"Ideally, governments want to create their own Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC) which is linked to a national digital ID which gives government total control over their citizens. They can track your every purchase and deduct any amount of tax without even asking.
(9/28)

The problem is we don’t have a national digital ID system that would be the underpinning of any such CBDC, and the old system is going to collapse, it’s only a question of when at this point.
How can we be so certain that the collapse is both imminent and unavoidable?
(10/28)

Interest rates are already at zero, so you can’t lower them. So the only option left is to print new money to stimulate the stock market. Indeed, the money printing has been absurd lately with 30% of all money having been created in the last few years.
(11/28)

Of course you can only prop up the market with printed money for so long before inflation turns our money into toilet paper. I think the elites realised the sh*t they were in in the mid-2010s. The next big 2008 style collapse was going to be their comeuppance.
(14/28)

So how do you transition to a new money system that retains the power of government and the elite? The logical alternative of bitcoin is stateless, and in that future if government don’t control the money you only pay for government services you actually want.
(15/28)

Fortunately (for them) the Chinese figured out the answer. You create your own digital money. Linked to their existing national digital ID system that goes the other way entirely from free money, indeed, it massively expands the power of government.
(16/28)"

https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1419293260468690946.html

DIGITAL ID's

New proposals for governing body to ensure safe and secure use of digital identity.

Plans to create a new system to make digital identities as trusted and secure as official documents, such as passports, have been published by the government.

On 19.7.2 the government launched a consultation- within link:-

https://www.gov.uk/government/news/plans-for-governing-body-to-make-digital-identities-as-trusted-as-passports

"The trust framework is also central to the Government Digital Service’s work with other government departments to develop a new cross-government single sign-on and identity assurance solution. This will ensure interoperability of identities and associated attributes between sectors in the longer term.
This document is just the beginning of building a trusted digital identity system for the UK."

https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/the-uk-digital-identity-and-attributes-trust-framework/the-uk-digital-identity-and-attributes-trust-framework

I love this, by Dr Lynn Flynn

Definition of absurdity: For the first time in human history, we can transmit a disease we don't have to those who are immunized against it.

ITALY 🇮🇹 Citizens gather under the national TV broadcaster RAI: "Terroristi! Terroristi! Terroristi! (Terrorists!)

PALERMO: ITALY 🇮🇹 "Libertá!.. No Green Pass!"

346 blind
504 deaf
1,490 fatalities
...our children are next in line...


UPDATED REPORT PUBLISHED 22ND JULY 2021
MHRA Yellow Card Reporting up to 14th July 2021

* Pfizer - 20million people - 32.1m doses - Yellow Card reporting rate - 1-in-215 people impacted
* Astrazeneca - 24.7m people - 47.5m doses - Yellow Card reporting rate - 1-in-111 people impacted
* Moderna - 1.3m people received first dose - Yellow Card reporting rate - 1-in-129 people impacted

Average 1-in-142 people have reported an event.

Reactions - 256,005 (Pfizer) + 794,545 (AZ) + 29,606 (Moderna) + 2786 (Unknown) = 1,082,942

Reports - 91,567 (Pfizer) + 222.291 (AZ) + 10,109 (Moderna) + 939 (Unknown) = 324,906

Fatal - 460 (Pfizer) + 999 (AZ) + 7 (Moderna) + 24 (Unknown) = 1490

Acute Cardiac - 3759 (Pfizer) + 8682 (AZ) + 282 (Moderna) + 27 (Unknown) = 12,750

Anaphylaxis - 433 (Pfizer) + 786 (AZ) + 26 (Moderna) + 1 (Unknown) = 1246

Blood Disorders - 8332 (Pfizer) + 7154 (AZ) + 584 (Moderna) + 38 (Unknown) = 16,108

Infections - 6166 (Pfizer) + 17,408 (AZ) + 462 (Moderna) + 81 (Unknown) = 24,117

Headaches - 19,098 (Pfizer) + 82,312 (AZ) + 1534 (Moderna) + 214 (Unknown) = 103,158

Migraine - 2080 (Pfizer) + 7774 (AZ) + 180 (Moderna) + 26 (Unknown) = 10,060

Eye Disorders - 4227 (Pfizer) + 13,182 (AZ) + 307 (Moderna) + 45 (Unknown) = 17,761

