The claims that “climate change” is to blame for all the world’s disasters are nothing but myths.
The science matters were mostly settled in the 1983 Nierenberg Report
"Ideology of climate alarmism (as preached by IPCC, complicit NGOs and Obama administration) can be defined as a primitive cult complete with worshiping idols, claiming that natural disasters happen because we do not listen to its shamans and necessary sacrifices. Many prominent scientists and non-scientists talked about that.
https://defyccc.com/climate-science-is-upside-down-recap/
Some examples:
Lindzen: “As with any cult … they get more and more fanatical“,
Ivar Giaever, Nobel Laureate: “Global warming has really become a new religion.“,
Monckton of Brenchley: “They have gotten religion, but they call it science“,
Cardinal Pell: “In the past, pagans sacrificed animals and even humans in vain attempts to placate capricious and cruel gods. Today they demand a reduction in carbon dioxide emissions.“,
William Happer, Brackett Professor of Physics at Princeton University: “climate change cult“,
Michael Crichton (about environmentalism in general), and myself here & here.
The energy industry (including nuclear and hydro power, not only fossil fuels) is demanded as the first sacrifice. I will not speculate what demands will follow, but humans emit CO2 when we breathe, and these emissions are substantial (about 5% of the total). There is nothing metaphorical about calling climate alarmism a cult or a religion."
The science matters were mostly settled in the 1983 Nierenberg Report
"Ideology of climate alarmism (as preached by IPCC, complicit NGOs and Obama administration) can be defined as a primitive cult complete with worshiping idols, claiming that natural disasters happen because we do not listen to its shamans and necessary sacrifices. Many prominent scientists and non-scientists talked about that.
https://defyccc.com/climate-science-is-upside-down-recap/
Some examples:
Lindzen: “As with any cult … they get more and more fanatical“,
Ivar Giaever, Nobel Laureate: “Global warming has really become a new religion.“,
Monckton of Brenchley: “They have gotten religion, but they call it science“,
Cardinal Pell: “In the past, pagans sacrificed animals and even humans in vain attempts to placate capricious and cruel gods. Today they demand a reduction in carbon dioxide emissions.“,
William Happer, Brackett Professor of Physics at Princeton University: “climate change cult“,
Michael Crichton (about environmentalism in general), and myself here & here.
The energy industry (including nuclear and hydro power, not only fossil fuels) is demanded as the first sacrifice. I will not speculate what demands will follow, but humans emit CO2 when we breathe, and these emissions are substantial (about 5% of the total). There is nothing metaphorical about calling climate alarmism a cult or a religion."
Science Defies Politics
“Climate Science” is Upside Down (recap)
Monckton: Of meteorology and morality
"They have gotten religion, but they call it science. They have gotten religion, but they do not know they have gotten religion. They have gotten religion, but they have not gotten the point of religion, which, like the point of science, is objective truth.
The question arises: can science function properly or at all in the absence of true religion and of its insistence upon morality? For science, in searching for the truth, is pursuing what is – or very much ought to be – a profoundly moral quest.
Yet what if a handful of bad scientists wilfully tamper with data, fabricate results, and demand assent to assertions for which there is no real scientific justification? And what if the vast majority of their colleagues cravenly look the other way and do nothing about their bent colleagues?
As every theologian knows, the simplest and usually the clearest of all tests for the presence of a moral sense is whether or not the truth is being told. The true-believers in the New Superstition are not telling the truth. On any objective test, they are lying, and are profiteering by lying, and are doing so at your expense and mine, and are bidding fair to bring down the Age of Enlightenment and Reason, flinging us back into the dumb, inspissate cheerlessness of a new Dark Age.
Nothing is done about the many lies, of course, because the many lies are the Party Line, and no one ever went to jail who safely parroted the Party Line.
“The Science Is Settled! There’s A Consensus! A 97.1% Consensus!"
Christopher Monckton of Brenchley
https://wattsupwiththat.com/2013/12/24/monckton-of-meteorology-and-morality/
"They have gotten religion, but they call it science. They have gotten religion, but they do not know they have gotten religion. They have gotten religion, but they have not gotten the point of religion, which, like the point of science, is objective truth.
The question arises: can science function properly or at all in the absence of true religion and of its insistence upon morality? For science, in searching for the truth, is pursuing what is – or very much ought to be – a profoundly moral quest.
