What is TCI?
'TCI is the “Thermosphere Climate Index”, a number NASA publishes every day to keep track of the temperature at the top of Earth’s atmosphere–a layer of gas researchers call “the thermosphere.”
https://spaceweatherarchive.com/2022/03/23/what-is-tci/
📱 ROBINMG
'TCI is the “Thermosphere Climate Index”, a number NASA publishes every day to keep track of the temperature at the top of Earth’s atmosphere–a layer of gas researchers call “the thermosphere.”
https://spaceweatherarchive.com/2022/03/23/what-is-tci/
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Spaceweather.com
What is TCI?
TCI is the “Thermosphere Climate Index”, a number NASA publishes every day to keep track of the temperature at the top of Earth’s atmosphere–a layer of gas researchers call “the t…
👍8❤4🙏3🤩2
CONGO: Where 60% of the world's cobalt for lithium-ion batteries that power smartphones, laptops and electric cars comes from.
📱 ROBINMG
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🤯28🤮22🤬11👀4👍3❤1😭1
STANFORD UNIVERSITY PROFESSOR:
MOST OF SCIENCE IS JUNK SCIENCE!
"Why Most Published Research Findings Are False" John P. A. Ioannidis
"There is increasing concern that most current published research findings are false... Simulations show that for most study designs and settings, it is more likely for a research claim to be false than true. Moreover, for many current scientific fields, claimed research findings may often be simply accurate measures of the prevailing bias."
John P. Ioannidis, Professor of Medicine, Professor of Epidemiology and Population Health, Professor (by courtesy) of Statistics and Professor (by courtesy) of Biomedical Data Science.
📱 ROBINMG
MOST OF SCIENCE IS JUNK SCIENCE!
"Why Most Published Research Findings Are False" John P. A. Ioannidis
"There is increasing concern that most current published research findings are false... Simulations show that for most study designs and settings, it is more likely for a research claim to be false than true. Moreover, for many current scientific fields, claimed research findings may often be simply accurate measures of the prevailing bias."
John P. Ioannidis, Professor of Medicine, Professor of Epidemiology and Population Health, Professor (by courtesy) of Statistics and Professor (by courtesy) of Biomedical Data Science.
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
💯58👍15🔥14👏4❤2🤔2✍1
The "Hockey Stick" graph of climate change is a hoax. It was falsified to erase the warm periods. This one derived from Vinos is the actual one.
From Climate Change First Aid Kit
By John Shewchuk
https://www.climatechange-firstaidkit.com/
📱 ROBINMG
From Climate Change First Aid Kit
By John Shewchuk
https://www.climatechange-firstaidkit.com/
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
👍44💯16❤8🔥2🙏2👏1
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
MY CLIMATE CRISIS REPORT
As a climate correspondent I am risking my life from the European centre of the climate crisis to report the truth on the end times approaching. Here are the latest updates from the extreme heat. The end is near. We are all guilty. Repent!
📱 ROBINMG
As a climate correspondent I am risking my life from the European centre of the climate crisis to report the truth on the end times approaching. Here are the latest updates from the extreme heat. The end is near. We are all guilty. Repent!
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🤣51🔥20👍17💯10❤4👏2😁1
Croatia's disallowed goal highlights scientism's core ideology that "data" is truth: but it is simply not. It is obvious to the naked eye that the ball direction is not altered by the player's head. That is truth. The blip on the sensor could simply be put there later, it could correspond to an earlier or later touch. If it is isolated from the other previous or subsequent touches it could simply be an added graphic. Data is how to fool people that lies are truth, because it is the easiest thing to manipulate. Trust your own judgment always: you don't see a touch? There is no touch.
📱 ROBINMG
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
👍37💯12❤6🤮6🤔4👏2🤗1
HOW SCIENCE STRIPPED MORALITY FROM TRUTH - 1/2
We must not look towards science for morality, but look towards truth-telling instead
"Just by listening to a gut feeling, we’ve probably got a bigger chance at truth. By listening to a gut feeling of whether something is truthful, rather than picking up a scientific experiment and saying this is the whole truth. I think we need to rethink the relationship between what we perceive of as truth and science altogether, because otherwise we are really setting ourselves up for the next one. We know what it’s coming from: climate fearmongering. We know it’s coming from there, but we also know that there’s more attempts at so-called pandemics and diseases, and so we need to be ready for this in the sense that anyone could come up and say:
“I am the chief scientist of X and Y and this is what’s happening.”
