a disease, why cloth masks increase infections rather than decrease them, why lockdowns kill rather than save lives, why vaccines which skipped years of human trials can cause many deaths, etc
Because that is the only way in which scientific progress can be made: testing theories until the theories, or part of them, can be proved wrong and a new or modified theory is required to explain that aspect of reality, which in turn can be tested and improved. That is science.
Having an a priori position on vaccinations is an entirely faith based anti-scientific position. Anybody who declares themselves pro or anti-vaxx as a matter of principle is not endorsing science, but faith, in both cases. Vaccines can fail or succeed: testing does require years.
Anybody who calls a mRNA genetic editing intervention a vaccination is also not endorsing science, but marketing for human gene editing. Science always requires precision on all levels, including terminology.
https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1358547889400795139.html
For Popper, science should always attempt to disprove a theory, rather than attempt to continually support theoretical hypotheses (eg that epidemiological modelling based on limited data & possibly flawed assumptions is a reflection of reality despite evidence to the contrary).
Scientific progress happens through proving theories wrong or partially wrong. The moment something is declared outside the boundaries of being able to be proved wrong (eg lockdowns, face masks & vaccines) then it is no longer science but a faith based set of unmovable beliefs.
The true scientist will always seek to find out how a PCR test can't possibly diagnose a disease, why cloth masks increase infections rather than decrease them, why lockdowns kill rather than save lives, why vaccines which skipped years of human trials can cause many deaths, etc
Because that is the only way in which scientific progress can be made: testing theories until the theories, or part of them, can be proved wrong and a new or modified theory is required to explain that aspect of reality, which in turn can be tested and improved. That is science.
Having an a priori position on vaccinations is an entirely faith based anti-scientific position. Anybody who declares themselves pro or anti-vaxx as a matter of principle is not endorsing science, but faith, in both cases. Vaccines can fail or succeed: testing does require years.
Anybody who calls a mRNA genetic editing intervention a vaccination is also not endorsing science, but marketing for human gene editing. Science always requires precision on all levels, including terminology.
https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1358547889400795139.html
Threadreaderapp
Read and Share Twitter Threads easily!
Thread Reader helps you read and share the best of Twitter Threads
"Meta-analysis of 54 studies with 77,758 participants found chance an infected person will infect one or more people at home is 18% if symptomatic & CLOSE TO 0% if asymptomatic [0.7% incl. PCR false + & attribution errors]
https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamanetworkopen/fullarticle/2774102
https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamanetworkopen/fullarticle/2774102
Steve Baker: Ministers must never again be free to impose crippling restrictions without proper scrutiny
A new Public Health Act would prevent ministers imposing job-destroying restrictions without warning or scrutiny
Just like Coronavirus itself, lockdowns and restrictions cause immense damage. Food insecurity has more than doubled since the start of the pandemic, half of us have put on weight, one in three people are drinking more, children’s educational prospects have been damaged, perhaps irrevocably, and many of the limited company directors, freelancers and the self-employed who were excluded from Government support have suffered untold harm. ...
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2021/02/14/ministers-must-never-free-impose-crippling-restrictions-without/
A new Public Health Act would prevent ministers imposing job-destroying restrictions without warning or scrutiny
Just like Coronavirus itself, lockdowns and restrictions cause immense damage. Food insecurity has more than doubled since the start of the pandemic, half of us have put on weight, one in three people are drinking more, children’s educational prospects have been damaged, perhaps irrevocably, and many of the limited company directors, freelancers and the self-employed who were excluded from Government support have suffered untold harm. ...
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2021/02/14/ministers-must-never-free-impose-crippling-restrictions-without/
The Telegraph
Ministers must never again be free to impose crippling restrictions without proper scrutiny
A new Public Health Act would prevent ministers imposing job-destroying restrictions without warning or scrutiny
"We, as professionals from around the UK, have grave concerns regarding Government policies put in place in response to Covid-19. In particular, these policies adversely affect core principles on which our democracy depends.
