97٪ FALSE POSITIVES:
"We correlated Ct values obtained using our PCR technique based on amplification of the E gene and the results of the culture. At Ct = 35, the value we used to report a positive result for PCR, <3% of cultures are positive." https://t.co/sxs1Zi9f6z
"We correlated Ct values obtained using our PCR technique based on amplification of the E gene and the results of the culture. At Ct = 35, the value we used to report a positive result for PCR, <3% of cultures are positive." https://t.co/sxs1Zi9f6z
OUP Academic
Correlation Between 3790 Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction–Positives Samples and Positive Cell Cultures, Including 1941 Severe…
TO THE EDITOR—The outbreak of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic due to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) was declared
mRNA Reverse Transcriptase: "It is quite probable that the RNA introduced into our cells via the vaccine could be reverse transcribed into a segment of double-stranded DNA, and then integrated into our core genetic material in the nucleus of the cell.
"Antibody dependent enhancement (ADE) is a major problem with any vaccine developed for coronaviruses. ADE is a risk for any type of vaccine, including RNA vaccines..being rushed forward..tested for a few months, ADE would not rear its ugly head for several years"
"Therefore, the current clinical trial data is not anywhere close to being sufficient to rule out the health risk of ADE. If ADE does occur in an individual, then their response to the virus could be fatal when they are actually exposed to the virus post-vaccination."
https://t.co/xWD6CbXbUM
"Antibody dependent enhancement (ADE) is a major problem with any vaccine developed for coronaviruses. ADE is a risk for any type of vaccine, including RNA vaccines..being rushed forward..tested for a few months, ADE would not rear its ugly head for several years"
"Therefore, the current clinical trial data is not anywhere close to being sufficient to rule out the health risk of ADE. If ADE does occur in an individual, then their response to the virus could be fatal when they are actually exposed to the virus post-vaccination."
https://t.co/xWD6CbXbUM
Science with Dr. Doug
Will an RNA Vaccine Permanently Alter My DNA?
Will RNA vaccines genetically modify humans?
❤1
The Great Reset's Build Back Better stakeholder capitalism is the final corporate takeover of the state apparatus to remove the last remaining vestiges of democracy. The first corporate industries to take over the state are the big pharmaceutical partners of WEF GAVI CEPI & BMGF. Paradoxically, the "stakeholder capitalism" plan to take over the state & abolish democracy was hatched up as a result of the unfocused protests of 1968
https://t.co/PXuS9CLlSh
This time round the protests needs to be much more focused. We take on Big Pharma's fraudulent narratives. We fight for every human right they try & remove, we fight to not relinquish any democratic rights to the ever more encroaching police state.
The protest movement of 2020-2021 is much bigger & much more important than the one of May 1968. It also needs to be much more focused and fight one clear battle at a time.
https://t.co/PXuS9CLlSh
This time round the protests needs to be much more focused. We take on Big Pharma's fraudulent narratives. We fight for every human right they try & remove, we fight to not relinquish any democratic rights to the ever more encroaching police state.
The protest movement of 2020-2021 is much bigger & much more important than the one of May 1968. It also needs to be much more focused and fight one clear battle at a time.
Twitter
Twitter / Account Suspended
From breaking news and entertainment to sports and politics, get the full story with all the live commentary.
UK template letter to send to your MP:
Dear Mr./Mrs
Whilst I am aware that this set of searching questions has been passed to all MPs, I wanted to be sure that you did not miss out and were fully up to date with our current covid situation by researching some answers where possible and asking on the floor of the house for a Government response
Dr Claire Craig FRCPath, along with Dr Jonathan Engler, have kindly written the following list of questions, which I would like answers to - but more to the point, I would like to know that you know the answers to prior to any vote regarding SARS-Cov-2, Covid-19.
I regard it as imperative that these questions are asked in the House of Commons prior to any vote regarding to Covid measures such as Lockdown, Masks and Vaccines, and the answers to such questions deemed satisfactory before any vote restricting individual freedom.
1. Why are SARS-CoV-2 antibody levels flat or dropping across all age groups since May if the pandemic is still going?
2. What percentage of the population is assumed to have had prior immunity to SARS-CoV-2 in the SAGE forecasting models?
3. Why do 50% of household members not catch SARS-CoV-2 from infected persons with whom they live?
4. Why have Japan and South Korea not had any serious outbreak if the human species has no prior immunity to SARS-CoV-2?
5. What percentage of the population of the UK is assumed to be immune to COVID-19 (including prior immunity) as of this date?
