Forwarded from NMNVMC - Josh Gregoire Jones
Via Jacqui Deevoy 👇👇👇👇👇👇👇👇
Here’s an update on Wayne Smith, the highly knowledgeable man who was due to appear in the documentary I’m making about euthanasia in U.K. medical facilities and who was found dead in (what I believe to be) suspicious circumstances in his home in Chichester just over a week ago.
I’ve been talking to Dr. Mark Jones (who also knew Wayne and who interviewed him in the video I’ll reshare below), who, in turn, has been exchanging emails with the coroner’s office about Wayne’s sudden, unexpected and untimely death.
I spoke to Sussex police several times since making my initial report on July 27th. According to them, they were called to the scene on July 25th after two friends of Wayne alerted them.
Wayne was found dead in the house and confirmed as ‘life extinct’ at 3pm. They agreed that he’d probably died the previous day. The police and coroner’s office confirmed to me and to Dr. Jones that Wayne died of ‘Covid’.
There were 28 Covid deaths in the U.K. on the 25/7/21: it would appear Wayne was one of them.
Dr. Jones called the council yesterday, who confirmed that Wayne’s cremation was set for this afternoon (4th August). Dr. Jones demanded that the cremation was delayed and the council agreed.
We emailed the coroner, insisting on an autopsy as we believe Wayne’s death is not all that it seems.
The coroner’s office replied and stated that Wayne had died of Covid, had had symptoms for a while and had tested positive.
Wayne would never willingly have had a test. He wasn’t unwell as far as I knew: he was due to visit me at home on Monday in preparation for the documentary and I’m sure he’d have let me know if he was poorly. We spoke on the phone regularly and he always replied to messages immediately. Other people who knew him said he ceased replying around July 10th. Same with me.
On his Twitter page, however, there are hundreds of retweets between the 10th and 20th.
Wayne wasn’t a big retweeter - he was a man on a mission with some very important stuff to share. He didn’t care about much else, let alone retweeting other people’s posts. He’d been liaising with the NHS and the government about his findings and was in possession of documents and information that could have posed a big threat to the people involved in the implementation of end of life ‘care’ pathways in U.K. hospitals, care homes and hospices. He was a true warrior and was making great headway.
He would tweet often but wasn’t big on retweeting. His last tweet was on July 10th. The last time he’d replied to me and other friends was July 7th. I messaged him on the 10th, 15th and 20th. No response. Had he been able to retweet hundreds of times on Twitter during that 10 day period, he would have certainly been able to respond to his friends.
Dr. Jones and I have asked the coroner again today for an autopsy. We also want a burial - not a cremation - for our friend and comrade Wayne. He had no family so it’s down to his friends to do the right thing. It’s what he would have wanted.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/Oc9Vgsjt03RN/?fbclid=IwAR1C3el1yh9RtjABN-N5_6rNfCe9bkzG65BX8n44N0Q9hAM8EO6QLKK3F2Y
Here’s an update on Wayne Smith, the highly knowledgeable man who was due to appear in the documentary I’m making about euthanasia in U.K. medical facilities and who was found dead in (what I believe to be) suspicious circumstances in his home in Chichester just over a week ago.
I’ve been talking to Dr. Mark Jones (who also knew Wayne and who interviewed him in the video I’ll reshare below), who, in turn, has been exchanging emails with the coroner’s office about Wayne’s sudden, unexpected and untimely death.
I spoke to Sussex police several times since making my initial report on July 27th. According to them, they were called to the scene on July 25th after two friends of Wayne alerted them.
Wayne was found dead in the house and confirmed as ‘life extinct’ at 3pm. They agreed that he’d probably died the previous day. The police and coroner’s office confirmed to me and to Dr. Jones that Wayne died of ‘Covid’.
There were 28 Covid deaths in the U.K. on the 25/7/21: it would appear Wayne was one of them.
Dr. Jones called the council yesterday, who confirmed that Wayne’s cremation was set for this afternoon (4th August). Dr. Jones demanded that the cremation was delayed and the council agreed.
We emailed the coroner, insisting on an autopsy as we believe Wayne’s death is not all that it seems.
The coroner’s office replied and stated that Wayne had died of Covid, had had symptoms for a while and had tested positive.