Yet what if a handful of bad scientists wilfully tamper with data, fabricate results, and demand assent to assertions for which there is no real scientific justification? And what if the vast majority of their colleagues cravenly look the other way and do nothing about their bent colleagues?
As every theologian knows, the simplest and usually the clearest of all tests for the presence of a moral sense is whether or not the truth is being told. The true-believers in the New Superstition are not telling the truth. On any objective test, they are lying, and are profiteering by lying, and are doing so at your expense and mine, and are bidding fair to bring down the Age of Enlightenment and Reason, flinging us back into the dumb, inspissate cheerlessness of a new Dark Age.
Nothing is done about the many lies, of course, because the many lies are the Party Line, and no one ever went to jail who safely parroted the Party Line.
“The Science Is Settled! There’s A Consensus! A 97.1% Consensus!"
Christopher Monckton of Brenchley
https://wattsupwiththat.com/2013/12/24/monckton-of-meteorology-and-morality/
Watts Up With That?
Monckton: Of meteorology and morality
By Christopher Monckton of Brenchley To those of us who have dared to question on scientific and economic grounds the official story on global warming, it is a continuing surprise…
Steve Kirsch has written 700+ articles on COVID & he declares this as THE MOST IMPORTANT he’s ever written.
It exposes the scandal at the heart of the Israeli government that they knew the “vaccines” were harming people yet they says nothing.
It’s all coming apart.
No media in the world is reporting on this.
If anyone still thinks what’s happening is random incompetence, time to give your head a wobble.
Please share widely right now, before it gets smothered.
Best wishes
Mike
Mike
https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/exclusive-proof-that-the-top-israeli
It exposes the scandal at the heart of the Israeli government that they knew the “vaccines” were harming people yet they says nothing.
It’s all coming apart.
No media in the world is reporting on this.
If anyone still thinks what’s happening is random incompetence, time to give your head a wobble.
Please share widely right now, before it gets smothered.
Best wishes
Mike
Mike
https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/exclusive-proof-that-the-top-israeli
Steve Kirsch's newsletter
Exclusive: Proof that Israel found serious safety problems with the COVID vaccines then deliberately covered it up
Israel didn't start to gather safety data until a year into the vaccine program. They gathered 6 months worth of data and found that the vaccines weren't safe so they lied to the world about it.
Forwarded from Global Research
Filling Gasoline Cars Could Become Cheaper Than Charging EVs in the UK
Due to skyrocketing energy prices, Britons could soon face higher costs for charging their electric vehicles (EVs) at home than filling up gasoline-fueled cars, The Washington Times reports.
The high energy and electricity prices that could undermine the growth in EVs uptake in the UK and globally could be a cautionary tale for what could be the future in the U.S. if the energy transition is pushed to accelerate without accounting for whether EVs and renewable energy sources could replace fossil fuels, analysts tell The Washington Times.
Link to the article:
https://www.globalresearch.ca/filling-gasoline-cars-could-become-cheaper-than-charging-evs-uk/5792349
Due to skyrocketing energy prices, Britons could soon face higher costs for charging their electric vehicles (EVs) at home than filling up gasoline-fueled cars, The Washington Times reports.
The high energy and electricity prices that could undermine the growth in EVs uptake in the UK and globally could be a cautionary tale for what could be the future in the U.S. if the energy transition is pushed to accelerate without accounting for whether EVs and renewable energy sources could replace fossil fuels, analysts tell The Washington Times.
Link to the article:
https://www.globalresearch.ca/filling-gasoline-cars-could-become-cheaper-than-charging-evs-uk/5792349
The EU is Weaponising Russian Gas Against its Own People
Corporate media claims Putin is weaponising energy against the EU.
The reality, as always, is almost the opposite: it is the EU who are weaponising energy against their own people, except the oligarchy of course.
Peskov: It is the EU, not Russia that has the contractual obligation of repairing Nord Stream 1
https://www.imolaoggi.it/2022/09/05/gas-cremlino-e-la-ue-che-deve-riparare-il-nord-stream-1/
Corporate media claims Putin is weaponising energy against the EU.
The reality, as always, is almost the opposite: it is the EU who are weaponising energy against their own people, except the oligarchy of course.
