Israeli military knew of Hamas's October 7 plans before terror attack - The Jerusalem Post
"A newly surfaced document has revealed that the Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) and intelligence systems had detailed knowledge of Hamas's plan to raid Israel and kidnap 250 people weeks before the October 7 massacre [massacre also due to the IDF implementation of the Hannibal Directive].
The document, which was compiled in the Gaza Division, outlined Hamas's intentions and was known to top intelligence officials, according to a report by Kan News.
The document, titled "Detailed End-to-End Raid Training," was distributed on September 19, 2023, and described in detail the series of exercises conducted by Hamas's elite units.
These exercises included raiding military posts and kibbutzim (collective communities in Israel), kidnapping soldiers and civilians, and maintaining the hostages once they were in the Gaza Strip.
The report by Kan News stated, "Security sources told Kan News that the document was known to the intelligence leadership, at the very least in the Gaza Division."
https://www.jpost.com/israel-hamas-war/article-806634
ROBINMG π
"A newly surfaced document has revealed that the Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) and intelligence systems had detailed knowledge of Hamas's plan to raid Israel and kidnap 250 people weeks before the October 7 massacre [massacre also due to the IDF implementation of the Hannibal Directive].
The document, which was compiled in the Gaza Division, outlined Hamas's intentions and was known to top intelligence officials, according to a report by Kan News.
The document, titled "Detailed End-to-End Raid Training," was distributed on September 19, 2023, and described in detail the series of exercises conducted by Hamas's elite units.
These exercises included raiding military posts and kibbutzim (collective communities in Israel), kidnapping soldiers and civilians, and maintaining the hostages once they were in the Gaza Strip.
The report by Kan News stated, "Security sources told Kan News that the document was known to the intelligence leadership, at the very least in the Gaza Division."
https://www.jpost.com/israel-hamas-war/article-806634
ROBINMG π
The Jerusalem Post | JPost.com
IDF knew of Hamas's plan to kidnap 250 before October 7 attack - report
The IDF had precise information about Hamas's intentions, but due to prevailing conceptions in the security establishment and possible negligence by officials, the warning signs were not acted on.
π₯45π25β€7π€¨2π€ͺ1
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Professor Jeffrey Sachs tells Briahna Joy Gray that Ukraine is becoming the βAfghanistan of Europeβ
βThis is not a democratically-elected government in Ukraine. This is a government of Martial law that has overstayed its constitutional limit,β he says.
ROBINMG π
βThis is not a democratically-elected government in Ukraine. This is a government of Martial law that has overstayed its constitutional limit,β he says.
ROBINMG π
π―85π9π₯8β€3π1π1
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
π€ͺ93π11π5π¨2β€1π―1
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
π64π19π13β€3
STARMER IS A GLOBALIST STOOGE
Fake left "Labour" leader Keir Starmer is a member of the undemocratic (Chomsky) Trilateral Commission founded by David Rockefeller in 1973 to foster "closer cooperation" between Japan, Western Europe & North American financial elites: i.e. the globalist oligarchy.
ROBINMG π
Fake left "Labour" leader Keir Starmer is a member of the undemocratic (Chomsky) Trilateral Commission founded by David Rockefeller in 1973 to foster "closer cooperation" between Japan, Western Europe & North American financial elites: i.e. the globalist oligarchy.
ROBINMG π
π―84π4π₯3π2
Zionist Friends Need Company β Part I: Birds of a Feather - Rusere Shoniwa
"Some leading lights in the media had incorporated a Limited Company called British Friends of Israel Limited. This prompts many questions, the first of which is: why would you need a Limited Company to assert your friendship with anyone or, in this case, anything?
So who are the directors of this Zionist-friendly company? They are:
Toby Young β he of the what-more-do-I-have-to-do-to-get-a-peerage fame, and founder of the selective Free Speech Union (FSU) (βselectiveβ to be explained in Part II).
Laura Dodsworth β she of the βfreeβ mind; a purportedly passionate anti-nudger who just happens to have teamed up with a professional nudger to warn you about the dangers of being nudged.
Allison Pearson β a confused stop-it-I-like-it jab-sceptic and jab-taker.
Francis Hoar β barrister specialising in birthday tweets to countries committing genocide.
Janet Macvarish β a sociologist with an interest in neuroscience, and also Education and Events director at Youngβs FSU.
