In simplified terms, the data is telling me this: in 6 out of 10 cases the injections do not work. This is confirmed by the data from Israel. In those 6 cases the injections do not work, the chances of death are 8 times higher in those people who got injected than those who did not. This is confirmed by the Public Health England (PHE) data I posted on this channel previously. High levels of circulating vitamin D in the blood whether achieved through sunshine or nutrition are also associated with reducing severity of disease and the chances of death. Do we call vitamin D3 a vaccine, because it may be as effective as the injections at reducing severity of disease? Robin

https://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/.premium-israel-reports-effectiveness-of-covid-vaccine-against-infection-drops-to-40-percent-1.10021477

"This WSJ editorial statement is a dangerous lie, with NO basis in either current scientific epidemiological data or the fundamentals of immunology.
To the contrary, the the bulk of studies on the topic of “re-infection” in the COVID-recovered, are demonstrating that individuals who are COVID-recovered and have thus acquired Antibody and T-cell immunity to SARS-CoV-2, are equally if not better protected from subsequent infection as compared to the vaccinated. Though I am cognizant this fact ought NOT be abused as an argument for seeking natural infection as a pathway to immunity, it IS the argument for not allowing coercion of COVID-recovered Americans into undergoing what is an unnecessary and potentially dangerous treatment to them.
I am left wondering why the editorial board of a respected media outlet like the WSJ would allow itself to spread such a lie with no stringent verification:
1) Are you simply careless journalists now? or
2) Are you now active participants in the US Government’s publicity machine attempting to impose a “one-size-fits-all” vaccine policy on all Americans, irrespective of medical necessity, the fundamentals of immunological science and medical ethics?
Irrespective of what the reason is for the lie you have now published in today’s editorial article, it is an absolute journalistic duty for you to either correct or retract this false statement immediately— given that you have been alerted to it.
For the WSJ to publish a critical false statement that opens the door to misleading the public and galvanizing generalist politicians and regulators into comfortably accepting unnecessary, and potentially dangerous coerced vaccination of the already immune subset of Americans, is a florid and dangerous dereliction of journalistic duty — but, of course, this seems to the norm for the mainstream media these days."

https://noorchashm.medium.com/warning-for-immediate-correction-wsj-editorial-falsehood-re-susceptibility-of-covid-recovered-4d0b0656cdd

Self-Reported Real-World Safety and Reactogenicity of COVID-19 Vaccines: A Vaccine Recipient Survey

"A prior COVID-19 infection was associated with an increased risk of any side effect. It was also associated with an increased risk of severe side effects leading to hospital care. mRNA vaccines were associated with a higher incidence of any side effect"

Are people being told this as part of the required informed consent? Because the media is certainly not telling them this. As the WSJ article posted prior shows, the media is actually encouraging the opposite, which will inevitably lead to more adverse reactions. People who have had the disease have a higher risk of serious adverse reactions to the injections.

https://www.mdpi.com/2075-1729/11/3/249

In addition to boosting your immune system Vitamin D also prevents blood clots https://vitamindwiki.com/Blood+clotting+%28Thrombosis%29+is+associated+with+low+Vitamin+D+%28yet+again%29

⬆️ REGULATORY CAPTURE

Nena's 99 Red Balloons is Robin Monotti's song choice of the day. Read post shared @robinmg to find out why.

https://youtu.be/hiwgOWo7mDc

Big r3sp3ct to Nena (https://bit.ly/3l9MNGj).

Quote:
"The question is not what we are allowed to do. The question is what we will let happen to us."

"Fascism is not what you’ve been told. Fascism is the concept:

When we’re all on the same page, then we all benefit.

That’s all there is to fascism, so you can see why fascism was not always a pejorative and was once widely respected. Most people thought it just made a lot of sense, although a few independent thinkers could foresee that it contained the seeds of hell on earth.
Consider that the term fascism is based on the ancient Roman symbol, the “fasces.” The fasces illustrates the concept of “strength through unity.” Whereas, one stick is weak; a bundle of sticks all pointing in the same direction, and tied together – is strong.