Peskov: It is the EU, not Russia that has the contractual obligation of repairing Nord Stream 1
https://www.imolaoggi.it/2022/09/05/gas-cremlino-e-la-ue-che-deve-riparare-il-nord-stream-1/
Imola Oggi
Gas, Cremlino: è la UE che deve riparare il Nord Stream 1 • Imola Oggi
Secondo Peskov, sono gli europei ad avere l'obbligo contrattuale di effettuare la manutenzione degli impianti del gasdotto Nord Stream 1
❤1
GPs to receive incentive payments to deliver ‘accelerated’ care home Covid boosters
"GPs will be incentivised to deliver ‘accelerated’ autumn Covid boosters in care homes, with payments of up to £525 per completed care home.
The autumn programme is due to start from next week, but GPs have now been asked to complete care home vaccinations by 23 October where possible."
https://www.pulsetoday.co.uk/news/breaking-news/gps-to-receive-incentive-payments-to-deliver-accelerated-care-home-covid-boosters/
"GPs will be incentivised to deliver ‘accelerated’ autumn Covid boosters in care homes, with payments of up to £525 per completed care home.
The autumn programme is due to start from next week, but GPs have now been asked to complete care home vaccinations by 23 October where possible."
https://www.pulsetoday.co.uk/news/breaking-news/gps-to-receive-incentive-payments-to-deliver-accelerated-care-home-covid-boosters/
PULSE
GPs to receive incentive payments to deliver ‘accelerated’ care home Covid boosters
GPs will be incentivised to deliver ‘accelerated’ autumn Covid boosters in care homes, with payments of up to £525 per completed care home.
https://youtu.be/kLqHVKVuBaw
This is a huge change & it’ll affect everyone, either practically or psychologically, who has money in a UK registered bank.
It is proposed that, “if it is necessary due to economic circumstances, they may limit the balance in your account, either by applying a charge or a limit”.
Recall the Cyprus bail-ins?
If you’ve money, I doubt there’s anything you can do, such as moving it.
I’ve no doubt they’ll just take it, when they want.
Be aware & do whatever you’d decided you’re going to do under these circumstances.
Best wishes
Mike
This is a huge change & it’ll affect everyone, either practically or psychologically, who has money in a UK registered bank.
It is proposed that, “if it is necessary due to economic circumstances, they may limit the balance in your account, either by applying a charge or a limit”.
Recall the Cyprus bail-ins?
If you’ve money, I doubt there’s anything you can do, such as moving it.
I’ve no doubt they’ll just take it, when they want.
Be aware & do whatever you’d decided you’re going to do under these circumstances.
Best wishes
Mike
YouTube
🚨 UK Banks FREEZE People’s Accounts Due To Recession 🤔
Join our anti-globalist movement 'Build Back Britain' by getting your very own merchandise to spread the message: https://mahyartousi.creator-spring.com
This is followed by nationwide tours and campaigns, which you will be invited to participate if you wish.…
This is followed by nationwide tours and campaigns, which you will be invited to participate if you wish.…
Dear all,
In recent interviews describing the multiple fraudulent aspects of the entire covid19 fiasco, obviously & deliberately planned and executed, I’ve chosen no longer to speak in detail about the PCR method, employed in the so-called “PCR test”, on grounds that there are so many, much more easily-communicated fraudulent matters.
PCR is very complicated & ignorant enthusiasts, without lab experience of applying the reaction who also have deep appreciation of the underlying theoretical aspects, simply don’t know what they don’t know.
Applied as it has been all around the world for clinical diagnostic purposes, “the method” as described in the rushed paper by Corman, Drosten & co, is unequivocally useless, because of numerous, severe & unresolved flaws in the very design, in the methods & in the interpretation of results.
In brief, it cannot to shown to “do what it says in the tin”.
Yet, commercial kits based on this & related methods have been used for well over two years, branding a significant fraction of the population in advanced nations “positive” for SARS-CoV-2.
In my opinion, this is a criminal matter, inserting a known to be fatally flawed test protocol, into the clinical diagnostic workflows in rapidly established huge testing facilitates. I know from direct expert testimony given by a personally highly experienced laboratory research scientist in UK that, even if a test based in this paper had been fully validated, the way it was used, mostly using workers inexperienced in commercial laboratories, could not fail to generate large & undefined proportions of false positives.
This permitted the perpetrators to anticipate that a useful fraction of tested samples would return a positive result. Allied to deliberately malign & harmful medical treatment protocols, we see how the fraudulent claim that huge numbers of people “died within 28 days of a positive test” was created.