Ian Rons β IT guy and fellow βfree-speechβ traveller of Toby Young. Rons was a director of the Free Speech Union at its incorporation but has since resigned his position.
Glancing at this list of British Zionists, youβd think that free speech hobby-horsing is a prerequisite for entry into the Zionist hall of infamy. And in a perverted way, it just might be, because the most effective way to subvert a civic good is to wear its mantle while twisting a knife into its back. If youβre going to plot the death of free speech and avoid suspicion for its murder, why not make like Machiavelli and publicly declare your undying love for the very thing you are privately killing? This is the basic modus operandi of Zionism. When you look at legislation being passed in the Western World, it would appear that Zionism is succeeding in defining all anti-Zionist speech and activism as antisemitic."
The vehicle called Israel was constituted to clear the land previously called Palestine of its indigenous inhabitants, Palestinians, who had been there for centuries. That is the contract between the State of Israel and its citizens, and that is what keeps its citizens strapped into a dangerously unsafe vehicle that went off the rails from the moment it was conceived. It was in fact born in a fiery furnace of terrorism and ethnic cleansing. In 1948, a minority (roughly 30%) of European Jewish settlers set out to achieve their goal of ethnic cleansing, but failed to finish the job. For 76 years since, virtually all of the strife within Israel has been over how to rid themselves completely of the remaining Palestinians and to somehow have this grisly deed rubber-stamped by an international court of public opinion. October 7th 2023, was the pretext Israelβs passengers and drivers (citizens and state) needed to unite and complete the longest drawn-out ethnic cleansing in modern history, and to do so without compunction; to drop the pretence that they cared about whether genocide was a crime against humanity."
https://plagueonbothhouses.substack.com/p/zionist-friends-need-company-part
ROBINMG π
"Some leading lights in the media had incorporated a Limited Company called British Friends of Israel Limited. This prompts many questions, the first of which is: why would you need a Limited Company to assert your friendship with anyone or, in this case, anything?
So who are the directors of this Zionist-friendly company? They are:
Toby Young β he of the what-more-do-I-have-to-do-to-get-a-peerage fame, and founder of the selective Free Speech Union (FSU) (βselectiveβ to be explained in Part II).
Laura Dodsworth β she of the βfreeβ mind; a purportedly passionate anti-nudger who just happens to have teamed up with a professional nudger to warn you about the dangers of being nudged.
Allison Pearson β a confused stop-it-I-like-it jab-sceptic and jab-taker.
Francis Hoar β barrister specialising in birthday tweets to countries committing genocide.
Janet Macvarish β a sociologist with an interest in neuroscience, and also Education and Events director at Youngβs FSU.
Ian Rons β IT guy and fellow βfree-speechβ traveller of Toby Young. Rons was a director of the Free Speech Union at its incorporation but has since resigned his position.
Glancing at this list of British Zionists, youβd think that free speech hobby-horsing is a prerequisite for entry into the Zionist hall of infamy. And in a perverted way, it just might be, because the most effective way to subvert a civic good is to wear its mantle while twisting a knife into its back. If youβre going to plot the death of free speech and avoid suspicion for its murder, why not make like Machiavelli and publicly declare your undying love for the very thing you are privately killing? This is the basic modus operandi of Zionism. When you look at legislation being passed in the Western World, it would appear that Zionism is succeeding in defining all anti-Zionist speech and activism as antisemitic."
The vehicle called Israel was constituted to clear the land previously called Palestine of its indigenous inhabitants, Palestinians, who had been there for centuries. That is the contract between the State of Israel and its citizens, and that is what keeps its citizens strapped into a dangerously unsafe vehicle that went off the rails from the moment it was conceived. It was in fact born in a fiery furnace of terrorism and ethnic cleansing. In 1948, a minority (roughly 30%) of European Jewish settlers set out to achieve their goal of ethnic cleansing, but failed to finish the job. For 76 years since, virtually all of the strife within Israel has been over how to rid themselves completely of the remaining Palestinians and to somehow have this grisly deed rubber-stamped by an international court of public opinion. October 7th 2023, was the pretext Israelβs passengers and drivers (citizens and state) needed to unite and complete the longest drawn-out ethnic cleansing in modern history, and to do so without compunction; to drop the pretence that they cared about whether genocide was a crime against humanity."
