Robin Monotti + Cory Morningstar
71.9K subscribers
14.5K photos
8.02K videos
624 files
28.4K links
Official Robin Monotti + Cory Morningstar
Donations:
robinmonotti.substack.com/
www.patreon.com/CoryMorningstar
Group is @robinmggroup
We don't DM from this channel account.
Download Telegram
Robin,

This is my latest technical writeup on the exacerbation of airborne pathogen due to masking.

Megan Kristen Mansell

@mamasaurusMeg on twitter


The Covid conversation should have begun with minimum viable particle size under pressure, which for Covid size particulates is .06 microns. This particle is under .3 microns, placing it firmly within the radically behaving particulate range, noting that multiple virions can compose a single particle cluster and still fall well under that threshold. https://www.sphosp.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/Letter-in-response-to-N-95-use-RA-Final.pdf


The conversational pivot would have then become about respiratory emission particle size ranges, and we’d have observed that around 90% of exhaled particulates fall within the radically behaving particulate airborne particulate range. 

https://www.pnas.org/content/118/8/e2021830118


Cloth masks have been shown to have 97% particle penetration, and 44% for surgical masks, while 71% of new cases reporting always masked, and 14% masking most of the time. 

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4420971/


Why does this matter? We heard DROPLET nonstop for 6 months before any governing body began acknowledging airborne pathogenic spread, without ever correcting course on our nation’s PPE recommendation considerations, especially as source control.
>>
This is a test site photo of the person most likely to be in contact with novel pathogen.  
This is the exhale plume of fine particulates created by this mask directly within respiratory range of test subjects and materials, contaminating site environ. 

Exhale matters a great deal with an airborne pathogen. 

Covid is a low minimum infective dose pathogen, so when every breath you take increases atmospheric viral load in an enclosed space, and it doesn’t take very much of it for vulnerable individuals to get sick, a contagious individual should not wear a mask or respirator that creates a concentrated stream of exhale of these fine particulates that do not respond predictably to gravity, remain aloft for hours (even days, as explained thoroughly by Senior Industrial Hygienist Stephen Petty here: 

https://twitter.com/rmconservative/status/1368909278514458626?s=12 ), as this exacerbates the spread of airborne pathogen.
https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/ep-826-only-neanderthal-can-believe-mask-stops-virus/id1065050908?i=1000511752553
In this photo, please note the outward, respiratory range trajectory of fine particulates. This is the critical issue:

For a closer consideration of the mechanics involved in the process of aerosolization through a membrane, please see

https://rationalground.com/indignation-in-a-polarized-state/ where I discuss at length how changes in respiratory pressure through a membrane cause forced aerosolization of droplet, creating both pressurized plumes and forced filtration of larger droplet, taking what would fall in a predictable 6 foot arc and sending it into an 18-20 foot trajectory, where it remains aloft, officially killing the 6 feet over or 6 feet under rhetoric. 2 minute video on this here: 

https://twitter.com/bsmithtampabay/status/1362866504367296516?s=21

Multiple additional citations on the fluid dynamics and particle physics applications below. 
Senior Industrial Hygienist Kristen Meghan Kelly and OSHA integration expert Tammy Clark’s stellar and concrete takedown of OSHA-noncompliant apparatuses being required with near-impossible public exemption requirements met in reality, and how medical consent and medical clearance fit into workplace respirator and PPE requirement guidelines and implementation. Their joint testimony aided in the success in passing the North Dakota House Bill 1323, which is aimed at the prevention of future masking requirements. 

https://twitter.com/rmconservative/status/1378028437659615232?s=21

In summary, workplace respirator use requires medical consent and medical clearance. None of the students in Florida schools received medical clearance before being required to wear deoxygenating, hypercapnia-inducing apparatuses that are largely unregulated, and without efficacy standards for the pathogen at hand. 

None of the employees forced to wear non-mitigating and expressly non-PPE apparatuses (or be faced with termination) are met with medical consent, clearance, and fit standards for workplace requirement of PPE for known pathogen under OSHA and NIOSH standards. 

Masks come with grave microbial inhalation issues (as most are wearing them in nonsterile public restrooms, dropping them, putting them on tables, back on their faces, sneeze in them, and breathe this for 8-12 hours per day hours),  Medical consent belongs in all conversations involving non-standard public integration requirements. 

Not only are exemptions being denied rampantly in the public sector without freecourse (that’s recourse without it costing you, and yes I made that word up), but truly immunocompromised citizens are compliant with these masking orders and it is putting the lives of our truly vulnerable in undue risk when there are far better options for tiered integration of special populations within our schools and public sector.

Current integration restrictions violate IDEA 300.114-300.120 for school systems and ADA 36.105, wherein mere presence does not constitute direct threat, even if contagious with transmissible illnesses, wherein those with a vast multitude of coverages have right to reasonable accommodation, without threat or coercion, to engage in the workplace and public sector. Instead, we have a heightened discriminatory public atmosphere and failure to provide least restrictive educational environment access within our districts, whereas neighboring districts under same state law are operated at the whim of local leaders who implement local ordinances that do not supersede federal integration laws and guidelines. 