And we’d all automatically believe that. Whereas I think the default position should probably be the opposite. If you’ve got to that position of power, what did you do to get there? And what happened to all the other people who didn’t get there? Were they maybe more truthful? Who’s profiting from you being there? So if we rewind a little bit, see how we got here? It wasn’t always like this. The culture that I come from is, essentially Classical culture that was integrated by Christianity. That’s the world I come from. And I feel that truth is not in the body of scientific research: it’s what needs to be said. It’s what rings true to me. Some people then say, but what if what he says is false? It could be, but it rings true to me because for me, truth is actually what happens when people talk, when people talk to each other, when people question each other. And also it happens in some texts and certain practices, whereas I think what, why we are where we are, is ultimately down to a philosopher called Descartes, who basically, believed that the mark of truth is evidence.
So our idea that in order to say something truthful, we need to present evidence, comes from there, but we are only taking this worldview and we are forgetting how we got there, which wasn’t from that worldview. We have seen clearly in the last three years, and we’re seeing now with climate, that I can be lying and have a whole body of evidence and have all the top experts backing me up, I can have all the graphs, I can have people I know in movies, in politics, and probably a lot more evidence than has been produced for the contrary, because there’s less funding to say the opposite, which may be true, and I can still be lying. I would think that it’s time to totally turn on its head this Cartesian view from the start, which is that evidence is the mark of truth, and to actually start to be highly suspicious of evidence, and come back to other criteria, which I think we can talk about.
One of them is gut feeling, intuition. But there are also certain practices. If we go back before Descartes, what do we have? We have Christianity. And in Christianity, truth was understood as a belief in a certain set of moral teachings as codified in very specific books. That was the truth: it’s there, it’s written out, it has to do with morality. And what has that been replaced with? It has been replaced with the belief that truth is science. Now what has changed there? What has changed there is that actually something went missing. We lost something along the way. And what is it?
It’s morality.
You see what happened? Where is the morality inherent in science or in what we consider science?
1/2
We must not look towards science for morality, but look towards truth-telling instead
"Just by listening to a gut feeling, we’ve probably got a bigger chance at truth. By listening to a gut feeling of whether something is truthful, rather than picking up a scientific experiment and saying this is the whole truth. I think we need to rethink the relationship between what we perceive of as truth and science altogether, because otherwise we are really setting ourselves up for the next one. We know what it’s coming from: climate fearmongering. We know it’s coming from there, but we also know that there’s more attempts at so-called pandemics and diseases, and so we need to be ready for this in the sense that anyone could come up and say:
“I am the chief scientist of X and Y and this is what’s happening.”
And we’d all automatically believe that. Whereas I think the default position should probably be the opposite. If you’ve got to that position of power, what did you do to get there? And what happened to all the other people who didn’t get there? Were they maybe more truthful? Who’s profiting from you being there? So if we rewind a little bit, see how we got here? It wasn’t always like this. The culture that I come from is, essentially Classical culture that was integrated by Christianity. That’s the world I come from. And I feel that truth is not in the body of scientific research: it’s what needs to be said. It’s what rings true to me. Some people then say, but what if what he says is false? It could be, but it rings true to me because for me, truth is actually what happens when people talk, when people talk to each other, when people question each other. And also it happens in some texts and certain practices, whereas I think what, why we are where we are, is ultimately down to a philosopher called Descartes, who basically, believed that the mark of truth is evidence.
So our idea that in order to say something truthful, we need to present evidence, comes from there, but we are only taking this worldview and we are forgetting how we got there, which wasn’t from that worldview. We have seen clearly in the last three years, and we’re seeing now with climate, that I can be lying and have a whole body of evidence and have all the top experts backing me up, I can have all the graphs, I can have people I know in movies, in politics, and probably a lot more evidence than has been produced for the contrary, because there’s less funding to say the opposite, which may be true, and I can still be lying. I would think that it’s time to totally turn on its head this Cartesian view from the start, which is that evidence is the mark of truth, and to actually start to be highly suspicious of evidence, and come back to other criteria, which I think we can talk about.
