Forwarded from Mike Yeadon
While I would expect a treatment which protects you against severe illness to also reduce transmission, it’s irrelevant because those who are vulnerable have already been offered & mostly accepted vaccination.
They’re protected. It doesn’t matter what anyone dose.
In the case of influenza, you’re much less likely to be fully protected by vaccination. But we don’t insist that everyone else gets vaccinated.
SARS-COV-2 is more of a risk than is flu to those over 70y, but LESS of a risk than is flu for those under 70y.
Why are we allowing autocrats to change policy stances everywhere, ostensibly because of a virus that is a more concentrated risk to a slice of the population than is influenza?
Why have officials completely ignored & in fact actively campaigned to censor & suppress good news that several medical treatments aside from vaccination are proven?
Is it that there’s no profit in vitamin D, generic versions of inhaled anti inflammatory drugs used in asthma, old drugs repurposed like ivermectin & hydroxychloroquinone, oral zinc & old antibiotics like azithromycin, inhaled interferon (though experimental, Synairgen at U Soton had a fantastic result in severe covid19 cases) etc?
All of these work. It’s quite remarkable how much clinical innovation there’s been in just one year.
Yet...in every case, the investigators have faced criticisms & often had difficulties in publishing.
Why had almost every country just ignored the best-evidenced drug, ivermectin, and refused even to consider giving it an emergency use authorisation, even though the clinical data package is more complete with it than is the case for any of the vaccines??
I notice that the Czech Republic has recently approved ivermectin in hospitalised patients. It works even better in ambulatory, non hospitalised patients, but it’s a start.
Why has the corrupted medicines regulators in Europe just ignored this cheap, old drug, which is so widely used that it’s among the WHO’s list of essential medicines?
https://youtu.be/FVUT78bzzKk
They’re protected. It doesn’t matter what anyone dose.
In the case of influenza, you’re much less likely to be fully protected by vaccination. But we don’t insist that everyone else gets vaccinated.
SARS-COV-2 is more of a risk than is flu to those over 70y, but LESS of a risk than is flu for those under 70y.
Why are we allowing autocrats to change policy stances everywhere, ostensibly because of a virus that is a more concentrated risk to a slice of the population than is influenza?
Why have officials completely ignored & in fact actively campaigned to censor & suppress good news that several medical treatments aside from vaccination are proven?
Is it that there’s no profit in vitamin D, generic versions of inhaled anti inflammatory drugs used in asthma, old drugs repurposed like ivermectin & hydroxychloroquinone, oral zinc & old antibiotics like azithromycin, inhaled interferon (though experimental, Synairgen at U Soton had a fantastic result in severe covid19 cases) etc?
All of these work. It’s quite remarkable how much clinical innovation there’s been in just one year.
Yet...in every case, the investigators have faced criticisms & often had difficulties in publishing.
Why had almost every country just ignored the best-evidenced drug, ivermectin, and refused even to consider giving it an emergency use authorisation, even though the clinical data package is more complete with it than is the case for any of the vaccines??
I notice that the Czech Republic has recently approved ivermectin in hospitalised patients. It works even better in ambulatory, non hospitalised patients, but it’s a start.
Why has the corrupted medicines regulators in Europe just ignored this cheap, old drug, which is so widely used that it’s among the WHO’s list of essential medicines?
https://youtu.be/FVUT78bzzKk
Forwarded from Hi Hi
Passing this on (and could you forward to others on your list):
On Monday Parliament debated the issue of vaccine passports in response to the petition which gained 290,000 signatures.
However, the Government has decided as the next step to issue a Call For Evidence. It is a sort of public consultation which anyone can participate in.
The full title is: Open Consultation. COVID Status Certification Review Call For Evidence It is vital that as many people as possible tell the Government why vaccine certificates are a bad idea.
If all the petition signatories did this we would overwhelm their system and we might frighten them into having second thoughts.
The closing date is 11.45pm on 29/3/21 so we have days to do this.
To do this you need to go to the link below and submit your comments.
https://www.gov.uk/government/consultations/covid-status-certification-review-call-for-evidence/covid-status-certification-review-call-for-evidence
Please try to get as many people involved as you can as quickly as you can.