6. What percentage of those diagnosed with COVID-19 since July have developed antibodies to COVID-19, confirming the diagnosis?
7. If 90%+ (SAGE Minutes: 21/09/20) of the population is still susceptible to SARS-CoV-2, why did the virus case numbers and deaths not double every 3-4 days throughout June, July and August, and indeed throughout the Autumn?
8. Why have positive test results rocketed while numbers of symptomatic patients in the community and NHS triage data show they have flatlined since mid-September?
9. Why are acute respiratory admissions through Accident & Emergency significantly below the normal for the time of year if the pandemic is still raging?
10. Why are total hospital admissions, ITU occupancy and hospital oxygen consumption at or below normal levels for the time of year?
11. What percentage of deaths labelled as being due to COVID-19 have had the diagnosis confirmed at post-mortem since July?
12. Why are the regions of the country that have had excess deaths not the same regions that have supposed COVID-19 deaths, unlike in spring?
13. Why has Liverpool testing by the Army failed to find COVID-19 in the community when they are supposedly at the centre of the alleged “second wave”?
14. How is a 0.22% rate of diagnosed infection in the public in Liverpool to be reconciled with the ONS prediction of 2.3% infection rates in Liverpool on 11th November based on PCR testing?
15. Why are much quicker lateral flow tests not being prioritised for hospital admissions to prevent the standard 24-48 hour delay with PCR results and ensure that those who are positive can be isolated to prevent hospital spread?
16. Why aren’t all staff being tested by the lateral flow test to prevent the staffing crisis being caused by false positive PCR results?
17. Do positive PCR tests for asymptomatic and symptomatic NHS staff, or anyone else, which result in them being required to self-isolate have confirmatory re-tests performed?
18. Why is the country in lockdown when there are no excess hospital admissions, no excess intensive care bed use and no excess death rates (by date of occurrence) in the midst of an allegedly out of control, raging pandemic?
19. Why are we in lockdown when the Government’s own Operation Cygnus pandemic plan stated that lockdown could only delay deaths by a few weeks at most?
20. What evidence is there that lockdown has prevented more deaths than it has caused?
In addition, Dr Craig adds:
SAGE believes over 90% of the UK population are still susceptible to COVID-19 (Sage Minutes: September 21st). There is now a large body of evidence
Dear Mr./Mrs
Whilst I am aware that this set of searching questions has been passed to all MPs, I wanted to be sure that you did not miss out and were fully up to date with our current covid situation by researching some answers where possible and asking on the floor of the house for a Government response
Dr Claire Craig FRCPath, along with Dr Jonathan Engler, have kindly written the following list of questions, which I would like answers to - but more to the point, I would like to know that you know the answers to prior to any vote regarding SARS-Cov-2, Covid-19.
I regard it as imperative that these questions are asked in the House of Commons prior to any vote regarding to Covid measures such as Lockdown, Masks and Vaccines, and the answers to such questions deemed satisfactory before any vote restricting individual freedom.
1. Why are SARS-CoV-2 antibody levels flat or dropping across all age groups since May if the pandemic is still going?
2. What percentage of the population is assumed to have had prior immunity to SARS-CoV-2 in the SAGE forecasting models?
3. Why do 50% of household members not catch SARS-CoV-2 from infected persons with whom they live?
4. Why have Japan and South Korea not had any serious outbreak if the human species has no prior immunity to SARS-CoV-2?
5. What percentage of the population of the UK is assumed to be immune to COVID-19 (including prior immunity) as of this date?
6. What percentage of those diagnosed with COVID-19 since July have developed antibodies to COVID-19, confirming the diagnosis?
7. If 90%+ (SAGE Minutes: 21/09/20) of the population is still susceptible to SARS-CoV-2, why did the virus case numbers and deaths not double every 3-4 days throughout June, July and August, and indeed throughout the Autumn?
8. Why have positive test results rocketed while numbers of symptomatic patients in the community and NHS triage data show they have flatlined since mid-September?
9. Why are acute respiratory admissions through Accident & Emergency significantly below the normal for the time of year if the pandemic is still raging?