Reopening schools under current federal law compliance in more protective measure:

 https://rationalground.com/using-the-bubble-isolate-concept-to-reopen-schools-without-universal-masking/  

Reopening society in a structured, protective manner:

https://rationalground.com/a-rational-reopening-guide/


Please give consideration to these critical oversights in pathogenic mitigation. 

Thank you,

Megan Kristen Mansell
Bill & Melinda Gates first bought a stake in Pfizer back in 2002 with the stated intention of "expand[ing] access to the pharmaceutical company's all-in-one injectable contraceptive, Sayana Press, to give to women in the Global South.

⚠️ INSIDER TRADING ALERT ⚠️

The Gates Foundation first bought a position in BioNTech in September 2019, just before the COVID-19 pandemic hit. It invested $55 million in the biotech, with the potential for total funding to reach $100 million.
https://www.fool.com/investing/2020/09/24/4-coronavirus-vaccine-stocks-the-bill-melinda-gate/
1_5186291331974037996.pdf
884.5 KB
Technical writeup on the exacerbation of airborne pathogen due to masking.
Megan Kristen Mansell

1_5186291331974037996.pdf
Forwarded from Climate Ireland
“I assert: decarbonizing by 80% by 2050 is impossible without mass deaths.” -Professor Michael J. Kelly, Cambridge University


https://www.thegwpf.org/content/uploads/2019/11/KellyWeb.pdf
The textbook definition of vaccine Antibody-Dependent Enhancement or ADE is when the vaccine creates non neutralizing antibodies (non NAb). Although gene modification studies claim they create NAbs, there is a question as to whether they do or not. With natural immunity T-cells will do the work of recognising the 29 proteins of SARSCoV2. With gene modification they are supposed to only recognise the spike protein. The risk of a gene modified person being exposed to ADE is higher than with the natural disease as they have fewer memory T cells ready for the entire 29 proteins of SARSCoV2:

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-021-81629-2

"In this study, we show that the early appearance of SARS-CoV-2 NAbs at high levels was not associated with milder disease nor with early clearance of the virus. Early appearance of NAbs has previously shown to occur in those with severe disease compared to those with mild illness17. It was recently shown that a high frequency of extrafollicular B cells development is seen in COVID-19, which correlated with disease severity. These extrafollicular B cells were responsible for development of development of SARS-CoV-2 specific neutralizing antibodies, very early during illness, which was shown to associate with severe disease18. In addition to production of NAbs by extrafollicular B cells, the early appearance of NAbs in patients with more severe disease could be due to the boosting of NAbs specific to previous coronaviruses. Therefore, early appearance of such cross-reactive antibody responses could have a potential to cause severe illness by antibody dependent enhancement19. Higher initial viral loads were associated with progression to more severe disease in SARS20,21. Therefore, higher viral loads could drive a more robust NAb response. However, infants who were symptomatic had higher nasopharyngeal viral loads, but less severe illness compared to older children with more severe illness22, suggesting that higher viral loads were not necessarily associated with more severe illness.

It was seen that by the end of 4 weeks, 11% of individuals did not have adequate quantities of NAbs. Since the onset of the outbreak, due to the lack of specific treatment options, convalescent plasma of recovered patients with COVID-19 has been used to treat patients with moderate or severe COVID-19 illness23,24. The FDA, USA has issued an emergency use authorization for the use of convalescent plasma as it was believed that it may be effective23. Although randomized clinical trials have not been conducted to determine the efficacy of this treatment, as use of convalescent plasma depends on the presence of high levels of NAbs, it is recommended to test the presence of high titres, before selection of potential donors25,26.

The relationship between the appearance of NAb with duration of virus shedding has not been previously studied. Surprisingly, those who had prolonged shedding had higher levels of NAbs than those who cleared the virus, and the NAbs appeared in such prolonged shedders earlier than in those who cleared the virus earlier. In Sri Lanka, until recently, patients with COVID-19 were only discharged from hospital if they had 2 negative PCRs, 24 h apart. Therefore, despite these prolonged shedders developing antibodies earlier than those who cleared the virus, and at higher titres, they still continued to shed the virus. Although the majority of such prolonged shedders had lower viral titres (Ct values > 30), some individuals still had higher viral loads even after 30 days of illness. As many other countries do not keep patients in hospital until they become PCR negative, the relationship between early appearance of NAbs and yet persistence has not been documented previously and questions the role of NAb alone in viral clearance."
There are two possible explanations for this:
-As SARSCoV2 replicates in bacteria, it can replicate in water sources in India and other places which do not monitor the drinking water, which may include parts of Brasil too.
-Antibody-Dependent Enhancement has started in India
https://cmeindia.in/how-the-second-wave-of-covid-is-unfolding-itself/
Forwarded from X
Makers of COVID-19 vaccines are now destroying long-term safety studies by unblinding their trials and giving the control groups the active vaccine, claiming it is “unethical” to withhold an effective vaccine - https://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2021/04/20/coronavirus-vaccine-safety-studies.aspx