Forwarded from DISASTER X (Maximilian Forte)
‘Beyond Chilling’: Homeland Security Seeks to Share Biometric Databanks With Foreign Countries
“The ramifications of a government — any government — having this much unregulated, unaccountable power to target, track, round up and detain its citizens is beyond chilling,” John Whitehead, attorney and author told The Defender.
EXTRACTS:
The U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) is promoting “Enhanced Border Security Agreements” by offering access to the department’s vast biometric databanks to foreign states that agree to reciprocate, according to a July 22 Statewatch report.
A DHS document, “DHS International Biometric Information Sharing (IBIS) Program,” is effectively a “sales pitch” to potential “foreign partners,” Statewatch said.
According to the document, the IBIS Program provides “a scalable, reliable, and rapid bilateral biometric and biographic information sharing capability to support border security and immigration vetting.”
Biometric technologies work by identifying unique features in the biological traits of a person and comparing them with stored information to see if a person is who they say they are.
According to DHS, these traits — which could be physical, such as a fingerprint or iris pattern, or behavioral, such as voice patterns — are used for “automated recognition” of individuals.
Some human rights and civil liberties advocates raised concerns about the collection of people’s biometric information by the DHS, foreign governments and corporations.
“It’s not just the surveillance and the buying and selling of your data that is worrisome,“ John Whitehead, a civil liberties attorney and author told The Defender.
“The ramifications of a government — any government — having this much unregulated, unaccountable power to target, track, round up and detain its citizens is beyond chilling,” he said.
The soaring use of biometric technologies is about money and profits, Whitehead said....
The extensive surveillance of U.S. citizens — first revealed by former NSA contractor Edward Snowden in 2013, and the subject of a lawsuit by the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) — still operates with no judicial and limited congressional oversight, according to a June 2021 report in The Washington Post.
While the NSA’s continued surveillance of citizens is problematic, Whitehead said he’s more concerned about today’s genetic “panopticon” — a digital prison of constant surveillance — in which “we’re all suspects in a DNA lineup, waiting to be matched with a crime.”
“In an age of overcriminalization, round-the-clock surveillance, and a police state eager to flex its muscles in a show of power, we are all guilty of some transgression or other,” Whitehead co-wrote in a July 27 article for the Rutherford Institute.
Corporations and governments around the world are rapidly investing in new technologies for identifying and tracking people, according to Global Newswire, which in June estimated the market to be worth just north of $49 billion in 2022 — and projected it will more than double, to $102 billion, by 2027....
According to Whitehead, a current for-profit surveillance capitalism scheme that threatens people’s privacy is made possible with individuals’ cooperation.
“All those disclaimers you scroll through without reading them, the ones written in minute font, only to quickly click on the ‘Agree’ button at the end so you can get to the next step — downloading software, opening up a social media account, adding a new app to your phone or computer — those signify your written consent to having your activities monitored, recorded and shared,” Whitehead said....
CONTINUE HERE:
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/homeland-security-share-biometric-databanks-foreign-countries/
#digitalID #WEF #surveillance #DHS #dictatorship #totalitarianism #capital #polecon
“The ramifications of a government — any government — having this much unregulated, unaccountable power to target, track, round up and detain its citizens is beyond chilling,” John Whitehead, attorney and author told The Defender.
EXTRACTS:
The U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) is promoting “Enhanced Border Security Agreements” by offering access to the department’s vast biometric databanks to foreign states that agree to reciprocate, according to a July 22 Statewatch report.
A DHS document, “DHS International Biometric Information Sharing (IBIS) Program,” is effectively a “sales pitch” to potential “foreign partners,” Statewatch said.
According to the document, the IBIS Program provides “a scalable, reliable, and rapid bilateral biometric and biographic information sharing capability to support border security and immigration vetting.”
Biometric technologies work by identifying unique features in the biological traits of a person and comparing them with stored information to see if a person is who they say they are.
According to DHS, these traits — which could be physical, such as a fingerprint or iris pattern, or behavioral, such as voice patterns — are used for “automated recognition” of individuals.
Some human rights and civil liberties advocates raised concerns about the collection of people’s biometric information by the DHS, foreign governments and corporations.
“It’s not just the surveillance and the buying and selling of your data that is worrisome,“ John Whitehead, a civil liberties attorney and author told The Defender.
“The ramifications of a government — any government — having this much unregulated, unaccountable power to target, track, round up and detain its citizens is beyond chilling,” he said.
The soaring use of biometric technologies is about money and profits, Whitehead said....
The extensive surveillance of U.S. citizens — first revealed by former NSA contractor Edward Snowden in 2013, and the subject of a lawsuit by the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) — still operates with no judicial and limited congressional oversight, according to a June 2021 report in The Washington Post.
