https://youtu.be/YFR5EtO_zdM
A long watch at 1.5h but it’s said to be a complete treatment of the topic!
Best wishes
Mike
A long watch at 1.5h but it’s said to be a complete treatment of the topic!
Best wishes
Mike
YouTube
Resonance Beings of Frequency documentary film
A well-researched, well-made, deeply disturbing documentary.
From the source description:
(Full Film) RESONANCE ➜ This James Russell film is a Sensational Eye Opening Documentary that examines 60 years of scientific research! ➜ Join the FACEBOOK page ht…
From the source description:
(Full Film) RESONANCE ➜ This James Russell film is a Sensational Eye Opening Documentary that examines 60 years of scientific research! ➜ Join the FACEBOOK page ht…
If you’ve not heard of Denis Rancourt, you may find this an interesting read.
More recently, he published a very detailed article claiming that there’d not been a pandemic.
Best wishes
Mike
NOT THE GREATEST POTENTIAL THREAT TO HUMANITY
Global warming is often presented as the greatest potential threat to humankind and as the greatest environmental and ecological threat on the planet. It is also presented as a problem that could be solved or contained by determined international collaboration - by political will if it were present.
"I argue: (1) that global warming (climate change, climate chaos, etc.) will not become humankind’s greatest threat until the sun has its next hiccup in a billion years or more (in the very unlikely scenario that we are still around), (2) that global warming is presently nowhere near being the planet’s most deadly environmental scourge, and (3) that government action and political will cannot measurably or significantly ameliorate global climate in the present world.
I also advance that there are strong societal, institutional, and psychological motivations for having constructed and for continuing to maintain the myth of a global warming dominant threat (global warming myth, for short). I describe these motivations in terms of the workings of the scientific profession and of the global corporate and finance network and its government shadows.
I argue that by far the most destructive force on the planet is power-driven financiers and profit-driven corporations and their cartels backed by military might; and that the global warming myth is a red herring that contributes to hiding this truth. In my opinion, activists who, using any justification, feed the global warming myth have effectively been co-opted, or at best neutralized."
http://activistteacher.blogspot.com/2007/02/global-warming-truth-or-dare.html
Channel: @robinmg
More recently, he published a very detailed article claiming that there’d not been a pandemic.
Best wishes
Mike
NOT THE GREATEST POTENTIAL THREAT TO HUMANITY
Global warming is often presented as the greatest potential threat to humankind and as the greatest environmental and ecological threat on the planet. It is also presented as a problem that could be solved or contained by determined international collaboration - by political will if it were present.
"I argue: (1) that global warming (climate change, climate chaos, etc.) will not become humankind’s greatest threat until the sun has its next hiccup in a billion years or more (in the very unlikely scenario that we are still around), (2) that global warming is presently nowhere near being the planet’s most deadly environmental scourge, and (3) that government action and political will cannot measurably or significantly ameliorate global climate in the present world.
I also advance that there are strong societal, institutional, and psychological motivations for having constructed and for continuing to maintain the myth of a global warming dominant threat (global warming myth, for short). I describe these motivations in terms of the workings of the scientific profession and of the global corporate and finance network and its government shadows.
I argue that by far the most destructive force on the planet is power-driven financiers and profit-driven corporations and their cartels backed by military might; and that the global warming myth is a red herring that contributes to hiding this truth. In my opinion, activists who, using any justification, feed the global warming myth have effectively been co-opted, or at best neutralized."
http://activistteacher.blogspot.com/2007/02/global-warming-truth-or-dare.html
Channel: @robinmg
Blogspot
Global Warming: Truth or Dare?
This article was reviewed on YaYaCanada before it was published. It was also reviewed in the April 2007 issue of The Dominion magazine (...
Standing with the UK means standing against Johnson
Standing with the US means standing against Biden
Standing with Germany means standing against Scholz
Standing with France means standing against Macron
Standing with Italy means standing against Draghi
Standing with Canada means standing against Trudeau
And:
Standing with Ukraine means standing against Zelensky
Why is this difficult to understand..?
Standing with the US means standing against Biden
Standing with Germany means standing against Scholz
Standing with France means standing against Macron
Standing with Italy means standing against Draghi
Standing with Canada means standing against Trudeau
And:
Standing with Ukraine means standing against Zelensky
Why is this difficult to understand..?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g1lYTuOhaBQ
CALL TO ACTION: EMAILING RELEVANT BODIES TO CEASE ROLL-OUT ‘OFFER’ OF CHILD VACCINES
We have a very important Call to Action today.
We are asking all signatories to email the relevant regulators as well as Health Secretary Sajid Javid and also Boris Johnson to ask them to stop to the roll-out of covid vaccines to 5-11 year olds.
Please watch the brief video above for clear instructions.
copy and paste the following email addresses in the ‘To' field in your email:
info@mhra.gov.uk, specialpopulationsunit@mhra.gov.uk, pharmacovigilanceservice@mhra.gov.uk, jcvi@phe.gov.uk, enquiries@ukhsa.gov.uk, Complaints1@ukhsa.gov.uk sajid.javid.mp@parliament.uk, boris.johnson.mp@parliament.uk
Copy and paste the following text into the body of the email:
To:
MHRA
UKHSA
JCVI
Sajid Javid
No. 10 Downing Street.
I am writing following the announcement of the policy ‘offer’ to vaccinate children aged 5-11 with the covid vaccines.
There is no justifiable case for this. For this cohort, it represents only risk with no possible benefit. Children of this age do not need to be vaccinated against covid as the disease carries an overall statistically zero risk to them.
There is no long-term safety data attached to these injections. To use them on young children, with so many life years ahead, is medical and policy recklessness. In allowing this to proceed, you are all failing in your duties as regulators and those in charge of public health.
There are already very worrying signals in the short and medium term data (e.g. incidence of myocarditis, particularly in young boys).
We urge you to cease this roll-out with immediate effect. Please refer to this series of Open Letters for further details of the concerns raised by many highly qualified healthcare professionals:
Open Letter: To all members of the FDA Vaccines Committee, re: Re: Pfizer Covid-19 mRNA vaccine EUA application for children aged 6 months to 4 years, returning to FDA in April
Open Letter: Open Letter from the Children’s Covid Vaccines Advisory Group (CCVAG) to the JCVI: Pause vaccines for children pending urgent review
Open Letter: Open Letter to the MHRA Regarding Child Death Data
I would like a response to this email please at your earliest convenience.
I would like to take this moment to remind you that you are all public servants and your first professional duty is to the people you represent.
Kind regards,
{DON'T FORGET TO INSERT YOUR OWN NAME HERE}
ONCE SENT, PLEASE AMPLIFY ON SOCIAL MEDIA
@TogetherDeclaration
CALL TO ACTION: EMAILING RELEVANT BODIES TO CEASE ROLL-OUT ‘OFFER’ OF CHILD VACCINES
We have a very important Call to Action today.
We are asking all signatories to email the relevant regulators as well as Health Secretary Sajid Javid and also Boris Johnson to ask them to stop to the roll-out of covid vaccines to 5-11 year olds.
Please watch the brief video above for clear instructions.
copy and paste the following email addresses in the ‘To' field in your email:
info@mhra.gov.uk, specialpopulationsunit@mhra.gov.uk, pharmacovigilanceservice@mhra.gov.uk, jcvi@phe.gov.uk, enquiries@ukhsa.gov.uk, Complaints1@ukhsa.gov.uk sajid.javid.mp@parliament.uk, boris.johnson.mp@parliament.uk
Copy and paste the following text into the body of the email:
To:
MHRA
UKHSA
JCVI
Sajid Javid
No. 10 Downing Street.
I am writing following the announcement of the policy ‘offer’ to vaccinate children aged 5-11 with the covid vaccines.
There is no justifiable case for this. For this cohort, it represents only risk with no possible benefit. Children of this age do not need to be vaccinated against covid as the disease carries an overall statistically zero risk to them.
There is no long-term safety data attached to these injections. To use them on young children, with so many life years ahead, is medical and policy recklessness. In allowing this to proceed, you are all failing in your duties as regulators and those in charge of public health.
There are already very worrying signals in the short and medium term data (e.g. incidence of myocarditis, particularly in young boys).
We urge you to cease this roll-out with immediate effect. Please refer to this series of Open Letters for further details of the concerns raised by many highly qualified healthcare professionals:
Open Letter: To all members of the FDA Vaccines Committee, re: Re: Pfizer Covid-19 mRNA vaccine EUA application for children aged 6 months to 4 years, returning to FDA in April
Open Letter: Open Letter from the Children’s Covid Vaccines Advisory Group (CCVAG) to the JCVI: Pause vaccines for children pending urgent review
Open Letter: Open Letter to the MHRA Regarding Child Death Data
I would like a response to this email please at your earliest convenience.