https://plagueonbothhouses.substack.com/p/zionist-friends-need-company-part
ROBINMG π
A Plague on Both Houses
Zionist Friends Need Company β Part I: Birds of a Feather
Or rather, Zionist friends need a company. What a difference the smallest word in the English language can make to the meaning of a sentence. In fact, Zionist friends, as we shall see, love a good limited guarantee company. The social media platform formerlyβ¦
π₯30π16π―9β€6π2
America Prepares for Global War and Restarts the Draft for 18-26 year olds
Greetings to Young Americans: You are Automatically Registered for the Draft Conscription without Representation? Where and WHY are we sending our Kids to War?
"Our government is planning a big draft, conscripting millions of young Americans for an even bigger war!
I call to your attention a Democratic amendment to the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), which was slipped into the almost trillion-dollar Pentagon war spending bill, by voice vote, in the House Armed Services committee.
The Democratic Amendment to H.R. 8070, the National Defense Authorization (NDAA) reads:
Section 531. Selective Service System: Automatic Registration. SEC. 3. (a)(1) βExcept as otherwise provided in this title, every male citizen of the United States, and every other male person residing in the United States, between the ages of eighteen and twenty-six, shall be automatically registered under this Act by the Director of the Selective Service System.β
This amendment is in the NDAA legislation and there is no pending amendment to strip it from the bill. So, when the NDAA passes, as early as this week, Congress will have taken steps to make automatic conscription the law of the land.
Why an automatic draft? Members of Congress and the President have an obligation to explain to the American people to which foreign land will their sons, and perhaps their daughters, be sent to die?
The U.S. has been in a continuous βState of Emergencyβ since September 11, 2001, which provides a president with over 100 powers he would not ordinarily have. Notwithstanding that the automatic draft provision will go into effect in a year, a presidential order invoking emergency powers and/or an Act of Congress, could readily move millions from their civilian lives to the front lines of a war.
WHAT WE KNOW:
We know that America is fomenting wars around the world
We know that the military industrial complex controls our government
We know that we are on the precipice of a global war, provoking aggression rather than resolution with Russia, China and in the Middle East.
The only winners in these wars are the war profiteers.
Theyβre now going to take our children to fight in unnecessary, destabilizing, dangerous, debt-creating wars.
Just today President Biden committed the U.S. to an additional decade of support for Ukraineβs war with Russia.
There is no other conceivable reason to require more than 16 million American males to be automatically registered for the draft, other than to prepare for a large-scale war.
The Selective Service System is the vehicle by which individuals are inducted into the armed forces. This NDAA Automatic Registration amendment facilitates an efficient, large-scale draft.
The new law will automatically register all males between the ages of 18 and 26. Selective Service will notify in writing every young American male that they have been registered and will prescribe regulations which can require the registrant to provide βdate of birth, address, social security account number, phone number and email addressβ¦.β
There are members of Congress who advocate that young women also be included in any draft, which could bring to 32 million the number of Americans of draft-eligible age.
The U.S. currently has over 1,300,000 men and women, career soldiers, as well as volunteers, serving in the all-volunteer armed forces.
According to the new automatic draft law, undocumented immigrants, between the ages of 18 and 26, numbering at least 1.5 million, could also be conscripted, if it were to apply to women as well as men.
A government conscription edict covering the undocumented could ironically do damage to the so-called βreplacement theory,β where draft-eligible undocumented immigrants could decide to retreat to the other side of the border. Military service may appeal to others as a path toward citizenship, since immigrants serving during βperiod of hostility,β can seek immediate naturalization.
Greetings to Young Americans: You are Automatically Registered for the Draft Conscription without Representation? Where and WHY are we sending our Kids to War?
"Our government is planning a big draft, conscripting millions of young Americans for an even bigger war!
I call to your attention a Democratic amendment to the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), which was slipped into the almost trillion-dollar Pentagon war spending bill, by voice vote, in the House Armed Services committee.
The Democratic Amendment to H.R. 8070, the National Defense Authorization (NDAA) reads:
Section 531. Selective Service System: Automatic Registration. SEC. 3. (a)(1) βExcept as otherwise provided in this title, every male citizen of the United States, and every other male person residing in the United States, between the ages of eighteen and twenty-six, shall be automatically registered under this Act by the Director of the Selective Service System.β
This amendment is in the NDAA legislation and there is no pending amendment to strip it from the bill. So, when the NDAA passes, as early as this week, Congress will have taken steps to make automatic conscription the law of the land.