We ask, as a matter of urgency, that the Government and all opposition MPs take appropriate actions to restore the UK to a true democracy, as a minimum:
(i) The Rule of Law & Separation of Powers.
Parliamentary Debate. Reinstate the lawful role of Parliament to represent its constituents as elected representatives of the people by ensuring that the Corona Virus Act 2020 is repealed or, as a minimum, receives a monthly review by Parliament.
(ii) Fundamental Human Rights and individual autonomy.
Freedom to protest. Ensure a proportionate policing approach for pro-rights movements and critics of Government policy. Decriminalise protests and prevent police violence.
Freedom of speech. Reverse instructions of censorship to the broadcast media and online platforms to allow for an independent media to report on this topic, free from Government interference.
Autonomy of decisions. Prevent tactics of coercion or discrimination by public or private entities that seek to disproportionately, unlawfully or unnecessarily impose upon the personal freedoms of UK citizens.
(iii) Openness and accountability in decisions, conflicts and the data.
Conflicts of Interest. Reconsider the sphere of influence of those members of the Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies (SAGE) that have a material conflict of interest in the Covid-19 solutions being proposed.
Conflicts of Interest. Ensure a proper procurement process is followed for all contract negotiation and issuing by Government departments.
Openness and Accountability. Complete proper informed risk assessments for all decisions being made to assess the proportionality and necessity of the measures and the impending harms likely to occur. Provide all risk assessments to Parliament in a timely manner for decisions to be made.
Democracy is not ‘optional’. The Government must now make a firm commitment to democracy and confirm that these powers will never again be used without proper legal authority, process or regular ratification by Parliament.
This Declaration is signed the following individuals:
https://democracydeclaration.com/
We ask, as a matter of urgency, that the Government and all opposition MPs take appropriate actions to restore the UK to a true democracy, as a minimum:
(i) The Rule of Law & Separation of Powers.
Parliamentary Debate. Reinstate the lawful role of Parliament to represent its constituents as elected representatives of the people by ensuring that the Corona Virus Act 2020 is repealed or, as a minimum, receives a monthly review by Parliament.
(ii) Fundamental Human Rights and individual autonomy.
Freedom to protest. Ensure a proportionate policing approach for pro-rights movements and critics of Government policy. Decriminalise protests and prevent police violence.
Freedom of speech. Reverse instructions of censorship to the broadcast media and online platforms to allow for an independent media to report on this topic, free from Government interference.
Autonomy of decisions. Prevent tactics of coercion or discrimination by public or private entities that seek to disproportionately, unlawfully or unnecessarily impose upon the personal freedoms of UK citizens.
(iii) Openness and accountability in decisions, conflicts and the data.
Conflicts of Interest. Reconsider the sphere of influence of those members of the Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies (SAGE) that have a material conflict of interest in the Covid-19 solutions being proposed.
Conflicts of Interest. Ensure a proper procurement process is followed for all contract negotiation and issuing by Government departments.
Openness and Accountability. Complete proper informed risk assessments for all decisions being made to assess the proportionality and necessity of the measures and the impending harms likely to occur. Provide all risk assessments to Parliament in a timely manner for decisions to be made.
Democracy is not ‘optional’. The Government must now make a firm commitment to democracy and confirm that these powers will never again be used without proper legal authority, process or regular ratification by Parliament.
This Declaration is signed the following individuals:
https://democracydeclaration.com/
Face Mask Discrimination Letter
https://democracydeclaration.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/Face_masks_discrimination_template_letter-1.pdf
https://democracydeclaration.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/Face_masks_discrimination_template_letter-1.pdf
Testing in Schools Open Letter to MPs
https://democracydeclaration.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/Testing-in-Schools-Open-Letter-to-MPs.pdf
https://democracydeclaration.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/Testing-in-Schools-Open-Letter-to-MPs.pdf
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
The PCR test at 35 cycle thresholds or over does not detect a Covid19 case. It detects inactive SARSCoV2 (if not any SARS or coronavirus) viral fragments, up to two months old. If there are symptoms, they could simply be symptoms of any influenza, common cold, rhinovirus, or any other respiratory disease. The same goes for deaths counted within say 28 days of a positive PCR test at over 35 cycle thresholds. SAGE minutes in comments below indicate live viral load which is high enough for transmission is only found at 24 cycle thresholds or under.