I would like to take this moment to remind you that you are all public servants and your first professional duty is to the people you represent.
Kind regards,
{DON'T FORGET TO INSERT YOUR OWN NAME HERE}
ONCE SENT, PLEASE AMPLIFY ON SOCIAL MEDIA
@TogetherDeclaration
YouTube
CALL TO ACTION: CONTACT MHRA, JCVI, Sajid Javid, UKHSA and Boris Johnson - stop roll-out in 5-11
Azov, the neo-Nazis doing the West’s dirty work in Ukraine
"But by far the most disingenuous example of today’s Nazi denial is Facebook. After years of demonising President Donald Trump’s supporters as ‘far Right’ and censoring criticism of woke politics in the name of ‘hate speech’, having specifically declared Azov a ‘dangerous organisation’, banning it alongside the Ku Klux Klan and Isis, this social media platform performed a complete U-turn to become a cheerleader for Ukraine’s neo-Nazis. Anyone supporting these groups was (at least nominally) banished from its platform until last month when suddenly, and suspiciously, it began to allow users to praise the neo-Nazi Azov battalion as ‘defenders’ of Ukraine, giving some credence to the ‘horseshoe theory’.
Formed in May 2014, the Azov battalion originally consisted of the ultra-nationalist Patriot of Ukraine gang and the neo-Nazi Social National Assembly (SNA). Both groups are xenophobic and adhere to neo-Nazi ideals. Its members wear the neo-Nazi Wolfsangel symbol, a black swastika. Since the Ukrainian revolution in 2013 they have been fighting Russian separatists in the East.
The Simon Wiesenthal Center (SWC), which monitors global anti-Semitism, has described the Azov battalion as a neo-Nazi movement and a danger to Jews.
Azov is virulently racist too. During a football game at Kiev stadium in 2016, its activists beat up black Chelsea fans who had travelled to Ukraine to watch their team play.
Nor are these neo-Nazis overly fond of Muslims. In a display of gross xenophobia, Azov fighters were shown covering their bullets in pig fat to be used against Muslim Chechens fighting for Russia. The terrorist attack at a New Zealand mosque in 2019 was cheered on by Azov members.
In 2018, Human Rights Watch accused Ukraine’s authorities of not responding adequately to the growing number of violent attacks and threats promoting hate and discrimination the country by members of violent radical groups. Roma, LGBT people, feminists, and human rights activists were all targets.
Local authorities were reported to have recruited these neo-Nazis to patrol any marches protesting against such attacks on minority groups. The Ukrainian offices of Amnesty International and Freedom House were also attacked and threatened by far Right extremists. The police mainly ignored these acts of violence, refusing to arrest even those who claimed responsibility on Facebook.
Fast forward to March 2022 and reports that Azov has expanded to become part of Ukraine’s armed forces, a street militia and a political party, and involved in training civilians through military exercises in the run-up to Russia’s invasion and its emergence as the defender of Ukraine. In fact, Azov was officially integrated into the National Guard of Ukraine on November 12, 2014,and, as a battalion, the group has been fighting ever since on the front lines against pro-Russian separatists in Donetsk, the eastern region of Ukraine where ithas been accused of inflicting inhumane treatment on civilians, using them as human shields, and torturing prisoners in the Donbas region.
The Ukrainian government has both welcomed this neo-Nazi movement and ignored its violent attacks. Azov forms part of its armed forces and has been entrenched in Mariupol fighting Russian forces. The battalion trains civilians in military exercises and is installed in the country’s power structures.
Andriy Biletsky, a former Azov battalion commander, is an MP in Ukraine’s parliament, and leader of the ultra-nationalist National Corpus party, Azov’s civilian and political wing. In 2010, echoing Nazi Jew hatred, Biletsky declared that Ukraine’s mission was to ‘lead the white races of the world in a final crusade . . . against Semite-led Untermenschen [subhumans]’. Biletsky also leads the National Militia, part of the National Corpus. Founded in 2016, it has been responsible for violent attacks against migrants and students and demonises ethnic minorities and LGBT people.
"But by far the most disingenuous example of today’s Nazi denial is Facebook. After years of demonising President Donald Trump’s supporters as ‘far Right’ and censoring criticism of woke politics in the name of ‘hate speech’, having specifically declared Azov a ‘dangerous organisation’, banning it alongside the Ku Klux Klan and Isis, this social media platform performed a complete U-turn to become a cheerleader for Ukraine’s neo-Nazis. Anyone supporting these groups was (at least nominally) banished from its platform until last month when suddenly, and suspiciously, it began to allow users to praise the neo-Nazi Azov battalion as ‘defenders’ of Ukraine, giving some credence to the ‘horseshoe theory’.
Formed in May 2014, the Azov battalion originally consisted of the ultra-nationalist Patriot of Ukraine gang and the neo-Nazi Social National Assembly (SNA). Both groups are xenophobic and adhere to neo-Nazi ideals. Its members wear the neo-Nazi Wolfsangel symbol, a black swastika. Since the Ukrainian revolution in 2013 they have been fighting Russian separatists in the East.
The Simon Wiesenthal Center (SWC), which monitors global anti-Semitism, has described the Azov battalion as a neo-Nazi movement and a danger to Jews.
Azov is virulently racist too. During a football game at Kiev stadium in 2016, its activists beat up black Chelsea fans who had travelled to Ukraine to watch their team play.
Nor are these neo-Nazis overly fond of Muslims. In a display of gross xenophobia, Azov fighters were shown covering their bullets in pig fat to be used against Muslim Chechens fighting for Russia. The terrorist attack at a New Zealand mosque in 2019 was cheered on by Azov members.
In 2018, Human Rights Watch accused Ukraine’s authorities of not responding adequately to the growing number of violent attacks and threats promoting hate and discrimination the country by members of violent radical groups. Roma, LGBT people, feminists, and human rights activists were all targets.
Local authorities were reported to have recruited these neo-Nazis to patrol any marches protesting against such attacks on minority groups. The Ukrainian offices of Amnesty International and Freedom House were also attacked and threatened by far Right extremists. The police mainly ignored these acts of violence, refusing to arrest even those who claimed responsibility on Facebook.
Fast forward to March 2022 and reports that Azov has expanded to become part of Ukraine’s armed forces, a street militia and a political party, and involved in training civilians through military exercises in the run-up to Russia’s invasion and its emergence as the defender of Ukraine. In fact, Azov was officially integrated into the National Guard of Ukraine on November 12, 2014,and, as a battalion, the group has been fighting ever since on the front lines against pro-Russian separatists in Donetsk, the eastern region of Ukraine where ithas been accused of inflicting inhumane treatment on civilians, using them as human shields, and torturing prisoners in the Donbas region.
The Ukrainian government has both welcomed this neo-Nazi movement and ignored its violent attacks. Azov forms part of its armed forces and has been entrenched in Mariupol fighting Russian forces. The battalion trains civilians in military exercises and is installed in the country’s power structures.
Andriy Biletsky, a former Azov battalion commander, is an MP in Ukraine’s parliament, and leader of the ultra-nationalist National Corpus party, Azov’s civilian and political wing. In 2010, echoing Nazi Jew hatred, Biletsky declared that Ukraine’s mission was to ‘lead the white races of the world in a final crusade . . . against Semite-led Untermenschen [subhumans]’. Biletsky also leads the National Militia, part of the National Corpus. Founded in 2016, it has been responsible for violent attacks against migrants and students and demonises ethnic minorities and LGBT people.
Only four years ago, 600 of its members marched through Kiev wearing battle fatigues, threatening to use force to ‘clean up’ Ukraine.
Azov has been accused of being a magnet for foreign far Right ideologues and neo-Nazis. Since 2015, more than 17,000 have joined the battalion and many have been welcomed by Ukrainian authorities and given citizenship. Facebook, the main channel used by Azov for this recruitment, was exposed in an alarming investigation by Time magazine in 2021: ‘How a White-Supremacist Militia Used Facebook to Radicalize and Train New Members’. It tracks a link between Azov and terrorism in the US.
In 2016, under the leadership of President Barak Obama, the US Congress inexplicitly repealed its ban on funding Azov. This meant that the battalion could now legally receive American aid. The SWC accused the US of ignoring the glorification of Nazi collaborators, and Israeli politicians said that the first target of these neo-Nazis would be the Jewish community.
