Jeffrey Epstein advising former Israeli PM Ehud Barak to join the steering board of PALANTIR. Is it all starting to make sense now?

📱 ROBINMG

Why do so many people fine it difficult to accept that there are a number of supremacist psychopaths at the top of the oligarchic food chain that actually derive both pleasure & control by reducing the world's population, and making the others ill by hooking them on toxic pharmaceuticals & cheap food?

📱 ROBINMG

Any questions?

📱 ROBINMG

EPSTEIN BEHIND THE 'PANDEMICS AS A BUSINESS MODEL' PROFIT INITIATIVE

Read the whole post, you will never see "vaccines" in the same way ever again:

https://sayerji.substack.com/p/breaking-the-epstein-files-illuminate

📱 ROBINMG

🚨 EPSTEIN FILES: FROM TRAFFICKING TO GEOPOLITICS - THE POWER CABAL UNMASKED

👉 What’s the most explosive revelation in the latest DOJ release? It isn't just about crime—it’s a blueprint of power. The documents sketch a web of influence linking governments, banks, and global institutions.

🔴 Global governance blueprint: Jeffrey Epstein allegedly proposed sidelining the UN in favor of a private, Davos-linked network controlling cyber, crypto, genetics, and international coordination.

🔴 On the brink of flipping: A stunning turn occurs as FBI records reveal Epstein's lawyers were actively negotiating a cooperation deal with federal prosecutors a mere two weeks before his death

🔴 Worldwide trafficking network: Court filings describe underage girls flown from Turkey, Central Europe, and Asia, some as young as 12, moved across borders and returned within days

🔴 Pandemic profiting: Emails link Epstein with Bill Gates and JPMorgan in early planning for vaccine funds, donor structures, and "pandemic investment" models years before COVID-19

🔴 Bio-lab 'designer baby' proposal: A biohacker sought Epstein's backing to fund human embryo and cloning experiments, referencing related, multi-million-dollar research at a Ukraine facility

🔴 Ukraine trafficking trail: E-mails name modeling agencies in Kiev offering "cheap escort" services linked to Jean-Luc Brunel, accused of supplying girls to the Epstein network 

🔴 Zelensky reference: Volodymyr Zelensky's name appears in an email alleging Ukraine’s role in trafficking via Brunel

🔴 Banking elite claim: Epstein claimed he "represents the Rothschilds" when lobbying Peter Thiel to direct a $160bn bank into tech and geopolitics

🔴 UK state secrets leak: Former minister Peter Mandelson allegedly shared market-moving government insider info with Epstein, tipping him off to impending EU bailouts and UK announcements

👍 @geopolitics_prime | Follow us on X

We can say that yes, Epstein, Gates & co. did "pull off" the pandemic in the end, and in the process awakened millions of people to the corrupt entity that is modern "medicine", and the "elites" behind it, and the ruthless way in which they consider the lives of the masses dispensable to their logic of power, profit & control.

📱 ROBINMG

Part II is live.

⚠️Inside Project Molecule: How JPMorgan and Elite Finance Turned Biology into Infrastructure

Part I exposed the documents.
Part II examines the architecture behind them — how pandemic preparedness quietly evolved into a financialized governance system, with JPMorgan at the center and biology treated as infrastructure long before COVID.

This isn’t about scandal.
It’s about systems.

📖Read Part II:
https://sayerji.substack.com/p/inside-project-molecule-how-jpmorgan

📖 Read Part I (if you missed it):
https://sayerji.substack.com/p/breaking-the-epstein-files-illuminate

🧵 Part I X Thread:
https://x.com/sayerjigmi/status/2018374717426503946
🧵 Part II X Thread:
https://x.com/sayerjigmi/status/2018836140166365450?s=20

Barrister’s powerful speech at Filton Trial reminds jury of its right to defy judge

"Mr Menon is the barrister representing Charlotte Head, who, like four of the others, is charged with three offences: aggravated burglary, criminal damage and violent disorder.

In his speech, he carefully unravels the prosecution’s – and, of course, the government’s – charge that the break-in was aggravated burglary. As Menon points out, for that to be true, Head and the others would have had to have harboured an intention to use the sledgehammers to hurt the guards when they broke into the factory. There is precisely no evidence that that was the case.