You don't need to write reams just think of some bullet points which matter to you and submit them ASAP If you have any good links to articles about the implications for health freedom and privacy or any other evidence you feel is important then submit it too.
Your opinion matters so speak up. It does not matter that you are an ordinary person, you don't need any specialist knowledge. This will impact you and your family. Tell them how it will effect you negatively.
Don't delay.
If we are ever going to be able to get on a plane again without the necessity of being jabbed like a guinea pig with an experimental vaccine which is being shown to have a higher level of harm to it than covid itself and risking our own health as a result, losing sovereignty over our bodies and our rights to make informed decisions which the State respects, being forced to do something which is against common sense, good science and public health and safety we are going to have to fight for it. Because it won’t stop here – going to the theatre, football match or cinema will also require a passport. Even shopping – who knows! To give up our right to basic freedom of movement is a huge thing to hand over willingly. And there will be no going back.
On Monday Parliament debated the issue of vaccine passports in response to the petition which gained 290,000 signatures.
However, the Government has decided as the next step to issue a Call For Evidence. It is a sort of public consultation which anyone can participate in.
The full title is: Open Consultation. COVID Status Certification Review Call For Evidence It is vital that as many people as possible tell the Government why vaccine certificates are a bad idea.
If all the petition signatories did this we would overwhelm their system and we might frighten them into having second thoughts.
The closing date is 11.45pm on 29/3/21 so we have days to do this.
To do this you need to go to the link below and submit your comments.
https://www.gov.uk/government/consultations/covid-status-certification-review-call-for-evidence/covid-status-certification-review-call-for-evidence
Please try to get as many people involved as you can as quickly as you can.
You don't need to write reams just think of some bullet points which matter to you and submit them ASAP If you have any good links to articles about the implications for health freedom and privacy or any other evidence you feel is important then submit it too.
Your opinion matters so speak up. It does not matter that you are an ordinary person, you don't need any specialist knowledge. This will impact you and your family. Tell them how it will effect you negatively.
Don't delay.
If we are ever going to be able to get on a plane again without the necessity of being jabbed like a guinea pig with an experimental vaccine which is being shown to have a higher level of harm to it than covid itself and risking our own health as a result, losing sovereignty over our bodies and our rights to make informed decisions which the State respects, being forced to do something which is against common sense, good science and public health and safety we are going to have to fight for it. Because it won’t stop here – going to the theatre, football match or cinema will also require a passport. Even shopping – who knows! To give up our right to basic freedom of movement is a huge thing to hand over willingly. And there will be no going back.
GOV.UK
COVID-Status Certification Review - Call for evidence - now closed
The government is reviewing whether COVID-status certification could play a role in reopening our economy, reducing restrictions on social contact and improving safety.
Make your choice Choose if data from your health records is shared for research and planning [data mining for profit]
https://www.nhs.uk/your-nhs-data-matters/manage-your-choice/
https://www.nhs.uk/your-nhs-data-matters/manage-your-choice/
nhs.uk
Make your choice about sharing data from your health records
Choose if you want to share data from your health records for planning and research.
NEW: I have finally written down a hyperlink referenced explanation of the MONOTTI PROTOCOL. I asked Mike Yeadon what he thought. Mike wrote:
"Robin,
Honestly, it’s brilliant!..I like the simplicity & elegance of it.
The first part alone would make a big difference. Stop mass testing period! And certainly asymptomatic people. It’s just nuts.
After three weeks of mass testing in U.K. schools, I don’t think they’ve found a genuine case. Many false positives of course!
Treatment kits in pharmacies, I’m sure the authorities will block it certainly in U.K.
Despite giving EUAs for new technology vaccines, they won’t approve ivermectin for covid19 even though it’s available on prescription to treat parasitic illnesses."
https://nulluslocussinegenio.com/2021/03/23/the-monotti-protocol/
"Robin,
Honestly, it’s brilliant!..I like the simplicity & elegance of it.
The first part alone would make a big difference. Stop mass testing period! And certainly asymptomatic people. It’s just nuts.
After three weeks of mass testing in U.K. schools, I don’t think they’ve found a genuine case. Many false positives of course!
Treatment kits in pharmacies, I’m sure the authorities will block it certainly in U.K.
