Forwarded from Mike Yeadon
I apologies for the lengths of several recent posts.
Sometimes, as with this one, I don’t have a link, so I can share it only in full.
Now follows a press release from the European Forum for Vaccine Vigilance
It’s rather shocking but I expect many of us will recognise the reverberations in our own locations.
I fully endorse their messages.
With best wishes,
Dr Mike Yeadon.
Press Release 4th July 2021
GLOBAL DEMAND FOR AN “IMMEDIATE END TO THE CURRENT CRIMINAL EXPERIMENTAL VACCINE CAMPAIGN AND THE CREATION OF AN INTERNATIONAL CITIZENS’ INVESTIGATION COMMISSION
Paris, France, 3rd July 2021.
Under the aegis of the European Forum for Vaccine Vigilance (EFVV) and during the first meeting in Paris and by teleconference of the International and French Scientific Council for Evaluation of Covid-19 Policies, a group of scientists, lawyers, intellectuals, health care professionals, officials and citizens unanimously adopted a motion to create an International Citizens’ Inquiry Commission.
One of the primary objectives of this decision was to pull together the expertise, experience, know-how and soft skills of the various existing movements which have emerged during this health crisis and apply them to the development of concrete health and strategic solutions. These will be scientific, legal, military security and political solutions, to be applied on the ground, with and for the people.
Experts in various fields and speakers attending either in person or by teleconference took the floor to voice their experience of Covid-19 and highlight the circumstances and consequences of events observed in 2020 and 2021 to date. The international Commission then worked on the development of concrete proposals. Consideration of these scientific, socio-economic, political and legal testimonies, along with the lack of justification for passing the state of emergency law and the organisation of an enforced dangerous experimental vaccination campaign - undoubtedly fatal for many, resulted in a demand from those attending for an immediate end to all vaccination campaigns in France and worldwide. The unanimously voted international citizens investigation commission will consolidate the material necessary to incriminate those responsible, whether directly or as an accomplice, for this organised massacre. There is already quantifiable evidence to prove this crime.
The meeting was chaired by Jean-Pierre Eudier (retired dental surgeon, Luxembourg), Gregory-Paul Martin (author, UK) and Astrid Stuckelberger (international scientist, Switzerland) with the participation of Virginie de Araujo-Recchia (Lawyer, France) and representatives attending from Israel, Quebec, Canada, the United States, Luxembourg, Belgium, Switzerland, French Savoie and the English-speaking world.
This meeting followed the Annual General Meeting (AGM) of the French Ligue Nationale pour la Liberté des Vaccinations (National League for Freedom of Choice in Vaccinations), chaired by Jean-Pierre Eudier. The AGM was attended this year by a large number of the group’s members who voted to approve the creation of this commission, pledging their active support for the project.
In his introductory speech at the opening of this first meeting of the Scientific Council for Evaluation of Covid-19 Policies, Dr. Jean-Pierre Eudier stressed the very urgent need to perform an inventory of all testimonies, findings and consequences available to date and to take action. The situation now being extremely serious and urgent, the time is no longer for procrastination but for immediate firm and resolute action to protect people before it is too late. Comparing the current situation to the Rwandan genocide on day D-1, Dr. Eudier reminded those attending of the speed of events, unsuspected on the eve of such a horrible massacre. He quoted General Roméo Dallaire, Commander-in-Chief of the UN peacekeepers, who witnessed the astounding speed of events.
Sometimes, as with this one, I don’t have a link, so I can share it only in full.
Now follows a press release from the European Forum for Vaccine Vigilance
It’s rather shocking but I expect many of us will recognise the reverberations in our own locations.
I fully endorse their messages.
With best wishes,
Dr Mike Yeadon.
Press Release 4th July 2021
GLOBAL DEMAND FOR AN “IMMEDIATE END TO THE CURRENT CRIMINAL EXPERIMENTAL VACCINE CAMPAIGN AND THE CREATION OF AN INTERNATIONAL CITIZENS’ INVESTIGATION COMMISSION
Paris, France, 3rd July 2021.
Under the aegis of the European Forum for Vaccine Vigilance (EFVV) and during the first meeting in Paris and by teleconference of the International and French Scientific Council for Evaluation of Covid-19 Policies, a group of scientists, lawyers, intellectuals, health care professionals, officials and citizens unanimously adopted a motion to create an International Citizens’ Inquiry Commission.
One of the primary objectives of this decision was to pull together the expertise, experience, know-how and soft skills of the various existing movements which have emerged during this health crisis and apply them to the development of concrete health and strategic solutions. These will be scientific, legal, military security and political solutions, to be applied on the ground, with and for the people.
Experts in various fields and speakers attending either in person or by teleconference took the floor to voice their experience of Covid-19 and highlight the circumstances and consequences of events observed in 2020 and 2021 to date. The international Commission then worked on the development of concrete proposals. Consideration of these scientific, socio-economic, political and legal testimonies, along with the lack of justification for passing the state of emergency law and the organisation of an enforced dangerous experimental vaccination campaign - undoubtedly fatal for many, resulted in a demand from those attending for an immediate end to all vaccination campaigns in France and worldwide. The unanimously voted international citizens investigation commission will consolidate the material necessary to incriminate those responsible, whether directly or as an accomplice, for this organised massacre. There is already quantifiable evidence to prove this crime.
The meeting was chaired by Jean-Pierre Eudier (retired dental surgeon, Luxembourg), Gregory-Paul Martin (author, UK) and Astrid Stuckelberger (international scientist, Switzerland) with the participation of Virginie de Araujo-Recchia (Lawyer, France) and representatives attending from Israel, Quebec, Canada, the United States, Luxembourg, Belgium, Switzerland, French Savoie and the English-speaking world.