10. Why are total hospital admissions, ITU occupancy and hospital oxygen consumption at or below normal levels for the time of year?
11. What percentage of deaths labelled as being due to COVID-19 have had the diagnosis confirmed at post-mortem since July?
12. Why are the regions of the country that have had excess deaths not the same regions that have supposed COVID-19 deaths, unlike in spring?
13. Why has Liverpool testing by the Army failed to find COVID-19 in the community when they are supposedly at the centre of the alleged “second wave”?
14. How is a 0.22% rate of diagnosed infection in the public in Liverpool to be reconciled with the ONS prediction of 2.3% infection rates in Liverpool on 11th November based on PCR testing?
15. Why are much quicker lateral flow tests not being prioritised for hospital admissions to prevent the standard 24-48 hour delay with PCR results and ensure that those who are positive can be isolated to prevent hospital spread?
16. Why aren’t all staff being tested by the lateral flow test to prevent the staffing crisis being caused by false positive PCR results?
17. Do positive PCR tests for asymptomatic and symptomatic NHS staff, or anyone else, which result in them being required to self-isolate have confirmatory re-tests performed?
18. Why is the country in lockdown when there are no excess hospital admissions, no excess intensive care bed use and no excess death rates (by date of occurrence) in the midst of an allegedly out of control, raging pandemic?
19. Why are we in lockdown when the Government’s own Operation Cygnus pandemic plan stated that lockdown could only delay deaths by a few weeks at most?
20. What evidence is there that lockdown has prevented more deaths than it has caused?
In addition, Dr Craig adds:
SAGE believes over 90% of the UK population are still susceptible to COVID-19 (Sage Minutes: September 21st). There is now a large body of evidence
(eg BMJ: September 17th) that 30-50% of the population had prior immunity to the SARS-CoV-2 virus because of its similarities to some types of common cold.
SAGE need to be challenged on the above.
I believe the findings of the BMJ are correct, and countless other eminent Professors and Doctors of Science and Medicine agree with them.
SAGE underestimating prior immunity to SARS-Cov-2 massively skews Government policy. I am VERY concerned given the Societal and Economic damage being done by Government policy, that decisions are being made, based on bad advice.
Best regards,
SAGE need to be challenged on the above.
I believe the findings of the BMJ are correct, and countless other eminent Professors and Doctors of Science and Medicine agree with them.
SAGE underestimating prior immunity to SARS-Cov-2 massively skews Government policy. I am VERY concerned given the Societal and Economic damage being done by Government policy, that decisions are being made, based on bad advice.
Best regards,
Letter sent to a school:
I note that the school secretary has forwarded a letter from the Council on flu vaccinations for the children. I draw your attention to where the letter, at the end states:
"Flu vaccination
Primary school and Year 7 pupils can get the free, annual flu vaccine at school – this is even more
important this year. Flu vaccines will be administered through the school"
This is not the case, the opposite is true:
A "case-control study in healthy Australian children found that seasonal flu shots doubled their risk of illness from noninfluenza virus infections..the vaccine increased the risk of virus-associated acute respiratory illness, including influenza, by 73%"
https://t.co/SOmkIsvy2e
"A randomized placebo-controlled trial in Hong Kong children found that flu shots increased the risk of noninfluenza viral ARIs [Acute Respiratory Illness] fivefold and, including influenza, tripled the overall viral ARI risk"
https://t.co/pwg8DUKrMa
Flu vaccine & respiratory virus interference: "Vaccine derived virus interference was significantly associated with coronavirus and human metapneumovirus"
https://t.co/WiVcTxzELv
"We identified a statistically significant increased risk of noninfluenza respiratory virus infection among TIV (trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine) recipients"
https://t.co/iPtpEyWqYR
A randomized placebo-controlled trial in children showed that flu shots increased fivefold the risk of acute respiratory infections caused by a group of noninfluenza viruses, including coronaviruses.
