Robin Monotti + Cory Morningstar
71.9K subscribers
14.5K photos
8.02K videos
624 files
28.4K links
Official Robin Monotti + Cory Morningstar
Donations:
robinmonotti.substack.com/
www.patreon.com/CoryMorningstar
Group is @robinmggroup
We don't DM from this channel account.
Download Telegram
Health professionals, public services & armed forces who are planning to attend the London protest on the 24th April; there will be a group marching together in uniforms. Join them.
It's not "just a mask" as that would make it a fashion accessory. It is an (allegedly) preventive medical intervention & it is a breach of your human rights for anybody to discriminate on you for choosing to not wear one. It's very clear:

UNESCO Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights
Article 6 – Consent 
1. Any preventive, diagnostic and therapeutic medical intervention is only to be carried out with the prior, free and informed consent of the person concerned. "The consent should, where appropriate, be express and may be withdrawn by the person concerned at any time and for any reason without disadvantage or prejudice."

UNESCO DECLARATION ON BIOETHICS & HUMAN RIGHTS Art.6

http://portal.unesco.org/en/ev.php-URL_ID=31058&URL_DO=DO_TOPIC&URL_SECTION=201.html
It's not "just a mask" as that would make it a fashion accessory. It is an (allegedly) preventive medical intervention & it is a breach of your human rights for anybody to discriminate on you for choosing to not wear one. It's very clear:

UNESCO Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights
Article 6 – Consent 
1. Any preventive, diagnostic and therapeutic medical intervention is only to be carried out with the prior, free and informed consent of the person concerned. The consent should, where appropriate, be express and may be withdrawn by the person concerned at any time and for any reason without disadvantage or prejudice."

UNESCO DECLARATION ON BIOETHICS & HUMAN RIGHTS Art.6

http://portal.unesco.org/en/ev.php-URL_ID=31058&URL_DO=DO_TOPIC&URL_SECTION=201.html
UK LAW: The Equality Act 2010 protects individuals from discrimination relating to protected characteristics, which include belief.

(2) Belief means any religious or philosophical belief and a reference to belief includes a reference to a lack of belief.

An anti-mask or anti-vaccination philosophical stance is a belief, it is therefore protected from discrimination by law.

https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2010/15/contents
Public Health (Control of Disease) Act 1984

45EMedical treatment

(1)Regulations under section 45B or 45C may not include provision requiring a person to undergo medical treatment.
(2)“ Medical treatment ” includes vaccination and other prophylactic treatment.

https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1984/22
Forwarded from F W
Them: You won't be able to attend a concert or football games

Me: I don't mind

Them: You can't go to a large shopping mall

Me: I'll survive

Them: You can't drink at the pub

Me: I no longer drink

Them: You can't enter night clubs

Me: I don't go out at night

Them: We'll tell your employer

Me: I don't have one

Them: We'll take it from your salary

Me: I don't have a salary

Them: You can't go to your job

Me: I don't have or want your job

Them: You can't be in the city

Me: I prefer living out in nature

Them: You can't go to McDonald's or Burger King

Me: I haven't in years anyway

Them: You can't eat at restaurants

Me: I'll order takeaway

Them: You can't shop at large grocery stores

Me: I grow my own food and buy from local farmers

Them: You can't be part of society

Me: I already checked out

Them: Your kids can't come to school

Me: I'll homeschool

Them: You'll be on your own

Me: I'm surrounded by my family and tribe and all the people reaching the same conclusion all over the world

Them: You can't choose for yourself

Me: I just did

Them: What can we tempt you with?

Me: Nothing

***

When they have nothing you want they have no power.

And that's when power comes to the people.
Robin,

This is my latest technical writeup on the exacerbation of airborne pathogen due to masking.

Megan Kristen Mansell

@mamasaurusMeg on twitter


The Covid conversation should have begun with minimum viable particle size under pressure, which for Covid size particulates is .06 microns. This particle is under .3 microns, placing it firmly within the radically behaving particulate range, noting that multiple virions can compose a single particle cluster and still fall well under that threshold. https://www.sphosp.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/Letter-in-response-to-N-95-use-RA-Final.pdf


The conversational pivot would have then become about respiratory emission particle size ranges, and we’d have observed that around 90% of exhaled particulates fall within the radically behaving particulate airborne particulate range. 

https://www.pnas.org/content/118/8/e2021830118


Cloth masks have been shown to have 97% particle penetration, and 44% for surgical masks, while 71% of new cases reporting always masked, and 14% masking most of the time. 