This meeting followed the Annual General Meeting (AGM) of the French Ligue Nationale pour la Liberté des Vaccinations (National League for Freedom of Choice in Vaccinations), chaired by Jean-Pierre Eudier. The AGM was attended this year by a large number of the group’s members who voted to approve the creation of this commission, pledging their active support for the project.
In his introductory speech at the opening of this first meeting of the Scientific Council for Evaluation of Covid-19 Policies, Dr. Jean-Pierre Eudier stressed the very urgent need to perform an inventory of all testimonies, findings and consequences available to date and to take action. The situation now being extremely serious and urgent, the time is no longer for procrastination but for immediate firm and resolute action to protect people before it is too late. Comparing the current situation to the Rwandan genocide on day D-1, Dr. Eudier reminded those attending of the speed of events, unsuspected on the eve of such a horrible massacre. He quoted General Roméo Dallaire, Commander-in-Chief of the UN peacekeepers, who witnessed the astounding speed of events.
Forwarded from Mike Yeadon
After reporting the lightening speed genocide and his powelessness faced with the destructive force of the hatred between the Tutsis and the Hutus, General Dallaire said “Seismic change evolves over a lifetime or it can happen in an instant!”
Dr. Eudier added that today we have reached this point in time with the Covid-19 crisis and that the creation of the International Citizens’ Investigation Commission is one of the imperative responses to this terrifying situation.
His speech is transcribed in full below.
INTRODUCTORY SPEECH BY DR. JEAN-PIERE EUDIER
Before coming to the purpose of this meeting, I would like, by way of introduction, to share a few thoughts on the current, particularly serious situation which has brought us together today.
A spirit of division emanates today from our public authorities. No one can possibly have missed how health policies and particularly the drive towards a vaccine mandate, are pitting individuals against each other, tearing relationships apart and even instilling conflict within families.
Divide and conquer is a well-known technique for obtaining and maintaining power.
I have seen this technique at work in Africa, a territory I know particularly well since I lived and worked there for 40 years. Let me cite as an example the tragedy of Rwanda. An effort to divide was deliberately organised to trigger war between the Hutus and the Tutsis, two tribes who had lived in peace, in the same country, for many long years, one consisting of animal farmers and the other crop farmers. Tension first broke out during the Belgian colonial era when the financial interests of those who wanted to plunder the country deliberately pitted these two groups against each other, to divide, conquer and loot.
The international community was repeatedly warned of the growing tension between these two communities but nothing was done. When the UN arrived to ensure peace, alarming information was sent back from the field to warn of imminent civil war, in particular from Canadian General Roméo Dallaire who was in charge of the operations. But the Canadian general did not have the authority to intervene; he had no choice but to stand powerless, witnessing the escalation of tension into civil war. At the time, the radio and television station, Radio-Télévision des Mille Collines (RTML), similar to BFMTV in France today, played a fatal and now well-identified role. For example, an extract from an article in French newspaper Le Monde (published in April 2019) reports: “Radio-Télévision des Mille Collines broadcast hate, timidly at first, then totally explicit. Names were given of people to kill, rewards were offered for corpses and the militiamen were encouraged to massacre: “You will set the Tutsis on fire and they will regret being born…Do your best!”, “The pits are still half empty; they need to be filled!” Le Monde concluded that “RTLM played a capital role in this 1994 genocide in which, according to the UN, 800,000 moderate Tutsis and Hutus lost their lives”.
I would like to point out that our great national newspaper appears today to have become a voice of disinformation for the general public. Like many other media, it is taking part in the effort to create division between those who are pro-vax and those who are “anti(or rather for freedom of choice in)-vax.
Must history repeat itself? Are we about to see civil war break out in France or in Europe? I fear that this may sadly be the case and I am not the only one in our health freedom associations to feel this way. In his book Les Vaccins à l’ère du Covid-19 (Vaccines in the Covid Era) Michel de Lorgeril mentions the possibility of civil war in the event of a Covid vaccine mandate. In his opinion, the tension between pro-vax and anti(or freedom of choice in)-vax has been gradually increasing since 2018 when 11 vaccines were mandated for French children.
Within our association, we witness daily the distress of families experiencing blackmail and pressure.
Dr. Eudier added that today we have reached this point in time with the Covid-19 crisis and that the creation of the International Citizens’ Investigation Commission is one of the imperative responses to this terrifying situation.
His speech is transcribed in full below.
INTRODUCTORY SPEECH BY DR. JEAN-PIERE EUDIER
Before coming to the purpose of this meeting, I would like, by way of introduction, to share a few thoughts on the current, particularly serious situation which has brought us together today.
A spirit of division emanates today from our public authorities. No one can possibly have missed how health policies and particularly the drive towards a vaccine mandate, are pitting individuals against each other, tearing relationships apart and even instilling conflict within families.
Divide and conquer is a well-known technique for obtaining and maintaining power.
I have seen this technique at work in Africa, a territory I know particularly well since I lived and worked there for 40 years. Let me cite as an example the tragedy of Rwanda. An effort to divide was deliberately organised to trigger war between the Hutus and the Tutsis, two tribes who had lived in peace, in the same country, for many long years, one consisting of animal farmers and the other crop farmers. Tension first broke out during the Belgian colonial era when the financial interests of those who wanted to plunder the country deliberately pitted these two groups against each other, to divide, conquer and loot.