Wayne would never willingly have had a test. He wasn’t unwell as far as I knew: he was due to visit me at home on Monday in preparation for the documentary and I’m sure he’d have let me know if he was poorly. We spoke on the phone regularly and he always replied to messages immediately. Other people who knew him said he ceased replying around July 10th. Same with me.
On his Twitter page, however, there are hundreds of retweets between the 10th and 20th.
Wayne wasn’t a big retweeter - he was a man on a mission with some very important stuff to share. He didn’t care about much else, let alone retweeting other people’s posts. He’d been liaising with the NHS and the government about his findings and was in possession of documents and information that could have posed a big threat to the people involved in the implementation of end of life ‘care’ pathways in U.K. hospitals, care homes and hospices. He was a true warrior and was making great headway.
He would tweet often but wasn’t big on retweeting. His last tweet was on July 10th. The last time he’d replied to me and other friends was July 7th. I messaged him on the 10th, 15th and 20th. No response. Had he been able to retweet hundreds of times on Twitter during that 10 day period, he would have certainly been able to respond to his friends.
Dr. Jones and I have asked the coroner again today for an autopsy. We also want a burial - not a cremation - for our friend and comrade Wayne. He had no family so it’s down to his friends to do the right thing. It’s what he would have wanted.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/Oc9Vgsjt03RN/?fbclid=IwAR1C3el1yh9RtjABN-N5_6rNfCe9bkzG65BX8n44N0Q9hAM8EO6QLKK3F2Y
Bitchute
Wayne Smith, the man exposing the Midazolam mass murder care home scandal FOUND DEAD
This video of Wayne Smith talking about the death of his father, and his investigations into the "death pathway" murders in the UK NHS, was downloaded from Peer Tube. Smith was recently found dead, with no information so far about why or what the circumstances…
Forwarded from 𝔽𝕣𝕖𝕖𝕕𝕠𝕞 𝕎𝕒𝕣𝕣𝕚𝕠𝕣𝕤 (Freedom Warriors)
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
I'm saddened to announce that Wayne Smith, whose father was killed by Midazolam, and fought tirelessly for justice, has been found dead.
That's all the information I have at the moment.
Wayne spoke to me about what happened to his father, and was due to present all his research in the upcoming Midazolam documentary.
Wayne was a warrior and a lovely lovely man. He is a real loss to the cause.
RIP, mate.
Gareth Icke
That's all the information I have at the moment.
Wayne spoke to me about what happened to his father, and was due to present all his research in the upcoming Midazolam documentary.
Wayne was a warrior and a lovely lovely man. He is a real loss to the cause.
RIP, mate.
Gareth Icke
THE SAME NUMBER AS THE YEARLY "COVID DEATHS"
2012: Top doctor's chilling claim: The NHS kills off 130,000 elderly patients every year
"Professor Patrick Pullicino said doctors had turned the use of a controversial ‘death pathway’ into the equivalent of euthanasia of the elderly.
He claimed there was often a lack of clear evidence for initiating the Liverpool Care Pathway, a method of looking after terminally ill patients that is used in hospitals across the country.
It is designed to come into force when doctors believe it is impossible for a patient to recover and death is imminent
There are around 450,000 deaths in Britain each year of people who are in hospital or under NHS care. Around 29 per cent – 130,000 – are of patients who were on the LCP."
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2161869/amp/Top-doctors-chilling-claim-The-NHS-kills-130-000-elderly-patients-year.html
2012: Top doctor's chilling claim: The NHS kills off 130,000 elderly patients every year
"Professor Patrick Pullicino said doctors had turned the use of a controversial ‘death pathway’ into the equivalent of euthanasia of the elderly.
He claimed there was often a lack of clear evidence for initiating the Liverpool Care Pathway, a method of looking after terminally ill patients that is used in hospitals across the country.
It is designed to come into force when doctors believe it is impossible for a patient to recover and death is imminent
There are around 450,000 deaths in Britain each year of people who are in hospital or under NHS care. Around 29 per cent – 130,000 – are of patients who were on the LCP."
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2161869/amp/Top-doctors-chilling-claim-The-NHS-kills-130-000-elderly-patients-year.html
Mail Online
Top doctor's chilling claim: The NHS kills off 130,000 elderly patients every year
Professor Patrick Pullicino is concerned that doctors are using the controversial 'death' care pathway as a form of euthanasia for the elderly.
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
TRIESTE, ITALY 🇮🇹 The purification ritual of the burning of the "Green Pass" Russian roulette/ Trojan certificates/ Covid passes to the sound of the drum and the chanting of "Libertá" (Freedom).