While the NSA’s continued surveillance of citizens is problematic, Whitehead said he’s more concerned about today’s genetic “panopticon” — a digital prison of constant surveillance — in which “we’re all suspects in a DNA lineup, waiting to be matched with a crime.”
“In an age of overcriminalization, round-the-clock surveillance, and a police state eager to flex its muscles in a show of power, we are all guilty of some transgression or other,” Whitehead co-wrote in a July 27 article for the Rutherford Institute.
Corporations and governments around the world are rapidly investing in new technologies for identifying and tracking people, according to Global Newswire, which in June estimated the market to be worth just north of $49 billion in 2022 — and projected it will more than double, to $102 billion, by 2027....
According to Whitehead, a current for-profit surveillance capitalism scheme that threatens people’s privacy is made possible with individuals’ cooperation.
“All those disclaimers you scroll through without reading them, the ones written in minute font, only to quickly click on the ‘Agree’ button at the end so you can get to the next step — downloading software, opening up a social media account, adding a new app to your phone or computer — those signify your written consent to having your activities monitored, recorded and shared,” Whitehead said....
CONTINUE HERE:
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/homeland-security-share-biometric-databanks-foreign-countries/
#digitalID #WEF #surveillance #DHS #dictatorship #totalitarianism #capital #polecon
Children's Health Defense
‘Beyond Chilling’: Homeland Security Seeks to Share Biometric Databanks With Foreign Countries
“The ramifications of a government — any government — having this much unregulated, unaccountable power to target, track, round up and detain its citizens is beyond chilling,” John Whitehead, attorney and author told The Defender.
❤1👍1😱1
Forwarded from European Insider
🇳🇱 After vowing 'stronger' protests last Friday, Dutch farmers have unveiled plans to disrupt the famed Vuelta a España bicycle race on 20 August, which this year will start in the city of Utrecht, Netherlands.
"We want to demonstrate along the course with flags and banners and a huge line of tractors, trucks and aerial platforms."
🌍 @European_Insider | 🕊 Retweet
"We want to demonstrate along the course with flags and banners and a huge line of tractors, trucks and aerial platforms."
🌍 @European_Insider | 🕊 Retweet
Lithium extraction [for electric cars] inevitably harms the soil and causes air contamination.
"According to a report by Friends of the Earth (FoE), lithium extraction inevitably harms the soil and causes air contamination. As demand rises, the mining impacts are “increasingly affecting communities where this harmful extraction takes place, jeopardising their access to water,” says the report."
https://www.euronews.com/green/2022/02/01/south-america-s-lithium-fields-reveal-the-dark-side-of-our-electric-future
"According to a report by Friends of the Earth (FoE), lithium extraction inevitably harms the soil and causes air contamination. As demand rises, the mining impacts are “increasingly affecting communities where this harmful extraction takes place, jeopardising their access to water,” says the report."
https://www.euronews.com/green/2022/02/01/south-america-s-lithium-fields-reveal-the-dark-side-of-our-electric-future
euronews
South America's 'lithium fields' reveal the dark side of electric cars
Demand for lithium-ion batteries is unprecedented - but is mining the chemical harmful to the environment?
Scotland cut down 14 million trees to make way for wind turbines
"The tree removal seems especially ironic given that world leaders supposedly agreed to end deforestation by 2030 at the recent COP26 climate summit in Glasgow, Scotland."
https://www.cfact.org/2021/11/22/scotland-cut-down-14-million-trees-to-make-way-for-wind-power/
"The tree removal seems especially ironic given that world leaders supposedly agreed to end deforestation by 2030 at the recent COP26 climate summit in Glasgow, Scotland."
https://www.cfact.org/2021/11/22/scotland-cut-down-14-million-trees-to-make-way-for-wind-power/
CFACT
Scotland cut down 14 million trees to make way for wind turbines
Scotland, site of the recent United Nations 26th Conference of the Parties (COP26) climate summit, has cut down 14 million trees to make room for new wind power installations.
As reported in The Herald, the tree removal was for 21 wind turbine projects.…
As reported in The Herald, the tree removal was for 21 wind turbine projects.…
Where Psyops Collide
"Russia’s war effort is currently financed by the ‘west’ which pays for it through record energy prices created by its own sanctions on Russia.
If the ‘west’ really wants to deprive Russia of money it must immediately lift the sanctions and restart importing oil, gas and coal from Russia at then much lower prices."
https://www.lewrockwell.com/2022/08/no_author/how-ukraine-lost-its-riches/
"Russia’s war effort is currently financed by the ‘west’ which pays for it through record energy prices created by its own sanctions on Russia.
