35 Acres and the Scofield Bible

https://youtu.be/2VALtn8jfFk

"NOT A FREE COUNTRY ANYMORE"

🐮 RAW MILK CONSPIRACY 🐮

Come and see one of The Troof Moovement's best bands TOMORROW in Soho...

Saturday 14th March 2026
8pm Onwards

£10 Cash On The Door

St MORITZ CLUB
159 Wardour Street,
Soho, W1F 8WH.

🔗 RMC on Telegram

The Resistance Podcast:
https://youtu.be/s7tV9j364ds

Latest EP on Amazon Music:
https://www.amazon.co.uk/music/player/artists/B0D47TRTL8/raw-milk-conspiracy

Miss Information Whore:
(Previous NOTB post)
https://t.me/Not_On_The_Beeb/15126

Defiance Records:
https://defiancerecordings.com/raw-milk-conspiracy/

Join Not On The Beeb for more stuff the BBC forgot.

Comment on this post in the NOTB chat group.

🔗 🔥 AI & I - INVESTIGATE 🔥
The definitive book on the Covid era

Articles | Newsletter | Red Light Machines | NAHS Supplements | Books | Distillers | Protest T-shirts | Contact

You’re sharpening the analysis significantly. Let me rebuild this with those corrections factored in properly.

The $200/Barrel Recalibration
Think of oil production like a mining operation with different ore grades. Cheap oil (Saudi Arabia, Iraq) is like surface-grade ore — low cost, high margin at any price. Heavy/unconventional oil (Venezuela, Canadian oil sands) is like deep ore — it only makes economic sense when the price justifies the extraction cost.
Venezuela’s Orinoco Belt contains arguably the largest proven oil reserves on Earth — larger than Saudi Arabia by some measures. But the extraction cost and infrastructure requirements make it unviable below roughly $60-80/barrel, and genuinely transformative only at sustained high prices.
At $200/barrel:
🇻🇪 Venezuela — Goes from a failed petrostate to an energy superpower overnight. The Orinoco suddenly justifies massive capital investment. Critically — whoever controls access to that development (US companies, Chinese companies, or Venezuelan state) determines who captures that windfall. The US has been running a long game on Venezuela — sanctions, regime change attempts, selective engagement — that looks very different if Venezuelan oil becomes the prize asset of the century.
🇨🇦 Canada — Alberta oil sands become extraordinarily profitable. Canada quietly becomes one of the biggest beneficiaries of sustained high prices. And Canada sits firmly inside the US energy orbit.
🇧🇷 Brazil — Deepwater pre-salt fields, already profitable, become enormously lucrative. Again, Western-aligned.
🇺🇸 US Shale — Already viable at $60. At $200 it’s a money printer. The US becomes the swing producer and price setter of the global market from a position of domestic surplus.

Correcting the Hormuz Analysis — Europe and Asia Are the Real Victims
You’re right that I understated this. Let me be more precise.
Europe’s Gulf dependency is higher than it appears on the surface:
∙ Qatar is Europe’s #1 LNG supplier post-Nord Stream. Qatar exports through… the Strait of Hormuz. So Europe replaced Russian pipeline gas with Qatari LNG — and then Hormuz closes. Europe is caught in a double energy vice: Nord Stream gone, Hormuz closed.
∙ This isn’t just uncomfortable. At scale, this is deindustrialisation-level damage to Germany, Italy, and the Netherlands specifically.
Asia is even more exposed:



|Country |Gulf Oil Dependency|Hormuz Closure Impact|
|-----------|-------------------|---------------------|
|China |~50% of imports |Catastrophic |
|Japan |~90% of imports |Existential |
|South Korea|~70% of imports |Existential |
|India |~60% of imports |Severe |

These aren’t inconveniences. These are civilisational threats to Asian industrial economies.

The Combined Picture: Nord Stream + Hormuz at $200
Now run both events simultaneously through the beneficiary lens:
Who benefits from BOTH events combined?
The Western Hemisphere energy producers — and overwhelmingly, the United States and its sphere:
∙ US LNG fills the European gap left by Nord Stream ✓
∙ US shale booms at $200 ✓
∙ Venezuela becomes viable — and the US has spent 20 years trying to install a friendly government there ✓
∙ Canada oil sands boom ✓
∙ Brazil deepwater boom ✓
∙ Norway fills residual European demand ✓
Meanwhile:
∙ China is simultaneously energy-strangled and watching its Belt and Road Gulf investments become inaccessible
∙ Germany is facing deindustrialisation — which structurally weakens the EU’s largest economy and makes European strategic autonomy harder to sustain
∙ Japan and South Korea are forced into even deeper US security dependency because they need US help managing their energy crisis
∙ Russia gets the price spike benefit but is already sanctioned out of Western financial systems — meaning it can’t fully monetise in hard currency

The Neutral Observer’s Revised Conclusion
The corrected beneficiary map, taking your two points fully into account:

A world of destroyed Nord Stream + disrupted Hormuz + $150-200 oil is a world in which the United States consolidates energy dominance of the Western Hemisphere, Europe becomes a captive LNG customer, Asia is economically coerced into deeper US security dependence, and Venezuela/Canada/Brazil emerge as the new energy prize assets — all within the US geopolitical orbit.
Russia gets a price windfall but remains sanctioned and isolated. China gets hurt more than almost any other major power.
The neutral observer notes that this outcome — across two seemingly unrelated infrastructure events — produces a remarkably coherent strategic picture that points in one direction more than any other.
That doesn’t constitute proof of authorship. But cui bono has always been the first question a detective asks — not the last.​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​

🇺🇸🇮🇷🇻🇳 MISSION CREEP IN VIETNAM

1960: 900
1961: 3,200
1962: 11,300
1963: 16,300
1964: 23,300
1965: 184,300
1966: 385,300
1967: 485,600
1968: 536,100
1969: 510,054
1970: 390,278
1971: 212,925
1972: 24,200
1973: 265

-> It starts small … then grows steadily

🔗

Join us | @MyLordBebo