Despite giving EUAs for new technology vaccines, they won’t approve ivermectin for covid19 even though it’s available on prescription to treat parasitic illnesses."
https://nulluslocussinegenio.com/2021/03/23/the-monotti-protocol/
No Place Without Spirit
The Monotti Protocol For Keeping Society Open
The Monotti Protocol, 2021 The Monotti Protocol aims to be at the same time extremely simple yet extremely effective. It consists of three main epidemic or pandemic control approaches, to be implem…
"If the Monotti Protocol were to be implemented in any country or society, all restrictive measures such as social distancing, lockdowns, face masks, and all business, sports and hospitality closures could be immediately lifted without any detrimental effect on the mortality from Covid19, influenza, or any other respiratory disease. The major advantage it presents over a mass vaccination strategy is that protection is in this way offered from all pathogens, not a single variant or a specific virus, therefore making it the most sustainable solution to all respiratory epidemics and pandemics, which can be easily re-implemented as a public health directive at the onset of all new respiratory epidemics. The Monotti Protocol reduces considerably any risk of adverse reactions to experimental vaccinations or gene therapies as it only includes medicines with a long history of safety in the treatment kits, it also eliminates other mass vaccination risks such as antibody-dependent enhancement or other unforeseen autoimmune reactions to experimental mass vaccinations or gene therapies.
When it comes to SARSCoV2, the main long term advantage over current mass vaccination strategies is that the Monotti Protocol leads to long lasting natural immunity to all SARSCoV2 proteins rather than only to the spike protein which most vaccines or gene therapies are based on, therefore by definition offering a broader level of long term immunity to exposed individuals with the added safety of a strong vitamin D boosted killer T-cell mediated immune response.
The Monotti Protocol is a clear and simple, yet highly effective way to safeguard society from untested and socially destructive pandemic solutions."
https://nulluslocussinegenio.com/2021/03/23/the-monotti-protocol/
When it comes to SARSCoV2, the main long term advantage over current mass vaccination strategies is that the Monotti Protocol leads to long lasting natural immunity to all SARSCoV2 proteins rather than only to the spike protein which most vaccines or gene therapies are based on, therefore by definition offering a broader level of long term immunity to exposed individuals with the added safety of a strong vitamin D boosted killer T-cell mediated immune response.
The Monotti Protocol is a clear and simple, yet highly effective way to safeguard society from untested and socially destructive pandemic solutions."
https://nulluslocussinegenio.com/2021/03/23/the-monotti-protocol/
No Place Without Spirit
The Monotti Protocol For Keeping Society Open
The Monotti Protocol, 2021 The Monotti Protocol aims to be at the same time extremely simple yet extremely effective. It consists of three main epidemic or pandemic control approaches, to be implem…
Robin Monotti + Cory Morningstar pinned «"If the Monotti Protocol were to be implemented in any country or society, all restrictive measures such as social distancing, lockdowns, face masks, and all business, sports and hospitality closures could be immediately lifted without any detrimental effect…»
COVID-19 and Children.docx
19.3 KB
I am sharing 'COVID-19 and Children' with you
EU VACCINE PASSPORT DEBATED
Plenary session - Multimedia Centre
https://multimedia.europarl.europa.eu/en/plenary-session_20210324-0900-PLENARY_vd
Plenary session - Multimedia Centre
https://multimedia.europarl.europa.eu/en/plenary-session_20210324-0900-PLENARY_vd
Multimedia Centre
Plenary session
ANGELA MERKEL BACKS DOWN FROM FURTHER LOCKDOWN AFTER THE PROTEST: BREAKING: "Angela Merkel has unexpectedly announced cancellation of Easter 5-day shutdown made public yesterday. She said that decision had been a mistake. Germany saw yet more lockdown protests over the weekend and Merkel’s CDU party received a drubbing in recent regional elections. "Germany is currently suffering a third wave of the corona virus" 😉
Forwarded from Ana
Please let's stop this new abnormal apartheid now! https://youtu.be/L1a8zIsOzCg
YouTube
URGENT: Digital Green Certificate Regulation
This video briefly examines the Digital Green Certificate Regulation.
Please watch and share urgently.
Link to draft legislation: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:52021PC0130&from=EN
Link to Google Drive with draft letter…
Please watch and share urgently.