Why an automatic draft? Members of Congress and the President have an obligation to explain to the American people to which foreign land will their sons, and perhaps their daughters, be sent to die?
The U.S. has been in a continuous βState of Emergencyβ since September 11, 2001, which provides a president with over 100 powers he would not ordinarily have. Notwithstanding that the automatic draft provision will go into effect in a year, a presidential order invoking emergency powers and/or an Act of Congress, could readily move millions from their civilian lives to the front lines of a war.
WHAT WE KNOW:
We know that America is fomenting wars around the world
We know that the military industrial complex controls our government
We know that we are on the precipice of a global war, provoking aggression rather than resolution with Russia, China and in the Middle East.
The only winners in these wars are the war profiteers.
Theyβre now going to take our children to fight in unnecessary, destabilizing, dangerous, debt-creating wars.
Just today President Biden committed the U.S. to an additional decade of support for Ukraineβs war with Russia.
There is no other conceivable reason to require more than 16 million American males to be automatically registered for the draft, other than to prepare for a large-scale war.
The Selective Service System is the vehicle by which individuals are inducted into the armed forces. This NDAA Automatic Registration amendment facilitates an efficient, large-scale draft.
The new law will automatically register all males between the ages of 18 and 26. Selective Service will notify in writing every young American male that they have been registered and will prescribe regulations which can require the registrant to provide βdate of birth, address, social security account number, phone number and email addressβ¦.β
There are members of Congress who advocate that young women also be included in any draft, which could bring to 32 million the number of Americans of draft-eligible age.
The U.S. currently has over 1,300,000 men and women, career soldiers, as well as volunteers, serving in the all-volunteer armed forces.
According to the new automatic draft law, undocumented immigrants, between the ages of 18 and 26, numbering at least 1.5 million, could also be conscripted, if it were to apply to women as well as men.
A government conscription edict covering the undocumented could ironically do damage to the so-called βreplacement theory,β where draft-eligible undocumented immigrants could decide to retreat to the other side of the border. Military service may appeal to others as a path toward citizenship, since immigrants serving during βperiod of hostility,β can seek immediate naturalization.
π€¬41β€7π7π€·ββ1π₯1π1
The last time a draft was instituted in the United States was during the Vietnam War, when 1.9 million Americans were conscripted.
A total of 8.7 million Americans served during the course of that war, according to the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, including married men, who were subject to the draft by Presidential order.
Of 58,220 U.S. service fatalities in the Vietnam War, 17,671 were draftees.
President Bidenβs recent D-Day speech, quoted in Politico, contained this noteworthy warning for young Americans: βThe price of unchecked tyranny is the blood of the young and the brave.β
Dennis Kucinich
https://denniskucinich.substack.com/p/america-prepares-for-global-war-and
ROBINMG π
A total of 8.7 million Americans served during the course of that war, according to the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, including married men, who were subject to the draft by Presidential order.
Of 58,220 U.S. service fatalities in the Vietnam War, 17,671 were draftees.
President Bidenβs recent D-Day speech, quoted in Politico, contained this noteworthy warning for young Americans: βThe price of unchecked tyranny is the blood of the young and the brave.β
Dennis Kucinich
https://denniskucinich.substack.com/p/america-prepares-for-global-war-and
ROBINMG π
The Kucinich Report
America Prepares for Global War and Restarts the Draft for 18-26 year olds
Greetings to Young Americans: You are Automatically Registered for the Draft Conscription without Representation? Where and WHY are we sending our Kids to War?
π’41π9π‘4β€2
Nigel Farage insists Kyiv will have to seek a peace deal with Russia - as Reform leader says Ukraine may have to be partitioned in negotiations with Kremlin | Daily Mail Online
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13540447/Nigel-Farage-insists-Kyiv-seek-peace-deal-Russia-Reform-leader-says-Ukraine-partitioned-negotiations-Kremlin.html
ROBINMG π
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13540447/Nigel-Farage-insists-Kyiv-seek-peace-deal-Russia-Reform-leader-says-Ukraine-partitioned-negotiations-Kremlin.html
ROBINMG π
Mail Online
Nigel Farage insists Kyiv will have to seek a peace deal with Russia
Ukraine will eventually have to seek a peace deal with Russia , Nigel Farage insisted yesterday, creating a clear divide between his party and the Tories over the conflict.