According to the Daily Beast, the US went one step further and started training parts of Azov, giving them $19million in 2017. It is ironic that Biden administration, once professing horror at the very idea of white supremacists, is now in effect supporting the neo-Nazis of Ukraine and silencing any objectors by labelling them ‘Putin sympathisers’.
This is a group that aims to take power in Europe, with the help of far Right coalitions. Thanks to Western governments and Facebook, it has unrivalled access to weapons and a peerless recruiting campaign. The world should be shuddering in horror at the thought that a violent, far Right, anti-Semitic neo-Nazi organisation in Eastern Europe is being given a free pass."
https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/azov-the-neo-nazis-doing-the-wests-dirty-work-in-ukraine/
Channel: @robinmg
Azov has been accused of being a magnet for foreign far Right ideologues and neo-Nazis. Since 2015, more than 17,000 have joined the battalion and many have been welcomed by Ukrainian authorities and given citizenship. Facebook, the main channel used by Azov for this recruitment, was exposed in an alarming investigation by Time magazine in 2021: ‘How a White-Supremacist Militia Used Facebook to Radicalize and Train New Members’. It tracks a link between Azov and terrorism in the US.
In 2016, under the leadership of President Barak Obama, the US Congress inexplicitly repealed its ban on funding Azov. This meant that the battalion could now legally receive American aid. The SWC accused the US of ignoring the glorification of Nazi collaborators, and Israeli politicians said that the first target of these neo-Nazis would be the Jewish community.
According to the Daily Beast, the US went one step further and started training parts of Azov, giving them $19million in 2017. It is ironic that Biden administration, once professing horror at the very idea of white supremacists, is now in effect supporting the neo-Nazis of Ukraine and silencing any objectors by labelling them ‘Putin sympathisers’.
This is a group that aims to take power in Europe, with the help of far Right coalitions. Thanks to Western governments and Facebook, it has unrivalled access to weapons and a peerless recruiting campaign. The world should be shuddering in horror at the thought that a violent, far Right, anti-Semitic neo-Nazi organisation in Eastern Europe is being given a free pass."
https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/azov-the-neo-nazis-doing-the-wests-dirty-work-in-ukraine/
Channel: @robinmg
The Conservative Woman
Azov, the neo-Nazis doing the West’s dirty work in Ukraine - The Conservative Woman
The Legality Of War - War Crimes Lawyer
Christopher Black is an international criminal lawyer based in Toronto. He is known for a number of high-profile war crimes cases.
"The western mass media and governments have fallen into a frenzy of anti-Russian propaganda over Russia’s military operations in Ukraine. One element of their propaganda war is the claim that Russia’s action is illegal under international law. But is this the case and what does it mean for these countries to make that claim when they have themselves invaded and attacked too many nations to enumerate, every one of which was not only illegal, but without any moral, ethical justification whatsoever?
In my opinion [Christopher Black, war crimes lawyer] Russia acted in accordance with international law under Article 51 of the UN Charter for the following reasons:"
https://christopher-black.com/the-legality-of-war/
Christopher Black is an international criminal lawyer based in Toronto. He is known for a number of high-profile war crimes cases.
"The western mass media and governments have fallen into a frenzy of anti-Russian propaganda over Russia’s military operations in Ukraine. One element of their propaganda war is the claim that Russia’s action is illegal under international law. But is this the case and what does it mean for these countries to make that claim when they have themselves invaded and attacked too many nations to enumerate, every one of which was not only illegal, but without any moral, ethical justification whatsoever?
In my opinion [Christopher Black, war crimes lawyer] Russia acted in accordance with international law under Article 51 of the UN Charter for the following reasons:"
https://christopher-black.com/the-legality-of-war/
The Empire of Lies
"It has been said that America has become an Empire of Lies.
Difficult as it may be to accept, this allegation is true. To deny this would be to fool ourselves.
The truth is that over the last several decades America’s elites have erected a system in which lies permeate every aspect of our societal life.
Everywhere we turn, we encounter lies. We have now arrived at a point where nearly all our public institutions operate on lies: the government, media, education system, arts, military and even sports.
A recent event is emblematic of the Empire of Lies in which we live.
On March 13, USA TODAY published its list of top twelve Women of the Year. One those “women” was one Rachel Levine. The problem is that Levine is not a woman."
https://www.lewrockwell.com/2022/04/vasko-kohlmayer/the-empire-of-lies/
Channel: @robinmg
"It has been said that America has become an Empire of Lies.
Difficult as it may be to accept, this allegation is true. To deny this would be to fool ourselves.
The truth is that over the last several decades America’s elites have erected a system in which lies permeate every aspect of our societal life.
Everywhere we turn, we encounter lies. We have now arrived at a point where nearly all our public institutions operate on lies: the government, media, education system, arts, military and even sports.
A recent event is emblematic of the Empire of Lies in which we live.
On March 13, USA TODAY published its list of top twelve Women of the Year. One those “women” was one Rachel Levine. The problem is that Levine is not a woman."
https://www.lewrockwell.com/2022/04/vasko-kohlmayer/the-empire-of-lies/
Channel: @robinmg
LewRockwell
The Empire of Lies - LewRockwell
It has been said that America has become an Empire of Lies. Difficult as it may be to accept, this allegation is true. To deny this would be to fool ourselves. The truth is that over the last several decades America’s elites have erected a system in which…
Ukraine: A New Battle in the Old War of the “New Normal”
"In one sense, I don’t have much to say about the newest chapter in the eight-year-old American war against the people of Ukraine – nothing that you can’t learn from an array of sources as politically diverse as George Galloway and Peter Hitchens, Tariq Ali and John Mearsheimer.
After all, the facts really aren’t complicated. Russia’s recent invasion, far from being “unprovoked” (as shamelessly claimed in mainstream media), follows eight years of the US-backed Ukrainian regime’s deadly shelling of ethnic Russians near the border of Russia itself, in fighting that has killed more than 13,000 civilians in territory Vladimir Putin’s administration pledged to protect long ago.
And that carnage had a fairly obvious cause, too: it was precipitated by the US-supported coup that toppled Ukraine’s elected government in 2014, ostensibly because of human rights abuses but more fundamentally because that government had refused to convert the former Soviet republic into a vassal state of NATO.
The machinations resulting in what is now called the “Maidan coup” destroyed Ukraine’s neutrality between Russia and the West, unleashing in its stead a violent and bigoted nationalist movement for which the inhabitants of the Don River basin, mostly ethnic Russians, have been paying with their lives ever since.
That much should be clear to all unbiased readers – like the fact that NATO’s relentless march toward the Russian border (in direct violation of U.S. officials’ promise to Russian leadership as far back as 1990) is the real story of “aggression” behind the manufactured outrage over the Russian “attack” on Ukraine.
But I want to emphasize a different point: that the war hysteria seething in the mainstream press isn’t just about demonizing Vladimir Putin or about dragging the West into another Cold War.
I think we need to focus on its less obvious purpose.
In a very real sense, this propaganda campaign is an extension of the lockdowns imposed on the populations of the Western “democracies” (I add the quotation marks mournfully but advisedly) in early 2020 – and of the attacks on the freedoms of their citizens for which COVID-19 is no longer as sturdy a pretext as it seemed to be two years ago. For most of us, that is really its primary significance.
In other words, the agenda underlying the new Cold War – and mind you, it’s already a pretty hot “cold war” when Atlantic Magazine, formerly a storehouse of liberal antiwar pieties, is chiding the US for not being sufficiently “bloody and brutal” in Ukraine – is not aimed at Russia (despite the US-led economic warfare that mainly targets blameless Russian citizens). It’s not even aimed at Ukraine (notwithstanding obvious US efforts to exacerbate the conflict by flooding the country with weapons).
The real target is us. And whatever news we see from Ukraine in the mainstream press – now, tomorrow, a month from now, whenever – that’s one point we mustn’t forget."
https://www.lewrockwell.com/2022/04/no_author/ukraine-a-new-battle-in-the-old-war-of-the-new-normal/
Channel: @robinmg
"In one sense, I don’t have much to say about the newest chapter in the eight-year-old American war against the people of Ukraine – nothing that you can’t learn from an array of sources as politically diverse as George Galloway and Peter Hitchens, Tariq Ali and John Mearsheimer.
After all, the facts really aren’t complicated. Russia’s recent invasion, far from being “unprovoked” (as shamelessly claimed in mainstream media), follows eight years of the US-backed Ukrainian regime’s deadly shelling of ethnic Russians near the border of Russia itself, in fighting that has killed more than 13,000 civilians in territory Vladimir Putin’s administration pledged to protect long ago.