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4420971/


Why does this matter? We heard DROPLET nonstop for 6 months before any governing body began acknowledging airborne pathogenic spread, without ever correcting course on our nation’s PPE recommendation considerations, especially as source control.
>>
This is a test site photo of the person most likely to be in contact with novel pathogen.  
This is the exhale plume of fine particulates created by this mask directly within respiratory range of test subjects and materials, contaminating site environ. 

Exhale matters a great deal with an airborne pathogen. 

Covid is a low minimum infective dose pathogen, so when every breath you take increases atmospheric viral load in an enclosed space, and it doesn’t take very much of it for vulnerable individuals to get sick, a contagious individual should not wear a mask or respirator that creates a concentrated stream of exhale of these fine particulates that do not respond predictably to gravity, remain aloft for hours (even days, as explained thoroughly by Senior Industrial Hygienist Stephen Petty here: 

https://twitter.com/rmconservative/status/1368909278514458626?s=12 ), as this exacerbates the spread of airborne pathogen.
https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/ep-826-only-neanderthal-can-believe-mask-stops-virus/id1065050908?i=1000511752553
In this photo, please note the outward, respiratory range trajectory of fine particulates. This is the critical issue:

For a closer consideration of the mechanics involved in the process of aerosolization through a membrane, please see

https://rationalground.com/indignation-in-a-polarized-state/ where I discuss at length how changes in respiratory pressure through a membrane cause forced aerosolization of droplet, creating both pressurized plumes and forced filtration of larger droplet, taking what would fall in a predictable 6 foot arc and sending it into an 18-20 foot trajectory, where it remains aloft, officially killing the 6 feet over or 6 feet under rhetoric. 2 minute video on this here: 

https://twitter.com/bsmithtampabay/status/1362866504367296516?s=21

Multiple additional citations on the fluid dynamics and particle physics applications below. 
Senior Industrial Hygienist Kristen Meghan Kelly and OSHA integration expert Tammy Clark’s stellar and concrete takedown of OSHA-noncompliant apparatuses being required with near-impossible public exemption requirements met in reality, and how medical consent and medical clearance fit into workplace respirator and PPE requirement guidelines and implementation. Their joint testimony aided in the success in passing the North Dakota House Bill 1323, which is aimed at the prevention of future masking requirements. 

https://twitter.com/rmconservative/status/1378028437659615232?s=21

In summary, workplace respirator use requires medical consent and medical clearance. None of the students in Florida schools received medical clearance before being required to wear deoxygenating, hypercapnia-inducing apparatuses that are largely unregulated, and without efficacy standards for the pathogen at hand. 

None of the employees forced to wear non-mitigating and expressly non-PPE apparatuses (or be faced with termination) are met with medical consent, clearance, and fit standards for workplace requirement of PPE for known pathogen under OSHA and NIOSH standards. 

Masks come with grave microbial inhalation issues (as most are wearing them in nonsterile public restrooms, dropping them, putting them on tables, back on their faces, sneeze in them, and breathe this for 8-12 hours per day hours),  Medical consent belongs in all conversations involving non-standard public integration requirements. 

Not only are exemptions being denied rampantly in the public sector without freecourse (that’s recourse without it costing you, and yes I made that word up), but truly immunocompromised citizens are compliant with these masking orders and it is putting the lives of our truly vulnerable in undue risk when there are far better options for tiered integration of special populations within our schools and public sector.

Current integration restrictions violate IDEA 300.114-300.120 for school systems and ADA 36.105, wherein mere presence does not constitute direct threat, even if contagious with transmissible illnesses, wherein those with a vast multitude of coverages have right to reasonable accommodation, without threat or coercion, to engage in the workplace and public sector. Instead, we have a heightened discriminatory public atmosphere and failure to provide least restrictive educational environment access within our districts, whereas neighboring districts under same state law are operated at the whim of local leaders who implement local ordinances that do not supersede federal integration laws and guidelines. 

Reopening schools under current federal law compliance in more protective measure:

 https://rationalground.com/using-the-bubble-isolate-concept-to-reopen-schools-without-universal-masking/  

Reopening society in a structured, protective manner:

https://rationalground.com/a-rational-reopening-guide/


Please give consideration to these critical oversights in pathogenic mitigation. 

Thank you,

Megan Kristen Mansell
Bill & Melinda Gates first bought a stake in Pfizer back in 2002 with the stated intention of "expand[ing] access to the pharmaceutical company's all-in-one injectable contraceptive, Sayana Press, to give to women in the Global South.

⚠️ INSIDER TRADING ALERT ⚠️

The Gates Foundation first bought a position in BioNTech in September 2019, just before the COVID-19 pandemic hit. It invested $55 million in the biotech, with the potential for total funding to reach $100 million.
https://www.fool.com/investing/2020/09/24/4-coronavirus-vaccine-stocks-the-bill-melinda-gate/