π100β€5π2π2π―2
WHY WOULD THEY PROVOKE WW3?
"Billionaires Try to Shrink World's Population, Report Says
"The New York meeting of billionaires Bill Gates, Warren Buffett, David Rockefeller, Eli Broad, George Soros, Ted Turner, Oprah, Michael Bloomberg and others was described by the Chronicle of Philanthropy as an informal gathering aimed at encouraging philanthropy. Just a few billionaires getting together for drinks and dinner and a friendly chat about how to promote charitable giving.
There was no agenda, we were told. And no plan for a follow-up meeting.
"Taking their cue from Gates they agreed that overpopulation was a priority," the article said, adding that "this could result in a challenge to some Third World politicians who believe contraception and female education weaken traditional values."
Such a stand wouldn't be surprising. Mssrs. Gates, Buffett and Turner have been quietly worrying about Malthusian population problems for years. Mr. Gates in February outlined a plan to try to cap the world's population at 8.3 billion people, rather than the projected 9.3 billion at which the population is expected to peak.
But some right-leaning blogs have started attacking the billionaires as forming a kind of secret sterilization society or giant ATM to fund abortions. It fed into time-honored fears of the rich using their wealth to reshape mankind in its preferred image. Some are raising the specter of eugenics."
https://www.wsj.com/articles/BL-WHB-1322
ROBINMG π
"Billionaires Try to Shrink World's Population, Report Says
"The New York meeting of billionaires Bill Gates, Warren Buffett, David Rockefeller, Eli Broad, George Soros, Ted Turner, Oprah, Michael Bloomberg and others was described by the Chronicle of Philanthropy as an informal gathering aimed at encouraging philanthropy. Just a few billionaires getting together for drinks and dinner and a friendly chat about how to promote charitable giving.
There was no agenda, we were told. And no plan for a follow-up meeting.
"Taking their cue from Gates they agreed that overpopulation was a priority," the article said, adding that "this could result in a challenge to some Third World politicians who believe contraception and female education weaken traditional values."
Such a stand wouldn't be surprising. Mssrs. Gates, Buffett and Turner have been quietly worrying about Malthusian population problems for years. Mr. Gates in February outlined a plan to try to cap the world's population at 8.3 billion people, rather than the projected 9.3 billion at which the population is expected to peak.
But some right-leaning blogs have started attacking the billionaires as forming a kind of secret sterilization society or giant ATM to fund abortions. It fed into time-honored fears of the rich using their wealth to reshape mankind in its preferred image. Some are raising the specter of eugenics."
https://www.wsj.com/articles/BL-WHB-1322
ROBINMG π
The Wall Street Journal
Billionaires Try to Shrink World's Population, Report Says - WSJ
π26π€¬15β€1
COLD DEATHS MATTER!
If the temperature increases, fewer people die. So let's form a movement: CDM: Cold Deaths Matter! Are you in?
ROBINMG π
If the temperature increases, fewer people die. So let's form a movement: CDM: Cold Deaths Matter! Are you in?
ROBINMG π
π61π―40π7β€3π€©2
Are you a "get rich quick via carbon markets while demonizing CO2 the gas of life" denier?
ROBINMG π
ROBINMG π
π€¬51π7π2π1
KAROL SIKORA: Only Nigel Farage is telling the truth about the NHS
"Labour will always be held back by its fanatical devotion to Bevanβs original concept. At least Wes Streeting wants change and seems very capable. But he will be held back by the partyβs leftist origin. Its manifesto is packed with the usual humdrum, with no genuine commitment to the radical change thatβs required. After 76 years every system surely needs a major overhaul.
The Conservatives? Speaking honestly, I almost didnβt bother reading it. Theyβve had fourteen years to sort out this mess, and have objectively failed on all counts. I donβt trust a word they say. There are a few murmurings in their plans which I can agree with. But why should we believe them now? If they thought their changes were so necessary, why havenβt they already been implemented?