If the ‘west’ really wants to deprive Russia of money it must immediately lift the sanctions and restart importing oil, gas and coal from Russia at then much lower prices."
https://www.lewrockwell.com/2022/08/no_author/how-ukraine-lost-its-riches/
LewRockwell
How Ukraine Lost Its Riches - LewRockwell
On February 24, the day Russian troops crossed the borders to Ukraine, I wrote about the potential end state of the operation: Looking at this map I believe that the most advantageous end state for Russia would be the creation of a new independent country…
More Vaccines Lead to More COVID-19 Infections
"This study demonstrates exactly how the repeat vaccinations are causing people to be more susceptible to COVID-19. Initial doses of the vaccine brought about classic inflammatory immune responses. Inflammation is a fundamental part of an immune response (to a vaccine or to an infection), and is responsible for most of what you feel when you are sick: fever, aches, lethargy, etc. This inflammation is why you may feel sick if you get a flu shot, and why the COVID-19 vaccine has become famous for making people feel so sick for a few days. Your body is producing an inflammatory response to the COVID-19 proteins.
But what happens in the body after you have had two vaccines and then you are given a third? The scientists found that successive doses of the mRNA vaccines start to habituate or desensitize the subjects to the COVID-19 proteins, migrating their immune response over to being dominated by the IgG4 form, which essentially teaches the body to tolerate the proteins.
The participants’ response to COVID-19 had actually been turned off, making them even more vulnerable to infection and less likely to mount a response to it than those who had never been vaccinated."
https://www.theepochtimes.com/new-science-shows-vaccines-help-omicron-spread-peer-reviewed-study_4645812.html
"This study demonstrates exactly how the repeat vaccinations are causing people to be more susceptible to COVID-19. Initial doses of the vaccine brought about classic inflammatory immune responses. Inflammation is a fundamental part of an immune response (to a vaccine or to an infection), and is responsible for most of what you feel when you are sick: fever, aches, lethargy, etc. This inflammation is why you may feel sick if you get a flu shot, and why the COVID-19 vaccine has become famous for making people feel so sick for a few days. Your body is producing an inflammatory response to the COVID-19 proteins.
But what happens in the body after you have had two vaccines and then you are given a third? The scientists found that successive doses of the mRNA vaccines start to habituate or desensitize the subjects to the COVID-19 proteins, migrating their immune response over to being dominated by the IgG4 form, which essentially teaches the body to tolerate the proteins.
The participants’ response to COVID-19 had actually been turned off, making them even more vulnerable to infection and less likely to mount a response to it than those who had never been vaccinated."
https://www.theepochtimes.com/new-science-shows-vaccines-help-omicron-spread-peer-reviewed-study_4645812.html
The Epoch Times
New Science Shows Vaccines Help Omicron Spread: Peer-Reviewed Study
From my friend in New York. She’s particularly peeved to learn that money is being used to bribe people to get the COVID jabs.
In this article, a woman doing community outreach looks orthodox but isn’t. The organisation she’s apparently part of is “As Jewish as a ham sandwich”.
I wonder whether she & people like her know what the safety profile of these injections is like?
She probably doesn’t know that, since there are good treatments for whatever this illness is, nobody need risk the adverse effects.
Please do not call them “side effects”. They’re front-on, main-feature, designed-in, intended effects. Since they don’t help in any way, the harmful effects observed are the aim.
It’s ghastly once you know this.
An ultra orthodox rabbi asks “How can we build trust in the medical system & the community when there’s $100 in it for both parties? If I offered this, it would be Medicare fraud”.
The woman begins to attempt to explain it, before stopping & saying “it’s a lot of money, it’s almost like a bribe”, and is then cut off by the rabbi, speaking bluntly, “It is a bribe”.
Why not walk around, poisoning people you persuade to stop & talk with you, because you look friendly & look like you belong?
There’s a special place in hell for such people.
Best wishes
Mike
https://americasfrontlinenews.com/post/report-baltimore-jewish-community-injection-campaign-administered-by-george-soros
In this article, a woman doing community outreach looks orthodox but isn’t. The organisation she’s apparently part of is “As Jewish as a ham sandwich”.
I wonder whether she & people like her know what the safety profile of these injections is like?
She probably doesn’t know that, since there are good treatments for whatever this illness is, nobody need risk the adverse effects.
Please do not call them “side effects”. They’re front-on, main-feature, designed-in, intended effects. Since they don’t help in any way, the harmful effects observed are the aim.
It’s ghastly once you know this.
An ultra orthodox rabbi asks “How can we build trust in the medical system & the community when there’s $100 in it for both parties? If I offered this, it would be Medicare fraud”.