"Anti-vaxxers urge people to get jab after realising they were wrong too late" The Independent 🤡
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/covid-vaccine-us-antivaxx-jab-b1896231.html
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/covid-vaccine-us-antivaxx-jab-b1896231.html
The Independent
They realised they were wrong too late: The anti-vaxxers making the best case for the Covid shot
“He kept saying no [to intubation] because he was scared. He said, ‘I’m going to die … I’m going to make you a widow at 60 years old.’ And he did”. Danielle Zoellner speaks to the many Americans now regretting their vaccine choice.
"The underlying point is that any asset which uses carbon will have essentially zero value in 2050. This in turn may encourage greater use in the run up to 2050 – for example, putting up new buildings at a much faster rate for the next 30 years, knowing that construction must then halt."
https://dailyexpose.co.uk/2021/08/05/2019-absolute-zero-report-sinister-agenda/
https://dailyexpose.co.uk/2021/08/05/2019-absolute-zero-report-sinister-agenda/
The Expose
You must read the 2019 ‘Absolute Zero’ report, authored by Imperial College London – once you do, you’ll realise the past 16 months…
A report produced by Oxford University and Imperial College London for the UK Government reveals that all airports will be ordered to close, eating beef and lamb will be made illegal, and construct…
"I don't know how someone controlled you
They bought and sold you
I look at the world and I notice it's turning
While my guitar gently weeps
With every mistake we must surely be learning
Still my guitar gently weeps
I don't know how you were diverted
You were perverted too
I don't know how you were inverted
No one alerted you
I look at you all, see the love there that's sleeping
While my guitar gently weeps
Look, look at you all
Still my guitar gently weeps"
George Harrison
They bought and sold you
I look at the world and I notice it's turning
While my guitar gently weeps
With every mistake we must surely be learning
Still my guitar gently weeps
I don't know how you were diverted
You were perverted too
I don't know how you were inverted
No one alerted you
I look at you all, see the love there that's sleeping
While my guitar gently weeps
Look, look at you all
Still my guitar gently weeps"
George Harrison
Forwarded from 💜 LOVE not fear
YouTube
While My Guitar Gently Weeps (Remastered 2009)
Provided to YouTube by Universal Music Group
While My Guitar Gently Weeps (Remastered 2009) · The Beatles
The Beatles
℗ 2009 Calderstone Productions Limited (a division of Universal Music Group)
Released on: 1968-11-22
Producer: George Martin
Composer…
While My Guitar Gently Weeps (Remastered 2009) · The Beatles
The Beatles
℗ 2009 Calderstone Productions Limited (a division of Universal Music Group)
Released on: 1968-11-22
Producer: George Martin
Composer…
SARA CUNIAL MP ON THE "GREEN PASS" IN THE ITALIAN PARLIAMENT - JUNE 2021
Thank you President. The COVID-19 green certificate introduced by this Decree is anunfair, inefficient, disproportionate obstacle
for the freedom of movement of Italian citizens.
The proposed Article 9 is neither scientifically or legally acceptable because it violates the freedom of movement guaranteed by the Constitution, it discriminates those who do not want to be tested or vaccinated, it does not guarantee the data protection rules.
The certificates are based on rapid or molecular antigenic tests which means on swabs, on the so-called vaccine or if healing occurred.
RT-PCR tests on which swabs are analyzed, according to the inventor Kary Mullis, “Colleagues, colleagues please, excuse me
Cunial, colleagues, colleagues”.
RT-PCR tests on which swabs are analyzed, according to the inventor Kary Mullis, who received the Nobel Prize for Chemistry in 1993 so he is not just a common Minister, they cannot be used for diagnosis. In November 2020 the Swedish Institute of Public health said that PCR tests couldn’t be used to determine the infectivity. In December 2020 also the WHO stated that PCR technology could result in false positives and negatives and therefore they encouraged health workers to take into consideration the diagnosis of the clinical symptoms, which is to say home care visits that you irresponsibly prohibited.
The high value of amplification cycles makes it difficult to distinguish between the background noise and the target virus.
ECDC itself refers to a reliable result only when it’s below 24 amplification cycles, which means
that in the present date tests results in Italy are about 80% unreliable because they are amplified to 30,40 and 50 cycles. The falsity of the epidemiological data resulting from the abuse, from abusive and incorrect use of the PCR test has been ascertained and confirmed from the Administrative Court of Vienna and from the Lisbon Court of Appeal. Rapid Tests are not reliable either.
