Forwarded from GreenMedInfo (Sayer JI)
🚨Everyone is looking at the names in the Epstein files. The bigger story is the blueprint: a financial architecture to profit from pandemics — built years before one arrived.
👉Full substack investigation: https://sayerji.substack.com/p/breaking-the-epstein-files-illuminate
👉X thread: https://x.com/sayerjigmi/status/2018374717426503946?s=20
👉Full substack investigation: https://sayerji.substack.com/p/breaking-the-epstein-files-illuminate
👉X thread: https://x.com/sayerjigmi/status/2018374717426503946?s=20
🔥34💯13👍9❤4👏1
GreenMedInfo
🚨Everyone is looking at the names in the Epstein files. The bigger story is the blueprint: a financial architecture to profit from pandemics — built years before one arrived. 👉Full substack investigation: https://sayerji.substack.com/p/breaking-the-epstein…
EPSTEIN BEHIND THE 'PANDEMICS AS A BUSINESS MODEL' PROFIT INITIATIVE
Read the whole post, you will never see "vaccines" in the same way ever again:
https://sayerji.substack.com/p/breaking-the-epstein-files-illuminate
📱 ROBINMG
Read the whole post, you will never see "vaccines" in the same way ever again:
https://sayerji.substack.com/p/breaking-the-epstein-files-illuminate
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Substack
BREAKING: The Epstein Files Illuminate a 20-Year Architecture Behind Pandemics as a Business Model—With Bill Gates at the Center…
Inside the JPMorgan–Gates–Epstein Pipeline: Donor-Advised Funds, Vaccine Finance, and the Architecture of Pre-Positioned Profit
🤬25😡16❤5👍4🔥2🤯2
ANT-ZIONIST MOVEMENT LAUNCH Tickets, Sun, Feb 8, 2026 at 4:00 PM | Eventbrite
https://www.eventbrite.com/e/ant-zionist-movement-launch-tickets-1982004938124
https://www.eventbrite.com/e/ant-zionist-movement-launch-tickets-1982004938124
👏34❤2
Forwarded from Geopolitics Prime
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
👍19❤11👏3
Epstein, Western Decline, & The Moral Collapse Of The Elites | ZeroHedge
"What is at stake is no longer who “visited the island” or who “caught a ride on Epstein’s plane.” What is at stake is the fact that networks of this kind only exist when they are backed by deep institutional protection. There is no ritual pedophilia, no human trafficking on a transnational scale, no systematic production of extreme material without political, police, judicial, and media cover. This is not conspiracy: it is the logic of power.
From this point on, the West can no longer hide behind the idea of gradual decline. It is not merely cultural degeneration or a loss of values.
It is something darker: an elite that operates outside any recognizable moral limits and yet continues to govern. People directly or indirectly involved with this world continue to decide elections, wars, economic policies, and the fate of entire societies.
If there is anything positive in this moment, it is the end of naivety.
It is no longer possible to pretend that the system is “sick but recoverable.” What remained of the Western (anti-)civilizational project has been corroded from within. What comes next is still uncertain – and will be contested by all possible and necessary means.
But one thing is clear: after Epstein, nothing can continue as before. Anyone who acts as if nothing has changed either does not understand the gravity of what has come to light or is pretending not to understand."
Lucas Leiroz
https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/epstein-western-decline-moral-collapse-elites
"What is at stake is no longer who “visited the island” or who “caught a ride on Epstein’s plane.” What is at stake is the fact that networks of this kind only exist when they are backed by deep institutional protection. There is no ritual pedophilia, no human trafficking on a transnational scale, no systematic production of extreme material without political, police, judicial, and media cover. This is not conspiracy: it is the logic of power.
From this point on, the West can no longer hide behind the idea of gradual decline. It is not merely cultural degeneration or a loss of values.
It is something darker: an elite that operates outside any recognizable moral limits and yet continues to govern. People directly or indirectly involved with this world continue to decide elections, wars, economic policies, and the fate of entire societies.
If there is anything positive in this moment, it is the end of naivety.