The woman begins to attempt to explain it, before stopping & saying “it’s a lot of money, it’s almost like a bribe”, and is then cut off by the rabbi, speaking bluntly, “It is a bribe”.
Why not walk around, poisoning people you persuade to stop & talk with you, because you look friendly & look like you belong?
There’s a special place in hell for such people.
Best wishes
Mike
https://americasfrontlinenews.com/post/report-baltimore-jewish-community-injection-campaign-administered-by-george-soros
Frontline News
Report: Baltimore Jewish community injection campaign administered by George Soros | Frontline News
'Over time, when you keep saying the message over and over again, eventually they do start agreeing'
⭐️Today, someone said that when they told a community leader who promoted covid shots about resultant deaths and injuries in the community, the response was that the rate of death is low and the shots “likely saved many more lives from covid.”
The person wondered what to answer the community leader. Since this surely comes up frequently for other people, I hope this information can help:
1) You must know that the true amount of vax-caused death and injury is actually much, much greater than the few you are currently aware of in your community. Many people are suffering quietly, and the long term is likely to be even worse G-d forbid, as we are aware of many healthy-looking people suddenly dying months later, or coming out with severe problems even a year later.
The covid shots greatly *increase* ALL CAUSE mortality, and this is well documented.
Data from England and other countries show clearly that the all cause mortality is much HIGHER among covid vaxxed individuals.
*The “proof is in the pudding”*- check the death and disability rates in 2021, the year of the vax, as opposed to 2020, the year of covid, right here in the US. By all available data, there has been a HUGE surge in illness, disability, and death since the vax rollout.
-Life insurance companies report approximately 150% increase in death claims among 18-64 year olds.
Example of one of the companies reporting the increase, Lincoln National:
2019 payouts $500 million
2020 payouts $548 million
2021 payouts $1.4 BILLION
Prudential, Northwestern Mutual, and One America Life have similar reports.
- Casket manufacturers report unprecedented surge in orders recently, including 2 *never-before bulk orders of child-size caskets*.
-The FRED disability data surged unprecedentedly.
-Cancer cases have exploded and cancer centers don’t have capacity to treat all. RCCS says calls for help have *tripled*. We are way beyond the time frame where it can be attributed to undetected early cases not noticed because of 2020 lockdown.
2) Even in terms of the shot saving lives “from covid”, that’s also blatantly untrue. The true data about COVID hospitalization and death of vaxxed compared to unvaxxed from England, Israel, etc (where the data has been more transparent than in the US) clearly shows the shot does NOT prevent hospitalization or death from covid, and actually *increases* the risks of catching covid and *dying* from covid. (The reason that the opposite was widely believed to be true in the US was because of a fraud, in which patients entering many hospitals were listed in the system as having “unknown” vax status - even if they had their vax card with them - unless they had gotten the shot within that very same medical system. The “unknown” status would then translate to “unvaccinated”, falsely convincing even the hospital doctors that it was the unvaccinated who were filling up hospitals. It took a long time for this trick to be figured out.)
3) Since there are safe and effective covid treatments, ANY death or injury by this shot is a completely unnecessary one, and classified as murder.
Absolutely it is. Any dancing around the statistics fails to recognise the terrible force of bullet 3 above.
NOBODY NEEDS TO TAKE A RISK TO HELP THEMSELVES & OTHERS. It’s all risk & no benefit whatsoever. Normally, with a medical treatment, you know nothing’s guaranteed, but you expect the chance of benefit massively outweighs the risk of harms. If you’ve an infection that is progressing & could become life threatening if not stopped, you’ll take the risk of, for example, developing C diff. superinfection in exchange for a high probability of the desired effect. But if it’s all risk & no possibility of upside, I don’t care what it says on the package. It’s attempted murder & needs to be treated as such. Those doing the injections, especially senior medical staff insisting on exacting policy, need to be told that’s what they are, murderers. Not “only following orders”.
Best wishes
Mike
The person wondered what to answer the community leader. Since this surely comes up frequently for other people, I hope this information can help:
1) You must know that the true amount of vax-caused death and injury is actually much, much greater than the few you are currently aware of in your community. Many people are suffering quietly, and the long term is likely to be even worse G-d forbid, as we are aware of many healthy-looking people suddenly dying months later, or coming out with severe problems even a year later.
The covid shots greatly *increase* ALL CAUSE mortality, and this is well documented.
Data from England and other countries show clearly that the all cause mortality is much HIGHER among covid vaxxed individuals.
*The “proof is in the pudding”*- check the death and disability rates in 2021, the year of the vax, as opposed to 2020, the year of covid, right here in the US. By all available data, there has been a HUGE surge in illness, disability, and death since the vax rollout.