Although fascism neither requires nor advocates genocide, when fascism inevitably fails, a government having absolute power will have both the incentive and the power to find a scapegoat who was not as much on the same page as everyone else – and punish them. Of course, the most believable and acceptable scapegoat will be some minority who actually wasn’t as much on the same page as everyone else. Then a powerful government controlled media would have the means and the motive to wage a propaganda campaign to further exaggerate their differences."

https://endofinnocence.com/fascism-explained-conformism/

"Fascism is the great Italian social crisis of the 20th century and its main form of oppression is the severe enforcement of conformism. Conformism through fascism is intellectually weak and profoundly lazy. Moravia 's protagonist Marcello is weak minded and succumbs to embracing fascism. Marcello 's interior monologue is the definitively twisted aspect of this novel as it shows us how he rationalizes the irrational choices made in his life. The time is marked by indifference meaning that the average person was too indifferent to their political life situation that they did not pick a side to support. Consequently this negative decision lead to the rise of fascism."

https://www.ipl.org/essay/Conformism-In-The-Conformist-PKU5FHEAJFR

"True fascism, Bertolucci suggests, is the failure to act: a passivity, rather than an active force.

A normal man, he is told, "likes people similar to himself and does not trust those who are different; that's why a normal man is a true brother, a true citizen, a true patriot... a true fascist."

https://www.theguardian.com/film/filmblog/2008/feb/28/theconformistreturns

"Authoritarian Conscience

Closely related to the idea of conformism is Fromm’s authoritarian conscience. What is considered right or wrong is not the growth of the individual and for society. The authoritarian conscience in its extreme form is not even about following the commands of a charismatic, authoritarian father figure. Morality is determined by conformism. “Virtue is to be adjusted and to be like the rest. Vice, to be different” (Fromm, 1955, p. 158). There is a conventionalism that determines their morals.
A powerful force is that the teachings of an authoritarian religion are internalized. When the person goes against the group, it no longer brings just fear of aloneness, but also feelings of guilt. Once internalized, it has a powerful hold on people. “Conscience is a more effective regulator of conduct than fear of external authorities; for, while one can run away from the latter, one cannot escape from oneself nor, therefore from the internalized authority which has become part of oneself” (Fromm, 1947, p. 144).
People who are emotionally weak, who have not developed a secure autonomous identity, must look up to authority figures. They are afraid of those in authority, while also admiring them. “The image of perfection is projected upon external authorities” (Fromm, 1947, p. 145). These authorities become the ideal striving of people. People with authoritarian characters (or personalities) internalize the idealized authority. This circular pattern of projection and internalization only intensifies the helplessness of people. The result is a conviction that is unshakable to any contradictory evidence."

https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/social-sciences/conformism

EXAMPLE OF SERIOUS MISINFORMATION.

I was just sent this short piece.

Please note that, in relation to what I’m alleged to have said, it’s ALL TOTALLY LIES.

They’ve misspelled my surname. They’ve given me a title I don’t have. And this part of the piece is months old.

Once more, I encourage you to err towards caution in sharing info. The fact that I do think we’re headed into a depopulation event does not mean that anything goes. The only thing I’ve got is Scientific competence, honesty & candour.

Here’s the offending text.
Many thanks
Dr Mike Yeadon


Vaccination - Bio-weapons of genocide of the 21st century. Former Pfizer Chief Scientist Mike Yeedon has once again expressed his position that it is too late now to save those who have been injected with a substance publicly called "the Covid-19 vaccine." He encourages those who have not yet received the lethal injection to fight for their lives, those around them and the lives of their children. The internationally renowned immunologist goes on to describe a process that he says will kill the vast majority of people: "Immediately after the first vaccination, about 0.8% of people die within two weeks. The average life expectancy of survivors will be a maximum of two years, but it also decreases with each new "injection". " Additional vaccines are still being developed to cause deterioration in certain organs, including the heart, lungs and brain. After two decades at Pfizer, Professor Yedon was familiar with the functions and research and development goals of pharmaceutical giant Pfizer, and states that the ultimate goal of the current "vaccination" regime can only be a massive demographic event that will make all world wars put together, like Mickey's staging Mouse. "Billions of people have already been sentenced to certain, inevitable and painful death. Anyone who receives the injection will die prematurely, and three years is a generous estimate of how long they can survive."

What I was trying to do with the earlier articles and previous observations which made an analogy with Italian fascism is to look at it from a psychological and social angle. Conformism is a pre-requisite to implement the fascist state because the fascist state is primarily self policing.

What I am trying to say is that this system of self policing of others until they conform to the will of the state is a technique that was used during Italian fascism and is being used today under the mass injection and mass obedience to the restrictions and measures campaign.

This is different to the Bolshevik terror for the simple reason that the Bolsheviks were a small minority that consolidated its power through the Cheka. This is also different from the Stalinist purges in which dissidents were removed and sent to the gulags by the NKVD.