One of them is gut feeling, intuition. But there are also certain practices. If we go back before Descartes, what do we have? We have Christianity. And in Christianity, truth was understood as a belief in a certain set of moral teachings as codified in very specific books. That was the truth: it’s there, it’s written out, it has to do with morality. And what has that been replaced with? It has been replaced with the belief that truth is science. Now what has changed there? What has changed there is that actually something went missing. We lost something along the way. And what is it?
It’s morality.
You see what happened? Where is the morality inherent in science or in what we consider science?
1/2
❤29💯19👍4👏2🤮1🤨1
Robin Monotti + Cory Morningstar
HOW SCIENCE STRIPPED MORALITY FROM TRUTH - 1/2 We must not look towards science for morality, but look towards truth-telling instead "Just by listening to a gut feeling, we’ve probably got a bigger chance at truth. By listening to a gut feeling of whether…
HOW SCIENCE STRIPPED MORALITY FROM TRUTH - 2/2
There is none, as such. So in this passage from the belief in Christianity to the belief in science, we’ve done away with morality and I don’t think that was accidental. We are holding onto these beliefs of control. Eugenics for example, was born with scientific so-called progress, this belief that there are biologically superior beings than others, and therefore we can dispense with those that are inferior. The same thing with races. I know a lot of people try and argue that’s not what he meant, but in the subtitle of The Origin of the Species by Darwin, he writes: the preservation of favoured races. Yes, he means it in a biological sense, but it’s all there in a subliminal sense. It’s all already there. It’s all setting the world up for eugenics, which is basically a form of, of control over other humans. And that is what happens when you dispense with morality altogether."
Robin Monotti
Read the full article here:
https://robinmonotti.substack.com/p/how-science-stripped-morality-from
2/2
📱 ROBINMG
There is none, as such. So in this passage from the belief in Christianity to the belief in science, we’ve done away with morality and I don’t think that was accidental. We are holding onto these beliefs of control. Eugenics for example, was born with scientific so-called progress, this belief that there are biologically superior beings than others, and therefore we can dispense with those that are inferior. The same thing with races. I know a lot of people try and argue that’s not what he meant, but in the subtitle of The Origin of the Species by Darwin, he writes: the preservation of favoured races. Yes, he means it in a biological sense, but it’s all there in a subliminal sense. It’s all already there. It’s all setting the world up for eugenics, which is basically a form of, of control over other humans. And that is what happens when you dispense with morality altogether."
Robin Monotti
Read the full article here:
https://robinmonotti.substack.com/p/how-science-stripped-morality-from
2/2
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Substack
How Science Stripped Morality From Truth
We must not look towards science for morality, but look towards truth-telling instead
💯27❤14👍10👏2🤮2🤯1🤨1
Robin Monotti + Cory Morningstar
Photo
Did you know that the World Cup kicked off at the WEF in Davos back in January with Gianni Infantino?
📱 ROBINMG
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🤮56👀11🤯9❤3
HAPPY 4th OF JULY
American Independence was lost on the 22nd November 1963, and never regained since. You know who runs America now, and in whose interest. If we can be honest about this, we can regain the original values of American Independence. Stop lying to yourself.
📱 ROBINMG
American Independence was lost on the 22nd November 1963, and never regained since. You know who runs America now, and in whose interest. If we can be honest about this, we can regain the original values of American Independence. Stop lying to yourself.
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
💯124👍20🔥9❤6🤔5😢4🏆2🤨2
The idea that higher levels of CO2 than actual ones results in measurable higher temperatures is a HOAX.
CO2’S WARMING POWER DECREASES VERY RAPIDLY WITH INCREASING CO2
At current CO2 levels or higher, warming is negligible, near ZERO
Richard Lindzen Professor of Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciences, Emeritus Massachusetts Institute of Technology
William Happer Professor of Physics, Emeritus, Princeton University
July 1, 2026
📱 ROBINMG
CO2’S WARMING POWER DECREASES VERY RAPIDLY WITH INCREASING CO2
At current CO2 levels or higher, warming is negligible, near ZERO
Richard Lindzen Professor of Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciences, Emeritus Massachusetts Institute of Technology
William Happer Professor of Physics, Emeritus, Princeton University
July 1, 2026
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
💯58🔥11❤10👍5✍1🫡1
"CO2 is NOT a control knob, the narrative is absurd. It gives governments the power to control the energy sector."