As shown by the COVID screening campaign “Sardi e Sicuri” that resulted in 800, in 582 positive Antigen Rapid Tests
of which then only 32 were confirmed positive by the molecular test.
About the effectiveness and the efficiency of those that you call vaccines, which are actually gene therapies, relative risk reduction values are known, the official ones are: 95% for Pfizer, 94% for Moderna, 67% for Johnson, 67 %for Astrazeneca and they have already been proven wrong several times. Peter Doshi, the editor of British Medical Journal, had already recalculated the Pfizer value and lately, in the Lancet article “COVID- 19 vaccine efficacy and effectiveness” published on April 19 2021, it has been taken into account the absolute value of the risk reduction on the entire population discovering that Astrazeneca has a risk reduction of the 1.3 % while Moderna and Johnson’s of the 1.2% and Pfizer the 0.84%.
The well known Rockefeller University on February 10, 2021 in the journal Nature with the article “mRNA vaccine-elicited antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 and circulating variants” states that the three major mutations of the virus SARS are probably experimentally linked to COVID-19 vaccinations. Therefore, it’s not possible to detect contagiousness and positivity with accuracy, because tests are not reliable.
It’s not possible to stop the famous spread with vaccines, actually, by modifying the innate immune response in people it gets worse; it’s not possible to reduce the risk of the vaccination. To reach the healing process we need doctors to go back to home-based therapies that you don’t want to be done.
Therefore, it’s clear now that he health emergency management is not about Science. Otherwise we cannot explain why after the confirmation of the link between death and vaccination for the Paterno case, one of the many cases of adverse fatal reaction, the Ministry, AIFA, the CTS and the Italian Institute of Health did not asked for a detailed analysis of these serums.
https://r2020.info/2021/06/28/sara-cunial-alla-camera-sul-covid-pass-sub-eng/
Thank you President. The COVID-19 green certificate introduced by this Decree is anunfair, inefficient, disproportionate obstacle
for the freedom of movement of Italian citizens.
The proposed Article 9 is neither scientifically or legally acceptable because it violates the freedom of movement guaranteed by the Constitution, it discriminates those who do not want to be tested or vaccinated, it does not guarantee the data protection rules.
The certificates are based on rapid or molecular antigenic tests which means on swabs, on the so-called vaccine or if healing occurred.
RT-PCR tests on which swabs are analyzed, according to the inventor Kary Mullis, “Colleagues, colleagues please, excuse me
Cunial, colleagues, colleagues”.
RT-PCR tests on which swabs are analyzed, according to the inventor Kary Mullis, who received the Nobel Prize for Chemistry in 1993 so he is not just a common Minister, they cannot be used for diagnosis. In November 2020 the Swedish Institute of Public health said that PCR tests couldn’t be used to determine the infectivity. In December 2020 also the WHO stated that PCR technology could result in false positives and negatives and therefore they encouraged health workers to take into consideration the diagnosis of the clinical symptoms, which is to say home care visits that you irresponsibly prohibited.
The high value of amplification cycles makes it difficult to distinguish between the background noise and the target virus.
ECDC itself refers to a reliable result only when it’s below 24 amplification cycles, which means
that in the present date tests results in Italy are about 80% unreliable because they are amplified to 30,40 and 50 cycles. The falsity of the epidemiological data resulting from the abuse, from abusive and incorrect use of the PCR test has been ascertained and confirmed from the Administrative Court of Vienna and from the Lisbon Court of Appeal. Rapid Tests are not reliable either.
As shown by the COVID screening campaign “Sardi e Sicuri” that resulted in 800, in 582 positive Antigen Rapid Tests
of which then only 32 were confirmed positive by the molecular test.
About the effectiveness and the efficiency of those that you call vaccines, which are actually gene therapies, relative risk reduction values are known, the official ones are: 95% for Pfizer, 94% for Moderna, 67% for Johnson, 67 %for Astrazeneca and they have already been proven wrong several times. Peter Doshi, the editor of British Medical Journal, had already recalculated the Pfizer value and lately, in the Lancet article “COVID- 19 vaccine efficacy and effectiveness” published on April 19 2021, it has been taken into account the absolute value of the risk reduction on the entire population discovering that Astrazeneca has a risk reduction of the 1.3 % while Moderna and Johnson’s of the 1.2% and Pfizer the 0.84%.