The international community was repeatedly warned of the growing tension between these two communities but nothing was done. When the UN arrived to ensure peace, alarming information was sent back from the field to warn of imminent civil war, in particular from Canadian General Roméo Dallaire who was in charge of the operations. But the Canadian general did not have the authority to intervene; he had no choice but to stand powerless, witnessing the escalation of tension into civil war. At the time, the radio and television station, Radio-Télévision des Mille Collines (RTML), similar to BFMTV in France today, played a fatal and now well-identified role. For example, an extract from an article in French newspaper Le Monde (published in April 2019) reports: “Radio-Télévision des Mille Collines broadcast hate, timidly at first, then totally explicit. Names were given of people to kill, rewards were offered for corpses and the militiamen were encouraged to massacre: “You will set the Tutsis on fire and they will regret being born…Do your best!”, “The pits are still half empty; they need to be filled!” Le Monde concluded that “RTLM played a capital role in this 1994 genocide in which, according to the UN, 800,000 moderate Tutsis and Hutus lost their lives”.
I would like to point out that our great national newspaper appears today to have become a voice of disinformation for the general public. Like many other media, it is taking part in the effort to create division between those who are pro-vax and those who are “anti(or rather for freedom of choice in)-vax.
Must history repeat itself? Are we about to see civil war break out in France or in Europe? I fear that this may sadly be the case and I am not the only one in our health freedom associations to feel this way. In his book Les Vaccins à l’ère du Covid-19 (Vaccines in the Covid Era) Michel de Lorgeril mentions the possibility of civil war in the event of a Covid vaccine mandate. In his opinion, the tension between pro-vax and anti(or freedom of choice in)-vax has been gradually increasing since 2018 when 11 vaccines were mandated for French children.
Within our association, we witness daily the distress of families experiencing blackmail and pressure.
Le Monde.fr
Au Rwanda, les funestes échos de Radio-Mille Collines
Les lieux du génocide (4/9). En 1994, la « voix de la mort » fut le principal instrument du « Hutu Power » pour diffuser la haine des Tutsi et appeler à leur massacre.
Forwarded from Mike Yeadon
Parents are subject to court orders stripping them of their parental rights with the imposition of immediate vaccination of their children.
With the current health crisis, we are witnessing how the media spin a constant pro-vax narrative geared to the imposition of a universal and undifferentiated vaccine mandate with no regard for individual biological status. In our opinion, this is nothing short of a biological, sociological and medical aberration. Like General Dallaire in Rwanda, some scientists and lawyers are warning the public authorities of the health and sociological risks of a vaccine mandate but there is nothing they can do. They stand powerless as they witness the growing division of society. Their voices are overpowered by the mass media which, as Radio Mille Collines was able to do, pit people against each other. According to our media and the experts interviewed on television, there are two kinds of citizen:
• The good ones who comply with all the health restrictions and get vaccinated “for the common good”,
• The “bad” citizens who question these repressive policies and are even considered “health criminals” because they refuse to get vaccinated. In truth, these so-called “bad citizens” are actually people who think for themselves and question the official health narrative pushing for a vaccine mandate. These are people who fear for their own health and for that of their loved ones.
In spite of the initial political discourse which reassured us that freedom of vaccine choice would be maintained, mandatory coronavirus vaccination is looming on the horizon. Yesterday, as I was listening to France-Inter, it was clear how the bill is being clarified. Here again, it is all based on figures shamefully manipulated in an effort to justify such a mandate. In our opinion, this is criminal.
At the same time, we are seeing rising concern in the general population at the prospect of a vaccine mandate. Whatever the media say to persuade us that people are queuing up outside the vaccination centres, our belief is that people are afraid of this vaccine. They fear not only losing their health but also their jobs.
Those who contact us are reporting an increasing number of adverse effects amongst their relatives, friends and neighbours; even sometimes these people are suffering themselves. Reportedly, never in the history of vaccination has a vaccine caused so much damage. Yesterday morning, I received a report from a law firm specialising in compensation for medical accident victims. They say they are now receiving increasing numbers of claims from families: death, thrombosis, heart attacks.
Faced with denial from the authorities and from prescribing physicians and vaccinators, the Ligue is increasingly solicited…whether for the 11 compulsory childhood vaccines or for the Covid-19 vaccine, these are currently the two battles we fight. We have no solutions, no messages of hope to offer. This powerlessness we feel is shared by so many people in France and worldwide. It’s an absolute impotence, so deleterious because these people have no association to support them and no legal recourse! Where do they turn?
Many families have already had to cope with genuine tragedy caused by the childhood vaccines, others are now discovering the horror, the enormous risks of the Covid-19 vaccine. Increasing numbers are now enlightened. They are becoming aware of the crime perpetrated not only against their physical integrity but also against their values. Will they allow it to continue?
This brings me to consideration of how this crisis will evolve if the vaccine is mandated. I only see two options:
• Either there will be a civil war between the pro-vax contingent and those who believe in freedom of vaccine choice combined with the real anti-vaxxers. In such a case, we can at least hope for a positive outcome for freedom of vaccine choice.
• Or, there will be a genuine health and also social disaster.
With the current health crisis, we are witnessing how the media spin a constant pro-vax narrative geared to the imposition of a universal and undifferentiated vaccine mandate with no regard for individual biological status. In our opinion, this is nothing short of a biological, sociological and medical aberration. Like General Dallaire in Rwanda, some scientists and lawyers are warning the public authorities of the health and sociological risks of a vaccine mandate but there is nothing they can do. They stand powerless as they witness the growing division of society. Their voices are overpowered by the mass media which, as Radio Mille Collines was able to do, pit people against each other. According to our media and the experts interviewed on television, there are two kinds of citizen:
• The good ones who comply with all the health restrictions and get vaccinated “for the common good”,
• The “bad” citizens who question these repressive policies and are even considered “health criminals” because they refuse to get vaccinated. In truth, these so-called “bad citizens” are actually people who think for themselves and question the official health narrative pushing for a vaccine mandate. These are people who fear for their own health and for that of their loved ones.
