The average contemporary doctor is nothing more than a Big Pharma drug salesman. We don't need their "experiments", we don't need their "science", we don't need their "scientific method". Our bodies know how to heal without any of that, if we learn how to listen to them again.

📱 ROBINMG

Reducing living organisms to separate constituent elements is precisely the wrong turn we took in the Enlightenment when it comes to medical practice.

I do not seek any concrete isolation of any part from the whole, including viruses.

There are categories of infections which present themselves with clinical symptoms we ascribe to viral infections.

Ultimately it does not really matter what we ascribe them to, but that we recognise the patterns, to then take informed treatment measures for ourselves only, which may vary from person to person.

Doing nothing, or doing less, worrying less about it all being often the best course of treatment.

We will heal regardless of the names we use for categories of clinical symptoms.

📱ROBINMG

Why the Scientific Method Generally Does Not Work:

Confirmation bias:
The tendency to unconsciously seek, favour, or interpret data that supports your hypothesis while ignoring or dismissing contradictory evidence. Research shows this often operates implicitly, shaping choices about comparators and outcomes without the researcher realising it.

P-hacking (data dredging or data snooping):
The practice of running many statistical tests or analyses on the same data and reporting only the ones that come back "significant." Even with no real effect, enough repeated tests will eventually produce a false positive by chance. A related practice, HARKing (Hypothesizing After Results are Known), involves formulating the hypothesis after seeing the data, then presenting it as if it were pre-registered.

Publication bias (or the "file drawer problem"):
Studies with positive or significant results are far more likely to be published than null or negative ones, skewing the literature and making effects look larger than they really are.

Sampling and measurement bias:
Flawed or unrepresentative samples, uncalibrated instruments, inconsistent data collection procedures, and failure to account for confounding variables can all invalidate results even when the overall process looks correct.

Neglecting controls and replication:
A single experiment without proper control groups, or one that cannot be independently reproduced, provides weak evidence. The replication crisis in psychology and other fields has highlighted how many published findings fail to reproduce.

Conceptual errors:
Confusing a hypothesis with a theory (a theory is a well-supported, broad explanation; a hypothesis is a specific, testable prediction), or treating findings as fixed truths rather than the best current explanation subject to revision.

Mistaking correlation for causation:
Observing that two variables move together and concluding one causes the other, without ruling out alternative explanations.

In short, the method is only as good as the discipline applied at each stage, and most of these pitfalls stem from human cognitive tendencies, structural incentives (e.g., pressure to publish positive results), or poor experimental design, including deliberate fraud.

📱 ROBINMG

Why the Scientific Method Fails with Living Organisms:

Indvidual Variation:
Individual variation is fundamental, not noise. Unlike a chemical reaction in a flask, every organism is genetically, epigenetically, and environmentally unique. Group averages from a clinical trial may apply to no single individual. The statistical assumption of ergodicity — that the group average equals the individual's own average over time — rarely holds in biology, yet it underpins most standard analysis.

Complexity and non-linearity:
Living systems are riddled with feedback loops, redundancy, and parallel pathways. It is impossible to write down or measure all the relevant variables, and small changes can produce large, unpredictable effects. This makes controlled experiments far harder to design and interpret than in physics or chemistry.

Placebo and Nocebo Effects:
The placebo effect and self-healing. In healing specifically, the act of treatment — expectation, context, the therapeutic relationship, even the ritual — triggers real neurobiological responses. This means you can never fully isolate the "active ingredient" of an intervention from the healing response the intervention itself provokes. Open-label placebo studies show improvement even when patients know they're receiving an inert pill, as long as they're told it works.

The Immune System
Many conditions (cold sores, migraines, back pain, viral infections) resolve on their own. Without a properly designed control, it's nearly impossible to tell whether a treatment helped or the body simply healed itself. You can never know, for a given patient, how long recovery would have taken without the treatment.

Reductionism: isolating the parts from the whole:
Modern biology and medicine tend to study isolated molecules, cells, or pathways. But a living organism is an organised whole with emergent properties that don't reduce to their parts. A drug that works beautifully in a cell culture can fail — or cause harm — in a whole organism because of interactions the reductionist model never captured.

Interspecies Differences:
Model organisms don't transfer cleanly. Findings in mice, zebrafish, or cell lines often fail to replicate in humans. Inbred lab strains lack the genetic diversity of real populations, and interspecies differences in physiology, immune response, and metabolism limit extrapolation. The thalidomide tragedy — safe in animal tests, catastrophic in human pregnancy — is the canonical example.

Ethical Constraints on Human Testing:
Ethical constraints are far tighter on humans. You can't randomise a patient to a treatment you suspect is harmful, can't repeat an experiment on the same person, can't expose a developing embryo to a new compound, and can't withhold a known-effective therapy from a control group. These constraints mean many important questions in medicine simply cannot be answered by the idealised experimental method.

Time and irreversibility:
A living organism is a time-bound, perishable system. You can't "reset" a patient to a baseline state, the trajectory of illness and recovery is unique to each person, and long-term effects may only become apparent years later.

Subjective outcomes:
Pain, fatigue, mood, and quality of life — often the things a patient actually cares about — are inherently subjective and hard to measure objectively, making them vulnerable to both placebo and reporting bias.

In short, the scientific method was developed for a world of repeatable, controlled, measurable phenomena. Living organisms violate nearly every one of those assumptions simultaneously, which is why medicine remains the most error-prone and replication-fragile of the sciences.

The scientific method is simply not widely applicable in a reliable or helpful way as a method to understand the healing processes of living organisms.

📱 ROBINMG

ITALY'S FORMER PRESIDENT ON 9/11:

"The Italian intelligence agency, knows very well the catastrophic attack was planned & carried out by the CIA & Mossad, with the help of the Zionist world, to accuse Arab countries & to persuade Western powers to go into Iraq & Afghanistan."