Remember, it was never considered necessary to corroborate a clinical, symptoms based diagnosis in order that a “covid case” or “Covid death” has occurred.
Stir in the global near-complete suspension of post mortem examinations, and this is the heart of the criminal fraud of epic proportions that has been wrought upon the world.
Just to illustrate how complicated this all is, the critical review of that original methods paper, still not corrected or withdrawn (“Corman-Drosten paper”, subject to the “Corman-Drosten Review, at the link) contains the short summary below.
If it’s difficult for good scientists, experienced in using the PCR method, to be able to discern what really is the utility & limitations of the method for clinical diagnostics, what hope do medical professionals without deep knowledge of PCR, let alone non-technical people have, in cutting through this fraud deception?
That’s why, once a large number of other, more easily communicated fraudulent matters arose, I chose no longer to feature deliberately bad PCR testing in my talks.
Please have a read yourself then share this critical review with anyone who you think might at least get the gist of why we’ve known that the diagnostic testing at the heart of this global fraud was so effective.
I do so because the perpetrators can do it again at any time & I expect they will. Billions of doses of “vaccines” are continuing to be manufactured & distributed. Fraudulent grounds will be manufactured which will result in drives to get a needle into every arm. At least, that’s what I anticipate, based in joining the dots. Any claimed infectious disease crisis involving a PCR based test is going to be fraudulent.
Best wishes
Mike
https://cormandrostenreview.com/report/
SUMMARY CATALOGUE OF ERRORS FOUND IN THE PAPER
The Corman-Drosten paper contains the following specific errors:
1. There exists no specified reason to use these extremely high concentrations of primers in this protocol. The described concentrations lead to increased nonspecific bindings and PCR product amplifications, making the test unsuitable as a specific diagnostic tool to identify the SARS-CoV-2 virus.
In recent interviews describing the multiple fraudulent aspects of the entire covid19 fiasco, obviously & deliberately planned and executed, I’ve chosen no longer to speak in detail about the PCR method, employed in the so-called “PCR test”, on grounds that there are so many, much more easily-communicated fraudulent matters.
PCR is very complicated & ignorant enthusiasts, without lab experience of applying the reaction who also have deep appreciation of the underlying theoretical aspects, simply don’t know what they don’t know.
Applied as it has been all around the world for clinical diagnostic purposes, “the method” as described in the rushed paper by Corman, Drosten & co, is unequivocally useless, because of numerous, severe & unresolved flaws in the very design, in the methods & in the interpretation of results.
In brief, it cannot to shown to “do what it says in the tin”.
Yet, commercial kits based on this & related methods have been used for well over two years, branding a significant fraction of the population in advanced nations “positive” for SARS-CoV-2.
In my opinion, this is a criminal matter, inserting a known to be fatally flawed test protocol, into the clinical diagnostic workflows in rapidly established huge testing facilitates. I know from direct expert testimony given by a personally highly experienced laboratory research scientist in UK that, even if a test based in this paper had been fully validated, the way it was used, mostly using workers inexperienced in commercial laboratories, could not fail to generate large & undefined proportions of false positives.
This permitted the perpetrators to anticipate that a useful fraction of tested samples would return a positive result. Allied to deliberately malign & harmful medical treatment protocols, we see how the fraudulent claim that huge numbers of people “died within 28 days of a positive test” was created.
Remember, it was never considered necessary to corroborate a clinical, symptoms based diagnosis in order that a “covid case” or “Covid death” has occurred.
Stir in the global near-complete suspension of post mortem examinations, and this is the heart of the criminal fraud of epic proportions that has been wrought upon the world.
Just to illustrate how complicated this all is, the critical review of that original methods paper, still not corrected or withdrawn (“Corman-Drosten paper”, subject to the “Corman-Drosten Review, at the link) contains the short summary below.
If it’s difficult for good scientists, experienced in using the PCR method, to be able to discern what really is the utility & limitations of the method for clinical diagnostics, what hope do medical professionals without deep knowledge of PCR, let alone non-technical people have, in cutting through this fraud deception?
That’s why, once a large number of other, more easily communicated fraudulent matters arose, I chose no longer to feature deliberately bad PCR testing in my talks.