In spite of the initial political discourse which reassured us that freedom of vaccine choice would be maintained, mandatory coronavirus vaccination is looming on the horizon. Yesterday, as I was listening to France-Inter, it was clear how the bill is being clarified. Here again, it is all based on figures shamefully manipulated in an effort to justify such a mandate. In our opinion, this is criminal.
At the same time, we are seeing rising concern in the general population at the prospect of a vaccine mandate. Whatever the media say to persuade us that people are queuing up outside the vaccination centres, our belief is that people are afraid of this vaccine. They fear not only losing their health but also their jobs.
Those who contact us are reporting an increasing number of adverse effects amongst their relatives, friends and neighbours; even sometimes these people are suffering themselves. Reportedly, never in the history of vaccination has a vaccine caused so much damage. Yesterday morning, I received a report from a law firm specialising in compensation for medical accident victims. They say they are now receiving increasing numbers of claims from families: death, thrombosis, heart attacks.
Faced with denial from the authorities and from prescribing physicians and vaccinators, the Ligue is increasingly solicited…whether for the 11 compulsory childhood vaccines or for the Covid-19 vaccine, these are currently the two battles we fight. We have no solutions, no messages of hope to offer. This powerlessness we feel is shared by so many people in France and worldwide. It’s an absolute impotence, so deleterious because these people have no association to support them and no legal recourse! Where do they turn?
Many families have already had to cope with genuine tragedy caused by the childhood vaccines, others are now discovering the horror, the enormous risks of the Covid-19 vaccine. Increasing numbers are now enlightened. They are becoming aware of the crime perpetrated not only against their physical integrity but also against their values. Will they allow it to continue?
This brings me to consideration of how this crisis will evolve if the vaccine is mandated. I only see two options:
• Either there will be a civil war between the pro-vax contingent and those who believe in freedom of vaccine choice combined with the real anti-vaxxers. In such a case, we can at least hope for a positive outcome for freedom of vaccine choice.
• Or, there will be a genuine health and also social disaster.
Forwarded from Mike Yeadon
This is why we are calling all scientists, lawyers, politicians and the media to open their eyes, ears and hearts to this most alarming situation which has compelled us to draft a strong message demanding an immediate end to this criminal vaccination campaign.
We also call for the creation of a citizens’ investigation commission and possibly a lawsuit to judge those responsible for the current and future disaster.
Paris, 3rd July 2021
Contact: cecif-cov@protonmail.com - chair@efvv.eu
We also call for the creation of a citizens’ investigation commission and possibly a lawsuit to judge those responsible for the current and future disaster.
Paris, 3rd July 2021
Contact: cecif-cov@protonmail.com - chair@efvv.eu
Forwarded from Mike Yeadon
Seen on Ivor Cummings twitter feed.
Has everyone stopped looking at the data?
Do note that the actual claimed numbers of deaths “with covid19” are fraudulent because they’re still using excessive amplification & still not subtracting the operational false positive rate.
So imagine the reality being even less scary.
Best wishes
Mike
Has everyone stopped looking at the data?
Do note that the actual claimed numbers of deaths “with covid19” are fraudulent because they’re still using excessive amplification & still not subtracting the operational false positive rate.
So imagine the reality being even less scary.
Best wishes
Mike
Apart from being atrociously discriminatory, to the point of being a hate crime, this is of course based on a terrible scientific understanding: injected or non injected makes no difference to infections, and hospitalizations & deaths are higher in the injected, see Public Health England (PHE) & Israeli Ministry of Health (MOH) data on this channel.
July 18, 2021: "IT'S VERY CLEAR. UNVACCINATED PEOPLE SHOULD NOT BE SHARING INDOOR AIR WITH ANYBODY WITHOUT A MASK. AND SHARING AIR AT ALL - TO EXTENT THAT WE CAN EVEN AVOID THAT ." - Epidemiologist Colin Furness criticized Ontario removing restrictions, saying first day of Stage 3 is also the 'first day of the fourth wave.'
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0m5WUkAaI6Q
July 18, 2021: "IT'S VERY CLEAR. UNVACCINATED PEOPLE SHOULD NOT BE SHARING INDOOR AIR WITH ANYBODY WITHOUT A MASK. AND SHARING AIR AT ALL - TO EXTENT THAT WE CAN EVEN AVOID THAT ." - Epidemiologist Colin Furness criticized Ontario removing restrictions, saying first day of Stage 3 is also the 'first day of the fourth wave.'
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0m5WUkAaI6Q
YouTube
Ontario entering Stage 3 was 'first day of fourth wave,' warns epidemiologist | COVID-19 in Canada
Epidemiologist Colin Furness criticized Ontario removing restrictions, saying first day of Stage 3 is also the 'first day of the fourth wave.'Subscribe to CT...
Remember the claim that graphene oxide was found in a Pfizer vial. The worrying FACT is we still have no explanation from the manufacturers of the injections of why magnets stick to the injection site, which I saw with my own eyes. This is worse than Chernobyl in terms of length of cover-up. Robin.