https://t.co/S2EbnMQIgO
I note that the school secretary has forwarded a letter from the Council on flu vaccinations for the children. I draw your attention to where the letter, at the end states:
"Flu vaccination
Primary school and Year 7 pupils can get the free, annual flu vaccine at school – this is even more
important this year. Flu vaccines will be administered through the school"
This is not the case, the opposite is true:
A "case-control study in healthy Australian children found that seasonal flu shots doubled their risk of illness from noninfluenza virus infections..the vaccine increased the risk of virus-associated acute respiratory illness, including influenza, by 73%"
https://t.co/SOmkIsvy2e
"A randomized placebo-controlled trial in Hong Kong children found that flu shots increased the risk of noninfluenza viral ARIs [Acute Respiratory Illness] fivefold and, including influenza, tripled the overall viral ARI risk"
https://t.co/pwg8DUKrMa
Flu vaccine & respiratory virus interference: "Vaccine derived virus interference was significantly associated with coronavirus and human metapneumovirus"
https://t.co/WiVcTxzELv
"We identified a statistically significant increased risk of noninfluenza respiratory virus infection among TIV (trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine) recipients"
https://t.co/iPtpEyWqYR
A randomized placebo-controlled trial in children showed that flu shots increased fivefold the risk of acute respiratory infections caused by a group of noninfluenza viruses, including coronaviruses.
https://t.co/S2EbnMQIgO
UK: If you are asked to wear a mask, simply reply you are exempt. You do not need to say why, or carry any exemption card. If they insist, tell them they are discriminating on you under the Equality Act 2010, & making themselves liable to a £5,000 fine & £9,000 compensation.
MASK EXEMPTIONS: "When you do not need to wear a face covering:
"where putting on, wearing or removing a face covering will cause you severe distress"
Those who have a..reason..should not be routinely asked to give any written evidence of this."
https://t.co/AW7IHrIgAg
MASK EXEMPTIONS: "When you do not need to wear a face covering:
"where putting on, wearing or removing a face covering will cause you severe distress"
Those who have a..reason..should not be routinely asked to give any written evidence of this."
https://t.co/AW7IHrIgAg
GOV.UK
[Withdrawn] [Withdrawn] Face coverings: when to wear one, exemptions and what makes a good one
Basically the Executive Board of the WHO chooses the WHO director (by secret ballot). There are 34 members on the board. Guess who sits on the executive board for the United Kingdom?
CHRIS WHITTY
https://t.co/YlstQRdWWE
CHRIS WHITTY
https://t.co/YlstQRdWWE
They are framing this into anti-vaxx vs pro-vaxx, but this is a false duality. The real issue is informed consent & preventing any government or corporation the right to limit the public & work lives of those who do not consent to being injected with any vaccine.
THE SCIENCE ON LOCKDOWNS: "Stringency of the measures settled to fight pandemia, including lockdown, did not appear to be linked with death rate."
https://t.co/5N06jgA0Bg
https://t.co/5N06jgA0Bg
DANMASK: Unlike other studies looking at masks, Danmask was a randomised controlled trial – the highest quality scientific evidence. It revealed a minimal statistical difference between those who wore masks & those who did not in terms of COVID19 infection
https://t.co/WRFEAEE5wW
https://t.co/WRFEAEE5wW
"None of the trials ... are designed to detect a reduction in any serious outcome such as hospital admissions, use of intensive care, or deaths. Nor are the vaccines being studied to determine whether they can interrupt transmission of the virus."
https://t.co/s77EGt9HlN
https://t.co/s77EGt9HlN
The BMJ
Will covid-19 vaccines save lives? Current trials aren’t designed to tell us
The world has bet the farm on vaccines as the solution to the pandemic, but the trials are not focused on answering the questions many might assume they are. Peter Doshi reports
As phase III trials of covid-19 vaccines reach their target enrolments, officials…
As phase III trials of covid-19 vaccines reach their target enrolments, officials…
Protesting works. Protesters win this first battle in France. The key to this is to be focused about what one is protesting against. Not generic but specific on the laws or decrees that one is protesting against. Like was done in the UK against the poll tax for example. "Macron pulls plug on controversial legislation on sharing images identifying police officers"
https://t.co/7nT3oEAB4M
https://t.co/7nT3oEAB4M
The Telegraph
Macron pulls plug on controversial legislation on sharing images identifying police officers
The decision came as four French police officers were charged with beating and racially insulting a black music producer
What the protesters in the UK last week-end have achieved is also huge. Images and videos of police brutality in the UK were shared globally. This is terrible for the reputation of any government. So as a result, they have changed the law so that the police need not intervene in any new protest. They can just watch in theory at least. Protesting is now not against the law under the new UK Health Protection Coronavirus, Restrictions Regulations 2020.