Blindness - 76 (Pfizer) + 261 (AZ) + 6 (Moderna) + 3 (Unknown) = 346

Deafness - 160 (Pfizer) + 335 (AZ) + 9 (Moderna) = 504

Psychiatric Disorders - 5006 (Pfizer) + 16,345 (AZ) + 544 (Moderna) + 69 (Unknown) = 21,964

Skin Disorders - 18,335 (Pfizer) + 48,834 (AZ) + 5211 (Moderna) + 183 (Unknown) = 72,563

Spontaneous Abortions - 181 + 5 stillbirth/foetal death (Pfizer) + 152 + 2 stillbirth (AZ) + 14 (Moderna) + 1 (Unknown) = 348 + 7

Vomiting - 2824 (Pfizer) + 11,185 (AZ) + 301 (Moderna) + 39 (Unknown) = 14,349

Facial Paralysis incl. Bell’s Palsy - 590 (Pfizer) + 796 (AZ) + 31 (Moderna) + 4 (Unknown) = 1421

Nervous System Disorders - 45,672 (Pfizer) + 169,722 (AZ) + 4433 (Moderna) + 543 (Unknown) = 220,370

Strokes and CNS haemorrhages - 452 (Pfizer) + 1854 (AZ) + 10 (Moderna) + 6 (Unknown) = 2322

Guillian Barre Syndrome - 44 (Pfizer) + 358 (AZ) + 2 (Moderna) + 5 (Unknown) = 409

Dizziness - 7207 (Pfizer) + 23,685 (AZ) + 979 (Moderna) + 79 (Unknown) = 31,950

Tremor - 1101 (Pfizer) + 9549 (AZ) + 95 (Moderna) + 36 (Unknown) = 10,781

Paraesthesia/dysaesthesia (chronic burning sensation, pricking nerve pain) - 4887 (Pfizer) + 15,594 (AZ) + 500 (Moderna) + 46 (Unknown) = 21,027

Pulmonary Embolism - 302 (Pfizer) + 1447 (AZ) + 7 (Moderna) + 8 (Unknown) = 1764

Deep Vein Thrombosis - 187 (Pfizer) + 1071 (AZ) + 7 (Moderna) + 8 (Unknown) = 1273

Respiratory Disorders - 11,124 (Pfizer) + 26,558 (AZ) + 752 (Moderna) + 89 (Unknown) = 38,523

Seizures - 616 (Pfizer) + 1794 (AZ) + 75 (Moderna) + 8 (Unknown) = 2493

Paralysis - 245 (Pfizer) + 683 (AZ) + 20 (Moderna) + 4 (Unknown) = 952

Haemorrhage (All types) - 2658 (Pfizer) + 4515 (AZ) + 228 (Moderna) + 19 (Unknown) = 7420

* Haemorrhage types - cardiac, ear, adrenal, eye, gastric, mouth, tongue, gums, intestinal, injection site, brain, wounds, stoma, bladder, kidney, vaginal, uterine, post-menopausal bleeding, ovarian, penile, lung, nasal

Vertigo/Tinnitis - 2260 (Pfizer) + 5990 (AZ) + 194 (Moderna) + 19 (Unknown) = 8463

Reproductive/Breast - 12,481 (Pfizer) + 14,776 (AZ) + 1551 (Moderna) + 81 (Unknown) = 28,889
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/coronavirus-covid-19-vaccine-adverse-reactions/coronavirus-vaccine-summary-of-yellow-card-reporting

Twitter suspended Dr Peter McCullough again. The most published cardiologist, is suspended for speaking from a clinical position.

"PFIZERLEAK: EXPOSING THE PFIZER MANUFACTURING AND SUPPLY AGREEMENT."

https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1419653002818990085.html?s=09

It's almost as if an entire financial reset depended on it..although pharmaceutical company capture of the authorities could be enough of an explantion too.

Another question from Ian Brown.

