It’s hard to believe we’ve come to this, that a product which could be injected into billions of human beings has been authorised with no clinical efficacy & safety testing.
Eight mice were apparently used & that wasn’t even a safety study.
I’m told a single dose clinical study showed antibodies were raised. I’ve not seen it yet. In any case that’s not any kind of measure of efficacy since blood antibodies aren’t important in respiratory viral illnesses (even assuming there is a new virus responsible for mass scale illnesses & deaths, which I don’t believe is true).
I can hardly believe what I’ve just written.
There is NO PRECEDENT for what’s happening.
It’s BEYOND RECKLESS.
Please discourage everyone you can to become aware of this assault on humanity.
I’ve no idea what’s in the vials & I wouldn’t believe any answer unless the product of independent analysis.
Steer well clear.
Best wishes
Mike

https://live.childrenshealthdefense.org/shows/chd-friday-roundtable/xbPMqtMYgQ

Zelensky's wife has launched a ferocious attack on British People complaining over the cost of living saying:

Britons "count pennies", Ukrainians "count casualties". You know what? We grudge every single penny going to your corrupt, globalist NWO piece of shit regime!

David Clews LIVE tonight from 7pm on dlive.tv/unitynews

🇫🇷🇺🇦 ROMAN SALUTE DURING A FRENCH TV REPORT ON UKRAINE?

👉🏻 The French TV outlet "France 2" released yesterday a report focusing on the lives of Ukrainian children. In it, two girls can be seen in the background doing what could be described as a roman/nazi salute (0:04).

🗣 France 2 has called off these claims: «We have rushes proving that they salute several times in a friendly manner by raising their hands or by simulating a military salute. We attest that this is in no way a Nazi salute. At no time did they make such a gesture»

🔎 But further into the report, one can see that the children were also standing next to the red and black flag of the Right Sector, a Ukrainian far-right organisation (1:21).

❓ So who should you believe? We decided to subtitle and share the entire report, feel free to make up your own mind.

🔗 Source

https://you.38degrees.org.uk/petitions/ban-hikvision

Please consider signing Big Brother Watch’s petition against installation of civil surveillance cameras of a particular variety, given its proven usefulness to security state’s utility in identifying specific people, going about their lawful business.

Best wishes
Mike

It’s all such a mess, where a highly watched YouTuber tells you he’s only allowed to say certain things, follow guidance.
John: what to do when you suspect you’re being lied to?
Videos of my warnings over a year ago still hold up, as do those of Dr Roger Hodkinson.
Cheers
Mike

https://metatron.substack.com/p/how-should-pregnant-and-breastfeeding

Good night! @BobMoran

We did know about the variable mRNA integrity & that EMA with no rationale unilaterally lowered the % acceptance level, without which the EUA could not have been granted.
The entire regulatory process is fraud.
I wasn’t aware of the EMA seniors deliberately avoiding declaring a particular event (unanticipated deviation), per article 5.2 or whatever, whose intent was to endure national regulators became aware of problems.
So officially the public were kept in the dark that the commercial material wasn’t at all like the clinical trials material.
Obviously it means you can take nothing from the clinical trials to hold true in the real world. Even if they hadn’t cheated in the trials, which they did.
Utter recklessness & corruption.
I don’t know, perhaps this is normal (for crooks)
Best wishes
Mike

https://blogs.mercola.com/sites/vitalvotes/archive/2022/09/01/why-we-aren_1920_t-allowed-to-analyze-vaccine-vials.aspx

This is a key front in the war. Please get briefed if you have not already.
I’m reading my way into this massive fraud. Methods are spookily familiar.
Best wishes
Mike

https://dailysceptic.org/2022/09/03/scientists-flock-to-sign-world-climate-declaration-and-declare-there-is-no-climate-emergency/

World Climate Declaration from 1200+ scientists led by Nobel Laureate Professor Ivar Giaever

There is no climate emergency

A global network of over 1200 scientists and professionals has prepared this urgent message. Climate science should be less political, while climate policies should be more scientific. Scientists should openly address uncertainties and exaggerations in their predictions of global warming, while politicians should dispassionately count the real costs as well as the imagined benefits of their policy measures.

