Form for Employees Whose Employers Are Requiring Covid-19 Injections | coreysdigs.com
https://www.coreysdigs.com/solutions/form-for-employees-whose-employers-are-requiring-covid-19-injections/

Letter for employee who DOES NOT work in health care
Dear [Managers name],
You have asked me to have a Covid vaccine and indicated that this is now a requirement of my employment with you. I am writing to set out the legal position with regards to the same, and to inform you that I will not be having a Covid vaccine.
Whilst I appreciate that some employers may be in favour of their employees being vaccinated, not all employees are keen to have a medical intervention as a condition of their employment for various good reasons, which I set out below in more detail, under the heading “considerations”.
In advance of this I would like to draw your attention to ACAS guidance which suggests that whilst employers may support staff in getting the vaccine, they cannot force them to be vaccinated.
Also, please be aware that I am protected, under current employment law, from being dismissed due to my decision not to have a Covid vaccine. Hence, I could claim constructive or unfair dismissal, as any decision to end my employment could be found unreasonable as it could be seen as:
• a way of forcing me to have the vaccine, only falling short of forcing a needle into my arm, which an employment tribunal would, I think, struggle to justify,
• potentially in breach of Article 8 of the Human Rights Act and
• overreaching my genuine and reasonable fears about receiving the vaccine
• Discrimination in beach of The Equality Act 2010 as my reasons for refusal of the Covid vaccine relate to my (delete as appropriate) [disability] [religious] philosophical beliefs], [other specific reasons why the vaccine is not suitable for you] and this may give rise to a claim that I am therefore being treated less favourably than your other employees because of my refusal
Considerations
In view your request of me to have the Covid vaccine appears to be an attempt to impose it as being mandatory upon me, I ask you to consider the following: -
• There are no statutory provisions that can force individuals to become vaccinated. The Public Health (Control of Disease) Act 1984 specifically states that members of the public should not be compelled to undergo any mandatory medical treatment, including vaccinations
• There may be some people who are advised not to have the vaccine, for example for health reasons. I feel I fall into this category given my health conditions of [state health conditions here or remove this bullet point if it does not apply]
• Someone may still get or spread coronavirus if they have had a Covid vaccine, so I present no greater risk for not having it than someone who has had it
• Mandatory vaccinations could be indirectly discriminatory against certain protected characteristics
• Vaccines are not currently available for everyone and all individuals must wait their turn in order of priority to be offered vaccination. Only allowing vaccinated individuals to be in the workplace could amount to indirect age discrimination
• There are data protection implications on you if you require me to provide information on my vaccination status and verification of its accuracy
• Freely given consent is required for any medical intervention. If you attempt to force me to be vaccinated, not only could it give rise to human rights concerns, but there could also be criminal implications. Forcing anyone to receive a vaccine injection under duress, under UK law, could constitute an unlawful injury. A vaccination requires an individual’s informed and voluntary consent
• On checking the UK yellow card system, I have noted large numbers of adverse reactions to all available Covid vaccines and as such I believe that taking the vaccine would be a serious threat to my health. I am happy to provide details of the adverse reactions on request, which number over 170,000
• All Covid vaccines are still in clinical trials which do not end until 2023, and as such they are experimental. I do not consent to taking part in an experimental trial, and neither am I required to