I judge people on what they have delivered, not what they say they will deliver. Under their watch the bureaucracy of overpaid apparatchiks sitting in fancy offices well away from the frontline appears to have grown beyond all recognition.
From the Liberal Democrats, there are a few interesting ideas, particularly on a commitment to named doctors for the elderly and sick. But where would these doctors come from? That patient group requires a lot of time. Just try to get a GP appointment for yourself β itβs not so easy, and they are surely too scared of rocking the professional boat to make the big changes needed. On the whole their plan lacks ambition.
And then I read Reformβs plan. I could have written it myself. Sharp, concise, controversial and radical. We do need something different to get us out of the mess weβre in, and itβs certainly that.
Lifting frontline staff out of paying basic rate tax for three years β common sense. It will help to stop the brutal brain drain weβre experiencing and actually encourage more British youngsters into healthcare. Clever, too, as more senior staff will still pay tax as they are in a different bracket. Ending training caps for medical students and writing off student debt following ten years service. Good idea. Capable staff with ambition, skill and determination can ascend from the bottom to the top. Hospital porter to brain surgeon may at last really be possible. This is a long term plan which wonβt see fruition for 5 years β but thatβs just the attitude we need.
Tax relief of 20 per cent on all private healthcare and insurance. Fantastic. It will make healthcare a consumer good leading to far more innovation in its delivery. The usual suspects will moan about privatisation, but quite frankly if hardworking families want to spend more on private healthcare then it should be welcomed and encouraged. It will benefit everyone, freeing up space in the NHS for those who need it. Alongside it is the commitment to properly embrace private healthcare, which would surely help clear the backlog.
Patients within the NHS who canβt see a GP within three days will receive a voucher for private treatment β again, a good idea. Patients should be treated like valued customers, rather than a nuisance to be dealt with.
Finally, and perhaps the most important, cutting waste and unnecessary management. From someone with half a century experience of dealing with the NHS, let me tell you β it is rife with incompetent bureaucrats who contribute nothing to the smooth running of the system. They deliver nothing for patient care, and disrupt the activities of frontline staff doing the actual work.
Armies of PR spin agents, diversity officers and intrusive management many now working from home. Layers and layers of bureaucracy starting with the top in NHS England and the Integrated Care Boards need to be slashed away. That money needs to be redirected to the frontline.
Make no mistake, the NHS is in crisis. We need radical ideas for radical solutions. Reform offers something different. I applaud their efforts."
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2024/06/18/reform-nhs-plan-nigel-farage/
ROBINMG π
"Labour will always be held back by its fanatical devotion to Bevanβs original concept. At least Wes Streeting wants change and seems very capable. But he will be held back by the partyβs leftist origin. Its manifesto is packed with the usual humdrum, with no genuine commitment to the radical change thatβs required. After 76 years every system surely needs a major overhaul.
The Conservatives? Speaking honestly, I almost didnβt bother reading it. Theyβve had fourteen years to sort out this mess, and have objectively failed on all counts. I donβt trust a word they say. There are a few murmurings in their plans which I can agree with. But why should we believe them now? If they thought their changes were so necessary, why havenβt they already been implemented?
I judge people on what they have delivered, not what they say they will deliver. Under their watch the bureaucracy of overpaid apparatchiks sitting in fancy offices well away from the frontline appears to have grown beyond all recognition.
From the Liberal Democrats, there are a few interesting ideas, particularly on a commitment to named doctors for the elderly and sick. But where would these doctors come from? That patient group requires a lot of time. Just try to get a GP appointment for yourself β itβs not so easy, and they are surely too scared of rocking the professional boat to make the big changes needed. On the whole their plan lacks ambition.
And then I read Reformβs plan. I could have written it myself. Sharp, concise, controversial and radical. We do need something different to get us out of the mess weβre in, and itβs certainly that.
Lifting frontline staff out of paying basic rate tax for three years β common sense. It will help to stop the brutal brain drain weβre experiencing and actually encourage more British youngsters into healthcare. Clever, too, as more senior staff will still pay tax as they are in a different bracket. Ending training caps for medical students and writing off student debt following ten years service. Good idea. Capable staff with ambition, skill and determination can ascend from the bottom to the top. Hospital porter to brain surgeon may at last really be possible. This is a long term plan which wonβt see fruition for 5 years β but thatβs just the attitude we need.
