HOW SCIENCE STRIPPED MORALITY FROM TRUTH - 1/2

We must not look towards science for morality, but look towards truth-telling instead

"Just by listening to a gut feeling, we’ve probably got a bigger chance at truth. By listening to a gut feeling of whether something is truthful, rather than picking up a scientific experiment and saying this is the whole truth. I think we need to rethink the relationship between what we perceive of as truth and science altogether, because otherwise we are really setting ourselves up for the next one. We know what it’s coming from: climate fearmongering. We know it’s coming from there, but we also know that there’s more attempts at so-called pandemics and diseases, and so we need to be ready for this in the sense that anyone could come up and say:

“I am the chief scientist of X and Y and this is what’s happening.”

And we’d all automatically believe that. Whereas I think the default position should probably be the opposite. If you’ve got to that position of power, what did you do to get there? And what happened to all the other people who didn’t get there? Were they maybe more truthful? Who’s profiting from you being there? So if we rewind a little bit, see how we got here? It wasn’t always like this. The culture that I come from is, essentially Classical culture that was integrated by Christianity. That’s the world I come from. And I feel that truth is not in the body of scientific research: it’s what needs to be said. It’s what rings true to me. Some people then say, but what if what he says is false? It could be, but it rings true to me because for me, truth is actually what happens when people talk, when people talk to each other, when people question each other. And also it happens in some texts and certain practices, whereas I think what, why we are where we are, is ultimately down to a philosopher called Descartes, who basically, believed that the mark of truth is evidence.

So our idea that in order to say something truthful, we need to present evidence, comes from there, but we are only taking this worldview and we are forgetting how we got there, which wasn’t from that worldview. We have seen clearly in the last three years, and we’re seeing now with climate, that I can be lying and have a whole body of evidence and have all the top experts backing me up, I can have all the graphs, I can have people I know in movies, in politics, and probably a lot more evidence than has been produced for the contrary, because there’s less funding to say the opposite, which may be true, and I can still be lying. I would think that it’s time to totally turn on its head this Cartesian view from the start, which is that evidence is the mark of truth, and to actually start to be highly suspicious of evidence, and come back to other criteria, which I think we can talk about.

One of them is gut feeling, intuition. But there are also certain practices. If we go back before Descartes, what do we have? We have Christianity. And in Christianity, truth was understood as a belief in a certain set of moral teachings as codified in very specific books. That was the truth: it’s there, it’s written out, it has to do with morality. And what has that been replaced with? It has been replaced with the belief that truth is science. Now what has changed there? What has changed there is that actually something went missing. We lost something along the way. And what is it?

It’s morality.

You see what happened? Where is the morality inherent in science or in what we consider science?

1/2

RUSSIA LEARNS FROM IRAN WAR /Alastair Crooke & Lt Col Daniel Davis

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M8avg3pJOgY

As we approach the anniversary of the 7/7 attacks never forget Netanyahu was in LONDON at that very time.

What exactly was he doing there?

Watch now: https://rumble.com/v7cbusi-netanyahu-was-in-london-at-the-time-of-the-77-attacks.html

🇮🇹 One of the the oldest surviving processions in the UK, Manchester’s annual Madonna Del Rosario Procession took place today. 🎉

Known as Festa Della Madonna Del Rosario', the procession started from St Michael's in the heart of 'Little Italy' in Ancoats, Manchester.

The procession, organised by Manchester Italian Association celebrates the migration of many Italians to Manchester, many of them settled in Ancoats.

Thank you to all who took part in the joyous occasion and lined the route to watch. 🎉👏

#MadonnaDelRosaroProcession #Ancoats #Manchester #LittleItaly #ManchesterHistory

❌ Don't shop at Sainsbury's until you watch this
https://youtube.com/shorts/8n4w9x-YaQ4

This is one of the biggest expansions of facial recognition surveillance in the country to date that has very serious consequences for our privacy rights.