And that carnage had a fairly obvious cause, too: it was precipitated by the US-supported coup that toppled Ukraine’s elected government in 2014, ostensibly because of human rights abuses but more fundamentally because that government had refused to convert the former Soviet republic into a vassal state of NATO.
The machinations resulting in what is now called the “Maidan coup” destroyed Ukraine’s neutrality between Russia and the West, unleashing in its stead a violent and bigoted nationalist movement for which the inhabitants of the Don River basin, mostly ethnic Russians, have been paying with their lives ever since.
That much should be clear to all unbiased readers – like the fact that NATO’s relentless march toward the Russian border (in direct violation of U.S. officials’ promise to Russian leadership as far back as 1990) is the real story of “aggression” behind the manufactured outrage over the Russian “attack” on Ukraine.
But I want to emphasize a different point: that the war hysteria seething in the mainstream press isn’t just about demonizing Vladimir Putin or about dragging the West into another Cold War.
I think we need to focus on its less obvious purpose.
In a very real sense, this propaganda campaign is an extension of the lockdowns imposed on the populations of the Western “democracies” (I add the quotation marks mournfully but advisedly) in early 2020 – and of the attacks on the freedoms of their citizens for which COVID-19 is no longer as sturdy a pretext as it seemed to be two years ago. For most of us, that is really its primary significance.
In other words, the agenda underlying the new Cold War – and mind you, it’s already a pretty hot “cold war” when Atlantic Magazine, formerly a storehouse of liberal antiwar pieties, is chiding the US for not being sufficiently “bloody and brutal” in Ukraine – is not aimed at Russia (despite the US-led economic warfare that mainly targets blameless Russian citizens). It’s not even aimed at Ukraine (notwithstanding obvious US efforts to exacerbate the conflict by flooding the country with weapons).
The real target is us. And whatever news we see from Ukraine in the mainstream press – now, tomorrow, a month from now, whenever – that’s one point we mustn’t forget."
https://www.lewrockwell.com/2022/04/no_author/ukraine-a-new-battle-in-the-old-war-of-the-new-normal/
Channel: @robinmg
LewRockwell
Ukraine: A New Battle in the Old War of the 'New Normal' - LewRockwell
In one sense, I don’t have much to say about the newest chapter in the eight-year-old American war against the people of Ukraine – nothing that you can’t learn from an array of sources as politically diverse as George Galloway and Peter Hitchens, Tariq Ali and John…
World Economic Forum Was Created by US Policies
"Schwab Wasn’t the Mastermind Behind WEF
If Schwab is the most dangerous person alive today, his predecessors deserve honorable mentions. In an investigative report by journalist Johnny Vedmore, it’s revealed that Schwab wasn’t the mastermind behind WEF and The Great Reset.
That honor goes to his three mentors — John K. Galbraith, a Canadian-American economist, diplomat and public policy maker, Herman Kahn, who created concepts on nuclear deterrence that became official military policy, and Henry A. Kissinger, who recruited Schwab at a Harvard international seminar, which was funded by the U.S. CIA.
“My research indicates that the World Economic Forum is not a European creation. In reality, it is instead an operation which emanates from the public policy grandees of the Kennedy, Johnson and Nixonian eras of American politics; all of whom had ties to the Council on Foreign Relations and the associated “Round Table” Movement, with a supporting role played by the Central Intelligence Agency.
There were three extremely powerful and influential men, Kissinger among them, who would lead Klaus Schwab towards their ultimate goal of complete American Empire-aligned global domination via the creation of social and economic policies.
In addition, two of the men were at the core of manufacturing the ever present threat of global thermonuclear war … their paths would cross and coalesce during the 1960s … they recruited Klaus Schwab through a CIA-funded program, and … they were the real driving force behind the creation of the World Economic Forum.”
https://www.lewrockwell.com/2022/04/joseph-mercola/world-economic-forum-was-created-by-us-policies/
Channel: @robinmg
"Schwab Wasn’t the Mastermind Behind WEF
If Schwab is the most dangerous person alive today, his predecessors deserve honorable mentions. In an investigative report by journalist Johnny Vedmore, it’s revealed that Schwab wasn’t the mastermind behind WEF and The Great Reset.
That honor goes to his three mentors — John K. Galbraith, a Canadian-American economist, diplomat and public policy maker, Herman Kahn, who created concepts on nuclear deterrence that became official military policy, and Henry A. Kissinger, who recruited Schwab at a Harvard international seminar, which was funded by the U.S. CIA.
“My research indicates that the World Economic Forum is not a European creation. In reality, it is instead an operation which emanates from the public policy grandees of the Kennedy, Johnson and Nixonian eras of American politics; all of whom had ties to the Council on Foreign Relations and the associated “Round Table” Movement, with a supporting role played by the Central Intelligence Agency.
There were three extremely powerful and influential men, Kissinger among them, who would lead Klaus Schwab towards their ultimate goal of complete American Empire-aligned global domination via the creation of social and economic policies.
In addition, two of the men were at the core of manufacturing the ever present threat of global thermonuclear war … their paths would cross and coalesce during the 1960s … they recruited Klaus Schwab through a CIA-funded program, and … they were the real driving force behind the creation of the World Economic Forum.”
https://www.lewrockwell.com/2022/04/joseph-mercola/world-economic-forum-was-created-by-us-policies/
Channel: @robinmg
LewRockwell
World Economic Forum Was Created by US Policies - LewRockwell
Klaus Schwab, founder and executive chairman of the World Economic Forum (WEF), is the personification of The Great Reset — the ultimate goal of which is to do away with the democratic process and give all ownership and control to the deep state — and the…
Ukraine – a modern tragedy in seven acts
Act Six: The Comedian’s Tale
"In April 2019 a new character arrives on the scene in the shape of Volodymyr Zelensky. His is the everyday story of a television comedian who in a short time becomes a billionaire, World Economic Forum Young Global Leader, and President of his country.
Ihor Kolomoisky of Bursima, PrivatBank and supporter of fascist para-militaries, is a patron of Zelensky, a man with an itchy nose.
Zelensky begins his successful television career in 2012. His programmes are aired on Ihor Kolomoisky’s 1+1 television channel.
Kolomoisky has good reason to want a change of president as it was Petro Poroshenko who nationalised Kolomoisky’s PrivatBank following the discovery of the $5.5million fraud.
Zelensky and his colleagues are well rewarded by Kolomoisky. According to the Pandora Papers, some of the PrivatBank funds find their way to companies owned by Zelensky and his associates in the British Virgin Islands, Cyprus and Belize. Kolomoisky also owns companies in those jurisdictions.
Zelensky’s current chief aide, Serhiy Shefir, now the head of the country’s security service, is part of the offshore network of tax avoiding companies, as are others from the President’s inner circle.
In office, Zelensky begins to take limited action against the corrupt oligarchs, although he maintains contact with Kolomoisky. The oligarch most disturbed by Zelensky’s actions is Viktor Medvedchuk, a close ally of Vladimir Putin.
Like other oligarchs, he is a political leader and the owner of television channels. However, Medvedchuk appears to foresee the imminent danger of an extended conflict with Russia and was active in 2020 in trying to revive the so-called Minsk agreement.
In 2021 the Ukraine government places Medvedchuk under house arrest – a red rag to Putin?
In March 2021, a letter is published in the Daily Telegraph and Le Monde signed by Zelensky, Johnson, Merkel, Macron, WHO chief Tedros Ghebreyesusand 20 other political leaders (including six WEF Global Leaders) asserting their intention to ‘build a more robust international health architecture that will protect future generations’.
They declare: ‘No single government or multilateral agency can address this threat alone. The question is not if, but when. Together, we must be better prepared to predict, prevent, detect, assess and effectively respond to pandemics in a highly co-ordinated fashion. The Covid-19 pandemic has been a stark and painful reminder that nobody is safe until everyone is safe.’
The WEF and the WHO are clearly working in harmony and the text of the letter echoes the words of Klaus Schwab, who declared in early 2021, ‘As long as not everybody is vaccinated, nobody will be safe.’
A key player in this drive is the Vaccination Credential Initiative, which surprise, surprise, includes Microsoft. The VCI is ‘committed to empowering individuals access to a trustworthy and verifiable copy of their vaccination records in digital or paper form using open, interoperable standards. Individuals can then use those verifiable credentials for medical purposes and to demonstrate their health status to safely return to work, school, travel . . .’