Tax relief of 20 per cent on all private healthcare and insurance. Fantastic. It will make healthcare a consumer good leading to far more innovation in its delivery. The usual suspects will moan about privatisation, but quite frankly if hardworking families want to spend more on private healthcare then it should be welcomed and encouraged. It will benefit everyone, freeing up space in the NHS for those who need it. Alongside it is the commitment to properly embrace private healthcare, which would surely help clear the backlog.
Patients within the NHS who canβt see a GP within three days will receive a voucher for private treatment β again, a good idea. Patients should be treated like valued customers, rather than a nuisance to be dealt with.
Finally, and perhaps the most important, cutting waste and unnecessary management. From someone with half a century experience of dealing with the NHS, let me tell you β it is rife with incompetent bureaucrats who contribute nothing to the smooth running of the system. They deliver nothing for patient care, and disrupt the activities of frontline staff doing the actual work.
Armies of PR spin agents, diversity officers and intrusive management many now working from home. Layers and layers of bureaucracy starting with the top in NHS England and the Integrated Care Boards need to be slashed away. That money needs to be redirected to the frontline.
Make no mistake, the NHS is in crisis. We need radical ideas for radical solutions. Reform offers something different. I applaud their efforts."
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2024/06/18/reform-nhs-plan-nigel-farage/
ROBINMG π
The Telegraph
Only Nigel Farage is telling the truth about the NHS
Embracing private healthcare while training British doctors is the sort of radical reform we need
π68β€17π8π2π‘2π₯°1
RIP Noam Chomsky
Noam Chomsky and the Ants β No Place Without Spirit
https://nulluslocussinegenio.com/2016/11/11/noam-chomsky-and-the-ants/
ROBINMG π
Noam Chomsky and the Ants β No Place Without Spirit
https://nulluslocussinegenio.com/2016/11/11/noam-chomsky-and-the-ants/
ROBINMG π
No Place Without Spirit
Noam Chomsky and the Ants
Noam Chomsky, reviewing an article by Samantha Power, emblem of American liberals and US ambassador to the UN said: A little more subtle, perhaps, is her observation that βif you continue to β¦
π€ͺ23β€3π2π€©2π―1
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
π22π€©3π€ͺ2π₯1
Forwarded from Lawyers of Light
Kansas AG sues Pfizer
"Kobachβs argument alleges Pfizer misled Kansans about risks associated with vaccines, including to pregnant women and for myocarditis"
https://fox4kc.com/news/kansas-attorney-general-sues-pfizer-over-covid-vaccine-company-responds/
"Kobachβs argument alleges Pfizer misled Kansans about risks associated with vaccines, including to pregnant women and for myocarditis"
https://fox4kc.com/news/kansas-attorney-general-sues-pfizer-over-covid-vaccine-company-responds/
FOX 4 Kansas City WDAF-TV | News, Weather, Sports
Kansas attorney general sues Pfizer over COVID vaccine, company responds
Related video: Class action lawsuits β what are they, and should you join one? TOPEKA (KSNT) β Kansas Attorney General Kris Kobach is suing the healthcare and pharmaceutical company Pfiβ¦
π₯54π16β€12π9
Forwarded from Lawyers of Light
He's done it again. Smack on point is our Bob
"There are a lot of weird posts around to do with 'Islamophobia' &, obviously, there are still a lot of equally confused people talking about 'Antisemitism'.
We need to be able to criticise different belief systems & point out where they do not align with our values as a nation, or culture. However, it's clearly idiotic to suggest that all members of the same group or faith subscribe to all of its ideas.
There are plenty of good Muslims in this country who possess decent moral principles. There are plenty of good Jews who do too. There are also deeply unpleasant Muslims. And deeply unpleasant Jews. And of course, there are plenty of Christians, who've been here for many generations, who are thoroughly immoral shits.
Indeed, our White British Archbishop of Canterbury is one of the most despicable little tossers we've ever produced.
Individuals must be judged on how they act in the world, not on arbitrary labels.
But the key question we should all be asking, before being manipulated into blaming those we perceive as outsiders, is what exactly ARE our values as a nation, as things currently stand?
Certainly, officially, they now include torturing & killing our children to protect the elderly from colds, cancelling Christian festivals for the same reason, and making citizens' basic rights dependent on their participation in dangerous medical experiments.