-Life insurance companies report approximately 150% increase in death claims among 18-64 year olds.
Example of one of the companies reporting the increase, Lincoln National:
2019 payouts $500 million
2020 payouts $548 million
2021 payouts $1.4 BILLION
Prudential, Northwestern Mutual, and One America Life have similar reports.
- Casket manufacturers report unprecedented surge in orders recently, including 2 *never-before bulk orders of child-size caskets*.
-The FRED disability data surged unprecedentedly.
-Cancer cases have exploded and cancer centers don’t have capacity to treat all. RCCS says calls for help have *tripled*. We are way beyond the time frame where it can be attributed to undetected early cases not noticed because of 2020 lockdown.
2) Even in terms of the shot saving lives “from covid”, that’s also blatantly untrue. The true data about COVID hospitalization and death of vaxxed compared to unvaxxed from England, Israel, etc (where the data has been more transparent than in the US) clearly shows the shot does NOT prevent hospitalization or death from covid, and actually *increases* the risks of catching covid and *dying* from covid. (The reason that the opposite was widely believed to be true in the US was because of a fraud, in which patients entering many hospitals were listed in the system as having “unknown” vax status - even if they had their vax card with them - unless they had gotten the shot within that very same medical system. The “unknown” status would then translate to “unvaccinated”, falsely convincing even the hospital doctors that it was the unvaccinated who were filling up hospitals. It took a long time for this trick to be figured out.)
3) Since there are safe and effective covid treatments, ANY death or injury by this shot is a completely unnecessary one, and classified as murder.
Absolutely it is. Any dancing around the statistics fails to recognise the terrible force of bullet 3 above.
NOBODY NEEDS TO TAKE A RISK TO HELP THEMSELVES & OTHERS. It’s all risk & no benefit whatsoever. Normally, with a medical treatment, you know nothing’s guaranteed, but you expect the chance of benefit massively outweighs the risk of harms. If you’ve an infection that is progressing & could become life threatening if not stopped, you’ll take the risk of, for example, developing C diff. superinfection in exchange for a high probability of the desired effect. But if it’s all risk & no possibility of upside, I don’t care what it says on the package. It’s attempted murder & needs to be treated as such. Those doing the injections, especially senior medical staff insisting on exacting policy, need to be told that’s what they are, murderers. Not “only following orders”.
Best wishes
Mike
❤1
https://voxday.net/2022/08/11/depopulation-vectors/
I wish to point out that, after making myself unpopular with the fraudsters in UK about the untrustworthy nature of PCR being used for clinical diagnostics, I went public, with Wolfgang Wodarg, in pointing out a potential, yet unexplored risk of adverse effects on reproduction by precisely the method A Midwestern Doctor reviews in this piece.
Now, I didn’t know about any of that history of ‘elites’ attempting population control through trying to induce autoimmune responses by injections.
Best wishes
Mike
I wish to point out that, after making myself unpopular with the fraudsters in UK about the untrustworthy nature of PCR being used for clinical diagnostics, I went public, with Wolfgang Wodarg, in pointing out a potential, yet unexplored risk of adverse effects on reproduction by precisely the method A Midwestern Doctor reviews in this piece.
Now, I didn’t know about any of that history of ‘elites’ attempting population control through trying to induce autoimmune responses by injections.
Best wishes
Mike
Depopulation Vectors
"A Midwestern doctor explains that the Covid vaxxes are far from the first global depopulationist assault on human fertility by the pharma-medical complex, they are merely the most effective:"
https://voxday.net/2022/08/11/depopulation-vectors/
"A Midwestern doctor explains that the Covid vaxxes are far from the first global depopulationist assault on human fertility by the pharma-medical complex, they are merely the most effective:"
https://voxday.net/2022/08/11/depopulation-vectors/
Vox Popoli
Depopulation Vectors - Vox Popoli
A Midwestern doctor explains that the Covid vaxxes are far from the first global depopulationist assault on human fertility by the pharma-medical complex, they are merely the most effective: We are all the prey now. As there is no good way to go about population…
https://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2021/07/05/time-to-assume-that-health-research-is-fraudulent-until-proved-otherwise/
This is very good. I think the title is OTT, but appropriately draws attention to the severe risk of fraud, which I’m certain is already a significant minority of research.
This is one of several reasons why I will never work again in applied biomedical R&D. The very stuff I need to trust in order to advise clients is no longer automatically to be trusted. Without that raw material, the whole basis of the post-Enlightenment scientific method is poisoned.
So if anything you mention is countered by peer reviewed journal articles (or doubted, because of their absence), tell them about this. Scientists are not more resistant to incentives to cheat than anyone else & its naive to imagine they are. Yet there are no formal audit methods, processes of training & nobody is building that essential capability.