The well known Rockefeller University on February 10, 2021 in the journal Nature with the article “mRNA vaccine-elicited antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 and circulating variants” states that the three major mutations of the virus SARS are probably experimentally linked to COVID-19 vaccinations. Therefore, it’s not possible to detect contagiousness and positivity with accuracy, because tests are not reliable.
It’s not possible to stop the famous spread with vaccines, actually, by modifying the innate immune response in people it gets worse; it’s not possible to reduce the risk of the vaccination. To reach the healing process we need doctors to go back to home-based therapies that you don’t want to be done.
Therefore, it’s clear now that he health emergency management is not about Science. Otherwise we cannot explain why after the confirmation of the link between death and vaccination for the Paterno case, one of the many cases of adverse fatal reaction, the Ministry, AIFA, the CTS and the Italian Institute of Health did not asked for a detailed analysis of these serums.
https://r2020.info/2021/06/28/sara-cunial-alla-camera-sul-covid-pass-sub-eng/
R2020
SARA CUNIAL ALLA CAMERA SUL COVID PASS - SUB ENG - R2020
The COVID-19 green certificate introduced by this Decree is anunfair, inefficient, disproportionate obstacle for the freedom of movement of Italian citizens. ECCO IL DISCORSO DI […]
The Public Prosecutor of Syracuse regarding the Paternò case said that because of the antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE) a healthy person who is protected with natural antibodies would face real risk with the administration of your vaccine. This happened meanwhile the Marche Region is preparing a third dose for everyone and the health management in Emilia Romagna invites health care workers to not prescribe serology testing which they criminally define as “useless”. Many cases of adverse reactions confirm the harmfulness of the protein spike, an actual toxin for our body, as well as the inoculated mRNA technology.
Harmful effects to the detriment of all the citizens are caused by residues of foreign substances that accumulates in our organs: brain, heart, liver, ovaries, testicles and among young people, beside the post vaccine thrombosis and disorders of the circulatory and neurovegetative system, they also lead to dangerous myocarditis and fulminant leukemia.
Vaccinated people can still carry and spread the virus.
COVID-19 vaccines do not prevent the transmission nor the infection; they cannot be a condition for the use of the Green-Pass and this was said by the WHO.
Actually the Covid Pass was also rejected by WHO which therefore considers it a dangerous illusion and also your Privacy Authority whom in the warning measure explains the following criticisms, in addition to the fact that he wasn’t even consulted by you, so it is totally unsuitable to legal basis on which it is based, there is one formal violation of the principle of data minimization, of the principle of accuracy, of transparency, of conservation, integrity and confidentiality.
With my suppressive amendment the attempt was to eradicate this evil that is dazzling,
sorry, afflicting our Republic: that is to say of social control at all costs. Covid Pass was rejected by many states in the world as hey want nothing to do with masks, restrictions and vaccines.
It cannot be attributed to: “Europe wants it”, because there would be opposition on the barricades which is not happening. So I am asking you: “who mandates it?”, “who’s forcing you to implement a tool that recalls the apartheid regime which only purpose is population control and that when someone sneezes will be forced to follow your order and get injected with a vaccine of unknown composition; adverse reactions have already been registered and everyday we have more cases, all of that is leading to people’s death”. I am also asking you “Do you consider morally acceptable
subjecting children to a medical treatment that may cause them harm in order to protect other adults?”.
Furthermore: “Why do I have to get certified while the vaccine you want me to get has no certification at all as it is still in phase of experimentation on Italian guinea pigs?”.
“How many Italians are considered expendable?”.
EMA is telling and updating weekly EU relating data about adverse reactions.
About last June 5 we read that with passive pharmacovigilance for four vaccines 1,354,000 adverse events were registered, 683 thousand of them are considered serious and between these ones there are 14 thousand deaths in Europe.
We know, and we know it from American CDC that the currently used degree of underestimation originates in the previous comparative studies between active and passive surveillance and it is by a factor X100, which means that these data must be multiplied by one hundred to be considered real.
The truth is the following one, if vaccines were safe in the Decree-Law 44 it wouldn’t have been approved a Shield
from Lawsuits for those who vaccinate.