Zelensky is ahead of the game in this respect. Despite the growing tension with Russia, his government introduces a programme that gives the double-jabbed 1,000 hryvnia (£25.60). The social credit scheme operates through their Diia App. The state restricts what this helicopter money can be spent on and who can spend it (Russians are excluded). Additional money is given following the so-called ‘booster’. They are seemingly well on their way to a universal basic income.
Russia invades Ukraine on February 24, 2022.
Zelensky’s fame grows. From afar, his face beams down on the fawning lawmakers of the Western world as he pleads for more money and weapons. The man who combines the talents of Churchill, Lincoln, Thatcher and Benny Hill can do no wrong."
https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/ukraine-a-modern-tragedy-in-seven-acts/
Channel: @robinmg
Act Six: The Comedian’s Tale
"In April 2019 a new character arrives on the scene in the shape of Volodymyr Zelensky. His is the everyday story of a television comedian who in a short time becomes a billionaire, World Economic Forum Young Global Leader, and President of his country.
Ihor Kolomoisky of Bursima, PrivatBank and supporter of fascist para-militaries, is a patron of Zelensky, a man with an itchy nose.
Zelensky begins his successful television career in 2012. His programmes are aired on Ihor Kolomoisky’s 1+1 television channel.
Kolomoisky has good reason to want a change of president as it was Petro Poroshenko who nationalised Kolomoisky’s PrivatBank following the discovery of the $5.5million fraud.
Zelensky and his colleagues are well rewarded by Kolomoisky. According to the Pandora Papers, some of the PrivatBank funds find their way to companies owned by Zelensky and his associates in the British Virgin Islands, Cyprus and Belize. Kolomoisky also owns companies in those jurisdictions.
Zelensky’s current chief aide, Serhiy Shefir, now the head of the country’s security service, is part of the offshore network of tax avoiding companies, as are others from the President’s inner circle.
In office, Zelensky begins to take limited action against the corrupt oligarchs, although he maintains contact with Kolomoisky. The oligarch most disturbed by Zelensky’s actions is Viktor Medvedchuk, a close ally of Vladimir Putin.
Like other oligarchs, he is a political leader and the owner of television channels. However, Medvedchuk appears to foresee the imminent danger of an extended conflict with Russia and was active in 2020 in trying to revive the so-called Minsk agreement.
In 2021 the Ukraine government places Medvedchuk under house arrest – a red rag to Putin?
In March 2021, a letter is published in the Daily Telegraph and Le Monde signed by Zelensky, Johnson, Merkel, Macron, WHO chief Tedros Ghebreyesusand 20 other political leaders (including six WEF Global Leaders) asserting their intention to ‘build a more robust international health architecture that will protect future generations’.
They declare: ‘No single government or multilateral agency can address this threat alone. The question is not if, but when. Together, we must be better prepared to predict, prevent, detect, assess and effectively respond to pandemics in a highly co-ordinated fashion. The Covid-19 pandemic has been a stark and painful reminder that nobody is safe until everyone is safe.’
The WEF and the WHO are clearly working in harmony and the text of the letter echoes the words of Klaus Schwab, who declared in early 2021, ‘As long as not everybody is vaccinated, nobody will be safe.’
A key player in this drive is the Vaccination Credential Initiative, which surprise, surprise, includes Microsoft. The VCI is ‘committed to empowering individuals access to a trustworthy and verifiable copy of their vaccination records in digital or paper form using open, interoperable standards. Individuals can then use those verifiable credentials for medical purposes and to demonstrate their health status to safely return to work, school, travel . . .’
Zelensky is ahead of the game in this respect. Despite the growing tension with Russia, his government introduces a programme that gives the double-jabbed 1,000 hryvnia (£25.60). The social credit scheme operates through their Diia App. The state restricts what this helicopter money can be spent on and who can spend it (Russians are excluded). Additional money is given following the so-called ‘booster’. They are seemingly well on their way to a universal basic income.
Russia invades Ukraine on February 24, 2022.
Zelensky’s fame grows. From afar, his face beams down on the fawning lawmakers of the Western world as he pleads for more money and weapons. The man who combines the talents of Churchill, Lincoln, Thatcher and Benny Hill can do no wrong."
https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/ukraine-a-modern-tragedy-in-seven-acts/
Channel: @robinmg
The Conservative Woman
Ukraine – a modern tragedy in seven acts - The Conservative Woman
Russia acted in accordance with international law under Article 51 of the UN Charter -
Christopher Black, war crimes lawyer
"First, the Kiev regime was mounting a major offensive with NATO’s help against the Donbass Republics with the intent of destroying them. Intensive shelling had already begun days before Russia acted, the shelling of civilian buildings and infrastructure, which resulted in scores of thousands of civilians fleeing into Russia. During that period the Kiev regime also attempted to assassinate a leader of the Republics with a car bomb. Russia had no choice but to protect the Donbass peoples and since the Security Council could do nothing, and the EU and NATO were supporting the Kiev offensive against the Donbass, Russia was the only nation that could act.
The request for military assistance from the Donbass Republics also compelled Russia to send in its forces to help push back the Kiev forces from the territories of the Republics.
Second, Russia itself had been attacked multiple times by Kiev regime forces. Saboteurs were sent into Crimea time and again to carry out raids, assassinate officials, to destroy infrastructure. They even cut Crimea’s water supply, a crime against humanity. Just a few days before Russia acted a Kiev reconnaissance unit invaded Russia but was detected and destroyed. Russia had every right under The Caroline Doctrine to go after the attackers and to prevent further attacks.
The Caroline Doctrine was established in 1837 when American forces invaded Canada, to assist Canadian rebels who had risen against the government. The Americans travelled to Canada by ship across Lake Ontario. The British then later invaded New York State to retaliate and burn the ship, named the Caroline. As a result of that incident, it was agreed by both the USA and Britain that the right of a nation to self-defence rested on two factors:
1. The use of force must be necessary because the threat is imminent and thus pursuing peaceful alternatives is not an option, and,
2. The response must be proportionate to the threat.
In this case the threat was more than imminent. It was on-going and increasing. The only effective and proportional defensive response was to destroy the offensive forces being deployed. These forces include not only Kiev regime government forces but also the nationalist, Nazi brigades supporting and spearheading the Kiev offensive and all the NATO equipment being supplied to them to conduct the Kiev offensive.
Thirdly, the deeper issue was the imminent threat to Russia from NATO posed by its continuous expansion to the east, its continuous build up of forces and offensive structure pointed at Russia and the completion this September of the American missile systems in Poland, Romania and Ukraine which could then be used to launch a nuclear attack against Russia.
We remember that in the past few months the NATO nations have conducted military exercises that included practicing launching nuclear attacks on Russia. We also remember that the USA has a first strike nuclear war policy, claiming the right to use nuclear weapons wherever and whenever they deem fit. It was evident that they were practising attacks because that was and is their intention.
Russia demanded the Americans withdraw those systems, and to withdraw NATO from Eastern Europe. They flatly refused. Ukraine talked of acquiring nuclear weapons and threatening Russia with them. It would take time for them to manufacture but there was nothing to stop the Americans from giving them nuclear weapons, under their control, as the Americans have done with Germany, for instance.
Russia could do nothing, keep the peace, and watch, as the weapons for its destruction were installed and made ready to fire; to commit suicide in other words, or it could defend itself. It warned the US that it would do so, and had the right to do so, the same right the Americans always claim to have, but again Russia was ignored. It had to act or face destruction and subjugation.
Christopher Black, war crimes lawyer
"First, the Kiev regime was mounting a major offensive with NATO’s help against the Donbass Republics with the intent of destroying them. Intensive shelling had already begun days before Russia acted, the shelling of civilian buildings and infrastructure, which resulted in scores of thousands of civilians fleeing into Russia. During that period the Kiev regime also attempted to assassinate a leader of the Republics with a car bomb. Russia had no choice but to protect the Donbass peoples and since the Security Council could do nothing, and the EU and NATO were supporting the Kiev offensive against the Donbass, Russia was the only nation that could act.
The request for military assistance from the Donbass Republics also compelled Russia to send in its forces to help push back the Kiev forces from the territories of the Republics.
Second, Russia itself had been attacked multiple times by Kiev regime forces. Saboteurs were sent into Crimea time and again to carry out raids, assassinate officials, to destroy infrastructure. They even cut Crimea’s water supply, a crime against humanity. Just a few days before Russia acted a Kiev reconnaissance unit invaded Russia but was detected and destroyed. Russia had every right under The Caroline Doctrine to go after the attackers and to prevent further attacks.