"INBRAIN Neuroelectronics Secures $17 Million in Series A Funding for First AI-Powered Graphene-Brain Interface
Funding enables company to advance first-in-human studies for its flagship product, a less-invasive neuromodulation device for treating neurological conditions using artificial intelligence and graphene electrodes"
https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20210330005388/en/INBRAIN-Neuroelectronics-Secures-17-Million-in-Series-A-Funding-for-First-AI-Powered-Graphene-Brain-Interface
"INBRAIN Neuroelectronics Secures $17 Million in Series A Funding for First AI-Powered Graphene-Brain Interface
Funding enables company to advance first-in-human studies for its flagship product, a less-invasive neuromodulation device for treating neurological conditions using artificial intelligence and graphene electrodes"
https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20210330005388/en/INBRAIN-Neuroelectronics-Secures-17-Million-in-Series-A-Funding-for-First-AI-Powered-Graphene-Brain-Interface
BusinessWire
INBRAIN Neuroelectronics Secures $17 Million in Series A Funding for First AI-Powered Graphene-Brain Interface
INBRAIN Neuroelectronics has closed $17 million in Series A financing to support first-in-human study of its novel AI-powered graphene-brain interface
Midazolam, the Zyklon B of 2020-2021.
"Midazolam has been associated with respiratory depression and respiratory arrest, especially when used for sedation in noncritical care settings."
https://www.drugs.com/sfx/midazolam-side-effects.html
"Did care homes use powerful sedatives to speed Covid deaths? Number of prescriptions for the drug midazolam doubled during height of the pandemic"
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8514081/Number-prescriptions-drug-midazolam-doubled-height-pandemic.html
"Midazolam has been associated with respiratory depression and respiratory arrest, especially when used for sedation in noncritical care settings."
https://www.drugs.com/sfx/midazolam-side-effects.html
"Did care homes use powerful sedatives to speed Covid deaths? Number of prescriptions for the drug midazolam doubled during height of the pandemic"
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8514081/Number-prescriptions-drug-midazolam-doubled-height-pandemic.html
Eric Clapton Says He Won't Play Shows if Covid Vaccines Are Required - Rolling Stone
https://www.rollingstone.com/music/music-news/eric-clapton-not-play-vaccine-shows-1200257/
https://www.rollingstone.com/music/music-news/eric-clapton-not-play-vaccine-shows-1200257/
Rolling Stone
Eric Clapton Will Not Play Shows Where Proof of Vaccine Is Required
Eric Clapton said he would cancel any shows if the venue requires attendees prove they are vaccinated against Covid-19.
"Clapton, along with fellow musician Van Morrison, has been a voice of resistance throughout the pandemic, putting out music in the last year or so that argues against lockdowns and the like. (Morrison has also been a vocal COVID-19 skeptic.) Clapton said he experienced “disastrous” side effects after both doses of the AstraZeneca/Oxford vaccine.
Meanwhile, Foo Fighters has been subject to vaccine-skeptic protesters as the U.S. rock band returns to the live-music scene after playing the Vax Live concert at SoFi Stadium in Inglewood in May.
Dozens of protesters rallied outside a 600-person, vaccinated-only show in Agoura Hills in mid-June.
“Separating humans is not OK,” one protester told KCAL News while wielding a sign outside the Canyon Club condemning the vaccination policy as “modern segregation.” “Those of us who have healthy immune systems should be able to enjoy these freedoms just like anybody else.”
https://www.latimes.com/entertainment-arts/music/story/2021-07-21/eric-clapton-concerts-covid-19-vaccination-policy
Meanwhile, Foo Fighters has been subject to vaccine-skeptic protesters as the U.S. rock band returns to the live-music scene after playing the Vax Live concert at SoFi Stadium in Inglewood in May.
Dozens of protesters rallied outside a 600-person, vaccinated-only show in Agoura Hills in mid-June.
“Separating humans is not OK,” one protester told KCAL News while wielding a sign outside the Canyon Club condemning the vaccination policy as “modern segregation.” “Those of us who have healthy immune systems should be able to enjoy these freedoms just like anybody else.”
https://www.latimes.com/entertainment-arts/music/story/2021-07-21/eric-clapton-concerts-covid-19-vaccination-policy
Los Angeles Times
Eric Clapton: Don't expect to see me at venues that ask audiences to be vaccinated
Eric Clapton, one of rock's most vocal COVID-19 skeptics, says he reserves to right to cancel any show where vaccination becomes a condition of attendance.
Letter from Boruch Weiss
Dr. Joel Groden, M.D.
Dr. Zev Zelenko, M.D.
"Dear Editor,
As a medical researcher who has been fully immersed in studying the covid-19 vaccine and effective treatments for covid-19, I wish to respond to Dr. Daniel Berman.
I will follow the structure of Dr. Berman’s response to Mr. Britz’s excellent letter.
1) Mr. Britz made the very valid point that there are no third-party, unbiased studies to determine the safety of the covid-19 vaccines. The pharmaceutical companies ran their trials themselves, without oversight, and reported their findings to the FDA. Clearly, with billions of dollars in profits at stake, there was ample motivation to manipulate both the safety and efficacy data in order to arrive at numbers which would result in product authorization and in enthusiasm and acceptance by the public. No kosher certifying agency would ever be able to give a kosher certification on any product produced under such conditions. And as Mr. Britz pointed out, there is all the more reason for concern, as Pfizer has repeatedly engaged in fraudulent behavior for financial gain, to the point that they were actually fined $2,300,000,000 in 2009, the largest healthcare fraud settlement in history. (https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/justice-department- announces-largest-health-care-fraud-settlement-its-history)
Indeed, there is ample evidence of the manipulation that Pfizer has done of their data to try to make the vaccine appear both effective and safe. For extremely powerful illustrations, please see the following articles: https://anthonycolpo.com/more-problems-with-the-pfizer-biontech-covid- 19-vaccine-trial-data and https://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2021/01/04/peter-doshi-pfizer-and- modernas-95-effective-vaccines-we-need-more-details-and-the-raw-data and, particularly in regards to the children’s trial, https://americasfrontlinedoctors.org/frontlinenews/serious- violations-and-manipulations-of-trial-protocol-how-pfizer-obtained-fda-emergency-authorization- for-children/.