It is no longer possible to pretend that the system is “sick but recoverable.” What remained of the Western (anti-)civilizational project has been corroded from within. What comes next is still uncertain – and will be contested by all possible and necessary means.
But one thing is clear: after Epstein, nothing can continue as before. Anyone who acts as if nothing has changed either does not understand the gravity of what has come to light or is pretending not to understand."
Lucas Leiroz
https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/epstein-western-decline-moral-collapse-elites
ZeroHedge
Epstein, Western Decline, & The Moral Collapse Of The Elites
January 2026 marks a rupture...
💯67❤5👏4😁1
We can say that yes, Epstein, Gates & co. did "pull off" the pandemic in the end, and in the process awakened millions of people to the corrupt entity that is modern "medicine", and the "elites" behind it, and the ruthless way in which they consider the lives of the masses dispensable to their logic of power, profit & control.
📱 ROBINMG
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
👍56💯25❤4😭1
Forwarded from GreenMedInfo (Sayer JI)
Part II is live.
⚠️ Inside Project Molecule: How JPMorgan and Elite Finance Turned Biology into Infrastructure
Part I exposed the documents.
Part II examines the architecture behind them — how pandemic preparedness quietly evolved into a financialized governance system, with JPMorgan at the center and biology treated as infrastructure long before COVID.
This isn’t about scandal.
It’s about systems.
📖Read Part II:
https://sayerji.substack.com/p/inside-project-molecule-how-jpmorgan
📖 Read Part I (if you missed it):
https://sayerji.substack.com/p/breaking-the-epstein-files-illuminate
🧵 Part I X Thread:
https://x.com/sayerjigmi/status/2018374717426503946
🧵 Part II X Thread:
https://x.com/sayerjigmi/status/2018836140166365450?s=20
Part I exposed the documents.
Part II examines the architecture behind them — how pandemic preparedness quietly evolved into a financialized governance system, with JPMorgan at the center and biology treated as infrastructure long before COVID.
This isn’t about scandal.
It’s about systems.
📖Read Part II:
https://sayerji.substack.com/p/inside-project-molecule-how-jpmorgan
📖 Read Part I (if you missed it):
https://sayerji.substack.com/p/breaking-the-epstein-files-illuminate
🧵 Part I X Thread:
https://x.com/sayerjigmi/status/2018374717426503946
🧵 Part II X Thread:
https://x.com/sayerjigmi/status/2018836140166365450?s=20
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
👍14❤4🏆4🔥3😢1
Forwarded from Middle East Eye
#BREAKING: Six Palestine Action activists have been found not guilty by a UK court of aggravated burglary following a months-long trial in connection with a break-in to an Israeli-owned arms factory.
After days of deliberations, jurors acquitted Leona Kamio, 30, Samuel Corner, 23, Fatema Rajwani ,21, Zoe Rogers, 22, Jordan Devlin, 31, and Charlotte Head, of charges of aggravated burglary.
All six defendants faced charges of aggravated burglary, criminal damage and violent disorder at an Elbit Systems' plant near Bristol on 6 August 2024.
After days of deliberations, jurors acquitted Leona Kamio, 30, Samuel Corner, 23, Fatema Rajwani ,21, Zoe Rogers, 22, Jordan Devlin, 31, and Charlotte Head, of charges of aggravated burglary.
All six defendants faced charges of aggravated burglary, criminal damage and violent disorder at an Elbit Systems' plant near Bristol on 6 August 2024.
👏41❤9👍5🤬2
Barrister’s powerful speech at Filton Trial reminds jury of its right to defy judge
"Mr Menon is the barrister representing Charlotte Head, who, like four of the others, is charged with three offences: aggravated burglary, criminal damage and violent disorder.
In his speech, he carefully unravels the prosecution’s – and, of course, the government’s – charge that the break-in was aggravated burglary. As Menon points out, for that to be true, Head and the others would have had to have harboured an intention to use the sledgehammers to hurt the guards when they broke into the factory. There is precisely no evidence that that was the case.