These ideas weren't introduced & normalised because Islamic extremists imposed Sharia law on Britain.
These ideas have been implemented & unapologetically embraced by both our main governing parties, our Royal Family - who are supposed to exist, primarily, as representatives of our national values - & all our major media outlets.
Most of our influential figures accepted these ideas too. Actors, musicians, comedians, writers, talkshow hosts, all wore a mask & sat far away from each other in order to tell the rest of us, "I don't see anything wrong with this new set of values."
Our justice system waved them through, unperturbed. Our education system immediately forced the new doctrine down our children's throats. Our health service took the whole thing to its fatally catastrophic end point, as their victims clapped them with pans.
Some of you may be thinking this all sounds a bit out of date. Sure, we embraced ritualistic child sacrifice under the guise of public health for a few years, & the architects got knighted, but we're not doing that right now this minute.
Unfortunately, yes we are. But regardless of whether or not you think it's finished, we will keep doing it again & again, until enough people acknowledge that it was, & is, totally evil.
In light of this horrific reality, it seems to me rather pointless to be fretting about radical Mullahs, or arguing about how well foreign cultures have integrated with our national identity, when we now officially identify as infanticidal fascists who worship Pharma before Father & exalt our executioners.
The values you think are under threat from without, have already been completely inverted from within. If people can grasp the fact that this has happened, & recognise those responsible, we might stop tearing down flags & begin the urgent business of repairing our ripped moral fabric"
X post https://x.com/bobscartoons/status/1803154781893976086?t=Xy96i3SLUUmNbAnidEn6yw&s=19
"There are a lot of weird posts around to do with 'Islamophobia' &, obviously, there are still a lot of equally confused people talking about 'Antisemitism'.
We need to be able to criticise different belief systems & point out where they do not align with our values as a nation, or culture. However, it's clearly idiotic to suggest that all members of the same group or faith subscribe to all of its ideas.
There are plenty of good Muslims in this country who possess decent moral principles. There are plenty of good Jews who do too. There are also deeply unpleasant Muslims. And deeply unpleasant Jews. And of course, there are plenty of Christians, who've been here for many generations, who are thoroughly immoral shits.
Indeed, our White British Archbishop of Canterbury is one of the most despicable little tossers we've ever produced.
Individuals must be judged on how they act in the world, not on arbitrary labels.
But the key question we should all be asking, before being manipulated into blaming those we perceive as outsiders, is what exactly ARE our values as a nation, as things currently stand?
Certainly, officially, they now include torturing & killing our children to protect the elderly from colds, cancelling Christian festivals for the same reason, and making citizens' basic rights dependent on their participation in dangerous medical experiments.
These ideas weren't introduced & normalised because Islamic extremists imposed Sharia law on Britain.
These ideas have been implemented & unapologetically embraced by both our main governing parties, our Royal Family - who are supposed to exist, primarily, as representatives of our national values - & all our major media outlets.
Most of our influential figures accepted these ideas too. Actors, musicians, comedians, writers, talkshow hosts, all wore a mask & sat far away from each other in order to tell the rest of us, "I don't see anything wrong with this new set of values."
Our justice system waved them through, unperturbed. Our education system immediately forced the new doctrine down our children's throats. Our health service took the whole thing to its fatally catastrophic end point, as their victims clapped them with pans.
Some of you may be thinking this all sounds a bit out of date. Sure, we embraced ritualistic child sacrifice under the guise of public health for a few years, & the architects got knighted, but we're not doing that right now this minute.
Unfortunately, yes we are. But regardless of whether or not you think it's finished, we will keep doing it again & again, until enough people acknowledge that it was, & is, totally evil.
In light of this horrific reality, it seems to me rather pointless to be fretting about radical Mullahs, or arguing about how well foreign cultures have integrated with our national identity, when we now officially identify as infanticidal fascists who worship Pharma before Father & exalt our executioners.
The values you think are under threat from without, have already been completely inverted from within. If people can grasp the fact that this has happened, & recognise those responsible, we might stop tearing down flags & begin the urgent business of repairing our ripped moral fabric"
X post https://x.com/bobscartoons/status/1803154781893976086?t=Xy96i3SLUUmNbAnidEn6yw&s=19
π₯65π20β€13π12π―4