"As I said, the publication of this response didn’t pass without comment. On 5 November, Rosalind English, a former lecturer on law and genetics at the University of Cambridge and currently part of the editorial team of the UK Human Rights Blog, wrote:

‘Even assuming an entirely safe and effective vaccination, it is something of a step to proclaiming the entire population of a country is on a par with mental health patients who have been deemed enough of a danger to themselves and others to warrant medical treatment under detention. Compulsory interference with a person’s bodily integrity is not something that a democratic society will tolerate without detailed regulations and specialist tribunals in place.’

Ms. English, nevertheless, concludes that, notwithstanding the Mental Health Act:

‘Vaccination without consent would be prohibited by the criminal law on assault, and even grievous bodily harm, if the consequences of the treatment are serious.’
In this she appears to take comfort from the conclusion the authors draw from their first parity argument, that new and primary legislation would be required for the Government to make a vaccination for COVID-19 compulsory."

https://architectsforsocialhousing.co.uk/2021/01/08/our-default-state-compulsory-vaccination-for-covid-19-and-human-rights-law/

Dear Robin, this fascinating manuscript shows that the common cold Rhinovirus protects human airway lining cells from attack by SARS-COV-2. It does so by causing those cells to release an anti-viral substance called interferon.
Isn’t that amazing!? Locking down would tend to reduce the easy spreading of this very common rhinovirus & paradoxically risk making COVID19 worse, both in individuals as well as populations.
Interestingly, we already knew that SARS-COV-2 was extremely sensitive to interferon because a UK biotech company called Synairgen showed last year a profoundly beneficial effect of their inhaled IFN product on covid19 patients.
With best wishes,
Mike Yeadon

http://eprints.gla.ac.uk/236452/1/236452.pdf

Spot the flaw with social distancing, lockdowns, stay at home orders, & face masks (if they worked, which they don't)

"Recent endemic coronavirus infection is associated with less-severe COVID-19"

https://www.jci.org/articles/view/143380

Mike Yeadon: "I think it’s entirely possible that lockdowns could have different effects on differing respiratory viruses.
I’m clear from the evidence that a symptomatic covid19 patient is required to be an efficient source of infection.
Since the general, ambulatory community actively & strongly de selects for symptomatic covid19 because they feel unwell if not frankly ill & aren’t likely to be wondering about & also the rest of us instinctively avoid evidently unwell people,
Lockdown therefore wouldn’t impact transmission much since community transmission was low anyway & didn’t much affect institutional transmission either. What a mess of mistaken assumptions.

The common cold, by contrast, rarely makes people so ill that they don’t go out. So community transmission of rhinovirus is probably an relatively important route of spreading.
As rhinovirus is so powerful an inhibitor of replication of SARS-COV-2 in airways, it’s loss during lockdown arguably meant those who did acquire covid19- perhaps because they live with a health & social care staff member, would be expected to have had a worse outcome thereby.
I agree that not understanding the different dynamics, ecology & virus-virus interactions in the host meant that not only did lockdowns not save people from catching SARS-COV-2, lockdowns harmed the immune response to it (to say nothing of the extreme harms of lockdowns on other aspects of life.
Nice one, SAGE, you dangerous idiots.
Mike"

In conclusion:
-endemic coronaviruses lead to less severe Covid19 through cross reactive T-cell immunity
-rhinoviruses protect from SARSCoV2 infection by causing airway cells to release the interferon anti-viral

Call for evidence - Committees - UK Parliament

The Government have announced a review into introducing a Covid vaccine certificate system or “vaccine passports.
The Committee have launched an inquiry to consider potential  ethical, legal and operational issues and the efficacy and appropriateness of a certificate system.
We invite written evidence on any of these areas?

https://committees.parliament.uk/call-for-evidence/438/covid-19-vaccine-certification/

PROTEST: APRIL 24th
Make it happen.

https://bigbrotherwatch.org.uk/CoronavirusAct/#email-your-mp

Urgent. Please send - template provided

PROTEST: APRIL 24th
Make it happen.

VERA SHARAV: "The Bill [and Melinda] Gates Foundation has tremendous influence on major media, and the publishing houses of the New England Journal [of Medicine] or The Lancet. The best science journals essentially become mouthpieces for the kind of politics Bill Gates would like. Bill Gates has even said publicly that the “Final Solution,” … he has used this exact word [final solution], [which was also used by the Nazis for the final solution of the Jewish question], the end -gültige solution for Covid -Pandemic would be a vaccine, and a vaccine only.
Well, Bill Gates is a man who uses the term with full knowledge of its meaning. He stepped onto the public stage at one of the TED conferences and explained exactly how the human population around the world can be reduced by 10-15% with our new vaccines and birth control! Gates has big plans to eradicate parts of the population. But I do not believe that those he has in mind will be informed about it in order to then give their consent with awareness of the consequences."

https://childrenshealthdefense.eu/covid-19/vera-sharav-a-holocaust-survivor-talks-about-the-corona-measures-and-how-they-attack-our-humanity-in-an-interview-with-our-correspondent-uwe-alschner/

"'Dystopian' policy on face masks in classrooms faces fresh legal challenge: There is “no credible scientific evidence” to support the Government’s current position, according to a pre-action letter"
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2021/03/23/dystopian-policy-face-masks-classrooms-faces-fresh-legal-challenge/

