Robin Monotti + Cory Morningstar
71.9K subscribers
14.5K photos
8.02K videos
624 files
28.4K links
Official Robin Monotti + Cory Morningstar
Donations:
robinmonotti.substack.com/
www.patreon.com/CoryMorningstar
Group is @robinmggroup
We don't DM from this channel account.
Download Telegram
Forwarded from Mike Yeadon
Official claims about the prevalence of the delta variant are bogus.

This from an expert in the relevant analytical techniques involved in recognising variants of SARS-COV-2 gave me a very interesting perspective.
I had long thought that not only is testing completely untrustworthy but that, in U.K. at least, it is fraudulent, in that those claiming to be running the testing facilities are deliberately altering conditions so as to exaggerate any threats.
This goes a step further, in asserting that the claims of officials about the delta variant is pure lies, because the testing used is simply incapable of distinguishing variants. Here below is his expert opinion:

...........,
“I think the so-called delta variant vaccine breakthrough is a fraud, or an unsubstantiated claim because there is no diagnostic test for delta variant. See Article below”:

https://www.deseret.com/coronavirus/2021/7/20/22585747/covid-test-for-delta-variant 

Is there a delta variant COVID-19 test?
Current COVID-19 tests can’t always detect the delta variant. The delta variant “carries distinctive biological markers that some among the dozens of commercially available COVID tests from academic institutes and medical giants may not be able to sense,” according to Fortune.
Forwarded from Coronavirus Plushie
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
DR. MIKE YEADON: COVID-19 LIES - VARIANTS

The seventh and final video in a series of videos of Dr. Mike Yeadon talking with Del Bigtree about the Covid-19 lies we've all been told.

Here are the other 6 videos in the series:

1) DR. MIKE YEADON: COVID-19 LIES - THE PCR TEST
https://www.bitchute.com/video/k45zrvEIYkLT/

2) DR. MIKE YEADON: COVID-19 LIES - NO TREATMENTS
https://www.bitchute.com/video/8yNv0Y3sUkMP/

3) DR. MIKE YEADON: COVID-19 LIES - THE SEVERITY OF THE VIRUS
https://www.bitchute.com/video/pI9fpExY4OVc/

4) DR. MIKE YEADON: COVID-19 LIES - ASYMPTOMATIC TRANSMISSION
https://www.bitchute.com/video/AndCqR3r4H3f/

5) DR. MIKE YEADON: COVID-19 LIES - LOCKDOWNS
https://www.bitchute.com/video/fUW1sBaj8fov/

6) DR. MIKE YEADON: COVID-19 LIES - IT'S A NOVEL VIRUS, SO THERE'S NO IMMUNITY
https://www.bitchute.com/video/RdMY3ddMdbP1/

…………………………………………………………………………

This video (Variants) in Bitchute:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/6dnc5Xa3L5cB/
…………………………………………………………………...........
"Unprecedented: NHS England £3.2 Billion tender for blood clot treatment… was 200 million a year."
https://www.investmentwatchblog.com/unprecedented-nhs-england-3-2-billion-tender-for-blood-clot-treatment/
INDIA: Gandhi & Choose Love not Fear
Forwarded from L
According to the latest Public Health England data, we may be seeing vaccine enhanced disease in approximately 0.8% of people who get infected after having received both injections. This is the percentage of injected infected people who died. The percentage of infection mortality drops to 0.1% for those who have not been injected.

Vaccine Enhanced Disease or VED

VACCINE ENHANCED DISEASE or PATHOGENIC PRIMING

FOUR mechanisms of vaccine enhanced disease or VED arising after exposure to wild virus post Covid19 gene editing attempts:

1 Non neutralizing antibody dependent enhancement leading to a more severe disease or ADE (or VADE)

2 Low quality, low quantity antibody mediated immune enhancement leading to cytokine storm or AMIE

3 Immune suppression leading to enhanced disease in the period of 1-6 weeks following "vaccination" when exposed to the wild virus

4 Long spike protein disease: where the circulatory system has been damaged by the injections induced spike proteins in the blood stream, and further exposure to the wild virus & its 28 proteins not included in the genetic editing injections exacerbates this damage.