US and Israel: "Seniors and high-risk patients vaccinated in January 2021 appear to have no protection whatsoever.
Important findings from Israel: The latest data from Israel, which has used the Pfizer mRNA vaccine primarily, indicates that vaccine effectiveness against Delta coronavirus infection and symptomatic (“mild”) disease has dropped from about 95% to about 40%, whereas effectiveness against hospitalization and severe disease (i.e., low blood oxygen levels) remains at 80% to 90% (see chart below).
Importantly, in people who got vaccinated already in January 2021 (primarily the elderly), protection against infection and mild disease may already have dropped to near 0% (see chart above). Moreover, since the Delta covid outbreak is still accelerating in Israel, the effectiveness against hospitalization and severe disease may further decrease (due to lags in hospitalizations)."
https://www.americaoutloud.com/swiss-policy-analysis%e2%8f%a4vaccine-failure/

"In the UK, which has primarily used the AstraZeneca DNA adenovector vaccine, the latest estimate by researchers at University College London indicates an effectiveness against infection of close to zero percent and an effectiveness against severe disease of about 60%. In very senior citizens, the effectiveness against severe disease may be even lower (due to a weaker immune response).
(A substantially higher estimate by Public Health England, recently published in the New England Journal of Medicine, was based on outdated data from early June. Interestingly, the British government hasn’t updated its data on AstraZeneca vaccine effectiveness since June 13. Update: New data by PHE confirms that vaccine effectiveness against infection dropped below 20%.)"

https://swprs.org/covid-vaccines-the-good-the-bad-the-ugly/

UK UCL data: "Current estimates of the vaccination efficacy are:

preventing exposure to infection: 19.2% (CI 15.4 to 22.8)

preventing transmission following infection: 84.7% (CI 83.5 to 85.7)

preventing serious illness when symptomatic (age 15-34): 74.0% (CI 73.3 to 74.8)

preventing serious illness when symptomatic (age 35-70): 49.3% (CI 47.8 to 50.8)

preventing fatality when seriously ill: 92.9% (CI 92.3 to 93.4)

The corresponding cumulative (vaccinated vs. unvaccinated) risks are:

relative risk of infection: 80.8%

relative risk of mild illness: 42.5%

relative risk of severe illness: 15.5%

relative risk of fatality: 1.1%

For example, vaccination reduces the risk of being infected and developing a severe illness to 15.5% of the risk prior to vaccination."

NOTE:
"Btw the way the protection against infection was 1% last week . When I read this last week. So either they changed it because it was wrong or they changed it for another reason"
(OR in comments below)

https://www.fil.ion.ucl.ac.uk/spm/covid-19/forecasting/

Compare injections efficacy at reducing severe disease to vitamin D efficacy in sufficiency studies. Subtract eight fold increased chance of death if you are seriously ill and have had the injections compared to seriously ill with no injections (PHE real data contradicts UCL projections entirely) and high vitamin D levels. Do we call vitamin D a vaccine? https://c19vitamind.com/

According to the data, having sufficient or more than sufficient levels of vitamin D is comparable at preventing serious illness to the injections in the UK, numbers around 60%. The big difference is over 1,000 deaths in the UK & over 30,000 deaths with the injections in the UK, EU & US compared to ZERO deaths from vitamin D. Which is safer right now, vitamin D or the injections?
https://johnplatinumgoss.com/covid-19-vaccination-statistics/

Why did regulators not demand biodistribution studies? Is this acceptable when we have over 30,000 dead people in the West? We are talking casualties level of a war here. Why is everyone ignoring the people who have died? Why are the injections not stopped until a safer alternative is worked on? What has happened to the regulators?

"No new biodistribution studies for covid-19 vaccines

Officials have consistently emphasised that despite shaving years off traditional timelines for producing vaccines, no compromises in the process were taken.20 However one type of study, tracking the distribution of a vaccine once injected in the body, was not conducted using any of the three vaccines currently authorised in the US.
Such biodistribution studies are a standard element of drug safety testing but “are usually not required for vaccines,” according to European Medicines Agency policy,21 which adds, “However, such studies might be applicable when new delivery systems are employed or when the vaccine contains novel adjuvants or excipients.”
In the case of covid-19 vaccines, regulators accepted biodistribution data from past studies performed with related, mostly unapproved compounds that use the same platform technology. "

https://www.bmj.com/content/373/bmj.n1244

"Highlights
•
Vitamin D serum levels above 35 ng/mL seem to correlate with the mortality rate of COVID-19 patients.
•
The majority of the Western population is deficient in Vitamin D.
•
Vitamin D3 supplementation also requires additional vitamin K2 intake.
•
The immunoregulating function of vitamin D is promising and might decrease the global epidemic mortality."