He also dismisses the claim of violent disorder against Head. For that to be true, she would have needed to have actively colluded with the others in using or threatening violence – violence that was not in self-defence or to defend someone else. This charge usually applies in circumstances such as pub brawls or football match fights. The test is whether a hypothetical “bystander of reasonable firmness” – someone uninvolved – would feel their safety was in danger from the fracas.

Again, Menon makes a compelling case that at no point was this true of Head, and suggests that the reason the video footage of the confrontation between the activists and the security guards looks so threatening is largely because one of the guards menaced the women, and twice assaulted an unarmed male activist, Jordan Devlin, with a sledgehammer.

But the most astonishing part of his speech relates to the third charge: criminal damage. The defendants have only one available defence against this. In legal parlance, it is called “lawful excuse”. It means that any criminal damage they caused can be viewed as lawful because it was designed to prevent the commission of a far graver crime – in this case genocide.

At one point in the trial a jury member sent a note to the judge, Mr Justice Johnson, asking this very question: “If we decide that they [the defendants] genuinely believe that they were performing life-saving action and were morally compelled to destroy weapons they believed were going to be used to kill civilians in what they believe to be an illegal genocide, would that amount to a lawful excuse?”

The judge, who repeatedly stifled efforts by the defence to air evidence of Elbit System’s involvement in the genocide, answered that the jury must not take into account such “lawful excuse”. In his words: “There is no evidence in this case of anything that is capable in law of amounting to a lawful excuse, so that is not something that you need to consider.”

https://www.jonathan-cook.net/blog/2026-01-14/filton-trial-jury-defy-judge/

📱 ROBINMG

Epstein files: Mandelson scandal indicts the entire British establishment | Middle East Eye

"Is Prime Minister Keir Starmer finished?
He gave Peter Mandelson one of the most cherished jobs the British state can offer: ambassador to the United States. Now Mandelson is embroiled in the gravest political scandal in more than a century.
We now know that Mandelson was leaking sensitive inside information about British government decisions to his financier friend Jeffrey Epstein, one of the most repulsive criminals of the 21st century - a criminal, moreover, who had recently been convicted in a Florida court for procuring a child for prostitution.
The depravity is beyond belief. 
At the time, Mandelson was business secretary (and effective deputy prime minister) in the Gordon Brown government as it weighed up how to confront a financial crisis. On the evidence of the Epstein emails, Mandelson may well be guilty of misconduct in public office - an offence that carries a maximum penalty of life imprisonment.

To make matters worse for Starmer, Mandelson has been celebrated - one might almost say loved - by the political and media classes for nearly half a century.

During this period, more than any other politician, he has shaped the modern Labour Party, exercising hypnotic influence over four leaders: Neil Kinnock, Blair, Brown and Starmer.

The scale of the latest political scandal cannot be understood outside of this background.his decision to despatch Mandelson to Washington breached historic foreign office conventions.
In the US, ambassadors are often political appointments. This is not the case in Britain. Karen Pierce, a career diplomat, preceded Mandelson in Washington, and after Mandelson was sacked, another British diplomat, Christian Turner, succeeded him.
Bear in mind therefore that Starmer was making a personal intervention when he sent Mandelson to the White House. This makes the prime minister directly responsible for the most reprehensible and disastrous appointment in the postwar history of the British diplomatic service - an appointment that blew up in his face, humiliating Britain in the process.

Mandelson has been celebrated - one might almost say loved - by the political and media classes for nearly half a century.

During this period, more than any other politician, he has shaped the modern Labour Party, exercising hypnotic influence over four leaders: Neil Kinnock, Blair, Brown and Starmer.

The scale of the latest political scandal cannot be understood outside of this background.

The party he resigned from on Sunday is a husk. It is no longer a vehicle of the left. It has broken its relations with the trade unions, becoming a vehicle for the billionaires who today own British (and world) politics."

Peter Oborne, Middle East Eye

https://www.middleeasteye.net/opinion/epstein-files-mandelson-scandal-indicts-entire-british-establishment

📱 ROBINMG