Is uncontrolled social media exposure damaging to under 16s? Yes.

Do I want the government to parent my children, knowing it will fail? No.

Is the real goal of the government to capture the identity of all over 16s? Yes.

They are defending their own corruption not children.

📱 ROBINMG

It is not a "social media ban for under 16s" : government knows that is impossible to enforce as VPNs will bypass it.

It is an anonymity ban for over 16s, meaning the real target are whistleblowers & journalists who are in danger of arrest for exposing government corruption.

📱 ROBINMG

What if I told you that the identity check for over 16s is not to "protect children" but on the contrary it is to protect the rape gangs who Labour used to harvest votes & get to power?

Anonymous victims & whistleblowers will be arrested once their identity is revealed.

📱 ROBINMG

You have to have a very low IQ to believe that the online identity checks are to ban under 16s from social media instead of to identify & arrest the anonymous whistleblowers to the organised crime cartel that runs the Labour government. We are surrounded by low IQ people.

📱 ROBINMG

No child should reveal their identity online. It is their parents job to introduce social media restrictions. There are appropriate physical and digital tools that parents can use. Lazy parenting can't be undone by fake government controls that will never ever work. Obvious

📱 ROBINMG

This government is NOT benevolent

They could not care less about your kids, in fact if they are free thinking they actively want them harmed

This government would never do anything which disadvantages the globalist oligarchy which backs them

They want to harm adults & kids

📱 ROBINMG

SAVE THE CHILDREN: "We are concerned that a blanket ban may look protective on paper, but instead pushes children into less regulated spaces, where they are less likely to seek help when something goes wrong. Children growing up in poverty are likely to be among those most affected."

📱 ROBINMG

UNITED NON COMPLIANCE

Now is the time to mobilize, organize & fight back to make sure the Digital ID to go on social media for over 16s fails from day one.

Do not comply.

📱 ROBINMG

The real reason Starmer is introducing ID checks for anonymous whistleblowers dressed up as an "under 16s ban":

http://bit.ly/4uE5odw

📱 ROBINMG

The children need access to social media to whistleblow on their rapists. Their rapist gangs harvest votes for Starmer's Labour. Join the dots what the "social media ban" is really for: it's to protect the rape gangs for votes.

📱 ROBINMG

Do you now understand what Keir Starmer is trying to achieve by the digital ID to go online for over 16s, and the silencing of under 16 child victims on social media?

📱 ROBINMG

Jeremy Clarkson has been diagnosed with an aggressive form of cancer. Professor Angus Dalgleish has documented the turbocancer link to the "vaccine" in his patients.

📱 ROBINMG

SOUNDS BEAUTIFUL MUSIC FESTIVAL 🎸
DORSET ENGLAND 26-28th JUNE 2026

I will be speaking with Thomas Atlas about the Freedom Blues @SoundsBeautifulFestival in Dorset between the 26th and 28th June

For tickets:
https://www.soundsbeautiful.uk/

📱 ROBINMG

Only mention of rape gangs on the BBC News UK handle dates to 1.5 years ago. They are part of the cover up.

📱 ROBINMG

"People need to STOP being defensive about the rape gang enquiry.

This is what they want.

Child grooming, exploitation and paedophilia are some of the worst crimes a human can commit.

I do not care if data is bad for the Pakistani community or if Muslims are over-represented in a certain area or type of crime. I am a Muslim and I care ONLY that it never happens again.

500,000 children are estimated to be sexually abused every year in England and Wales. Police recorded ~123,000 child sexual abuse and exploitation (CSAE) offences in 2024 (the latest full-year figure available) — most by family members, people the child knows, or committed by other children.

Look at how many are NOT recorded.

The grooming gangs are another horrific pattern in this massive national crisis that must be dealt with.

Pakistanis or Muslims trying to downplay something that has become a huge story does not help anyone. If the data is wrong then share proof and dispute it with numbers. But the most important thing is to call for accountability instead.

They want to track ethnicity or religion for crimes? DO IT.

They want to deport the criminals? Do it. Although I personally believe that is weak: reinstate the death penalty and hand it to every disgusting child rapist.

They want to deport family members or individuals who covered up the crimes? Fine, although I believe they too should be prosecuted.

It is not enough for the enquiry to document testimonies and extrapolate (estimate) data. We need systemic change, transparent data collection, and prevention.

I do not care what colour, religion, or ethnicity a person is. If they rape or groom children they deserve the harshest punishment possible.

Stop the defensiveness. Stop trying to say the police, state or anyone else is more to blame. Or that others (Whites/Blacks/Europeans/'far right') commit more crimes. It is not a sick competition.

The criminals are to blame first and foremost.

And by the way: WE ARE ALL TO BLAME when children are being raped in our societies."

Dr Rahmeh Aladwan

📱 ROBINMG