@goddek

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S120197122030624X#bib0200

CONCLUSION: VITAMIN D VERSUS THE INJECTIONS

Vaccinations are by definition there to prevent infection. If an injection does not prevent infection it is incorrect to call it a vaccine: it is only a medical injection.

If we only talk about a medical injection preventing serious respiratory disease then we might as well stick to supplementation with vitamin D: much safer and works not only for all variants but for all respiratory viruses.

There is no doubt that focusing on a single variant or virus when you can address all respiratory infections with vitamin D is short sighted and frankly a very, very stupid direction which only benefits the big pharmaceutical companies. It's stupid because you can easily die of another respiratory virus when you focus on SARSCoV2 only.

The intelligent solution addresses the possibility of infection from all viruses for all your life and reducing the chances of serious illness from all of them at the same time: it's called vitamin D.

The difference between vitamin D and Covid19 injections is over 30,000 deaths reported as adverse events from the injections.

In conclusion, vitamin D is the safest preventive solution to this and all future respiratory virus pandemics, without any doubt.

Robin.

COVID19 INJECTIONS, WHAT THE NEW EFFICACY DATA SAYS:

"In many countries, mass vaccination campaigns have themselves triggered large coronavirus outbreaks (“post first dose spike”), possibly due to a combination of vaccine-induced temporary immune suppression and infections at large indoor vaccination centers visited by thousands of people. The vaccine-induced temporary immune suppression may also explain the frequently observed post-vaccination appearance of shingles (i.e. herpes zoster reactivation).

Concerning children, since covid remains mostly asymptomatic or mild in them anyway, and since vaccination cannot prevent infection and infectiousness, the vaccination of children and even of young low-risk adults becomes increasingly difficult to justify, especially given the very real vaccine-associated cardiovascular risks to them (e.g. teen myocarditis and cerebral blood clots).

[I WOULD EXPLAIN THIS IS BECAUSE OF A COMBINATION OF HERD IMMUNITY FROM NATURAL INFECTION AND HIGHER SUMMER LEVELS OF VITAMIN D AS WELL. ALSO THE REALITY IS THAT MANY VULNERABLE PEOPLE ALREADY DIED FROM COVID19 IN THE UK- RM]:
A look at covid data in places like Israel, the UK and Portugal – which were first in Europe to experience the Delta variant summer wave – confirms that, while infections have skyrocketed, hospitalizations have remained rather low and deaths have remained very low so far (see charts below). In contrast, in countries with a low vaccination rate – such as India, Russia, as well as many Asian and African countries, Delta covid deaths have reached all-time record levels (see below).

In conclusion, and as argued previously, vaccine protection against infection and “mild disease” has pretty much collapsed, whereas protection against severe disease and death remains at a reasonable level, with the partial exception of the most senior citizens and especially nursing home residents, some of whom have never mounted a neutralizing antibody response to the vaccine.

Indeed, data from Israel as well as recent studies all indicate that a previous coronavirus infection continues to offer the best protection against future infections and disease.
In contrast, vaccination cannot achieve “sterile immunity” against infection and infectiousness. Thus, the whole idea of “vaccination certificates” has become obsolete – at least from a medical and epidemiological perspective – and should be rejected: the claim that it’s just “the unvaccinated” that are driving outbreaks – a claim made by many authorities – is simply false.

For instance, just this week a “fully vaccinated” Australian managed to pre-symptomatically [how do we know he/she was not feeling unwell already? Nobody would admit it in the current climate] infect about 60 people at a party in the United States. Many similar stories have already been reported in Europe and Israel: fully vaccinated people can easily transmit the virus even to large groups. Hence, imposing “vaccination certificates” or “green passes” may only serve a political purpose. "

https://swprs.org/covid-vaccines-the-good-the-bad-the-ugly/