Best wishes
Mike
This is very good. I think the title is OTT, but appropriately draws attention to the severe risk of fraud, which I’m certain is already a significant minority of research.
This is one of several reasons why I will never work again in applied biomedical R&D. The very stuff I need to trust in order to advise clients is no longer automatically to be trusted. Without that raw material, the whole basis of the post-Enlightenment scientific method is poisoned.
So if anything you mention is countered by peer reviewed journal articles (or doubted, because of their absence), tell them about this. Scientists are not more resistant to incentives to cheat than anyone else & its naive to imagine they are. Yet there are no formal audit methods, processes of training & nobody is building that essential capability.
Best wishes
Mike
The BMJ
Time to assume that health research is fraudulent until proven otherwise? - The BMJ
Health research is based on trust. Health professionals and journal editors reading the results of a clinical trial assume that the trial happened and that the results were honestly reported. [...]More...
Time to assume that health research is fraudulent until proven otherwise?
"Health professionals and journal editors reading the results of a clinical trial assume that the trial happened and that the results were honestly reported. But about 20% of the time, said Ben Mol, professor of obstetrics and gynaecology at Monash Health, they would be wrong. As I’ve been concerned about research fraud for 40 years, I wasn’t that surprised as many would be by this figure, but it led me to think that the time may have come to stop assuming that research actually happened and is honestly reported, and assume that the research is fraudulent until there is some evidence to support it having happened and been honestly reported. The Cochrane Collaboration, which purveys “trusted information,” has now taken a step in that direction.
Stephen Lock, my predecessor as editor of The BMJ, became worried about research fraud in the 1980s, but people thought his concerns eccentric. Research authorities insisted that fraud was rare, didn’t matter because science was self-correcting, and that no patients had suffered because of scientific fraud. All those reasons for not taking research fraud seriously have proved to be false, and, 40 years on from Lock’s concerns, we are realising that the problem is huge, the system encourages fraud, and we have no adequate way to respond. It may be time to move from assuming that research has been honestly conducted and reported to assuming it to be untrustworthy until there is some evidence to the contrary."
https://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2021/07/05/time-to-assume-that-health-research-is-fraudulent-until-proved-otherwise/
"Health professionals and journal editors reading the results of a clinical trial assume that the trial happened and that the results were honestly reported. But about 20% of the time, said Ben Mol, professor of obstetrics and gynaecology at Monash Health, they would be wrong. As I’ve been concerned about research fraud for 40 years, I wasn’t that surprised as many would be by this figure, but it led me to think that the time may have come to stop assuming that research actually happened and is honestly reported, and assume that the research is fraudulent until there is some evidence to support it having happened and been honestly reported. The Cochrane Collaboration, which purveys “trusted information,” has now taken a step in that direction.
Stephen Lock, my predecessor as editor of The BMJ, became worried about research fraud in the 1980s, but people thought his concerns eccentric. Research authorities insisted that fraud was rare, didn’t matter because science was self-correcting, and that no patients had suffered because of scientific fraud. All those reasons for not taking research fraud seriously have proved to be false, and, 40 years on from Lock’s concerns, we are realising that the problem is huge, the system encourages fraud, and we have no adequate way to respond. It may be time to move from assuming that research has been honestly conducted and reported to assuming it to be untrustworthy until there is some evidence to the contrary."
https://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2021/07/05/time-to-assume-that-health-research-is-fraudulent-until-proved-otherwise/
The BMJ
Time to assume that health research is fraudulent until proven otherwise? - The BMJ
Health research is based on trust. Health professionals and journal editors reading the results of a clinical trial assume that the trial happened and that the results were honestly reported. [...]More...
👍1
Forwarded from Pepe Escobar
Glazyev hits the heart of the matter:
"Zelensky, at the direction of Washington, is blackmailing the Russian leadership by shelling Zaporozhye nuclear power plant. The essence of blackmail was expressed by the G7 foreign ministers, who demanded that Russia return this nuclear power plant to Nazi control.”
“In fact, this is nuclear terrorism on the part of US & satellites. The essence of this blackmail is: either you hand over Energodar to the puppet regime, or it blows up a nuclear power plant with catastrophic environmental consequences for SE Europe including Ukraine.”
“What is this if not nuclear terrorism? And, judging by the real shelling of the Zaporozhye NPP from American guns controlled by the Pentagon, this terrorism is moving into the category of crimes against humanity. This is how it should be said at UN Security Council.”
"Zelensky, at the direction of Washington, is blackmailing the Russian leadership by shelling Zaporozhye nuclear power plant. The essence of blackmail was expressed by the G7 foreign ministers, who demanded that Russia return this nuclear power plant to Nazi control.”
