"Late Monday, the Data and Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB) notified NIAID, BARDA, and AstraZeneca that it was concerned by information released by AstraZeneca on initial data from its COVID-19 vaccine clinical trial. The DSMB expressed concern that AstraZeneca may have included outdated information from that trial, which may have provided an incomplete view of the efficacy data. We urge the company to work with the DSMB to review the efficacy data and ensure the most accurate, up-to-date efficacy data be made public as quickly as possible."
https://www.nih.gov/news-events/news-releases/niaid-statement-astrazeneca-vaccine

You can have your say until 29 March on vaccine passports of course people are not adequately informed so here it is https://www.gov.uk/government/consultations/covid-status-certification-review-call-for-evidence

I predicted the vaccine curtain as a reverse iron curtain and it is happening as we speak. Eastern Europe is now the Free Europe.
https://twitter.com/samstreetwrites/status/1374138875136901120?s=19

We only got social welfare between 1945-1990 because the West was afraid of the USSR's model. We will only get our freedom back if they become scared of the Russian model of non coerced vaccination today. That is why we all need to publicly support Russia's moves on freedom of choice and informed consent, no lockdowns and everything that is on offer there which is not in the West anymore. Any other considerations can be discussed if and when we get an equivalent level of freedom than they have there.

U.S. health body questions AstraZeneca's COVID-19 vaccine efficacy trial data [IT DOESN'T WORK]
https://mobile.reuters.com/article/amp/idUSKBN2BF0JO

Coronavirus Act section 51 gave police powers to arrest "potentially infectious" people.

It's mainly been used to unlawfully detain healthy, innocent people.

It's due for renewal THIS THURSDAY 25 March.

Write to your MP - template on our website: https://t.co/ydNQvcDaUC

DAVID DAVIS HAS GONE OVER TO THE DARK SIDE. HE SUPPORTS VACCINE PASSPORTS

Subject: Covid 19 Vaccine Certification

Witness(es): Rt Hon David Davis MP; Professor Jonathan Wolff, Alfred Landecker Professor of Values and Public Policy at the University of Oxford; Silkie Carlo, Director of Big Brother Watch

https://parliamentlive.tv/event/index/d98a0039-ccad-466e-aff2-d48879e47aec?s=09

Makes sense now?

If enough people don't take the vax their plans can't work - remember the unions in the 70s or Thatcher in the 80s looked victorious and they fell in the end - this is done to demoralise us so we surrender

"As I said, the publication of this response didn’t pass without comment. On 5 November, Rosalind English, a former lecturer on law and genetics at the University of Cambridge and currently part of the editorial team of the UK Human Rights Blog, wrote:

‘Even assuming an entirely safe and effective vaccination, it is something of a step to proclaiming the entire population of a country is on a par with mental health patients who have been deemed enough of a danger to themselves and others to warrant medical treatment under detention. Compulsory interference with a person’s bodily integrity is not something that a democratic society will tolerate without detailed regulations and specialist tribunals in place.’

Ms. English, nevertheless, concludes that, notwithstanding the Mental Health Act:

‘Vaccination without consent would be prohibited by the criminal law on assault, and even grievous bodily harm, if the consequences of the treatment are serious.’
In this she appears to take comfort from the conclusion the authors draw from their first parity argument, that new and primary legislation would be required for the Government to make a vaccination for COVID-19 compulsory."

https://architectsforsocialhousing.co.uk/2021/01/08/our-default-state-compulsory-vaccination-for-covid-19-and-human-rights-law/

Dear Robin, this fascinating manuscript shows that the common cold Rhinovirus protects human airway lining cells from attack by SARS-COV-2. It does so by causing those cells to release an anti-viral substance called interferon.
Isn’t that amazing!? Locking down would tend to reduce the easy spreading of this very common rhinovirus & paradoxically risk making COVID19 worse, both in individuals as well as populations.
Interestingly, we already knew that SARS-COV-2 was extremely sensitive to interferon because a UK biotech company called Synairgen showed last year a profoundly beneficial effect of their inhaled IFN product on covid19 patients.
With best wishes,
Mike Yeadon

http://eprints.gla.ac.uk/236452/1/236452.pdf

Spot the flaw with social distancing, lockdowns, stay at home orders, & face masks (if they worked, which they don't)

"Recent endemic coronavirus infection is associated with less-severe COVID-19"

https://www.jci.org/articles/view/143380