Link to draft legislation: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:52021PC0130&from=EN
Link to Google Drive with draft letter…
⬆️ UK: NORTH: BRADFORD
SATURDAY 27TH MARCH
THE NORTH UNITES RALLY
SATURDAY 27TH MARCH
THE NORTH UNITES RALLY
UK LAW: The Public Health (Control of Disease) Act 1984 provides that Regulations made under the Act may not include provision requiring a person to undergo medical treatment. “Medical treatment” includes vaccinations and other prophylactic treatment.
https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1984/22
https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1984/22
www.legislation.gov.uk
Public Health (Control of Disease) Act 1984
An Act to consolidate certain enactments relating to the control of disease and to the establishment and functions of port health authorities, including enactments relating to burial and cremation and to the regulation of common lodging–houses and canal boats…
UK LAW: The Equality Act 2010 protects individuals from discrimination relating to protected characteristics, which include belief. An anti-vaccination stance is a belief, it is therefore protected from discrimination by law
https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2010/15/contents
https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2010/15/contents
www.legislation.gov.uk
Equality Act 2010
An Act to make provision to require Ministers of the Crown and others when making strategic decisions about the exercise of their functions to have regard to the desirability of reducing socio-economic inequalities; to reform and harmonise equality law and…
Forwarded from Mike Yeadon
Perhaps sone are mistaken.
I can’t assess anyone else’s motives.
What I can do is show you that the evidential basis of immune escape is a deliberate contrivance, using in vitro test systems - always just on antibodies - which aren’t a measure of the broader immune response to a large virus.
Here’s one paper from one of the worlds top immunology labs. There are also YouTube videos by Prof Shane Crotty about this.
The paper demonstrates that those recovering from natural infection or having been vaccinated all possess in their blood T-cells which recognise all the main variants.
https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.02.27.433180v1
In addition, getting ahead of this idea, the same lab did a prodigious amount of work characterising comprehensively the T-cell responses to every part of the virus, which uses up to 600 short, unique pieces.
Each persons immune response uses a few dozen of these to form what’s called an immune repertoire.
Statistically, the variants have changed so little (0.3% in 15 months!) that most of the pieces are unchanged & so your T-cells EASILY recognise all the variants, whether your immunity arose from vaccination or infection.
The chances the virus could truly escape immunity is miniscule, but even better than this is the realisation that even if a lucky variant got passed my immunity, it would not get passed yours. In other words, variants cannot represent a community health threat.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33521695/
Here’s their conclusion:
<<Overall, T cell responses in SARS-CoV-2 are estimated to recognize even more epitopes per donor than seen in the context of other RNA viruses, such as dengue,38,39 where 11.6 and 7 CD4+ and CD8+ T cell epitopes, respectively, were recognized on average. This analysis should allay concerns over the potential for SARS-CoV-2 to escape T cell recognition by mutation of a few key viral epitopes.>>
Also, worth noting that the closest relation to SARS-COV-2 is SARS. Those infected by SARS in 2003 were contacted & when their T-cells were studied they still had good immunity 17y later & bonus, their T-cells also responded to SARS-COV-2!
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2020/07/200716101536.htm
These two viruses are just 80% identical (20% differences).
Yet it’s suggested that a 0.3% difference in variants will enable the virus to “escape immunity”?
Really?
Cheers,
Mike Yeadon
I can’t assess anyone else’s motives.
What I can do is show you that the evidential basis of immune escape is a deliberate contrivance, using in vitro test systems - always just on antibodies - which aren’t a measure of the broader immune response to a large virus.
Here’s one paper from one of the worlds top immunology labs. There are also YouTube videos by Prof Shane Crotty about this.
The paper demonstrates that those recovering from natural infection or having been vaccinated all possess in their blood T-cells which recognise all the main variants.
https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.02.27.433180v1
In addition, getting ahead of this idea, the same lab did a prodigious amount of work characterising comprehensively the T-cell responses to every part of the virus, which uses up to 600 short, unique pieces.
Each persons immune response uses a few dozen of these to form what’s called an immune repertoire.
Statistically, the variants have changed so little (0.3% in 15 months!) that most of the pieces are unchanged & so your T-cells EASILY recognise all the variants, whether your immunity arose from vaccination or infection.