Letter for employee who DOES work in health care
Dear [Managers name],
You have asked me to have a Covid vaccine and indicated that this is now a requirement of my employment with you. I am writing to set out the legal position with regards to the same, and to inform you that I will not be having a Covid vaccine.
Whilst I appreciate that some employers may be in favour of their employees being vaccinated, not all employees are keen to have a medical intervention as a condition of their employment for various good reasons, which I set out below in more detail, under the heading “considerations”.
In advance of this I would like to draw your attention to ACAS guidance which suggests that whilst employers may support staff in getting the vaccine, they cannot force them to be vaccinated.
Also, please be aware that I am protected, under current employment law, from being dismissed due to my decision not to have a Covid vaccine. Hence, I could claim constructive or unfair dismissal, as any decision to end my employment could be found unreasonable as it could be seen as:
• a way of forcing me to have the vaccine, only falling short of forcing a needle into my arm, which an employment tribunal would, I think, struggle to justify,
• potentially in breach of Article 8 of the Human Rights Act and
• overreaching my genuine and reasonable fears about receiving the vaccine
• Discrimination in beach of The Equality Act 2010 as my reasons for refusal of the Covid vaccine relate to my (delete as appropriate) [disability] [religious] philosophical beliefs], [other specific reasons why the vaccine is not suitable for you] and this may give rise to a claim that I am therefore being treated less favourably than your other employees because of my refusal
In addition to the above, the RCN has recently put out a statement in which it confirms that whilst it recognises that vaccination is a key pillar in infection control and disease prevention, they do not support staff being made or coerced into having the Covid vaccine. They go on to state that staff vaccination should not be used as part of staff contracts and should not be a condition of employment or part of employment contracts, linked to terms and conditions of employment or to pay.
The RCN have also explicitly stated that they do not believe that a mandatory approach is effective in improving uptake of vaccination in staff. Further they state that linking the Covid vaccine with employment as being similar to the occupational health policy already in existence for other vaccines, such as Hepatitis B is not appropriate. The policy for hepatitis b vaccine in occupational health for health and social care workers sits within the wider guidance to minimise the risk for staff in exposure prone procedures and blood born virus. The guidance discusses what happens where staff who are unable to mount an adequate antibody response to vaccination are then protected from blood born virus and potentially not put in a situation where they carry out exposure prone procedures. The guidance is clear that staff who decline hepatitis B vaccination should not be denied employment.
Considerations
In view your request of me to have the Covid vaccine appears to be an attempt to impose it as being mandatory upon me, I ask you to consider the following: -
• There are no statutory provisions that can force individuals to become vaccinated. The Public Health (Control of Disease) Act 1984 specifically states that members of the public should not be compelled to undergo any mandatory medical treatment, including vaccinations
• There may be some people who are advised not to have the vaccine, for example for health reasons. I feel I fall into this category given my health conditions of [state health conditions here or remove this bullet point if it does not apply]
• Someone may still get or spread coronavirus if they have had a Covid vaccine, so I present no greater risk for not having it than someone who has had it

Letter Templates -
https://www.covidtruths.co.uk/letter-templates/

UK: Face mask discrimination template letter.

People exempt from wearing a face covering are entitled to go about their business on the same basis as everyone else, but on just one proviso, the words "I'm exempt" must be clearly stated if challenged  This is unsatisfactory for some, but the Guidance does allow service providers to check if someone wearing a mask is exempt or simply forgotten to wear a face covering.  But that is as far as any service provider can legitimately go. 

Again HMG states, "...we make it clear that some people may have a ‘reasonable excuse’ for not wearing face coverings, and that people do not need to prove they are exempt and should not be challenged about this.  We are also clear that people should remove their face coverings to aid communication where asked, and that those accompanying or assisting people for whom a face covering will inhibit communication are not required to wear face coverings".


Face_masks_discrimination_template_letter.pdf

https://youtu.be/WyLNpbN7P1g Numbers, p@ssports, the V-word, meditations, pr0tests and equinoxes.

*
The People’s Lawyer Telegram group - ‘Combating Medical Tyranny’ :
https://t.me/thepeopleslawyerchannel​.

LETTER TEMPLATES TO CHALLENGE MASKS, & DECLINE TESTING & VACCINES

This is from Miri Anne Finch, Lawyer. UKMFA:
Let’s empower ourselves with legal ways of refusing such tyranny!

LETTER TEMPLATES: A USER'S GUIDE
LETTERS CHALLENGING MASK MANDATES:
https://miriaf.webs.com/employer-mask...​
https://miriaf.webs.com/mask-risk-ass...​
https://miriaf.webs.com/pub-mask-refusal​
https://miriaf.webs.com/airline-mask-...​
https://miriaf.webs.com/masks-small-b...​
https://miriaf.webs.com/shopping-cent...​
https://miriaf.webs.com/leisure-centr...​
https://miriaf.webs.com/exercise-mask...​
https://miriaf.webs.com/council-shops...​
https://miriaf.webs.com/doctor-smear-...​
LETTERS DECLINING COVID TESTING
https://miriaf.webs.com/school-consen...​
https://miriaf.webs.com/covid-test-da...​
https://miriaf.webs.com/school-corona...​
https://miriaf.webs.com/hospital-covi...​
https://miriaf.webs.com/hospital-work...​
LETTERS DECLINING VACCINES
https://miriaf.webs.com/school-consen...​
https://miriaf.webs.com/custody-conse...​
https://miriaf.webs.com/hospital-work...​
ALL OTHER LETTERS:
https://miriaf.webs.com/site-index​
Kindly share WIDELY

Register for the V-Stop No Vaccine UK Festival, 24th July 2021
https://www.vstopfestival.com/?fbclid...​

Stop 5G protest event, 19th March, for those in Southern California:
https://stop5ginternational.org/5g-sp...​

Human rights: Vaccination and public/private coercion:
https://ukhumanrightsblog.com/2021/02...