Please have a read yourself then share this critical review with anyone who you think might at least get the gist of why we’ve known that the diagnostic testing at the heart of this global fraud was so effective.
I do so because the perpetrators can do it again at any time & I expect they will. Billions of doses of “vaccines” are continuing to be manufactured & distributed. Fraudulent grounds will be manufactured which will result in drives to get a needle into every arm. At least, that’s what I anticipate, based in joining the dots. Any claimed infectious disease crisis involving a PCR based test is going to be fraudulent.
Best wishes
Mike
https://cormandrostenreview.com/report/
SUMMARY CATALOGUE OF ERRORS FOUND IN THE PAPER
The Corman-Drosten paper contains the following specific errors:
1. There exists no specified reason to use these extremely high concentrations of primers in this protocol. The described concentrations lead to increased nonspecific bindings and PCR product amplifications, making the test unsuitable as a specific diagnostic tool to identify the SARS-CoV-2 virus.
2. Six unspecified wobbly positions will introduce an enormous variability in the real world laboratory implementations of this test; the confusing nonspecific description in the Corman-Drosten paper is not suitable as a Standard Operational Protocol making the test unsuitable as a specific diagnostic tool to identify the SARS-CoV-2 virus.
3. The test cannot discriminate between the whole virus and viral fragments. Therefore, the test cannot be used as a diagnostic for intact (infectious) viruses, making the test unsuitable as a specific diagnostic tool to identify the SARS-CoV-2 virus and make inferences about the presence of an infection.
4. A difference of 10° C with respect to the annealing temperature Tm for primer pair1 (RdRp_SARSr_F and RdRp_SARSr_R) also makes the test unsuitable as a specific diagnostic tool to identify the SARS-CoV-2 virus.
5. A severe error is the omission of a Ct value at which a sample is considered positive and negative. This Ct value is also not found in follow-up submissions making the test unsuitable as a specific diagnostic tool to identify the SARS-CoV-2 virus.
6. The PCR products have not been validated at the molecular level. This fact makes the protocol useless as a specific diagnostic tool to identify the SARS-CoV-2 virus.
7. The PCR test contains neither a unique positive control to evaluate its specificity for SARS-CoV-2 nor a negative control to exclude the presence of other coronaviruses, making the test unsuitable as a specific diagnostic tool to identify the SARS-CoV-2 virus.
8. The test design in the Corman-Drosten paper is so vague and flawed that one can go in dozens of different directions; nothing is standardized and there is no SOP. This highly questions the scientific validity of the test and makes it unsuitable as a specific diagnostic tool to identify the SARS-CoV-2 virus.
9. Most likely, the Corman-Drosten paper was not peer-reviewed making the test unsuitable as a specific diagnostic tool to identify the SARS-CoV-2 virus.
10. We find severe conflicts of interest for at least four authors, in addition to the fact that two of the authors of the Corman-Drosten paper (Christian Drosten and Chantal Reusken) are members of the editorial board of Eurosurveillance. A conflict of interest was added on July 29 2020 (Olfert Landt is CEO of TIB-Molbiol; Marco Kaiser is senior researcher at GenExpress and serves as scientific advisor for TIB-Molbiol), that was not declared in the original version (and still is missing in the PubMed version); TIB-Molbiol is the company which was “the first” to produce PCR kits (Light Mix) based on the protocol published in the Corman-Drosten manuscript, and according to their own words, they distributed these PCR-test kits before the publication was even submitted [20]; further, Victor Corman & Christian Drosten failed to mention their second affiliation: the commercial test laboratory “Labor Berlin”. Both are responsible for the virus diagnostics there [21] and the company operates in the realm of real time PCR-testing.
In light of our re-examination of the test protocol to identify SARS-CoV-2 described in the Corman-Drosten paper we have identified concerning errors and inherent fallacies which render the SARS-CoV-2 PCR test useless.
3. The test cannot discriminate between the whole virus and viral fragments. Therefore, the test cannot be used as a diagnostic for intact (infectious) viruses, making the test unsuitable as a specific diagnostic tool to identify the SARS-CoV-2 virus and make inferences about the presence of an infection.
4. A difference of 10° C with respect to the annealing temperature Tm for primer pair1 (RdRp_SARSr_F and RdRp_SARSr_R) also makes the test unsuitable as a specific diagnostic tool to identify the SARS-CoV-2 virus.
