This very interesting paper discusses the regulatory environment in Europe 4-5 years ago.

Considering how much emotion has been expended on the question “are these gene based vaccines, vaccines or are they gene therapy, read for yourself.

“Interestingly, depending on whether RNA-based vaccines are directed against tumors or infectious disease, they are formally considered gene therapy products or not, respectively”

The answer is of course they’re gene therapy. They instruct your body to manufacture a part of a foreign organisation by inserting genetic code into your cells.

If the objective is to raise an immune response against a non-self tumour target, it’s called & classified as gene therapy.

However if the objective is to raise an immune response against a non self foreign protein, specifically one from a pathogen, it’s not gene therapy (& instead a vaccine).

Now, I know this is nuts & extremely dangerous.

It suggests the people deciding this were stupid, reckless and/ or evil (why choose?)

Why do I say that? For this blindingly obvious reason.

A standard vaccine is to be given to large numbers of people in perfectly good health including many not at the slightest risk from the pathogen against which the vaccine is intended to induce immunity.

So, not people in whom much risk can be justified.

But it’s this very setting in which this new & untested technology are to be given to billions that we set the lowest bar.

The requirements for infectious disease vaccines are low. Very little is done.

No PK/PD, for example. They didn’t study where the vaccine dose went, what it did where, how much & for how long.

This is how we ended up with brain blood clots & deaths. Because stupid regulators permitted a low ball package to pass their ridiculously stupid regulations.

I believe this wasn’t an accident. How do you pass regulations? Well, you either raise your game or you suggest to those setting the bar that it’s too high & “will impede the flow of innovative, life saving products”. The bar is placed helpfully and they all go off for a nice dinner.

The elderly and vulnerable were murdered in care homes and this Government convinced you Covid-19 was to blame

Democide is the murder of any person or people by their government, including genocide, senicide, and mass murder. Her Majesty’s Government, its scientific advisors, medical advisors, and NHS chiefs have committed all of these acts since March 2020, but they couldn’t do it without convincing you Covid-19 was to blame. Here’s how they did it…
@dailyexpose

https://dailyexpose.co.uk/2021/08/13/elderly-were-murdered-covid19-wasnt-to-blame/

Very interesting paper. Strong evidence of durable immunity after SARS-COV-2 infection, mostly directed against non-spike protein components of the virus, especially nucleoprotein.
That anti spike antibodies aren’t particularly prompt might indicate that spike isn’t the ideal immunogen (when our immune systems choose, they’re mostly choosing other than spike).

https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.04.19.21255739v2

⬆️ an admission the Spike protein inducing "vaccines" are fundamentally badly designed.

Well worth reading if immunology is your thing. If it isn’t, it’ll just be confusing.
Rest assured it tallies with expectations that immunity is robust, complete & durable.
This isn’t surprising, as we’ve been saying from the very beginning.

If humans weren’t brilliant at this sort of thing, we’d have been green goo millennia ago!

Mike

"Interestingly, most of the risk groups described for COVID-19 are at the same time groups that were associated with zinc deficiency. As zinc is essential to preserve natural tissue barriers such as the respiratory epithelium, preventing pathogen entry, for a balanced function of the immune system and the redox system, zinc deficiency can probably be added to the factors predisposing individuals to infection and detrimental progression of COVID-19. Finally, due to its direct antiviral properties, it can be assumed that zinc administration is beneficial for most of the population, especially those with suboptimal zinc status."

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7365891/

"Ascorbic acid is a crucial vitamin necessary for the correct functioning of the immune system. It plays a role in stress response and has shown promising results when administered to the critically ill. Quercetin is a well-known flavonoid whose antiviral properties have been investigated in numerous studies. There is evidence that vitamin C and quercetin co-administration exerts a synergistic antiviral action due to overlapping antiviral and immunomodulatory properties and the capacity of ascorbate to recycle quercetin, increasing its efficacy. Safe, cheap interventions which have a sound biological rationale should be prioritized for experimental use in the current context of a global health pandemic. We present the current evidence for the use of vitamin C and quercetin both for prophylaxis in high-risk populations and for the treatment of COVID-19"

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7318306/

You wait. This extraordinarily rare set of conditions, where a 3rd dose of the same vaccine sometimes raises an antibody response where the first two didn’t, Will speedily morph into EVERYONE IN THE USA IS GETTING A BOOSTER & if you object, you’re a knuckle dragger who’s not following The Science.
Just wait.
Mike

https://m.theepochtimes.com/mkt_breakingnews/cdc-panel-recommends-third-covid-19-vaccine-dose-for-immunocompromised_3948012.html

They tried to dump the expiring "vaccines" into kids.

Click on it. It is gone now.

"VACCINATION" IS THE WRONG COMPARATIVE CATEGORY ALTOGETHER, THEY WILL MANIPULATE IT, SO REJECT IT

If they really want to categorize the cases and hospitalizations, then let them categorize them in terms of who has high and who has low levels of vitamin D & zinc in their blood, because that is what makes the real difference, not "vaccination" or non "vaccination".

Same as with mortality, they will just have more difficulty to manipulate that category so that one will still show much higher deaths in the "vaccinated".

This is the CDC's definition of "vaxxed" = complete 2 doses + 2 weeks. So if you got your 2nd jab but died/hospitalised before those 2 weeks are over, you're still considered "unvaxxed". Its all psy-war yes

When you watch this, remember that the Western version will be a lot more tyrannical than China's pilot scheme. For a start in the West your social credit score will be tied to the profits of the pharmaceutical corporations (and the depopulation objectives of Bill Gates targeted to specific countries). This means as a minimum yearly boosters of "vaccines" with unspecified toxic adjuvants from birth.

Watch "Keeping Score: How Bad is China's Social Credit System? | InfoBites" on YouTube
https://youtu.be/swje6NSdkfk