"SARS-CoV-2 spike protein binds to bacterial lipopolysaccharide and boosts proinflammatory activity"
https://academic.oup.com/jmcb/article/12/12/916/6028992?s=09

"Among COVID-19 positive Veterans, preexisting aspirin prescription was associated with a statistically and clinically significant decrease in overall mortality..cutting the odds of mortality by more than half. Findings demonstrated that pre-diagnosis aspirin prescription was strongly associated with decreased mortality rates for Veterans diagnosed with COVID-19
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.12.13.20248147v1

"Our results indicate that the anti-inflammatory properties of aspirin and salicylate are mediated in part by their specific inhibition of IKK-β, thereby preventing activation by NF-κB of genes involved in the pathogenesis of the inflammatory response."
https://www.nature.com/articles/23948

While I would expect a treatment which protects you against severe illness to also reduce transmission, it’s irrelevant because those who are vulnerable have already been offered & mostly accepted vaccination.
They’re protected. It doesn’t matter what anyone dose.
In the case of influenza, you’re much less likely to be fully protected by vaccination. But we don’t insist that everyone else gets vaccinated.
SARS-COV-2 is more of a risk than is flu to those over 70y, but LESS of a risk than is flu for those under 70y.
Why are we allowing autocrats to change policy stances everywhere, ostensibly because of a virus that is a more concentrated risk to a slice of the population than is influenza?

Why have officials completely ignored & in fact actively campaigned to censor & suppress good news that several medical treatments aside from vaccination are proven?

Is it that there’s no profit in vitamin D, generic versions of inhaled anti inflammatory drugs used in asthma, old drugs repurposed like ivermectin & hydroxychloroquinone, oral zinc & old antibiotics like azithromycin, inhaled interferon (though experimental, Synairgen at U Soton had a fantastic result in severe covid19 cases) etc?

All of these work. It’s quite remarkable how much clinical innovation there’s been in just one year.

Yet...in every case, the investigators have faced criticisms & often had difficulties in publishing.

Why had almost every country just ignored the best-evidenced drug, ivermectin, and refused even to consider giving it an emergency use authorisation, even though the clinical data package is more complete with it than is the case for any of the vaccines??

I notice that the Czech Republic has recently approved ivermectin in hospitalised patients. It works even better in ambulatory, non hospitalised patients, but it’s a start.

Why has the corrupted medicines regulators in Europe just ignored this cheap, old drug, which is so widely used that it’s among the WHO’s list of essential medicines?

https://youtu.be/FVUT78bzzKk

Passing this on (and could you forward to others on your list):

On Monday Parliament debated the issue of vaccine passports in response to the petition which gained 290,000 signatures.

However, the Government has decided as the next step to issue a Call For Evidence. It is a sort of public consultation which anyone can participate in.

The full title is: Open Consultation. COVID Status Certification Review Call For Evidence It is vital that as many people as possible tell the Government why vaccine certificates are a bad idea.

If all the petition signatories did this we would overwhelm their system and we might frighten them into having second thoughts.

The closing date is 11.45pm on 29/3/21 so we have days to do this.

To do this you need to go to the link below and submit your comments.

https://www.gov.uk/government/consultations/covid-status-certification-review-call-for-evidence/covid-status-certification-review-call-for-evidence

Please try to get as many people involved as you can as quickly as you can.

You don't need to write reams just think of some bullet points which matter to you and submit them ASAP If you have any good links to articles about the implications for health freedom and privacy or any other evidence you feel is important then submit it too.

Your opinion matters so speak up. It does not matter that you are an ordinary person, you don't need any specialist knowledge. This will impact you and your family. Tell them how it will effect you negatively.

Don't delay.

If we are ever going to be able to get on a plane again without the necessity of being jabbed like a guinea pig with an experimental vaccine which is being shown to have a higher level of harm to it than covid itself and risking our own health as a result, losing sovereignty over our bodies and our rights to make informed decisions which the State respects, being forced to do something which is against common sense, good science and public health and safety we are going to have to fight for it. Because it won’t stop here – going to the theatre, football match or cinema will also require a passport. Even shopping – who knows! To give up our right to basic freedom of movement is a huge thing to hand over willingly. And there will be no going back.

Make your choice Choose if data from your health records is shared for research and planning [data mining for profit]

https://www.nhs.uk/your-nhs-data-matters/manage-your-choice/

NEW: I have finally written down a hyperlink referenced explanation of the MONOTTI PROTOCOL. I asked Mike Yeadon what he thought. Mike wrote:
"Robin,
Honestly, it’s brilliant!..I like the simplicity & elegance of it.
The first part alone would make a big difference. Stop mass testing period! And certainly asymptomatic people. It’s just nuts.
After three weeks of mass testing in U.K. schools, I don’t think they’ve found a genuine case. Many false positives of course!
Treatment kits in pharmacies, I’m sure the authorities will block it certainly in U.K.
Despite giving EUAs for new technology vaccines, they won’t approve ivermectin for covid19 even though it’s available on prescription to treat parasitic illnesses."
https://nulluslocussinegenio.com/2021/03/23/the-monotti-protocol/