"A recent study in the journal Cancer Discovery found that inhalation of harmful microbes can contribute to advanced stage lung cancer in adults. Long-term use of face masks may help breed these dangerous pathogens.
Microbiologists agree that frequent mask wearing creates a moist environment in which microbes are allowed to grow and proliferate before entering the lungs. Those foreign microbes then travel down the trachea and into two tubes called the bronchi until they reach small air sacks covered in blood vessels called alveoli."
https://geopolitic.org/2021/02/04/long-term-mask-use-may-contribute-to-advanced-stage-lung-cancer-study-finds
Microbiologists agree that frequent mask wearing creates a moist environment in which microbes are allowed to grow and proliferate before entering the lungs. Those foreign microbes then travel down the trachea and into two tubes called the bronchi until they reach small air sacks covered in blood vessels called alveoli."
https://geopolitic.org/2021/02/04/long-term-mask-use-may-contribute-to-advanced-stage-lung-cancer-study-finds
👏1
How face masks increase Covid19 risks: Nebulization may "result in viral particles lingering longer and traveling farther in airspace from a masked person than exhaled respiratory droplets falling close to the body from the orifices of an unmasked person."
https://pdmj.org/papers/masks_false_safety_and_real_dangers_part4/
https://pdmj.org/papers/masks_false_safety_and_real_dangers_part4/
pdmj.org
PDMJ: Primary Doctor Medical Journal
Primary Doctor Medical Journal is a peer-reviewed online medical journal focused primarily on public health topics. This new journal boasts the most thorough research to date in English on the topic of mask hazards. Address research submissions to editor@pdmj.org.
aaqr-20-07-covid-0403.pdf
663.5 KB
aaqr-20-07-covid-0403.pdf
Concentrations of carbon dioxide measured for all three types of face masks while working on the computer, remaining
seated all of the time and breathing through the nose
https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.2020.07.0403
seated all of the time and breathing through the nose
https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.2020.07.0403
"Concentrations [of carbon dioxide when wearing any type of face mask] in the detected range can cause undesirable symptoms, such as fatigue, headache, and loss of concentration":
"Effect of Wearing Face Masks on the Carbon Dioxide Concentration in the Breathing Zone
Special Issue on COVID-19 Aerosol Drivers, Impacts and Mitigation (X) 2021 - Volume 21 Volume 21, Issue 2, February 2021"
https://aaqr.org/articles/aaqr-20-07-covid-0403
"Effect of Wearing Face Masks on the Carbon Dioxide Concentration in the Breathing Zone
Special Issue on COVID-19 Aerosol Drivers, Impacts and Mitigation (X) 2021 - Volume 21 Volume 21, Issue 2, February 2021"
https://aaqr.org/articles/aaqr-20-07-covid-0403
Aerosol and Air Quality Research
Effect of Wearing Face Masks on the Carbon Dioxide Concentration in the Breathing Zone
ABSTRACT
The use of face masks is among the measures taken to prevent person-to-person transmission of the virus (SARS-CoV-2) responsible for the coronavirus disease (COVID-19). Lately, concern was expressed about the possibility that carbon dioxide could…
The use of face masks is among the measures taken to prevent person-to-person transmission of the virus (SARS-CoV-2) responsible for the coronavirus disease (COVID-19). Lately, concern was expressed about the possibility that carbon dioxide could…
Luke Freeman - ‼️BRITISH POLICE BULLYING THE PUBLIC FOR...
https://m.facebook.com/100061361442974/videos/115004257221622/
https://m.facebook.com/100061361442974/videos/115004257221622/
Facebook Watch
Luke Freeman
‼️BRITISH POLICE BULLYING THE PUBLIC FOR BEING MASK EXEMPT‼️