(eg BMJ: September 17th) that 30-50% of the population had prior immunity to the SARS-CoV-2 virus because of its similarities to some types of common cold.
SAGE need to be challenged on the above.
I believe the findings of the BMJ are correct, and countless other eminent Professors and Doctors of Science and Medicine agree with them.
SAGE underestimating prior immunity to SARS-Cov-2 massively skews Government policy. I am VERY concerned given the Societal and Economic damage being done by Government policy, that decisions are being made, based on bad advice.
Best regards,

Letter sent to a school:
I note that the school secretary has forwarded a letter from the Council on flu vaccinations for the children. I draw your attention to where the letter, at the end states:

"Flu vaccination

Primary school and Year 7 pupils can get the free, annual flu vaccine at school – this is even more
important this year. Flu vaccines will be administered through the school"


This is not the case, the opposite is true:


A "case-control study in healthy Australian children found that seasonal flu shots doubled their risk of illness from noninfluenza virus infections..the vaccine increased the risk of virus-associated acute respiratory illness, including influenza, by 73%"
https://t.co/SOmkIsvy2e


"A randomized placebo-controlled trial in Hong Kong children found that flu shots increased the risk of noninfluenza viral ARIs [Acute Respiratory Illness] fivefold and, including influenza, tripled the overall viral ARI risk"
https://t.co/pwg8DUKrMa


Flu vaccine & respiratory virus interference: "Vaccine derived virus interference was significantly associated with coronavirus and human metapneumovirus"
https://t.co/WiVcTxzELv


"We identified a statistically significant increased risk of noninfluenza respiratory virus infection among TIV (trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine) recipients"
https://t.co/iPtpEyWqYR


A randomized placebo-controlled trial in children showed that flu shots increased fivefold the risk of acute respiratory infections caused by a group of noninfluenza viruses, including coronaviruses.
https://t.co/S2EbnMQIgO

UK: If you are asked to wear a mask, simply reply you are exempt. You do not need to say why, or carry any exemption card. If they insist, tell them they are discriminating on you under the Equality Act 2010, & making themselves liable to a £5,000 fine & £9,000 compensation.
MASK EXEMPTIONS: "When you do not need to wear a face covering:

"where putting on, wearing or removing a face covering will cause you severe distress"

Those who have a..reason..should not be routinely asked to give any written evidence of this."
https://t.co/AW7IHrIgAg

Basically the Executive Board of the WHO chooses the WHO director (by secret ballot). There are 34 members on the board. Guess who sits on the executive board for the United Kingdom?

CHRIS WHITTY
https://t.co/YlstQRdWWE

They are framing this into anti-vaxx vs pro-vaxx, but this is a false duality. The real issue is informed consent & preventing any government or corporation the right to limit the public & work lives of those who do not consent to being injected with any vaccine.

THE SCIENCE ON LOCKDOWNS: "Stringency of the measures settled to fight pandemia, including lockdown, did not appear to be linked with death rate."
https://t.co/5N06jgA0Bg

DANMASK: Unlike other studies looking at masks, Danmask was a randomised controlled trial – the highest quality scientific evidence. It revealed a minimal statistical difference between those who wore masks & those who did not in terms of COVID19 infection
https://t.co/WRFEAEE5wW

Michael Yeadon classic on Unlocked
https://www.facebook.com/unlockedunitedkingdom/videos/409747283542470/

"None of the trials ... are designed to detect a reduction in any serious outcome such as hospital admissions, use of intensive care, or deaths. Nor are the vaccines being studied to determine whether they can interrupt transmission of the virus."
https://t.co/s77EGt9HlN

Protesting works. Protesters win this first battle in France. The key to this is to be focused about what one is protesting against. Not generic but specific on the laws or decrees that one is protesting against. Like was done in the UK against the poll tax for example. "Macron pulls plug on controversial legislation on sharing images identifying police officers"
https://t.co/7nT3oEAB4M

What the protesters in the UK last week-end have achieved is also huge. Images and videos of police brutality in the UK were shared globally. This is terrible for the reputation of any government. So as a result, they have changed the law so that the police need not intervene in any new protest. They can just watch in theory at least. Protesting is now not against the law under the new UK Health Protection Coronavirus, Restrictions Regulations 2020.

Some Mouthwashes eradicate COVID-19 infectivity
https://t.co/nyHY5zPe12

THE REAL REASON THEY ARE BANNING ALCOHOL? "Mouthwashes eradicate COVID-19 infectivity - mouthwashes containing less than 23% ethanol [ALCOHOL] had no effect on viral infectivity"
https://t.co/nyHY5zPe12

In the UK they are banning alcohol without a substantial meal & closing pubs one hour earlier. With meals people tend to consume drinks with a lower % alcohol than the 23% required to kill Covid19. It really all makes sense now. Whitty & Vallance know the science well.

(2015)