EMA confirmed that the trials of COVID-19 vaccines failed to prevent death or severe illness, not even in the short run,
and WHO recognized that they do not prevent COVID-19 infection nor the spread of the virus to other people; the authorities allow the vaccination against COVID-19 which facilitates the spread of variants;
Harmful effects to the detriment of all the citizens are caused by residues of foreign substances that accumulates in our organs: brain, heart, liver, ovaries, testicles and among young people, beside the post vaccine thrombosis and disorders of the circulatory and neurovegetative system, they also lead to dangerous myocarditis and fulminant leukemia.
Vaccinated people can still carry and spread the virus.
COVID-19 vaccines do not prevent the transmission nor the infection; they cannot be a condition for the use of the Green-Pass and this was said by the WHO.
Actually the Covid Pass was also rejected by WHO which therefore considers it a dangerous illusion and also your Privacy Authority whom in the warning measure explains the following criticisms, in addition to the fact that he wasn’t even consulted by you, so it is totally unsuitable to legal basis on which it is based, there is one formal violation of the principle of data minimization, of the principle of accuracy, of transparency, of conservation, integrity and confidentiality.
With my suppressive amendment the attempt was to eradicate this evil that is dazzling,
sorry, afflicting our Republic: that is to say of social control at all costs. Covid Pass was rejected by many states in the world as hey want nothing to do with masks, restrictions and vaccines.
It cannot be attributed to: “Europe wants it”, because there would be opposition on the barricades which is not happening. So I am asking you: “who mandates it?”, “who’s forcing you to implement a tool that recalls the apartheid regime which only purpose is population control and that when someone sneezes will be forced to follow your order and get injected with a vaccine of unknown composition; adverse reactions have already been registered and everyday we have more cases, all of that is leading to people’s death”. I am also asking you “Do you consider morally acceptable
subjecting children to a medical treatment that may cause them harm in order to protect other adults?”.
Furthermore: “Why do I have to get certified while the vaccine you want me to get has no certification at all as it is still in phase of experimentation on Italian guinea pigs?”.
“How many Italians are considered expendable?”.
EMA is telling and updating weekly EU relating data about adverse reactions.
About last June 5 we read that with passive pharmacovigilance for four vaccines 1,354,000 adverse events were registered, 683 thousand of them are considered serious and between these ones there are 14 thousand deaths in Europe.
We know, and we know it from American CDC that the currently used degree of underestimation originates in the previous comparative studies between active and passive surveillance and it is by a factor X100, which means that these data must be multiplied by one hundred to be considered real.
The truth is the following one, if vaccines were safe in the Decree-Law 44 it wouldn’t have been approved a Shield
from Lawsuits for those who vaccinate.
EMA confirmed that the trials of COVID-19 vaccines failed to prevent death or severe illness, not even in the short run,
and WHO recognized that they do not prevent COVID-19 infection nor the spread of the virus to other people; the authorities allow the vaccination against COVID-19 which facilitates the spread of variants;
The Public Prosecutor of Syracuse tells us that the experimental vaccine may exacerbate the disease when vaccinated people contracted or they contract the virus by natural infection, see the case of Paterno; so it is said that the survival of the population to the COVID-19 exceeds 99.8% on global level.
Worldwide death rate of the infection is 0.03% for persons under 70 years of age.
In addition, evidence shows that early treatment with existing drugs reduces hospitalization and mortality by 85%
and 75% ,respectively. The well known home care not willed by you.
Why don’t you set up an active pharmacovigilance system as it was requested on the agenda of the Honorable Baroni. Dear Honorable Lorenzin, what are you afraid of? What have you got to hide from us, poor Italians, now turned into guinea pigs?.
Why don’t you set up a serious quality control for these serums, improperly called vaccines, and for tests?; this quality control should be mandatory and it is actually mandatory for any other injectable and ingestible thing commercially available. Because the eal problem is not what I do say in this room, gentlemen, the problem is what you are not telling us!
The confirmation stays in your threats and in your lies with which you are converting this Parliament into a vulgar market of rights and privileges.
Rights cannot be bought with a swab, a vaccine or a test!
So I’m carrying a message for you from one of the many conscientious healthcare workers that I meet every day: “morality means doing what’s right regardless of what you are told, obedience means doing what you are told to do regardless of what is right!”.
Thank you.
https://r2020.info/2021/06/28/sara-cunial-alla-camera-sul-covid-pass-sub-eng/
Worldwide death rate of the infection is 0.03% for persons under 70 years of age.