The Caroline Doctrine was established in 1837 when American forces invaded Canada, to assist Canadian rebels who had risen against the government. The Americans travelled to Canada by ship across Lake Ontario. The British then later invaded New York State to retaliate and burn the ship, named the Caroline. As a result of that incident, it was agreed by both the USA and Britain that the right of a nation to self-defence rested on two factors:
1. The use of force must be necessary because the threat is imminent and thus pursuing peaceful alternatives is not an option, and,
2. The response must be proportionate to the threat.
In this case the threat was more than imminent. It was on-going and increasing. The only effective and proportional defensive response was to destroy the offensive forces being deployed. These forces include not only Kiev regime government forces but also the nationalist, Nazi brigades supporting and spearheading the Kiev offensive and all the NATO equipment being supplied to them to conduct the Kiev offensive.
Thirdly, the deeper issue was the imminent threat to Russia from NATO posed by its continuous expansion to the east, its continuous build up of forces and offensive structure pointed at Russia and the completion this September of the American missile systems in Poland, Romania and Ukraine which could then be used to launch a nuclear attack against Russia.
We remember that in the past few months the NATO nations have conducted military exercises that included practicing launching nuclear attacks on Russia. We also remember that the USA has a first strike nuclear war policy, claiming the right to use nuclear weapons wherever and whenever they deem fit. It was evident that they were practising attacks because that was and is their intention.
Russia demanded the Americans withdraw those systems, and to withdraw NATO from Eastern Europe. They flatly refused. Ukraine talked of acquiring nuclear weapons and threatening Russia with them. It would take time for them to manufacture but there was nothing to stop the Americans from giving them nuclear weapons, under their control, as the Americans have done with Germany, for instance.
Russia could do nothing, keep the peace, and watch, as the weapons for its destruction were installed and made ready to fire; to commit suicide in other words, or it could defend itself. It warned the US that it would do so, and had the right to do so, the same right the Americans always claim to have, but again Russia was ignored. It had to act or face destruction and subjugation.
We remember that during the Cuban Missile Crisis, in 1962, the Americans threatened to invade Cuba and to attack the USSR because nuclear missiles had been placed in Cuba to protect it against American aggression. President Kennedy established the precedent principle that when a nation feels its existence is at stake from nuclear weapons it has the right to use force to protect itself pre-emptively. Russia is acting on the same principle.
Lastly, the NATO powers have lately relied on their bogus legal doctrine of “responsibility to protect” that they invented after the fact to try to justify their aggression against Yugoslavia. No such doctrine exists in international law but they claim the right to use it nevertheless. It applies, according to them, when a military action is justified, though illegal, “for legitimate humanitarian reasons.’ They were warned that this false doctrine could be turned against them. Russia has not referred to it at all, but if NATO can rely on it for their wars of aggression, then surely Russia can rely on it to justify their military action to defend the Donbass, and themselves.
When one takes account of all the factors that governed the Russian decision to send its forces into Ukraine it is clear that in law they had the legal right to do so whereas the United States continues its illegal invasion and occupation of Iraq and Syria to this day and the NATO media powers and governments say nothing, because they are all complicit in those invasions.
If the United States and the NATO alliance had complied with international law in the first place as set out in the UN Charter, the world would not be in this mess. They caused this, not Russia. The responsibility is entirely theirs and they will be judged for it."
https://christopher-black.com/the-legality-of-war/
Channel: @robinmg
Lastly, the NATO powers have lately relied on their bogus legal doctrine of “responsibility to protect” that they invented after the fact to try to justify their aggression against Yugoslavia. No such doctrine exists in international law but they claim the right to use it nevertheless. It applies, according to them, when a military action is justified, though illegal, “for legitimate humanitarian reasons.’ They were warned that this false doctrine could be turned against them. Russia has not referred to it at all, but if NATO can rely on it for their wars of aggression, then surely Russia can rely on it to justify their military action to defend the Donbass, and themselves.
When one takes account of all the factors that governed the Russian decision to send its forces into Ukraine it is clear that in law they had the legal right to do so whereas the United States continues its illegal invasion and occupation of Iraq and Syria to this day and the NATO media powers and governments say nothing, because they are all complicit in those invasions.
If the United States and the NATO alliance had complied with international law in the first place as set out in the UN Charter, the world would not be in this mess. They caused this, not Russia. The responsibility is entirely theirs and they will be judged for it."
https://christopher-black.com/the-legality-of-war/
Channel: @robinmg
Forwarded from UK To Do List
These must be included in the Pandemic Treaty:
1. Human rights are inalienable. Governments may not suspend human rights because of “emergencies”.
2. The rights of nations, states, provinces, groups and organizations are subservient to inalienable human rights.
3. The right to try is an inalienable right. Bureaucrats do not have the right to deny potentially life-saving medications to anyone.
4. Bodily autonomy is sacrosanct and must ALWAYS be respected. The right to refuse treatment is an inalienable right.
5. Vaccine status cannot be used to restrict people's inalienable right to travel, work, seek education or gain access to public spaces or businesses.
6. Lockdowns and/or quarantines of healthy people are wrong.
7. We demand complete transparency. All depersonalized data from all clinical studies should be immediately available to everyone in real time.
8. Everyone has the right to their own opinion. All human beings have the inalienable right to speak their mind in public.
9. All manufacturers, distributors and administrators of health care products and/or procedures must be held liable for any and all damages caused by their products and services.
10. People must have the right to vote to end states of emergency.
1. Human rights are inalienable. Governments may not suspend human rights because of “emergencies”.
2. The rights of nations, states, provinces, groups and organizations are subservient to inalienable human rights.
3. The right to try is an inalienable right. Bureaucrats do not have the right to deny potentially life-saving medications to anyone.
4. Bodily autonomy is sacrosanct and must ALWAYS be respected. The right to refuse treatment is an inalienable right.
5. Vaccine status cannot be used to restrict people's inalienable right to travel, work, seek education or gain access to public spaces or businesses.
6. Lockdowns and/or quarantines of healthy people are wrong.
7. We demand complete transparency. All depersonalized data from all clinical studies should be immediately available to everyone in real time.
8. Everyone has the right to their own opinion. All human beings have the inalienable right to speak their mind in public.
9. All manufacturers, distributors and administrators of health care products and/or procedures must be held liable for any and all damages caused by their products and services.
10. People must have the right to vote to end states of emergency.
Forwarded from UK To Do List
—————————————————————————————
* URGENT * WHO Pandemic Treaty Consultation
Template provided below. Time required : 5 mins
> Visit https://inb.who.int/home/written-submissions
> Click "Written Submissions"
> Solve math puzzle captcha, eg if it says "92 - 2", enter 90
> For "Organization", enter : "Citizen of the United Kingdom" (or similar for your country)
> For "Address", add "United Kingdom" at end (or similar for your country)
> For "Written Submission", copy/paste from here :
https://pastebin.com/MbhBpDkJ
OR here : https://t.me/uk_todo_list/81
Webpage states 250 word limit. Apparently there's also a 1250 character limit. Suggested copy/paste above meets those limits.
> For "Please check before submitting", select "I have read <etc>" from dropdown.
> Click "Submit". They don't appear to send any confirmation email.
Deadline : Wed 13 Apr 2022, 4:00pm
More info :
https://jamesroguski.substack.com/p/an-open-letter-to-the-who
https://drtrozzi.org/2022/04/10/urgent-call-to-action-help-stop-the-whos-next-plandemic/
Mark Trozzi says he'll soon create a website for a firm record of public input/opinion (not just a "black hole" consultation), so keep an eye for that : https://drtrozzi.org
Please share. Ask channel owners to post to main channel for better visibility.
—————————————————————————————
Join @uk_todo_list for bite-size actions, 5 min or under
* URGENT * WHO Pandemic Treaty Consultation
Template provided below. Time required : 5 mins
> Visit https://inb.who.int/home/written-submissions
> Click "Written Submissions"
> Solve math puzzle captcha, eg if it says "92 - 2", enter 90
> For "Organization", enter : "Citizen of the United Kingdom" (or similar for your country)
> For "Address", add "United Kingdom" at end (or similar for your country)
> For "Written Submission", copy/paste from here :
https://pastebin.com/MbhBpDkJ
OR here : https://t.me/uk_todo_list/81
Webpage states 250 word limit. Apparently there's also a 1250 character limit. Suggested copy/paste above meets those limits.
> For "Please check before submitting", select "I have read <etc>" from dropdown.
> Click "Submit". They don't appear to send any confirmation email.