“In fact, this is nuclear terrorism on the part of US & satellites. The essence of this blackmail is: either you hand over Energodar to the puppet regime, or it blows up a nuclear power plant with catastrophic environmental consequences for SE Europe including Ukraine.”
“What is this if not nuclear terrorism? And, judging by the real shelling of the Zaporozhye NPP from American guns controlled by the Pentagon, this terrorism is moving into the category of crimes against humanity. This is how it should be said at UN Security Council.”
https://jessicar.substack.com/p/is-the-spike-protein-acting-as-a
A long & complex article. Worth ploughing through, to get the idea.
I agree completely with Jessica’s remark about the complexity of biological systems.
Those talking about remote control are talking out of their a****. You can’t begin a rational intervention without first having an in-depth understanding of that which you intend to control. We don’t have it, not faintly.
It’ll be the usual methods, fear, nightsticks, dogs, guns. Oldies but goldies, if you’re a dictator. PsyOps for the most part. Biology, nope. We’ve far too little idea of how to intervene without messing things up. Especially if you sprint.
Best wishes
Mike
A long & complex article. Worth ploughing through, to get the idea.
I agree completely with Jessica’s remark about the complexity of biological systems.
Those talking about remote control are talking out of their a****. You can’t begin a rational intervention without first having an in-depth understanding of that which you intend to control. We don’t have it, not faintly.
It’ll be the usual methods, fear, nightsticks, dogs, guns. Oldies but goldies, if you’re a dictator. PsyOps for the most part. Biology, nope. We’ve far too little idea of how to intervene without messing things up. Especially if you sprint.
Best wishes
Mike
Forwarded from Ehden's Channel
Struggling to pay 𝐄𝐍𝐄𝐑𝐆𝐘 𝐁𝐢𝐥𝐥𝐬?⚡️💷
🧵 / THREAD
@MartinSLewis has given really helpful💡Advice & ⚠️Warning 👇🏽
#EnergyPrices #CostofLiving #EnergyBills #Help https://t.co/fpfWj6nhWY
DO NOT refuse to pay your energy bill in October. Below is how you can make a stand and hurt your energy supplier without getting into debt/damaging your credit rating:
1. Cancel your DD & pay for what you use each month.
2. You then need to 📝 of complaint to your supplier
Once that complaint had been raised, your energy supplier can't take any debt collection work on your account, so they can't pass your details to the credit reference agencies etc. That bill gets put on hold whilst they try to resolve your complaint.
𝐑𝐄𝐀𝐋𝐋𝐘 𝐈𝐌𝐏𝐎𝐑𝐓𝐀𝐍𝐓 ⚠️💯👇🏽
The energy company might offer you a small reduction - DON'T accept it. Keep the complaint open & hold strong.
3. In time, they will send you a letter of 'Deadlock'. A letter of Deadlock is a letter that is sent to you from your energy company saying they gone as far as they can with your complaint & can't go any further, so your only option now is to take it up with the energy Ombudsman.
This bit is pretty good:
For every complaint the Ombudsman receives, they charge your energy supplier £500 for every claim they have to investigate.
4. The energy companies also have limitations on how many complaints they're allowed open as well as a turnaround time of how fast they have to respond to a complaint & get a complaint closed....
If they don't respond to them fast enough & don't resolve the complaints or they have too many complaints open, the energy firm will also get hit with a fine from the Ombudsman.
*𝐓𝐡𝐢𝐬 𝐢𝐬 𝐡𝐨𝐰 𝐲𝐨𝐮 𝐡𝐮𝐫𝐭 𝐚𝐧 𝐞𝐧𝐞𝐫𝐠𝐲 𝐜𝐨𝐦𝐩𝐚𝐧𝐲!*… Not to mention:
This will also put them in breach of their licensing conditions AND put their ability to trade at risk!
I hope this is helping so far?
3 VITAL ACTIONS THEN:
So if you want to fight these extortionate price hikes:
1. Raise complaints
2. Do NOT close them
3. Take them to the Ombudsman
You can also submit a “subject access request” (SAR), at the same time as the above.