In addition, evidence shows that early treatment with existing drugs reduces hospitalization and mortality by 85%
and 75% ,respectively. The well known home care not willed by you.
Why don’t you set up an active pharmacovigilance system as it was requested on the agenda of the Honorable Baroni. Dear Honorable Lorenzin, what are you afraid of? What have you got to hide from us, poor Italians, now turned into guinea pigs?.
Why don’t you set up a serious quality control for these serums, improperly called vaccines, and for tests?; this quality control should be mandatory and it is actually mandatory for any other injectable and ingestible thing commercially available. Because the eal problem is not what I do say in this room, gentlemen, the problem is what you are not telling us!
The confirmation stays in your threats and in your lies with which you are converting this Parliament into a vulgar market of rights and privileges.
Rights cannot be bought with a swab, a vaccine or a test!
So I’m carrying a message for you from one of the many conscientious healthcare workers that I meet every day: “morality means doing what’s right regardless of what you are told, obedience means doing what you are told to do regardless of what is right!”.
Thank you.
https://r2020.info/2021/06/28/sara-cunial-alla-camera-sul-covid-pass-sub-eng/
R2020
SARA CUNIAL ALLA CAMERA SUL COVID PASS - SUB ENG - R2020
The COVID-19 green certificate introduced by this Decree is anunfair, inefficient, disproportionate obstacle for the freedom of movement of Italian citizens. ECCO IL DISCORSO DI […]
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
SARA CUNIAL ITALIAN MP SPEECH ON THE "GREEN PASS" IN THE ITALIAN PARLIAMENT
JUNE 2021
https://r2020.info/2021/06/28/sara-cunial-alla-camera-sul-covid-pass-sub-eng/
JUNE 2021
https://r2020.info/2021/06/28/sara-cunial-alla-camera-sul-covid-pass-sub-eng/
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
PARIS, FRANCE 🇫🇷
The Constitutional Court today officially voted for the vaccine passport and mandatory vaccine for healthcare workers amongst other tyrannical measures.
The Constitutional Court today officially voted for the vaccine passport and mandatory vaccine for healthcare workers amongst other tyrannical measures.
Forwarded from RT News
⚡️Paris Protests: Thousands FACE UP to police demonstrating against Constitutional Court backing of Health Pass & mandatory vaccines for health workers (Watch!)
The French capital is once again a MASS THRONG of protesting citizens – gathered in their thousands to oppose Thursday’s court ruling backing Macron’s ‘Health Pass.”
Video by Sputnik News
Subscribe to RT t.me/rtintl
The French capital is once again a MASS THRONG of protesting citizens – gathered in their thousands to oppose Thursday’s court ruling backing Macron’s ‘Health Pass.”
Video by Sputnik News
Subscribe to RT t.me/rtintl
"Bioethics of Experimental COVID Vaccine Deployment under EUA: It's time we stop and look at what's going down"
"We should be enlisting the best biostatistics and machine learning experts to examine these data, and the results should- no must- be made available to the public promptly. Please follow along and take a moment to examine the underlying bioethics of this situation with me.
I believe that adult citizens must be allowed free will, the freedom to choose. This is particularly true in the case of clinical research. These mRNA and recombinant adenovirus vaccine products remain experimental at this time. Furthermore, we are supposed to be doing rigorous, fact-based science and medicine. If rigorous and transparent evaluation of vaccine reactogenicity and treatment-emergent post-vaccination adverse events is not done, we (the public health, clinical research and vaccine developer communities) play right into the hands of anti-vaxxer memes and validate many of their arguments. The suppression of information, discussion, and outright censorship concerning these current COVID vaccines which are based on gene therapy technologies cast a bad light on the entire vaccine enterprise. It is my opinion that the adult public can handle information and open discussion. Furthermore, we must fully disclose any and all risks associated with these experimental research products.
In this context, the adult public are basically research subjects that are not being required to sign informed consent due to EUA waiver. But that does not mean that they do not deserve the full disclosure of risks that one would normally require in an informed consent document for a clinical trial. And now some national authorities are calling on the deployment of EUA vaccines to adolescents and the young, which by definition are not able to directly provide informed consent to participate in clinical research – written or otherwise.