Deadline : Wed 13 Apr 2022, 4:00pm
More info :
https://jamesroguski.substack.com/p/an-open-letter-to-the-who
https://drtrozzi.org/2022/04/10/urgent-call-to-action-help-stop-the-whos-next-plandemic/
Mark Trozzi says he'll soon create a website for a firm record of public input/opinion (not just a "black hole" consultation), so keep an eye for that : https://drtrozzi.org
Please share. Ask channel owners to post to main channel for better visibility.
—————————————————————————————
Join @uk_todo_list for bite-size actions, 5 min or under
Forwarded from Myfanwy Evans
That would be Maurice Strong, recruited by the Rockerfellers at a very young age in the oil industry and eventually became instrumental for them in setting up the Rio Summit in 1992 and forging the way for U.N. Agenda 21. One of his most infamous utterances was the following and where we find our selves now, “Isn’t the only hope for the planet that the industrialized civilizations collapse? Isn’t it our responsiblity to bring that about?”
– Maurice Strong,
founder of the UN Environment Programme (UNEP
The article below about the Club of Rome, UN Agenda 21 and the scam of man made global warming is well worth a read as is The Corbett Report “Meet Maurice Strong globalist oiligarch”.
https://www.corbettreport.com/meet-maurice-strong-globalist-oiligarch-environmentalist/
https://climatism.wordpress.com/2014/01/24/in-searching-for-a-new-enemy-to-unite-us-we-came-up-with-the-threat-of-global-warming/
– Maurice Strong,
founder of the UN Environment Programme (UNEP
The article below about the Club of Rome, UN Agenda 21 and the scam of man made global warming is well worth a read as is The Corbett Report “Meet Maurice Strong globalist oiligarch”.
https://www.corbettreport.com/meet-maurice-strong-globalist-oiligarch-environmentalist/
https://climatism.wordpress.com/2014/01/24/in-searching-for-a-new-enemy-to-unite-us-we-came-up-with-the-threat-of-global-warming/
Climatism
THE Creator, Fabricator And Proponent Of Global Warming – Maurice Strong
“Isn’t the only hope for the planet that the industrialized civilizations collapse? Isn’t it our responsiblity to bring that about?” – Maurice Strong, founder of the U…
Dear Robin, colleagues & friends,
Some news I hope you’ll find exciting & worth sharing WIDELY!
A second Grand Jury process, (complimentary to that of the Corona Committee), to lay out the evidence of systematic & astonishingly broad criminal activity in relation to the so-called Covid19 pandemic & gene-based vaccines is about to run.
It’s to run, live, through this week at times laid out below. A number of experts will have the opportunity to present their evidence. I’m honoured to be among them.
No one is coming to save us. Only we can do this. So please try extra hard to persuade new people, who might have become frustrated or lost about what’s happening, to at least watch & listen.
Nobody who opens themselves to some of this evidence will fail to realise they’ve been lied to, and the reasons are less important than that it’s still happening. There is not the slightest possibility that this is benign. None at all. So if we can’t get a few more people to see it, we may fail completely. That’s just not acceptable.
Many thanks!
Mike
Dr Mike Yeadon
…………………………………….
Hi All,
Tonight is the premiere of America's Grand Jury! Below is the daily rundown of show times and nightly witnesses as well as where to Live Stream. We will be sending out social posts and media coverage links each day for your review and share.
Please let me know if you have any questions.
Thank you,
Lynne
Website link to watch
www.AmericasGrandJury.com
Rumble Live link
https://rumble.com/v10f1r1-americas-grand-jury-the-people-vs.-dr-fauci.html
We will send out
Daily Show Rundown
Monday
4:30pm PT/7:30pm ET - Pre-Show with Jen Massey, republican strategist and former congressional staffer
5:00pm PT/8:00pm ET - America’s Grand Jury Live Stream begins
On-Air Lineup
Prosecutors (Nightly):
• Curtis Hill, former Indiana Attorney General
• Parisa Fishback, president and general counsel for The Unity Project
Expert Witnesses:
• Robert F. Kennedy Jr.
• Dr. Chris Martenson
• Dr. Paul Marik
Tuesday
4:30pm PT/7:30pm ET - Pre-Show with Jen Massey, republican strategist and former congressional staffer
5:00pm PT/8:00pm ET - America’s Grand Jury Live Stream begins
Expert Witnesses:
• Dr. Aaron Kheriaty
• Dr. Paul Marik
• Dr. Chris Martenson
Wednesday
4:30pm PT/7:30pm ET - Pre-Show with Jen Massey, republican strategist and former congressional staffer
5:00pm PT/8:00pm ET - America’s Grand Jury Live Stream begins
Expert Witnesses:
• Dr. Pierre Kory
Thursday
4:30pm PT/7:30pm ET - Pre-Show with Jen Massey, republican strategist and former congressional staffer
5:00pm PT/8:00pm ET - America’s Grand Jury Live Stream begins
On-Air Lineup
Expert Witnesses:
• Dr. David Gortler
• Dr. Peter McCullough
• Dr. Michael Yeadon
Friday
4:30pm PT/7:30pm ET - Pre-Show with Jen Massey, republican strategist and former congressional staffer
5:00pm PT/8:00pm ET - America’s Grand Jury Live Stream begins
Expert Witnesses:
• Dr. Robert Malone
• Brianne Dressen, vaccine injured founder of Real Not Rare
• Vaccine injured victims
Expert Witness Bios
• Robert F. Kennedy Jr.
Kennedy is the New York Times Best Selling Author of “The Real Anthony Fauci” that exposes the corruption and collusion of Big Pharma, media and government agencies. For over three decades, Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. has been one of the world’s leading environmental advocates and founded the non-profit Children’s Health Defense
• Dr. Chris Martenson
Dr. Martenson has a PhD from Duke University (Pathology/Toxicology) and an MBA from Cornell. After being a scientist for seven years, he worked in corporate finance for Pfizer and then as VP of SAIC. He is a published scientist, and now a successful entrepreneur and founder of Peak Prosperity.
• Dr. Paul Marik
Board certified in internal medicine, critical care medicine, neurocritical care and nutrition science, Dr. Marik has written over 500 peer reviewed journal articles, 80 book chapters and authored four critical care books. He has been cited over 48,000 times in peer-reviewed publications and has an H-index of 105.
Some news I hope you’ll find exciting & worth sharing WIDELY!
A second Grand Jury process, (complimentary to that of the Corona Committee), to lay out the evidence of systematic & astonishingly broad criminal activity in relation to the so-called Covid19 pandemic & gene-based vaccines is about to run.
It’s to run, live, through this week at times laid out below. A number of experts will have the opportunity to present their evidence. I’m honoured to be among them.
No one is coming to save us. Only we can do this. So please try extra hard to persuade new people, who might have become frustrated or lost about what’s happening, to at least watch & listen.
Nobody who opens themselves to some of this evidence will fail to realise they’ve been lied to, and the reasons are less important than that it’s still happening. There is not the slightest possibility that this is benign. None at all. So if we can’t get a few more people to see it, we may fail completely. That’s just not acceptable.
Many thanks!
Mike
Dr Mike Yeadon
…………………………………….
Hi All,
Tonight is the premiere of America's Grand Jury! Below is the daily rundown of show times and nightly witnesses as well as where to Live Stream. We will be sending out social posts and media coverage links each day for your review and share.
Please let me know if you have any questions.
Thank you,
Lynne
Website link to watch
www.AmericasGrandJury.com
Rumble Live link
https://rumble.com/v10f1r1-americas-grand-jury-the-people-vs.-dr-fauci.html
We will send out
Daily Show Rundown
Monday
4:30pm PT/7:30pm ET - Pre-Show with Jen Massey, republican strategist and former congressional staffer
5:00pm PT/8:00pm ET - America’s Grand Jury Live Stream begins
On-Air Lineup
Prosecutors (Nightly):
• Curtis Hill, former Indiana Attorney General
• Parisa Fishback, president and general counsel for The Unity Project
Expert Witnesses:
• Robert F. Kennedy Jr.