While not disputing that there were no third-party studies about the vaccine, or that Pfizer has repeatedly engaged in fraud, Dr. Berman responded that safety data is primarily derived from the CDC’s VAERS database.
It is highly problematic to use VAERS to assure safety, for a number of reasons.
A) By its very design, the database will only detect problems AFTER the vaccine has been given
to a large portion of the population. VAERS is no substitute for a proper trial with unbiased
third-party oversight before a vaccine hits the market.
😎 Previous studies have shown that only between 1-10% of adverse reactions get reported to
VAERS. A paper out of Harvard in 2016 indicated that VAERS may be showing only 10% of what’s really happening. This would mean that 10,000 deaths reported after the vaccine really may indicate a total of 100,000 deaths.
C) Much of the population does not know about the existence of this database, so they cannot file reports.
D) Many people believe that the vaccine is very safe, and thus do not draw any connection between the covid-19 vaccine and subsequent illness or death, so they wouldn’t be reporting anything. I know countless stories which bear out this fact, and so does a doctor I discussed this with.
July 19,’21
BS”D
E) Many doctors refuse to conclude that an adverse event is connected to the covid-19 vaccine and will not file a report, even if the patient’s family suspects a connection.
F) Other doctors do not have time to file multiple VAERS reports for all the adverse events they are seeing after covid-19 vaccination. (This was personally told to me by a gastroenterologist about her own practice.)
G) Doctors are sometimes finding that the VAERS system will not accept their reports. Dr. Zev Zelenko testified that he personally knows of twenty instances of patient death after the covid-19 vaccine in which a doctor attempted to make a report to VAERS and the report was not accepted.
Dr. Joel Groden, M.D.
Dr. Zev Zelenko, M.D.
"Dear Editor,
As a medical researcher who has been fully immersed in studying the covid-19 vaccine and effective treatments for covid-19, I wish to respond to Dr. Daniel Berman.
I will follow the structure of Dr. Berman’s response to Mr. Britz’s excellent letter.
1) Mr. Britz made the very valid point that there are no third-party, unbiased studies to determine the safety of the covid-19 vaccines. The pharmaceutical companies ran their trials themselves, without oversight, and reported their findings to the FDA. Clearly, with billions of dollars in profits at stake, there was ample motivation to manipulate both the safety and efficacy data in order to arrive at numbers which would result in product authorization and in enthusiasm and acceptance by the public. No kosher certifying agency would ever be able to give a kosher certification on any product produced under such conditions. And as Mr. Britz pointed out, there is all the more reason for concern, as Pfizer has repeatedly engaged in fraudulent behavior for financial gain, to the point that they were actually fined $2,300,000,000 in 2009, the largest healthcare fraud settlement in history. (https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/justice-department- announces-largest-health-care-fraud-settlement-its-history)
Indeed, there is ample evidence of the manipulation that Pfizer has done of their data to try to make the vaccine appear both effective and safe. For extremely powerful illustrations, please see the following articles: https://anthonycolpo.com/more-problems-with-the-pfizer-biontech-covid- 19-vaccine-trial-data and https://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2021/01/04/peter-doshi-pfizer-and- modernas-95-effective-vaccines-we-need-more-details-and-the-raw-data and, particularly in regards to the children’s trial, https://americasfrontlinedoctors.org/frontlinenews/serious- violations-and-manipulations-of-trial-protocol-how-pfizer-obtained-fda-emergency-authorization- for-children/.
While not disputing that there were no third-party studies about the vaccine, or that Pfizer has repeatedly engaged in fraud, Dr. Berman responded that safety data is primarily derived from the CDC’s VAERS database.
It is highly problematic to use VAERS to assure safety, for a number of reasons.
A) By its very design, the database will only detect problems AFTER the vaccine has been given
to a large portion of the population. VAERS is no substitute for a proper trial with unbiased
third-party oversight before a vaccine hits the market.
😎 Previous studies have shown that only between 1-10% of adverse reactions get reported to
VAERS. A paper out of Harvard in 2016 indicated that VAERS may be showing only 10% of what’s really happening. This would mean that 10,000 deaths reported after the vaccine really may indicate a total of 100,000 deaths.
C) Much of the population does not know about the existence of this database, so they cannot file reports.
D) Many people believe that the vaccine is very safe, and thus do not draw any connection between the covid-19 vaccine and subsequent illness or death, so they wouldn’t be reporting anything. I know countless stories which bear out this fact, and so does a doctor I discussed this with.
July 19,’21
BS”D
E) Many doctors refuse to conclude that an adverse event is connected to the covid-19 vaccine and will not file a report, even if the patient’s family suspects a connection.
F) Other doctors do not have time to file multiple VAERS reports for all the adverse events they are seeing after covid-19 vaccination. (This was personally told to me by a gastroenterologist about her own practice.)
G) Doctors are sometimes finding that the VAERS system will not accept their reports. Dr. Zev Zelenko testified that he personally knows of twenty instances of patient death after the covid-19 vaccine in which a doctor attempted to make a report to VAERS and the report was not accepted.
Anthonycolpo
More Problems With the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine Trial Data
Back in January, I wrote about some of the inherent problems with the new Pfizer-BioNtech mRNA COVID-19 'vaccine' code-named BNT162b2, and sold under the brand name Comirnaty. To quickly recap:
-The drug is not really a vaccine but a gene-modifying therapy…
-The drug is not really a vaccine but a gene-modifying therapy…
Forwarded from Deleted Account
Doctors' Letter to Yated in Response to Dr. Berman.pdf
295.6 KB
It's not a vaccine.
Extracts from Dr Zelenko's letter attached a few posts before this one:
"Dr. Peter McCullough said last week (July 14) that it is clear that vaccinated people are transmitting the virus, and that the vaccines actually do not seem to be working at all against the Delta variant, and therefore are becoming obsolete at this point in time.