The key point here is that what is being done by suppressing open disclosure and debate concerning the profile of adverse events associated with these vaccines violates fundamental bioethical principles for clinical research. This goes back to the Geneva convention and the Helsinki declaration. See https://www.wma.net/policies-post/wma-declaration-of-helsinki-ethical-principles-for-medical-research-involving-human-subjects/. There must be informed consent for experimentation on human subjects. The human subjects – you, me, and the citizens of these countries – must be informed of risks. As a community, we have already had a discussion and made our decision – we cannot compel prisoners, military recruits, or any other population of humans to participate in a clinical research study..
https://www.rwmalonemd.com/news/xjz6sws8let4yt39ddsgs3leessg8d
"We should be enlisting the best biostatistics and machine learning experts to examine these data, and the results should- no must- be made available to the public promptly. Please follow along and take a moment to examine the underlying bioethics of this situation with me.
I believe that adult citizens must be allowed free will, the freedom to choose. This is particularly true in the case of clinical research. These mRNA and recombinant adenovirus vaccine products remain experimental at this time. Furthermore, we are supposed to be doing rigorous, fact-based science and medicine. If rigorous and transparent evaluation of vaccine reactogenicity and treatment-emergent post-vaccination adverse events is not done, we (the public health, clinical research and vaccine developer communities) play right into the hands of anti-vaxxer memes and validate many of their arguments. The suppression of information, discussion, and outright censorship concerning these current COVID vaccines which are based on gene therapy technologies cast a bad light on the entire vaccine enterprise. It is my opinion that the adult public can handle information and open discussion. Furthermore, we must fully disclose any and all risks associated with these experimental research products.
In this context, the adult public are basically research subjects that are not being required to sign informed consent due to EUA waiver. But that does not mean that they do not deserve the full disclosure of risks that one would normally require in an informed consent document for a clinical trial. And now some national authorities are calling on the deployment of EUA vaccines to adolescents and the young, which by definition are not able to directly provide informed consent to participate in clinical research – written or otherwise.
The key point here is that what is being done by suppressing open disclosure and debate concerning the profile of adverse events associated with these vaccines violates fundamental bioethical principles for clinical research. This goes back to the Geneva convention and the Helsinki declaration. See https://www.wma.net/policies-post/wma-declaration-of-helsinki-ethical-principles-for-medical-research-involving-human-subjects/. There must be informed consent for experimentation on human subjects. The human subjects – you, me, and the citizens of these countries – must be informed of risks. As a community, we have already had a discussion and made our decision – we cannot compel prisoners, military recruits, or any other population of humans to participate in a clinical research study..
https://www.rwmalonemd.com/news/xjz6sws8let4yt39ddsgs3leessg8d
RW Malone MD, LLC
Bioethics of Experimental COVID Vaccine Deployment under EUA: It’s time we stop and look at what’s going down — RW Malone MD, LLC
I provide this brief essay because you are involved or at least interested in human subject clinical research. By way of background, please understand that I am a vaccine specialist and advocate, as well as the original inventor of the mRNA vaccine (and DNA…
👍1
I’m surprised that I can become even more appalled but I just have.
They knew about ovarian concentration of certain carriers years ago
And used them anyway
This is presumably why the Japanese regulatory agency requested that study.
Mike Y.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0168365912000892
They knew about ovarian concentration of certain carriers years ago
And used them anyway
This is presumably why the Japanese regulatory agency requested that study.
Mike Y.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0168365912000892
"Protect the elderly" they said..
"As of Thursday morning, there were some 250 COVID-19 patients in serious condition. What are their ages and what is their vaccination status?
About 210 of them are individuals over the age of 60. Of those, 153 were fully vaccinated, seven were in the process of getting fully immunized and 50 were not vaccinated."
https://m.jpost.com/israel-news/coronavirus-who-are-the-serious-patients-in-israel-675924/amp?__twitter_impression=true
"As of Thursday morning, there were some 250 COVID-19 patients in serious condition. What are their ages and what is their vaccination status?
About 210 of them are individuals over the age of 60. Of those, 153 were fully vaccinated, seven were in the process of getting fully immunized and 50 were not vaccinated."
https://m.jpost.com/israel-news/coronavirus-who-are-the-serious-patients-in-israel-675924/amp?__twitter_impression=true
The Jerusalem Post
Coronavirus: Who are Israel's seriously ill patients?
As of Thursday morning, Israel had some 250 patients in serious condition. What are their ages and their vaccination status?