• Dr. Chris Martenson
• Dr. Paul Marik
Tuesday
4:30pm PT/7:30pm ET - Pre-Show with Jen Massey, republican strategist and former congressional staffer
5:00pm PT/8:00pm ET - America’s Grand Jury Live Stream begins
Expert Witnesses:
• Dr. Aaron Kheriaty
• Dr. Paul Marik
• Dr. Chris Martenson
Wednesday
4:30pm PT/7:30pm ET - Pre-Show with Jen Massey, republican strategist and former congressional staffer
5:00pm PT/8:00pm ET - America’s Grand Jury Live Stream begins
Expert Witnesses:
• Dr. Pierre Kory
Thursday
4:30pm PT/7:30pm ET - Pre-Show with Jen Massey, republican strategist and former congressional staffer
5:00pm PT/8:00pm ET - America’s Grand Jury Live Stream begins
On-Air Lineup
Expert Witnesses:
• Dr. David Gortler
• Dr. Peter McCullough
• Dr. Michael Yeadon
Friday
4:30pm PT/7:30pm ET - Pre-Show with Jen Massey, republican strategist and former congressional staffer
5:00pm PT/8:00pm ET - America’s Grand Jury Live Stream begins
Expert Witnesses:
• Dr. Robert Malone
• Brianne Dressen, vaccine injured founder of Real Not Rare
• Vaccine injured victims
Expert Witness Bios
• Robert F. Kennedy Jr.
Kennedy is the New York Times Best Selling Author of “The Real Anthony Fauci” that exposes the corruption and collusion of Big Pharma, media and government agencies. For over three decades, Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. has been one of the world’s leading environmental advocates and founded the non-profit Children’s Health Defense
• Dr. Chris Martenson
Dr. Martenson has a PhD from Duke University (Pathology/Toxicology) and an MBA from Cornell. After being a scientist for seven years, he worked in corporate finance for Pfizer and then as VP of SAIC. He is a published scientist, and now a successful entrepreneur and founder of Peak Prosperity.
• Dr. Paul Marik
Board certified in internal medicine, critical care medicine, neurocritical care and nutrition science, Dr. Marik has written over 500 peer reviewed journal articles, 80 book chapters and authored four critical care books. He has been cited over 48,000 times in peer-reviewed publications and has an H-index of 105.
Americasgrandjury
Americas Grand Jury
Until recently, Dr. Marik was a tenured Professor of Medicine and is currently a co-founder of the Front-Line COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance (FLCCC).
• Dr. David Gortler
Dr. Gortler is a pharmacologist, pharmacist, and an FDA and health policy fellow at the Ethics and Public Policy Center. He was a professor of pharmacology and biotechnology at the Yale University School of Medicine, where he also served at Yale’s Bioethicist Center, and was an FDA medical officer who was later appointed by the White House as senior advisor to the FDA commissioner for drug safety, FDA science policy, and FDA regulatory affairs. He is a columnist at Forbes, where he writes on drug safety, health care and FDA policy.
• Dr. Aaron Kheriaty
Dr. Kheriaty is a fellow and director, Bioethics and American Democracy Program, at the Ethics and Public Policy Center. An author and expert on bioethics, social science and psychiatry, Dr. Kheriaty was previously the Director of the Medical Ethics Program at University of CA Irvine Health. He also serves as Chief of Medical Ethics for The Unity Project.
• Dr. Robert Malone
Dr. Malone is a virology, immunology, and molecular biology scientist, original inventor of mRNA vaccine technology and Chief Medical & Regulatory Officer of The Unity Project. Currently, Dr. Malone has been leading a large team since January 10, 2020 focused on clinical research design, drug development, computational discovery and mechanisms of action for COVID-19 repurposed drug treatments. His mission is to ensure vaccine safety, make sure that children are protected, stop and/or limit the vaccine mandates, to identify and teach about lifesaving treatments for COVID-19 and other pandemics.
• Dr. Pierre Kory
America’s Grand Jury is excited to announce expert witness, Dr. Pierre Kory! Dr. Kory is an MD, ICU director, pulmonologist and Co-Founder and President, Frontline COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance (FLCCC Alliance). He is the former Chief of the Critical Care Service and Medical Director of the Trauma and Life Support Center at the University of Wisconsin. He is considered one of the world pioneers in the use of ultrasound by physicians in the diagnosis and treatment of critically ill patients.
• Dr. Peter McCullough
Dr. McCullough is an internist, cardiologist, epidemiologist and one of the most published and researched experts on COVID-19. He currently manages the cardiovascular complications of both the viral infection and the injuries developing after the COVID vaccine in Dallas, TX.
• Dr. Michael Yeadon
Dr. Yeadon is the former Chief Science Officer and Head of Allergy & Respiratory Research at Pfizer. Innovator in inflammatory, immune and allergic diseases and has published 40 full papers, 63 abstracts, two books and six published patents. He is an innovator in inflammatory, immune and allergic diseases, developed out of deep knowledge of biology, therapeutics and business
Prosecutor Bios
• Curtis Hill
As Indiana’s 43rd Attorney General, Curtis Hill led his staff of more than 400 in aggressively defending freedom and gained his reputation as a skilled litigator in the prosecution of homicides, child abuse, and the distribution of illegal drugs. Hill has been a national leader in law enforcement having served on several White House public safety initiatives, and testified before congress.
• Parisa Fishback
Parisa Fishback is the president and general counsel of The Unity Project and a California attorney working pro bono to defend children, front line workers and teachers against vax mandates. She is also the founder and principal attorney at Fishback Law Corp, a legal firm that specializes in bankruptcy law in Orange County and throughout Southern California.
Channel: @robinmg
• Dr. David Gortler
Dr. Gortler is a pharmacologist, pharmacist, and an FDA and health policy fellow at the Ethics and Public Policy Center. He was a professor of pharmacology and biotechnology at the Yale University School of Medicine, where he also served at Yale’s Bioethicist Center, and was an FDA medical officer who was later appointed by the White House as senior advisor to the FDA commissioner for drug safety, FDA science policy, and FDA regulatory affairs. He is a columnist at Forbes, where he writes on drug safety, health care and FDA policy.
• Dr. Aaron Kheriaty
Dr. Kheriaty is a fellow and director, Bioethics and American Democracy Program, at the Ethics and Public Policy Center. An author and expert on bioethics, social science and psychiatry, Dr. Kheriaty was previously the Director of the Medical Ethics Program at University of CA Irvine Health. He also serves as Chief of Medical Ethics for The Unity Project.
• Dr. Robert Malone
Dr. Malone is a virology, immunology, and molecular biology scientist, original inventor of mRNA vaccine technology and Chief Medical & Regulatory Officer of The Unity Project. Currently, Dr. Malone has been leading a large team since January 10, 2020 focused on clinical research design, drug development, computational discovery and mechanisms of action for COVID-19 repurposed drug treatments. His mission is to ensure vaccine safety, make sure that children are protected, stop and/or limit the vaccine mandates, to identify and teach about lifesaving treatments for COVID-19 and other pandemics.
• Dr. Pierre Kory
America’s Grand Jury is excited to announce expert witness, Dr. Pierre Kory! Dr. Kory is an MD, ICU director, pulmonologist and Co-Founder and President, Frontline COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance (FLCCC Alliance). He is the former Chief of the Critical Care Service and Medical Director of the Trauma and Life Support Center at the University of Wisconsin. He is considered one of the world pioneers in the use of ultrasound by physicians in the diagnosis and treatment of critically ill patients.
• Dr. Peter McCullough
Dr. McCullough is an internist, cardiologist, epidemiologist and one of the most published and researched experts on COVID-19. He currently manages the cardiovascular complications of both the viral infection and the injuries developing after the COVID vaccine in Dallas, TX.
• Dr. Michael Yeadon
Dr. Yeadon is the former Chief Science Officer and Head of Allergy & Respiratory Research at Pfizer. Innovator in inflammatory, immune and allergic diseases and has published 40 full papers, 63 abstracts, two books and six published patents. He is an innovator in inflammatory, immune and allergic diseases, developed out of deep knowledge of biology, therapeutics and business
Prosecutor Bios
• Curtis Hill
As Indiana’s 43rd Attorney General, Curtis Hill led his staff of more than 400 in aggressively defending freedom and gained his reputation as a skilled litigator in the prosecution of homicides, child abuse, and the distribution of illegal drugs. Hill has been a national leader in law enforcement having served on several White House public safety initiatives, and testified before congress.
• Parisa Fishback
Parisa Fishback is the president and general counsel of The Unity Project and a California attorney working pro bono to defend children, front line workers and teachers against vax mandates. She is also the founder and principal attorney at Fishback Law Corp, a legal firm that specializes in bankruptcy law in Orange County and throughout Southern California.
Channel: @robinmg
"Julian Lennon Drops Ukraine Inspired Version of His Father's "Imagine""
https://youtu.be/Z6PzW6_Guwc
https://youtu.be/Z6PzW6_Guwc
YouTube
Julian Lennon Drops Ukraine Inspired Version of His Father's "Imagine"
So many entertainers believe the same thing. I guess it's a good fundraising tool. Wonder who is handing out the money and if it will go to the "refugees"?