In fact, PHE (Public Health England) reports show that not only is the vaccine not helpful in reducing death, it actually increases the risk of death in vaccinated individuals who contract covid. Hospitalized covid patients with the Delta variant were found to be six times more likely to die if they were fully vaccinated than if they were unvaccinated (people who had received 1 dose fell out in the middle of this range.) See https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/covid- delta-variant-lockdowns/. This data corroborates the scientists’ warnings about ADE (namely, that vaccinating for certain viruses, coronavirus among them, causes the body to react in a worse way than it otherwise would, when faced with the infection)..
Mr. Birtz brings up the extremely serious risk of death from cytokine storm caused by ADE, which was indeed the problem with all previous attempts at producing a coronavirus vaccine, and the reason that none ever made it to the population. Indeed, all the animals in the trials died, but not right away. It took up to three years for ADE to affect them. There are simply some viruses, including dengue, RSV, and coronaviruses, for which vaccination is not the solution, because it results in enhanced disease, not prevention of disease. Dr. Berman does not have an answer as to why we can be sure that this vaccine is known to not cause ADE in the long term. Indeed, there is no such proof, as there were no adequate animal safety trials on this vaccine, and not enough time has passed in the human trials, which are still ongoing (on the world population). Actually, some scientists believe that the spike in disease rate soon after vaccination, and the increased death rate among the vaccinated who contract covid, is a form of ADE.
As Dr. Zev Zelenko so aptly put it, there are only two risk factors for covid: the doctor you choose, and the government you live under. With the right treatment, virtually nobody had to die in this pandemic, no matter how old or what comorbidities they had.
The government is spending billions to promote the vaccine and “save lives”, but if they truly desired to save lives, the first and easiest thing that they could have done would have been to encourage Vitamin D supplementation. Studies show that people with an excellent Vitamin D blood level (a level over 50) simply do not end up in the ICU, or die of corona. Why is this fact not all over the news?
In order to have an effective dialogue about this topic, it is necessary to acknowledge the open and proven fact of the censorship of information about effective corona treatments (and of the dangers of the vaccine). For an excellent presentation showing the censorship in the media, please see https://www.dropbox.com/s/skcr7aznhr3y224/covid%202520-3.mp4?=0.
The media is open about and proud of their censorship, and they have an agreement called “the trusted news initiative”. This is not a secret. You can look it up.
13) I am glad that Dr. Berman seems to agree about the strength of natural immunity, and agrees that the government has nevertheless been pushing to vaccinate individuals with a prior covid infection. It is crucial to take the next step, and question why the government would be pushing a new medical treatment on people who definitely do not need it? The question is compounded by the following facts:
a) that it is also being pushed on young people with prior infection (who have such miniscule risk in any case),
b) that the shot was never tested on people with prior infection (they were excluded from the trials),
Extracts from Dr Zelenko's letter attached a few posts before this one:
"Dr. Peter McCullough said last week (July 14) that it is clear that vaccinated people are transmitting the virus, and that the vaccines actually do not seem to be working at all against the Delta variant, and therefore are becoming obsolete at this point in time.
In fact, PHE (Public Health England) reports show that not only is the vaccine not helpful in reducing death, it actually increases the risk of death in vaccinated individuals who contract covid. Hospitalized covid patients with the Delta variant were found to be six times more likely to die if they were fully vaccinated than if they were unvaccinated (people who had received 1 dose fell out in the middle of this range.) See https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/covid- delta-variant-lockdowns/. This data corroborates the scientists’ warnings about ADE (namely, that vaccinating for certain viruses, coronavirus among them, causes the body to react in a worse way than it otherwise would, when faced with the infection)..
Mr. Birtz brings up the extremely serious risk of death from cytokine storm caused by ADE, which was indeed the problem with all previous attempts at producing a coronavirus vaccine, and the reason that none ever made it to the population. Indeed, all the animals in the trials died, but not right away. It took up to three years for ADE to affect them. There are simply some viruses, including dengue, RSV, and coronaviruses, for which vaccination is not the solution, because it results in enhanced disease, not prevention of disease. Dr. Berman does not have an answer as to why we can be sure that this vaccine is known to not cause ADE in the long term. Indeed, there is no such proof, as there were no adequate animal safety trials on this vaccine, and not enough time has passed in the human trials, which are still ongoing (on the world population). Actually, some scientists believe that the spike in disease rate soon after vaccination, and the increased death rate among the vaccinated who contract covid, is a form of ADE.
As Dr. Zev Zelenko so aptly put it, there are only two risk factors for covid: the doctor you choose, and the government you live under. With the right treatment, virtually nobody had to die in this pandemic, no matter how old or what comorbidities they had.
The government is spending billions to promote the vaccine and “save lives”, but if they truly desired to save lives, the first and easiest thing that they could have done would have been to encourage Vitamin D supplementation. Studies show that people with an excellent Vitamin D blood level (a level over 50) simply do not end up in the ICU, or die of corona. Why is this fact not all over the news?
In order to have an effective dialogue about this topic, it is necessary to acknowledge the open and proven fact of the censorship of information about effective corona treatments (and of the dangers of the vaccine). For an excellent presentation showing the censorship in the media, please see https://www.dropbox.com/s/skcr7aznhr3y224/covid%202520-3.mp4?=0.
The media is open about and proud of their censorship, and they have an agreement called “the trusted news initiative”. This is not a secret. You can look it up.