This is not what is happening now, what is happening now is a system much more similar to the self policing fascist society which was achieved through the promotion of conformism by the media and the state. Much like what is happening now with the injection campaign, and what was happening during the lockdown with people turning on each other for not wearing masks for example.

This self policing has one psychological-societal pre-requisite: the willingness to conform to a group which conforms to the instructions from the state.

The willingness to conform was created during lockdown, with coordinated actions. The "we are all in it together" mantra plays precisely this role. In reality we were never all in it together, some were at the driving wheel all along, and others had to make way for the vehicle of fear to plough through all it could find.

Erich Fromm's description of authoritarian conscience is perhaps a less political and more psychological description. What it also rests on is conformism.

Conformism leads to a self policing country according to the interests of those in power, while pretending to be caring for others.

This is how the centrists & liberal left, who at least in the UK are meant to oppose what is going by sitting on the opposition benches, and in the US through their claims of identifying with anti-fascism, have instead been hoodwinked in supporting the project of the self policing masks, lockdowns and injection fascism state while believing they are doing something for the common good.

They were and are being easily fooled, when they are not directly complicit and personally benefiting from it by painting themselves as those with a sense of superior morality. Instead, those who think of themselves as more altruistic in this case can be described is extremely gullible and prone to the manipulation of conformism carried out primarily by the state on its people. This manipulation is achieved through fear based campaigns and false solutions which are being offered to consolidate the power of the state, not to save grandma. Robin

The Times, circa 1938 in Italy or Germany.

"Unjabbed students face ban as ‘raging’ Boris Johnson targets vaccine refuseniks"

https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/unjabbed-students-face-ban-as-raging-boris-johnson-targets-vaccine-refuseniks-jmwwkcwfh

Cat. Bag.

Let me tell you how much this government cares about students. Firtsly, I work in student halls and aot of student rented properties. I work for their letting agencies. I speak to the students first hand. Last year before the term starts student's pay upto £6000 for thier residency for the yr. Last yr even though we were locked down and the students didn't have to pay the fees as they weren't going to uni and doing online like many. The government would not announce wether the students were going to be allowed back to uni or studying from home. They wouldn't announce it until 90% of the students had paid their fees for their appts. A week later, after paying their fees they were told they would be studying from home and their accommodation wasn't needed.

"Ideally, governments want to create their own Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC) which is linked to a national digital ID which gives government total control over their citizens. They can track your every purchase and deduct any amount of tax without even asking.
(9/28)

The problem is we don’t have a national digital ID system that would be the underpinning of any such CBDC, and the old system is going to collapse, it’s only a question of when at this point.
How can we be so certain that the collapse is both imminent and unavoidable?
(10/28)

Interest rates are already at zero, so you can’t lower them. So the only option left is to print new money to stimulate the stock market. Indeed, the money printing has been absurd lately with 30% of all money having been created in the last few years.
(11/28)

Of course you can only prop up the market with printed money for so long before inflation turns our money into toilet paper. I think the elites realised the sh*t they were in in the mid-2010s. The next big 2008 style collapse was going to be their comeuppance.
(14/28)

So how do you transition to a new money system that retains the power of government and the elite? The logical alternative of bitcoin is stateless, and in that future if government don’t control the money you only pay for government services you actually want.
(15/28)

Fortunately (for them) the Chinese figured out the answer. You create your own digital money. Linked to their existing national digital ID system that goes the other way entirely from free money, indeed, it massively expands the power of government.
(16/28)"

https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1419293260468690946.html

DIGITAL ID's

New proposals for governing body to ensure safe and secure use of digital identity.

Plans to create a new system to make digital identities as trusted and secure as official documents, such as passports, have been published by the government.

On 19.7.2 the government launched a consultation- within link:-

https://www.gov.uk/government/news/plans-for-governing-body-to-make-digital-identities-as-trusted-as-passports

"The trust framework is also central to the Government Digital Service’s work with other government departments to develop a new cross-government single sign-on and identity assurance solution. This will ensure interoperability of identities and associated attributes between sectors in the longer term.
This document is just the beginning of building a trusted digital identity system for the UK."

https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/the-uk-digital-identity-and-attributes-trust-framework/the-uk-digital-identity-and-attributes-trust-framework

I love this, by Dr Lynn Flynn

Definition of absurdity: For the first time in human history, we can transmit a disease we don't have to those who are immunized against it.