Professor Richard L. Lindzen,
Professor Emeritus of Atmospheric Sciences at MIT
📱 ROBINMG
Professor Richard L. Lindzen,
Professor Emeritus of Atmospheric Sciences at MIT
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
💯104👍16👏6❤5🙏1
Forwarded from Alastair Crooke
RUSSIA LEARNS FROM IRAN WAR /Alastair Crooke & Lt Col Daniel Davis
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M8avg3pJOgY
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M8avg3pJOgY
YouTube
RUSSIA LEARNS FROM IRAN WAR /Alastair Crooke & Lt Col Daniel Davis
** NEW MERCH ** Rocks Glasses, Thermo Mugs, T-shirts & more!
Daniel Davis Deep Dive Merch: Etsy store
https://www.etsy.com/shop/DanielDavisDeepDive?ref=seller-platform-mcnav
Daniel Davis Deep Dive Merch: Etsy store
https://www.etsy.com/shop/DanielDavisDeepDive?ref=seller-platform-mcnav
👍20❤3
Alastair Crooke
RUSSIA LEARNS FROM IRAN WAR /Alastair Crooke & Lt Col Daniel Davis https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M8avg3pJOgY
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
“Europe is trying to pull a Pearl Harbor to drag America into war.”
Alastair Crooke warns of a danger few in America see in his breakdown of the Iran war, U.S. strategy, and the accelerating Russia–Ukraine conflict.
Crooke explains how European governments are escalating the war between Russia and Ukraine deliberately (giving more sophisticated long-range missiles, technology, and targeting data so Kyiv can strike deeper into Russia) — pushing for an incident dramatic enough to spur Moscow to overreact in a strong enough way to pull the U.S. into the war.
Full video:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M8avg3pJOgY
📱 ROBINMG
Alastair Crooke warns of a danger few in America see in his breakdown of the Iran war, U.S. strategy, and the accelerating Russia–Ukraine conflict.
Crooke explains how European governments are escalating the war between Russia and Ukraine deliberately (giving more sophisticated long-range missiles, technology, and targeting data so Kyiv can strike deeper into Russia) — pushing for an incident dramatic enough to spur Moscow to overreact in a strong enough way to pull the U.S. into the war.
Full video:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M8avg3pJOgY
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🤬36👍18💯8🤪4❤3🔥2🤮1
Forwarded from UNN
As we approach the anniversary of the 7/7 attacks never forget Netanyahu was in LONDON at that very time.
What exactly was he doing there?
Watch now: https://rumble.com/v7cbusi-netanyahu-was-in-london-at-the-time-of-the-77-attacks.html
What exactly was he doing there?
Watch now: https://rumble.com/v7cbusi-netanyahu-was-in-london-at-the-time-of-the-77-attacks.html
Rumble
Netanyahu was in LONDON at the time of the 7/7 attacks!
💯31🔥14👀7❤2
Forwarded from sc
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🇮🇹 One of the the oldest surviving processions in the UK, Manchester’s annual Madonna Del Rosario Procession took place today. 🎉
Known as Festa Della Madonna Del Rosario', the procession started from St Michael's in the heart of 'Little Italy' in Ancoats, Manchester.
The procession, organised by Manchester Italian Association celebrates the migration of many Italians to Manchester, many of them settled in Ancoats.
Thank you to all who took part in the joyous occasion and lined the route to watch. 🎉👏
#MadonnaDelRosaroProcession #Ancoats #Manchester #LittleItaly #ManchesterHistory
Known as Festa Della Madonna Del Rosario', the procession started from St Michael's in the heart of 'Little Italy' in Ancoats, Manchester.
The procession, organised by Manchester Italian Association celebrates the migration of many Italians to Manchester, many of them settled in Ancoats.
Thank you to all who took part in the joyous occasion and lined the route to watch. 🎉👏
#MadonnaDelRosaroProcession #Ancoats #Manchester #LittleItaly #ManchesterHistory
❤61🙏13👍2💯2✍1😱1🆒1
They are desperate for Russia's retaliation, they hope in thousands of civilian victims, as only that they believe justifies NATO's vampiric existence, the sucking of the blood of Western European civilians. Yet we see through them. Expect a massive false flag.
📱 ROBINMG
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🤮67👍38❤7🤯3🕊2
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Very clued on. She saw through October 7th & sees through "Russia".
This lady should be Germany's Chancellor.
📱 ROBINMG
This lady should be Germany's Chancellor.
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
💯68❤63👍13👏6🤔2