The chances the virus could truly escape immunity is miniscule, but even better than this is the realisation that even if a lucky variant got passed my immunity, it would not get passed yours. In other words, variants cannot represent a community health threat.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33521695/
Here’s their conclusion:
<<Overall, T cell responses in SARS-CoV-2 are estimated to recognize even more epitopes per donor than seen in the context of other RNA viruses, such as dengue,38,39 where 11.6 and 7 CD4+ and CD8+ T cell epitopes, respectively, were recognized on average. This analysis should allay concerns over the potential for SARS-CoV-2 to escape T cell recognition by mutation of a few key viral epitopes.>>
Also, worth noting that the closest relation to SARS-COV-2 is SARS. Those infected by SARS in 2003 were contacted & when their T-cells were studied they still had good immunity 17y later & bonus, their T-cells also responded to SARS-COV-2!
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2020/07/200716101536.htm
These two viruses are just 80% identical (20% differences).
Yet it’s suggested that a 0.3% difference in variants will enable the virus to “escape immunity”?
Really?
Cheers,
Mike Yeadon
bioRxiv
Negligible impact of SARS-CoV-2 variants on CD4+ and CD8+ T cell reactivity in COVID-19 exposed donors and vaccinees
The emergence of SARS-CoV-2 variants highlighted the need to better understand adaptive immune responses to this virus. It is important to address whether also CD4+ and CD8+ T cell responses are affected, because of the role they play in disease resolution…
⬇️ C R I M I N A L S ⬇️
"EMA advises against use of ivermectin for the prevention or treatment of COVID-19 outside randomised clinical trials | European Medicines Agency"
https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/news/ema-advises-against-use-ivermectin-prevention-treatment-covid-19-outside-randomised-clinical-trials
"EMA advises against use of ivermectin for the prevention or treatment of COVID-19 outside randomised clinical trials | European Medicines Agency"
https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/news/ema-advises-against-use-ivermectin-prevention-treatment-covid-19-outside-randomised-clinical-trials
Chiapas, Mexico, is the only Mexican state where the government distributes Ivermectin. Chiapas has the 3rd highest indigenous population in México at 13%, a group supposedly at higher risk. They adopted a version of The Monotti Protocol with great success. #MonottiProtocol
Forwarded from Tessa Fights Robots (Tessa Lena)
Vera Sharav: It's Not Enough to Say NEVER AGAIN.
The other day in Union Square in New York, Vera Sharav, a Holocaust survivor and a highly respected activist in the area of medical ethics, shared her thoughts on alarming similarities between our life today and how things went in early Nazi Germany.
“It is not enough to say NEVER AGAIN.”
https://vimeo.com/528439594
The other day in Union Square in New York, Vera Sharav, a Holocaust survivor and a highly respected activist in the area of medical ethics, shared her thoughts on alarming similarities between our life today and how things went in early Nazi Germany.
“It is not enough to say NEVER AGAIN.”
https://vimeo.com/528439594
Vimeo
Vera Sharav: It's Not Enough to Say NEVER AGAIN
Vera Sharav: It's Not Enough to Say NEVER AGAIN. The other day in Union Square in New York, Vera Sharav, a Holocaust survivor and a highly respected activist…
Forwarded from Eshani King
Re posting here:
https://youtu.be/L1a8zIsOzCg
Robin, the above is extremely urgent for Irish people. Need to be dealt with today to warn Irish MPs who are going to be bounced into agreeing fast tracking of "green passports" tomorrow morning!!
It is possible that similar things will be happening in other countries too simultaneously so they can't warn each other.
I have texted to an MP I know and will email to my own MP tonight.
https://youtu.be/L1a8zIsOzCg
Robin, the above is extremely urgent for Irish people. Need to be dealt with today to warn Irish MPs who are going to be bounced into agreeing fast tracking of "green passports" tomorrow morning!!
It is possible that similar things will be happening in other countries too simultaneously so they can't warn each other.
I have texted to an MP I know and will email to my own MP tonight.
YouTube
URGENT: Digital Green Certificate Regulation
This video briefly examines the Digital Green Certificate Regulation.
Please watch and share urgently.
Link to draft legislation: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:52021PC0130&from=EN
Link to Google Drive with draft letter…
Please watch and share urgently.
Link to draft legislation: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:52021PC0130&from=EN
Link to Google Drive with draft letter…