Robin Monotti + Cory Morningstar
71.9K subscribers
14.5K photos
8.02K videos
624 files
28.4K links
Official Robin Monotti + Cory Morningstar
Donations:
robinmonotti.substack.com/
www.patreon.com/CoryMorningstar
Group is @robinmggroup
We don't DM from this channel account.
Download Telegram
Forwarded from Lara Graham
• Mandatory vaccinations could be indirectly discriminatory against certain protected characteristics
• Vaccines are not currently available for everyone and all individuals must wait their turn in order of priority to be offered vaccination. Only allowing vaccinated individuals to be in the workplace could amount to indirect age discrimination
• There are data protection implications on you if you require me to provide information on my vaccination status and verification of its accuracy
• Freely given consent is required for any medical intervention. If you attempt to force me to be vaccinated, not only could it give rise to human rights concerns, but there could also be criminal implications. Forcing anyone to receive a vaccine injection under duress, under UK law, could constitute an unlawful injury. A vaccination requires an individual’s informed and voluntary consent
• On checking the UK yellow card system, I have noted large numbers of adverse reactions to all available Covid vaccines and as such I believe that taking the vaccine would be a serious threat to my health. I am happy to provide details of the adverse reactions on request, which number over 170,000
• All Covid vaccines are still in clinical trials which do not end until 2023, and as such they are experimental. I do not consent to taking part in an experimental trial, and neither am I required to
• My contract of employment with you does not state that it is a requirement that I be vaccinated with a Covid 19 vaccine to be employed. You cannot change my contract without my agreement and therefore to try and force a change by threatening me with job loss if I do not take a Covid vaccine would be in breach of my contract. This means I am entitled to resign and claim constructive or unfair dismissal
I would like to resolve this matter amicably and I am sure that we will be able to. Therefore, if you wish to discuss my position further, I am happy to attend a meeting, befriended, at a mutually convenient time.
If we cannot resolve this matter amicably, I do need to put you on notice that I will unfortunately have to make the matter formal by raising a grievance. I do not wish to do this, and I therefore hope we can come to a satisfactory conclusion for both of us.
In ending I would like to make clear that I would of course not come into work if I felt ill or showed any symptoms of having coronavirus and would be happy to isolate at home if required.
Yours sincerely,
Health professionals, public services & armed forces who are planning to attend the London protest on the 24th April; there will be a group marching together in uniforms. Join them.
It's not "just a mask" as that would make it a fashion accessory. It is an (allegedly) preventive medical intervention & it is a breach of your human rights for anybody to discriminate on you for choosing to not wear one. It's very clear:

UNESCO Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights
Article 6 – Consent 
1. Any preventive, diagnostic and therapeutic medical intervention is only to be carried out with the prior, free and informed consent of the person concerned. "The consent should, where appropriate, be express and may be withdrawn by the person concerned at any time and for any reason without disadvantage or prejudice."

UNESCO DECLARATION ON BIOETHICS & HUMAN RIGHTS Art.6

http://portal.unesco.org/en/ev.php-URL_ID=31058&URL_DO=DO_TOPIC&URL_SECTION=201.html
It's not "just a mask" as that would make it a fashion accessory. It is an (allegedly) preventive medical intervention & it is a breach of your human rights for anybody to discriminate on you for choosing to not wear one. It's very clear:

UNESCO Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights
Article 6 – Consent 
1. Any preventive, diagnostic and therapeutic medical intervention is only to be carried out with the prior, free and informed consent of the person concerned. The consent should, where appropriate, be express and may be withdrawn by the person concerned at any time and for any reason without disadvantage or prejudice."

UNESCO DECLARATION ON BIOETHICS & HUMAN RIGHTS Art.6

http://portal.unesco.org/en/ev.php-URL_ID=31058&URL_DO=DO_TOPIC&URL_SECTION=201.html
UK LAW: The Equality Act 2010 protects individuals from discrimination relating to protected characteristics, which include belief.

(2) Belief means any religious or philosophical belief and a reference to belief includes a reference to a lack of belief.

An anti-mask or anti-vaccination philosophical stance is a belief, it is therefore protected from discrimination by law.

https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2010/15/contents
Public Health (Control of Disease) Act 1984

45EMedical treatment

(1)Regulations under section 45B or 45C may not include provision requiring a person to undergo medical treatment.
(2)“ Medical treatment ” includes vaccination and other prophylactic treatment.

https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1984/22
Forwarded from F W
Them: You won't be able to attend a concert or football games

Me: I don't mind

Them: You can't go to a large shopping mall

Me: I'll survive

Them: You can't drink at the pub

Me: I no longer drink

Them: You can't enter night clubs

Me: I don't go out at night

Them: We'll tell your employer

Me: I don't have one

Them: We'll take it from your salary

Me: I don't have a salary

Them: You can't go to your job

Me: I don't have or want your job

Them: You can't be in the city

Me: I prefer living out in nature

Them: You can't go to McDonald's or Burger King

Me: I haven't in years anyway

Them: You can't eat at restaurants

Me: I'll order takeaway

Them: You can't shop at large grocery stores

Me: I grow my own food and buy from local farmers

Them: You can't be part of society

Me: I already checked out

Them: Your kids can't come to school

Me: I'll homeschool

Them: You'll be on your own

Me: I'm surrounded by my family and tribe and all the people reaching the same conclusion all over the world

Them: You can't choose for yourself

Me: I just did

Them: What can we tempt you with?

Me: Nothing

***

When they have nothing you want they have no power.

And that's when power comes to the people.
Robin,

This is my latest technical writeup on the exacerbation of airborne pathogen due to masking.

Megan Kristen Mansell

@mamasaurusMeg on twitter


The Covid conversation should have begun with minimum viable particle size under pressure, which for Covid size particulates is .06 microns. This particle is under .3 microns, placing it firmly within the radically behaving particulate range, noting that multiple virions can compose a single particle cluster and still fall well under that threshold. https://www.sphosp.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/Letter-in-response-to-N-95-use-RA-Final.pdf


The conversational pivot would have then become about respiratory emission particle size ranges, and we’d have observed that around 90% of exhaled particulates fall within the radically behaving particulate airborne particulate range. 

https://www.pnas.org/content/118/8/e2021830118


Cloth masks have been shown to have 97% particle penetration, and 44% for surgical masks, while 71% of new cases reporting always masked, and 14% masking most of the time. 

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4420971/


Why does this matter? We heard DROPLET nonstop for 6 months before any governing body began acknowledging airborne pathogenic spread, without ever correcting course on our nation’s PPE recommendation considerations, especially as source control.
>>
This is a test site photo of the person most likely to be in contact with novel pathogen.  
This is the exhale plume of fine particulates created by this mask directly within respiratory range of test subjects and materials, contaminating site environ. 

Exhale matters a great deal with an airborne pathogen. 

Covid is a low minimum infective dose pathogen, so when every breath you take increases atmospheric viral load in an enclosed space, and it doesn’t take very much of it for vulnerable individuals to get sick, a contagious individual should not wear a mask or respirator that creates a concentrated stream of exhale of these fine particulates that do not respond predictably to gravity, remain aloft for hours (even days, as explained thoroughly by Senior Industrial Hygienist Stephen Petty here: 

https://twitter.com/rmconservative/status/1368909278514458626?s=12 ), as this exacerbates the spread of airborne pathogen.
https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/ep-826-only-neanderthal-can-believe-mask-stops-virus/id1065050908?i=1000511752553