5. A severe error is the omission of a Ct value at which a sample is considered positive and negative. This Ct value is also not found in follow-up submissions making the test unsuitable as a specific diagnostic tool to identify the SARS-CoV-2 virus.
6. The PCR products have not been validated at the molecular level. This fact makes the protocol useless as a specific diagnostic tool to identify the SARS-CoV-2 virus.
7. The PCR test contains neither a unique positive control to evaluate its specificity for SARS-CoV-2 nor a negative control to exclude the presence of other coronaviruses, making the test unsuitable as a specific diagnostic tool to identify the SARS-CoV-2 virus.
8. The test design in the Corman-Drosten paper is so vague and flawed that one can go in dozens of different directions; nothing is standardized and there is no SOP. This highly questions the scientific validity of the test and makes it unsuitable as a specific diagnostic tool to identify the SARS-CoV-2 virus.
9. Most likely, the Corman-Drosten paper was not peer-reviewed making the test unsuitable as a specific diagnostic tool to identify the SARS-CoV-2 virus.
10. We find severe conflicts of interest for at least four authors, in addition to the fact that two of the authors of the Corman-Drosten paper (Christian Drosten and Chantal Reusken) are members of the editorial board of Eurosurveillance. A conflict of interest was added on July 29 2020 (Olfert Landt is CEO of TIB-Molbiol; Marco Kaiser is senior researcher at GenExpress and serves as scientific advisor for TIB-Molbiol), that was not declared in the original version (and still is missing in the PubMed version); TIB-Molbiol is the company which was “the first” to produce PCR kits (Light Mix) based on the protocol published in the Corman-Drosten manuscript, and according to their own words, they distributed these PCR-test kits before the publication was even submitted [20]; further, Victor Corman & Christian Drosten failed to mention their second affiliation: the commercial test laboratory “Labor Berlin”. Both are responsible for the virus diagnostics there [21] and the company operates in the realm of real time PCR-testing.
In light of our re-examination of the test protocol to identify SARS-CoV-2 described in the Corman-Drosten paper we have identified concerning errors and inherent fallacies which render the SARS-CoV-2 PCR test useless.
👍1
Just received this:
Hello,
The first step has been announced by Catherine Austin Fitts…www.globalwalkout.com/step-one
THANK YOU to all of you who have helped us launch this.
In this drive, there are social media tiles you can use to add your own pic to…the hashtag #globalwalkout is going nuts right now on twitter and other platforms. The step 1 launch has done very well and it’s only been 2.5 hours.
See resources here - https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1DdyROcK3X8OkADTEu3bA2N516-25lkIz?usp=sharing
Another exciting development is that we are investing in a private project management platform that will work within the website using our own server. We won’t need google, Microsoft, drobox or any of that big project management software. We’re going to have our own.
We will be able to create new projects, schedule meetings, assign tasks and deadlines, private message each other and so much more…It will be ready THIS WEEK.
I’m telling you this just to keep you updates. We’ve now got over 200 collaborators and the need for a proper system is clear as day 😊 I can say, we’re learning very quick over here.
Speak soon 😊
Monica Smit
Hello,
The first step has been announced by Catherine Austin Fitts…www.globalwalkout.com/step-one
THANK YOU to all of you who have helped us launch this.
In this drive, there are social media tiles you can use to add your own pic to…the hashtag #globalwalkout is going nuts right now on twitter and other platforms. The step 1 launch has done very well and it’s only been 2.5 hours.
See resources here - https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1DdyROcK3X8OkADTEu3bA2N516-25lkIz?usp=sharing
Another exciting development is that we are investing in a private project management platform that will work within the website using our own server. We won’t need google, Microsoft, drobox or any of that big project management software. We’re going to have our own.
We will be able to create new projects, schedule meetings, assign tasks and deadlines, private message each other and so much more…It will be ready THIS WEEK.
I’m telling you this just to keep you updates. We’ve now got over 200 collaborators and the need for a proper system is clear as day 😊 I can say, we’re learning very quick over here.
Speak soon 😊
Monica Smit
We need everyone to appreciate the essential character of cash, AS AN OPTION.
It doesn’t matter if you don’t immediately think losing cash isn’t a problem.
If it goes, a malign power is suddenly & irrevocably totalitarian.