The geological archive reveals that Earth’s climate has varied as long as the planet has existed, with natural cold and warm phases. The Little Ice Age ended as recently as 1850. Therefore, it is no surprise that we now are experiencing a period of warming.

Climate policy relies on inadequate models

CO2 is plant food, the basis of all life on Earth

Global warming has not increased natural disasters

https://clintel.org/world-climate-declaration/

Anthropogenic Global Warming. From the Deception about Consensus to Total Refutation.

The claim that 97% of climate scientists agree that human emissions are the primary cause of global warming derives from the work of John Cook 2013, linked below. Cook calculated this number by excluding 66% of climate scientists who did not state their position on Anthropogenic Global Warming (AGW). For the remaining 34%, he considered 3 criteria: a) explicit endorsement that humans are the primary cause of climate change in recent times, b) unqualified endorsement of AGW, meaning that humans contribute something/anything to warming but are not necessarily the primary cause of climate change c) implicit endorsement of some human contribution to climate change. He then lumps all these criteria together and claims that 97% of the 34% agree on AGW theory. He fails to clarity in the conclusions that AGW in that context means even very slight contribution to warming; not that 97% agree that humans are the Primary driver of the recent warming. https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-9326/8/2/024024/pdf

The real problem with Cooks work is revealed only in his second study, in which Cook performs a sleight of hand and substitutes his earlier, weak definition of AGW consensus, that humans contribute anything to global warming but are not necessarily the dominant cause, with the strongest IPCC definition: “Climate scientists overwhelmingly agree that humans are causing recent global warming. The consensus position is articulated by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) statement that 'human influence has been the dominant cause of the observed warming since the mid-20th century'”. https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-9326/11/4/048002

From this point onwards IPCC has adopted Cooks “evidence” in support of their different definition, and so the fallacy of 97% consensus on IPCC position was born. All this is apart from the fact that consensus about beliefs is not evidence of facts about the objective reality.

Since Humlum 2013 we know beyond any doubt that human emissions of CO2 are not the primary driver of global temperature. Humlum et al. have shown, by analysing the official climate data-sets, that the rate of change of global temperature shows zero sensitivity to the rate of change of CO2 concentration, which precludes the possibility of CO2 driving the global temperature.

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/257343053_The_phase_relation_between_atmospheric_carbon_dioxide_and_global_temperature

Humlum’s study has attracted aggressive criticism for his largely speculative, alternative explanation of climate change, but nobody has even attempted to refute his primary conclusion, that the rate of global warming does not increase in response to an increased rate of CO2 emissions, which is a necessary feature of (strong) anthropogenic climate change as defined by IPCC.

Looks correct to me.
The most constant leader in the world at present.
What a turn up for the books.
Mike

Putin explains why energy costs are high in Europe.

"Sanctions are very harmful, especially for those imposing them" Putin warned in 2018.

UK: Births in England COLLAPSED and are NOT Coming Back Up

Births Declined by 14%. Should we call it INFERTILITY?

"A new UKHSA Sep 1, 2022 Vaccine Effectiveness Report is out. The report says that it “applies to England”.
And it has very bad news. Live births dropped in England by 14% as of May 2022, and the decline seems to be worsening and not recovering.

https://igorchudov.substack.com/p/uk-births-in-england-collapsed-and

We all know what was going on 9 months prior to January-May of 2022. The UK was busy vaccinating its fertile and pregnant women, claiming that “Covid vaccine is safe for pregnancy”.

Please read my Hungary article, where I compared birth rate drops in 20 Hungarian counties, with vaccination rates in the same counties 9 months prior to birth rate drops. A statistical analysis called “linear regression” shows the relationship between vaccination rates and birth rate drops 9 months later. That shows causation, due to the “temporal relationship” inherent in 9-month pregnancies."

https://igorchudov.substack.com/p/hungary-most-vaccinated-counties