UK: Strategy for friends and family who are not getting it.
The HART Strategy.

The soft approach.

1. Tell them there is a group of professionals called HART who have a different view than SAGE. Send them a link to who they are: https://www.hartgroup.org/bios/

2. Send them their weekly bulletin. Current one here:
https://www.hartgroup.org/category/covid-19-bulletin/

3. Ask them to join HART on social media.
Telegram: t.me/HARTgroup
Twitter: @hartgroup_org

Doctors for Covid Ethics:
We are hundreds of doctors and scientists from all corners of the globe. We have written three letters to the European Medicines Agency, urgently warning of short term and long term dangers from COVID-19 vaccines, including clotting, bleeding and platelet abnormalities. We first began warning of blood-related risks before media reports of clotting led to vaccine suspensions around the world. In the absence of crucial safety data, we are demanding the immediate withdrawal of all experimental gene-based COVID-19 vaccines. We oppose vaccine passports, which threaten public health and violate Nuremberg and other protections. We are warning that 'health passes' place coercive pressure on citizens to submit to dangerous medical experimentation, in return for freedoms that once were human rights. Read our letters, press releases and educational materials, and watch our videos, to learn more. Follow us on Twitter @Drs4CovidEthics.
https://doctors4covidethics.medium.com/about

PLEASE SHARE:

ELECTION FRAUD again from Big Tech like with America!

Use the hashtag; #Kurten4Mayor on Twitter!

ELECTIONS FOR LONDON MAYOR #LondonMayor2021

I voted for BOTH

LAURENCE FOX

and

DAVID KURTEN

(Yes you get vote A & vote B)

"Court Decision

“no-one should be excluded from education on the grounds that they are not wearing a face covering”

This was what the School told the Court and was relied on by the Court in its decision that at this stage an injunction is not necessary to protect Child AB.

AB, aged 12, had taken the brave step to not to wear a mask at school, despite staff and peer pressure to wear one.
Child AB had given evidence that “Like one of my friends said to me ‘I feel as those wearing it is harming me, but I feel like we have to because I don’t want to get told off.’ Those were the words she was using.” 
She also reported “Teachers take it in turns, some of them seeming to enjoy it, wondering corridors and checking through the windows in classes to make sure everyone’s wearing masks. Three bad-behaviour points and you get excluded. It’s not done quietly but in front of everyone.”
At this stage the Court was not required to decide exactly what was happening in the school but it became important that the school assured the Court that Child AB would not be required to wear a mask. In giving this assurance, the school relied on its policy – derived from the government guidance – that it would not require any child to wear a mask, even if (like Child AB) they do not have a medical exemption.
The Court’s decision emphasises that no child in any school can be forced to wear a mask. No medical exemption is required.
The Court also noted that the school had not provided enough evidence to find it had conducted a full risk assessment or that it was sufficient. Neither the government nor the school has assessed the risk of physical or psychological harms from wearing masks throughout almost all the school day (in classrooms, in corridors and on public transport) and the Court acknowledged the detailed evidence of those harms by Chartered Health and Safety Practitioner, Ms Simone Plaut and Clinical Psychologist, Dr Zenobia Storah. These reports are available here:

https://www.crowdjustice.com/case/stop-masks-in-schools/

Court Ruling:
Child AB vs Tapton School Acamedy Trust, 2021
https://drive.google.com/file/d/16Cq_oaJjjedwf-vmJfU5EihY0Vj-DeIJ/view?usp=sharing

.
Apaths - Exhibit A

'Merry Hell Shopping Centre'

Reminds me of the time last year when I cut across a shopping centre floor to enter a shop and a man pointed at me and shouted "you're going the wrong way, you need to follow the lines on the floor" (one of Piers Morgan's GMTV army enjoying a rush of power)

I continued on my way

https://twitter.com/garethicke/status/1389506852342452228?s=20
.

Death of fully vaccinated US expert in India sparks worry over Pfizer's efficacy "against COVID-19 double mutant" - Global Times
https://www.globaltimes.cn/page/202105/1222709.shtml

OPERATION WAKE-UP SHEEPLE
Started my campaign on LinkedIn. Please connect and like my posts there if you can thanks.

NEW - Google-backed RAND report recommends infiltrating & subverting "online conspiracy groups" from within.

The initial analysis was focused on online chatter relating to alien visitations, COVID-19 origins, white genocide, and anti-vaccination.

https://rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RRA676-1.html

@disclosetv