Francesco Cossiga,
former Italy President
Corriere della Sera, 2007

📱 ROBINMG

On 9/11, the BBC announced the collapse of Building 7 at approximately 4:54–4:57 PM Eastern Time, while the building actually fell at 5:20 PM — roughly 23–26 minutes later!

The announcement was made by correspondent Jane Standley, who described the building as already collapsed while it was clearly still standing behind her on the live feed!

📱 ROBINMG

"We got very, very lucky! Larry Silverstein

Owner of the World Trade Centre on 9/11 who had just reinsured the towers for $3.55 billion placed across 25 different insurers in the summer of 2001, just weeks before signing his 99-year lease on July 24. 

After 9/11, he argued the two plane impacts constituted two separate "occurrences", which would have doubled his payout to ~$7.1 billion

📱 ROBINMG

"Assisted Dying" Bill aka killing vulnerable people legally bill has lost the vote in Parliament by a narrow margin!

286 votes against versus 270 for.

Narrow victory but we'll take it!

More difficult for them to "suicide" us and our families now!

📱 ROBINMG

The Israeli-British NAZA documentary premiered in competition at the 83rd Venice Film Festival on 10 September 2026, where it received a record-breaking 24.5-minute standing ovation.

NAZA is a Hebrew military acronym (from nezek agavi) used by Israeli intelligence to mean "collateral damage" — specifically, the number of civilians expected to be killed in a given airstrike. Rather than naming women, children, or families, operators refer to projected civilian deaths as a simple count: "4 NAZA," "20 NAZA," "500 NAZA."

The 2026 documentary NAZA, directed by Yuval Abraham and Rachel Szor (two of the four co-directors of the Oscar-winning No Other Land), takes its title directly from this euphemism.

Shot in secrecy at night on the rooftops of Tel Aviv, the 80-minute film features anonymized interviews with 24 Israeli military intelligence officers and soldiers who describe, in their own words, the systems — AI-driven targeting, phone surveillance, drone strikes — used to carry out what the film characterizes as the calculated mass killing of Palestinian civilians in Gaza.

The title is itself a critique: by reducing human lives to a numerical "NAZA" figure, the military language obscures the intent and scale of civilian deaths, a practice the film exposes through the perpetrators' own testimony.

📱 ROBINMG

NAZA, the film which received the longest applause in the history of film festivals, is directed by Israelis, and it interviews 24 Israeli military intelligence officers. It is, by and large an Israel based film with British producers.

The content in the film comes straight from the mouths of Israeli intelligence officers. It is not a work of interpretation, or narrative fiction. It is really difficult to dismiss this film from the point of view of Israeli and Western society.

This is why the film is so important.

https://x.com/robinmonotti/status/2098718451074220518

📱 ROBINMG

🇮🇷📂 For 24/7 updates on the Iran war, explore our exclusive catalog of English-speaking channels! 📢

Interested in all the Middle East frenzy? We've curated a special catalog of English-speaking channels just for you!

Whether you're seeking in-depth analysis, breaking news, or expert insights, our catalog has got you covered.

👉 ADD CHANNELS

If you are interested in becoming part of this catalog, please contact us via Direct Messages @geopolitics_prime 🤖

Featuring 📱 ROBINMG

Naza was awarded the Special Jury Prize at the Venice Film Festival.

t.me/robinmg/47312

📱 ROBINMG

NAZA WINS VENICE SPECIAL JURY PRIZE:

NAZA exposes the repeated intentional violation of the Geneva Convention: ONLY military objectives can be directly targeted & in order to avoid war crimes, the parties must:
"(ii) take all feasible precautions in the choice of means and methods of attack with a view to avoiding, and in any event to minimizing, incidental loss of civilian life, injury to civilians and damage to civilian objects."

The Geneva Conventions of 1949 are the cornerstone of International Humanitarian Law (IHL), also known as the laws of war. Adopted on August 12, 1949, these four treaties establish the legal standards for the humanitarian treatment of war victims, including the wounded, sick, shipwrecked, prisoners of war, and civilians. They are universally ratified by all 196 member states of the international community, making them a fundamental and binding body of public international law.

The conventions apply to all cases of international armed conflict and, through Common Article 3, set minimum standards for non-international armed conflicts. Their core principles, such as the prohibition of torture and the requirement to protect non-combatants, are widely recognized as customary international law, binding on all states regardless of treaty ratification.

Anyone who uses the bombing of Dresden as a precedent fails to understand that was in 1945, & the Geneva Conventions apply from 1949.

📱 ROBINMG

If I say that 9/11 was a planned 3000 NAZA event, do you understand the implications of this statement?

📱 ROBINMG

Look at this image of one of the Twin Towers under the construction. Look at the core structure carefully. Under no circumstances this structure could completely collapse under the weight of a small section of the building collapsing, nor could it ever collapse due to fire.

While the exterior framed-tube (236 closely spaced perimeter columns) resisted lateral wind loads, the core worked in tandem with the exterior shell to support vertical gravity loads, allowing for the signature open, column-free floor plans.

The core columns and internal structures were protected by sprayed-on fire-resistant material and enclosed in two-inch thick gypsum board panels to maintain structural integrity during fires.

📱 ROBINMG

I wonder who truly did 9/11?

We will never know!

It will always remain a mystery!

Experts are baffled at how two 110 floor buildings hit way high up at around the 95th and 80th floors with a structural 3 hour fire resistance & 1 building hit by nothing could entirely collapse!

📱 ROBINMG

And this is the monstrosity they replaced the elegant Twin Towers with. Talk about the decline of civilization...

📱 ROBINMG

And look at me thinking Israel is the only democracy in the Middle East!

📱 ROBINMG