He also dismisses the claim of violent disorder against Head. For that to be true, she would have needed to have actively colluded with the others in using or threatening violence – violence that was not in self-defence or to defend someone else. This charge usually applies in circumstances such as pub brawls or football match fights. The test is whether a hypothetical “bystander of reasonable firmness” – someone uninvolved – would feel their safety was in danger from the fracas.
Again, Menon makes a compelling case that at no point was this true of Head, and suggests that the reason the video footage of the confrontation between the activists and the security guards looks so threatening is largely because one of the guards menaced the women, and twice assaulted an unarmed male activist, Jordan Devlin, with a sledgehammer.
But the most astonishing part of his speech relates to the third charge: criminal damage. The defendants have only one available defence against this. In legal parlance, it is called “lawful excuse”. It means that any criminal damage they caused can be viewed as lawful because it was designed to prevent the commission of a far graver crime – in this case genocide.
At one point in the trial a jury member sent a note to the judge, Mr Justice Johnson, asking this very question: “If we decide that they [the defendants] genuinely believe that they were performing life-saving action and were morally compelled to destroy weapons they believed were going to be used to kill civilians in what they believe to be an illegal genocide, would that amount to a lawful excuse?”
The judge, who repeatedly stifled efforts by the defence to air evidence of Elbit System’s involvement in the genocide, answered that the jury must not take into account such “lawful excuse”. In his words: “There is no evidence in this case of anything that is capable in law of amounting to a lawful excuse, so that is not something that you need to consider.”
https://www.jonathan-cook.net/blog/2026-01-14/filton-trial-jury-defy-judge/
📱 ROBINMG
"Mr Menon is the barrister representing Charlotte Head, who, like four of the others, is charged with three offences: aggravated burglary, criminal damage and violent disorder.
In his speech, he carefully unravels the prosecution’s – and, of course, the government’s – charge that the break-in was aggravated burglary. As Menon points out, for that to be true, Head and the others would have had to have harboured an intention to use the sledgehammers to hurt the guards when they broke into the factory. There is precisely no evidence that that was the case.
He also dismisses the claim of violent disorder against Head. For that to be true, she would have needed to have actively colluded with the others in using or threatening violence – violence that was not in self-defence or to defend someone else. This charge usually applies in circumstances such as pub brawls or football match fights. The test is whether a hypothetical “bystander of reasonable firmness” – someone uninvolved – would feel their safety was in danger from the fracas.
Again, Menon makes a compelling case that at no point was this true of Head, and suggests that the reason the video footage of the confrontation between the activists and the security guards looks so threatening is largely because one of the guards menaced the women, and twice assaulted an unarmed male activist, Jordan Devlin, with a sledgehammer.
But the most astonishing part of his speech relates to the third charge: criminal damage. The defendants have only one available defence against this. In legal parlance, it is called “lawful excuse”. It means that any criminal damage they caused can be viewed as lawful because it was designed to prevent the commission of a far graver crime – in this case genocide.
At one point in the trial a jury member sent a note to the judge, Mr Justice Johnson, asking this very question: “If we decide that they [the defendants] genuinely believe that they were performing life-saving action and were morally compelled to destroy weapons they believed were going to be used to kill civilians in what they believe to be an illegal genocide, would that amount to a lawful excuse?”
The judge, who repeatedly stifled efforts by the defence to air evidence of Elbit System’s involvement in the genocide, answered that the jury must not take into account such “lawful excuse”. In his words: “There is no evidence in this case of anything that is capable in law of amounting to a lawful excuse, so that is not something that you need to consider.”
https://www.jonathan-cook.net/blog/2026-01-14/filton-trial-jury-defy-judge/
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
www.jonathan-cook.net
Barrister’s powerful speech at Filton Trial reminds jury of its right to defy judge
Starmer and the media need convictions to justify Palestine Action’s proscription as a terrorist group. Rajiv Menon KC spells out to the jury why it is a vital last defence against government tyranny.
👏21❤6💯4🏆2