13) I am glad that Dr. Berman seems to agree about the strength of natural immunity, and agrees that the government has nevertheless been pushing to vaccinate individuals with a prior covid infection. It is crucial to take the next step, and question why the government would be pushing a new medical treatment on people who definitely do not need it? The question is compounded by the following facts:
a) that it is also being pushed on young people with prior infection (who have such miniscule risk in any case),
b) that the shot was never tested on people with prior infection (they were excluded from the trials),
Children's Health Defense
COVID 19 News Watch Archive
Archive from February 26th – November 17th, 2020 *** February 26 ‘Mission Possible’: Pfizer and BioNtech Star in Their Own Vaccine Discovery Movie FiercePharma reported: It’s lights, camera, action for Pfizer and BioNTech vaccine scientists and executives.…
c) that the vaccine-induced antibodies will destroy their superior natural antibodies (witness the Red Cross briefing saying that vaccinated covid-recovered individuals could no longer donate convalescent plasma, which was quickly amended after it created a storm),
(also see Dr. Geert Vanden Bossche, top vaccine developer, who has a similar concern which applies to all individuals https://youtu.be/ZJZxiNxYLpc),
d) that the shot is much more risky for individuals with natural covid antibodies from infection (studies have found these individuals to develop adverse effects from the shot, such as blood clots, at a much higher rate).
These are hard questions that must be asked of a government who purports to want our best health.
In response to Dr. Berman’s message about the vaccines being the way out from the inconvenience of quarantine, the truth is that the only way that the craziness of quarantine will end is not by vaccination, which in any case has proven to be largely ineffective, but when we start taking control of our own health, with G-d’s help, and treating covid symptoms early at home with treatments that work, as we do for any other treatable illness. We need to stop allowing the government to dictate our lives and lock us up at will. There is no need to live in fear, or to test or quarantine asymptomatic people. There is no proof that testing and quarantining asymptomatic individuals helps, and we have never done it in the past. We don’t need to do it in this case, either."
(also see Dr. Geert Vanden Bossche, top vaccine developer, who has a similar concern which applies to all individuals https://youtu.be/ZJZxiNxYLpc),
d) that the shot is much more risky for individuals with natural covid antibodies from infection (studies have found these individuals to develop adverse effects from the shot, such as blood clots, at a much higher rate).
These are hard questions that must be asked of a government who purports to want our best health.
In response to Dr. Berman’s message about the vaccines being the way out from the inconvenience of quarantine, the truth is that the only way that the craziness of quarantine will end is not by vaccination, which in any case has proven to be largely ineffective, but when we start taking control of our own health, with G-d’s help, and treating covid symptoms early at home with treatments that work, as we do for any other treatable illness. We need to stop allowing the government to dictate our lives and lock us up at will. There is no need to live in fear, or to test or quarantine asymptomatic people. There is no proof that testing and quarantining asymptomatic individuals helps, and we have never done it in the past. We don’t need to do it in this case, either."
According to the Guardian I am a "Covid sceptic". Yet I get criticized for claiming I have been infected with Covid twice with a gap of 18 months in between, not even once. So I am not a Covid sceptic at all. They could have bothered to check with me, but they didn't. This is just another example of not to trust corporate media and go to direct sources instead.
Other media is saying I am an "anti-vaxxer", yet I never said a word about vaccines before 2020 and I do not consider these injections vaccines, so there is no evidence for this claim.
What I am glad about is that now there may be the beginnings of a much needed debate on this, as no government has the right to violate the UNESCO UNIVERSAL Declaration of Bioethics and Human Rights 2005 Article 6 on CONSENT to any preventive (injections) or even diagnostic (tests, masks) medical intervention.
Robin
https://theguardian.com/music/2021/jul/22/eric-clapton-refuses-to-play-venues-require-proof-of-vaccination-covid
Other media is saying I am an "anti-vaxxer", yet I never said a word about vaccines before 2020 and I do not consider these injections vaccines, so there is no evidence for this claim.
What I am glad about is that now there may be the beginnings of a much needed debate on this, as no government has the right to violate the UNESCO UNIVERSAL Declaration of Bioethics and Human Rights 2005 Article 6 on CONSENT to any preventive (injections) or even diagnostic (tests, masks) medical intervention.
Robin
https://theguardian.com/music/2021/jul/22/eric-clapton-refuses-to-play-venues-require-proof-of-vaccination-covid
the Guardian
Eric Clapton refuses to play venues that require proof of vaccination
Clapton says he won’t perform for a ‘discriminated audience’ after vaccination passports made mandatory for clubs and venues this autumn
It simply means they are not vaccines by any definition of the word as they do not stop infection and therefore transmission and that therefore vaccine certification is a useless and ridiculous concept based on the current data. Anybody insisting on injection certifications is either in bad faith or with very limited reasoning capabilities. The alternative is of course that there is a further motive which has nothing to do with public health which at this stage seems to be a certainty to those thinking through what is going on carefully. Robin.
On this channel we are opposed to discrimination and segregation and the violation of human rights, namely the violation of the UNESCO Universal Declaration of Bioethics and Human Rights 2005 Article 6 on consent, which clearly states that consent is required for preventive (injections, whether they are vaccinations or not) and diagnostic (tests, masks) medical interventions, and if no consent is given the person involved cannot be treated with disadvantage or prejudice (article 6.1,2). Therefore any form of certification involving a medical intervention as condition of entry of a public or private place is a direct violation of universal human rights under the above declaration, and is unacceptable under international human rights agreements undertaken by most countries worldwide, and also preceded by the Nuremberg Code. Robin
http://portal.unesco.org/en/ev.php-URL_ID=31058&URL_DO=DO_TOPIC&URL_SECTION=201.html
http://portal.unesco.org/en/ev.php-URL_ID=31058&URL_DO=DO_TOPIC&URL_SECTION=201.html