"We argue that ADE should be given full consideration in the safety evaluation of emerging candidate vaccines for SARS-CoV-2." SOURCE:
"The potential danger of suboptimal antibody responses in COVID-19 | Nature Reviews Immunology"
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41577-020-0321-6
In simplified terms, the data is telling me this: in 6 out of 10 cases the injections do not work. This is confirmed by the data from Israel. In those 6 cases the injections do not work, the chances of death are 8 times higher in those people who got injected than those who did not. This is confirmed by the Public Health England (PHE) data I posted on this channel previously. High levels of circulating vitamin D in the blood whether achieved through sunshine or nutrition are also associated with reducing severity of disease and the chances of death. Do we call vitamin D3 a vaccine, because it may be as effective as the injections at reducing severity of disease? Robin

https://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/.premium-israel-reports-effectiveness-of-covid-vaccine-against-infection-drops-to-40-percent-1.10021477
"This WSJ editorial statement is a dangerous lie, with NO basis in either current scientific epidemiological data or the fundamentals of immunology.
To the contrary, the the bulk of studies on the topic of “re-infection” in the COVID-recovered, are demonstrating that individuals who are COVID-recovered and have thus acquired Antibody and T-cell immunity to SARS-CoV-2, are equally if not better protected from subsequent infection as compared to the vaccinated. Though I am cognizant this fact ought NOT be abused as an argument for seeking natural infection as a pathway to immunity, it IS the argument for not allowing coercion of COVID-recovered Americans into undergoing what is an unnecessary and potentially dangerous treatment to them.
I am left wondering why the editorial board of a respected media outlet like the WSJ would allow itself to spread such a lie with no stringent verification:
1) Are you simply careless journalists now? or
2) Are you now active participants in the US Government’s publicity machine attempting to impose a “one-size-fits-all” vaccine policy on all Americans, irrespective of medical necessity, the fundamentals of immunological science and medical ethics?
Irrespective of what the reason is for the lie you have now published in today’s editorial article, it is an absolute journalistic duty for you to either correct or retract this false statement immediately— given that you have been alerted to it.
For the WSJ to publish a critical false statement that opens the door to misleading the public and galvanizing generalist politicians and regulators into comfortably accepting unnecessary, and potentially dangerous coerced vaccination of the already immune subset of Americans, is a florid and dangerous dereliction of journalistic duty — but, of course, this seems to the norm for the mainstream media these days."

https://noorchashm.medium.com/warning-for-immediate-correction-wsj-editorial-falsehood-re-susceptibility-of-covid-recovered-4d0b0656cdd
Self-Reported Real-World Safety and Reactogenicity of COVID-19 Vaccines: A Vaccine Recipient Survey

"A prior COVID-19 infection was associated with an increased risk of any side effect. It was also associated with an increased risk of severe side effects leading to hospital care. mRNA vaccines were associated with a higher incidence of any side effect"

Are people being told this as part of the required informed consent? Because the media is certainly not telling them this. As the WSJ article posted prior shows, the media is actually encouraging the opposite, which will inevitably lead to more adverse reactions. People who have had the disease have a higher risk of serious adverse reactions to the injections.

https://www.mdpi.com/2075-1729/11/3/249
Forwarded from Cate
⬆️ REGULATORY CAPTURE
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Big r3sp3ct to Nena (https://bit.ly/3l9MNGj).

Quote:
"The question is not what we are allowed to do. The question is what we will let happen to us."
"Fascism is not what you’ve been told. Fascism is the concept:

When we’re all on the same page, then we all benefit.

That’s all there is to fascism, so you can see why fascism was not always a pejorative and was once widely respected. Most people thought it just made a lot of sense, although a few independent thinkers could foresee that it contained the seeds of hell on earth.
Consider that the term fascism is based on the ancient Roman symbol, the “fasces.” The fasces illustrates the concept of “strength through unity.” Whereas, one stick is weak; a bundle of sticks all pointing in the same direction, and tied together – is strong.

Although fascism neither requires nor advocates genocide, when fascism inevitably fails, a government having absolute power will have both the incentive and the power to find a scapegoat who was not as much on the same page as everyone else – and punish them. Of course, the most believable and acceptable scapegoat will be some minority who actually wasn’t as much on the same page as everyone else. Then a powerful government controlled media would have the means and the motive to wage a propaganda campaign to further exaggerate their differences."

https://endofinnocence.com/fascism-explained-conformism/
"Fascism is the great Italian social crisis of the 20th century and its main form of oppression is the severe enforcement of conformism. Conformism through fascism is intellectually weak and profoundly lazy. Moravia 's protagonist Marcello is weak minded and succumbs to embracing fascism. Marcello 's interior monologue is the definitively twisted aspect of this novel as it shows us how he rationalizes the irrational choices made in his life. The time is marked by indifference meaning that the average person was too indifferent to their political life situation that they did not pick a side to support. Consequently this negative decision lead to the rise of fascism."

https://www.ipl.org/essay/Conformism-In-The-Conformist-PKU5FHEAJFR
"True fascism, Bertolucci suggests, is the failure to act: a passivity, rather than an active force.

A normal man, he is told, "likes people similar to himself and does not trust those who are different; that's why a normal man is a true brother, a true citizen, a true patriot... a true fascist."

https://www.theguardian.com/film/filmblog/2008/feb/28/theconformistreturns