What this does/mean:
The energy company has a legal obligation to provide you with every piece of information they have on you; inc ☎️ conversation transcripts, past bills, etc! This is time consuming for them to collect & is a huge hassle for them however they legally have only one month to comply…
⚠️ Edit: the accompanying graphic contains a quote from Martin Lewis. This was taken from an article by Tyla. The written content of this post was taken from a commentator on the Tyla article. I thought others would find it useful so I made this post public. ⚠️
🧵 / THREAD
@MartinSLewis has given really helpful💡Advice & ⚠️Warning 👇🏽
#EnergyPrices #CostofLiving #EnergyBills #Help https://t.co/fpfWj6nhWY
DO NOT refuse to pay your energy bill in October. Below is how you can make a stand and hurt your energy supplier without getting into debt/damaging your credit rating:
1. Cancel your DD & pay for what you use each month.
2. You then need to 📝 of complaint to your supplier
Once that complaint had been raised, your energy supplier can't take any debt collection work on your account, so they can't pass your details to the credit reference agencies etc. That bill gets put on hold whilst they try to resolve your complaint.
𝐑𝐄𝐀𝐋𝐋𝐘 𝐈𝐌𝐏𝐎𝐑𝐓𝐀𝐍𝐓 ⚠️💯👇🏽
The energy company might offer you a small reduction - DON'T accept it. Keep the complaint open & hold strong.
3. In time, they will send you a letter of 'Deadlock'. A letter of Deadlock is a letter that is sent to you from your energy company saying they gone as far as they can with your complaint & can't go any further, so your only option now is to take it up with the energy Ombudsman.
This bit is pretty good:
For every complaint the Ombudsman receives, they charge your energy supplier £500 for every claim they have to investigate.
4. The energy companies also have limitations on how many complaints they're allowed open as well as a turnaround time of how fast they have to respond to a complaint & get a complaint closed....
If they don't respond to them fast enough & don't resolve the complaints or they have too many complaints open, the energy firm will also get hit with a fine from the Ombudsman.
*𝐓𝐡𝐢𝐬 𝐢𝐬 𝐡𝐨𝐰 𝐲𝐨𝐮 𝐡𝐮𝐫𝐭 𝐚𝐧 𝐞𝐧𝐞𝐫𝐠𝐲 𝐜𝐨𝐦𝐩𝐚𝐧𝐲!*… Not to mention:
This will also put them in breach of their licensing conditions AND put their ability to trade at risk!
I hope this is helping so far?
3 VITAL ACTIONS THEN:
So if you want to fight these extortionate price hikes:
1. Raise complaints
2. Do NOT close them
3. Take them to the Ombudsman
You can also submit a “subject access request” (SAR), at the same time as the above.
What this does/mean:
The energy company has a legal obligation to provide you with every piece of information they have on you; inc ☎️ conversation transcripts, past bills, etc! This is time consuming for them to collect & is a huge hassle for them however they legally have only one month to comply…
⚠️ Edit: the accompanying graphic contains a quote from Martin Lewis. This was taken from an article by Tyla. The written content of this post was taken from a commentator on the Tyla article. I thought others would find it useful so I made this post public. ⚠️
Not for beginners, but defies explanation unless you accept the 1992 & 2012 Olympic Games opening ceremonies are part of the long run planning for the covid19 mediated take-down of the modern world.
Your call.
I don’t use this stuff. It’s bad enough trying to explain the objective evidence.
Best wishes
Mike
https://lionessofjudah.substack.com/p/the-corona-end-game-addendum
Your call.
I don’t use this stuff. It’s bad enough trying to explain the objective evidence.
Best wishes
Mike
https://lionessofjudah.substack.com/p/the-corona-end-game-addendum
Substack
The Corona End Game. Addendum
The Olympic Rituals of 1992/2012 "Predicted" The Corona Operation
You’ll know I believe that the covid19 “pandemic” is wholly contrived, that so was the 2009 Swine Flu “pandemic” (who’s main purpose was the do the final roadtest of PCR mass testing) & that serious global warming is a fraud.
Turns out the water shortages are not so much fraud as deliberate, long term government policy.
Here’s the evidence from ten years ago.
Please share. People don’t believe things, even when you can show them black & white in front of them.
Best wishes
Mike
Keeping the country short of water is now government – and EU – policy
"If the people of Britain, not least the 20 million in the South East still under a hosepipe ban, were aware that this was being brought about by a quite deliberate policy, backed by the crackpot projections of our climate change-obsessed Met Office, they would be very angry indeed."
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/9261122/Keeping-the-country-short-of-water-is-now-government-and-EU-policy.html?s=09
Turns out the water shortages are not so much fraud as deliberate, long term government policy.
Here’s the evidence from ten years ago.
Please share. People don’t believe things, even when you can show them black & white in front of them.
Best wishes
Mike
Keeping the country short of water is now government – and EU – policy
"If the people of Britain, not least the 20 million in the South East still under a hosepipe ban, were aware that this was being brought about by a quite deliberate policy, backed by the crackpot projections of our climate change-obsessed Met Office, they would be very angry indeed."
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/9261122/Keeping-the-country-short-of-water-is-now-government-and-EU-policy.html?s=09