Subscribe | @BigBrotherWatchHQ

As today is the anniversary of the 7/7 attacks people need to realise the official narrative on this, just like 9/11, is a complete fabrication.

Watch now: https://rumble.com/v7cbusi-netanyahu-was-in-london-at-the-time-of-the-77-attacks.html?e9s=src_v1_upp_a

What are the chances that at the height of the 'War on Terror' all the world's leaders happened to be in the UK when the 7/7 'terror attacks' took place?

🇬🇧 ❗️ TODAY MARKS 20 years since the 7/7 London terror attacks, when, allegedly, 4 suicide bombers detonated homemade explosives on the London transport network, killing themselves, and 52 others. We are told that the bombs were homemade, carried onto the respective Tube trains and London bus, by 'radicalised' homegrown terrorists. The problem is, the evidence simply doesn't stack up, and the events of that day bear ALL the hallmarks of a false flag. An 'Israeli' one. 🇬🇧 ❗️

The Military Grade Explosives
In the immediate aftermath of the bombings, Christophe Chaboud - the then Head of the French Anti-Terrorism Co-ordination Unit - after having performed forensic analysis at all four bomb sites, told Le Monde that the explosives used were of "military origin", something he described as "very worrying".

The UK Mirror reported (archived page can be found here) that traces of RDX - a military grade high-explosive - had indeed been found by detectives.

This too was reported by the Irish Examiner (archived page here) as follows:

"Traces of military plastic explosive, more deadly and efficient than commercial varieties, are understood to have been found in the debris of the wrecked Underground carriages and the bus."

This crucial information - which contradicts the official account of primitive, homemade explosives -  went straight down the Orwellian memory hole, never to be mentioned again.

From the 5 Dancing 'Israelis' to the 4 'Broken' Cameras
To this day, there exists no CCTV footage of ANY of the supposed bombers boarding the doomed vehicles. You know why? Because the cameras 'weren't working'. All four of them. Despite the cameras (on the Tube trains and the bus) being operated by two completely DIFFERENT companies.

Yet both companies were 'Israeli'.

Verint Systems - an 'Israeli'-founded company - took control of the London Underground's CCTV system a matter of weeks before the attacks, after being selected by Metronet Rail in September 2004. The second link has been removed from the Internet entirely, after being verified by this writer 14 years hence.

'Israeli' company ICTS - which is also implicated in the Zionist false flag of 9/11 - ran the cameras on the bus.

Far from homemade bombs carried by two-bit terrorists in backpacks, the forensic examinations pointed to pre-planted military grade explosives.

The cameras weren't working because the footage doesn't exist.

The Drills
Then we have ex-Scotland Yard anti-terror copper, Peter Power, then CEO of private sector crisis management firm Visor Consultants, who - amazingly - appeared on TV that day, relaying the fact that his company had been running terror drills THAT MORNING, involving 1,000 people, simulating "ALMOST PRECISELY" (his words), the very attacks that took place.

This, too, went down the Orwellian memory hole, never to be reported again.

The Mossad Warning
'Israeli' news outlet Ynet reported 4 days after the attacks that the Mossad office in London had "received advance notice about the attacks, but only six minutes before the first blast". That too has been removed from the Internet, but it can be viewed via the archives here.

The Netanyahu Visit
Benjamin Netanyahu - the literal author of the fraudulent 'War on Terror' - was present in London that day, and he was warned to stay inside his hotel as the bombs detonated.

The 7/7 attacks came, conveniently, at a time when the British military was already trying to pull its troops from Iraq. One year after the London bombings, as part of its counter-terrorism strategy, the UK government's Prevent 'deradicalisation' programme - which had been quietly started in 2003 - was aggressively expanded, and the rest is history. The British withdrawal from Iraq didn't happen.

From the military grade explosives, to the cameras and the drills...two decades later, the country is divided into two camps: those who believe the official story...and those who aren't completely retarded. 🇬🇧

🔴 @Cultures_of_Resistance