That’s what we fear & even if it’s only a 1% chance that we’re right, not defending cash right now puts all the future power into the hands of entities that many of us believe will misuse it to deprive you of liberty, privacy, democracy & humanity. Not to say also all your assets & even your children & perhaps your life.
Do you have absolute trust in your political leaders? In all super wealthy people?
Is it conceivable that at any time in the future, your “Yes” to these questions might change?
If you answered “No” to either question then you already know how absolutely central it is to retain cash.
Ignore the siren voices telling you cash has to go.
There is no legitimate reason why the executive wishes to withdraw cash as an option.
So if that’s what they intend, my opinion is that this renders them automatically malign.
Best wishes
Mike
https://globalwalkout.com/keepcashalive/
Ps: my good friend Catherine Austin Fitts is one of those behind this movement & she wholeheartedly supports it. So do I.
https://globalwalkout.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/step_one_article32-1.pdf
It doesn’t matter if you don’t immediately think losing cash isn’t a problem.
If it goes, a malign power is suddenly & irrevocably totalitarian.
That’s what we fear & even if it’s only a 1% chance that we’re right, not defending cash right now puts all the future power into the hands of entities that many of us believe will misuse it to deprive you of liberty, privacy, democracy & humanity. Not to say also all your assets & even your children & perhaps your life.
Do you have absolute trust in your political leaders? In all super wealthy people?
Is it conceivable that at any time in the future, your “Yes” to these questions might change?
If you answered “No” to either question then you already know how absolutely central it is to retain cash.
Ignore the siren voices telling you cash has to go.
There is no legitimate reason why the executive wishes to withdraw cash as an option.
So if that’s what they intend, my opinion is that this renders them automatically malign.
Best wishes
Mike
https://globalwalkout.com/keepcashalive/
Ps: my good friend Catherine Austin Fitts is one of those behind this movement & she wholeheartedly supports it. So do I.
https://globalwalkout.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/step_one_article32-1.pdf
Global Walk Out
Keep Cash Alive - Global Walk Out
– Cash Payments – Why bother keeping cash alive? You have landed on this page because someone who cares about your local economy has paid cash for something and handed you a small piece of paper. Weird isn’t it? I bet you’re thinking, “Tapping my phone,…
Please consider adding your email to my "No Place Without Spirit" mailing list, which you can join by scrolling to the bottom of the link below.
Robin
https://nulluslocussinegenio.com/
Robin
https://nulluslocussinegenio.com/
Forwarded from Disclose.tv
NEW - London begins to install Chinese facial recognition CCTVs for your security.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11179641/Is-Big-Brother-Britain-worlds-ultimate-surveillance-state.html
@disclosetv
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11179641/Is-Big-Brother-Britain-worlds-ultimate-surveillance-state.html
@disclosetv
Mail Online
Is Big Brother Britain about to become the world's surveillance state?
With at least six million CCTV cameras in the UK - one for every 11 people - the UK now ranks alongside China in terms of its surveillance capacity.
Forwarded from Spirit of Liberty
Europe's Energy Crisis Was Created By Political Interventionism
"An energy policy that bans investment in some technologies based on ideological views and ignores security of supply is doomed to a strepitous failure.
The energy crisis in the European Union was not created by market failures or lack of alternatives. It was created by political nudging and imposition.
Renewable energies are a positive force within a balanced energy mix, not on their own, due to the volatile and intermittent nature of the technology. Politicians have imposed an unstable energy mix banning base technologies that work almost 100% of the time and this has made prices soar for consumers and threatened security of supply.
This week, Ursula Von Der Leyen, President of the European Commission, gave two messages that have grabbed many headlines. First, she announced a strong intervention in the electricity market…"
👉 Read more: Daniel Lacalle
"An energy policy that bans investment in some technologies based on ideological views and ignores security of supply is doomed to a strepitous failure.
The energy crisis in the European Union was not created by market failures or lack of alternatives. It was created by political nudging and imposition.
Renewable energies are a positive force within a balanced energy mix, not on their own, due to the volatile and intermittent nature of the technology. Politicians have imposed an unstable energy mix banning base technologies that work almost 100% of the time and this has made prices soar for consumers and threatened security of supply.
This week, Ursula Von Der Leyen, President of the European Commission, gave two messages that have grabbed many headlines. First, she announced a strong intervention in the electricity market…"
👉 Read more: Daniel Lacalle
Forwarded from Global Intel Watch
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM