"Vitamin D deficiency (≤12ng/mL or <30nmol/L), is independently associated with COVID-19 mortality after adjustment for visceral fat (epicardial fat thickness) [Epicardial fat covers 80% of the heart surface]. Low 25-OHD may contribute to a pro-inflammatory and pro-thrombotic state, increasing risk"
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.03.12.21253490v2
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.03.12.21253490v2
medRxiv
Serum Vitamin D levels are associated with increased COVID-19 severity and mortality independent of visceral adiposity
INTRODUCTION Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) is a global pandemic. Vitamin D (25-OHD) deficiency has been associated with susceptibility to infectious disease. In this study, the association between COVID-19 outcomes and 25-OHD levels in patients attending…
Forwarded from Mike Yeadon
Pro lockdown folk appear to have a semi religious belief that lockdowns MUST work, because this is a human contact transmitted infection & lockdown reduces average number of contacts.
I’ve been astonished by the number of people who uncritically accept this.
Of course, what matters is not the number of contacts, but the number of contacts which lead to INFECTION.
Now, this pivots on density of infectious individuals. I don’t accept that transmission of infective levels of virus occurs from people without symptoms, not at any frequency with which we need to be concerned.
Transmission is also far lower outside with massive air dilution than inside in still rebreathed air.
Consider the phenotype of a person infected with virus, but who has no symptoms. Because symptoms are a consequence of either substantial virus pathology in lungs & elsewhere, or of the body’s response to invasion, its logical to expect INFECTIOUS people have much virus in their airways also have SYMPTOMS. Not saying 100% match, but in the vast majority of infectious individuals, they will feel unwell. They’re much less likely to be walking around & able to bump into susceptible people.
In contrast, consider institutions. Hospitals & care homes are in contrast, with large numbers of people & patients especially & from time to time, residents, are there because they’re not only symptomatic, but ill, often seriously ill.
In short, I believe the virus was never anywhere near as prevalent in the community as in institutions. And that’s why lockdown did little except to damage society & the economy. lockdown did little to reduce INFECTIOUS contacts. Reduction in contacts which were most unlikely to lead to infection was an illogical step to have taken.
In parallel to this logical argument we have the empirical evidence that the bulk of infections were acquired in institutions & not random contacts in the community.
This isn’t a new concept, either: both SARS & MERS are considered largely as infectious diseases of INSTITUTIONS. Not the community.
I hope I’ve acknowledged the logical approach outlined by those favouring lockdown & believing it MUST work, while providing a coherent & internally consistent explanation why it is in fact not true. My explanation tallies with the great bulk of international literature in this point, that indiscriminate lockdowns are not associated with lower mortality, either of deaths attributed to Covid19 or all causes mortality.
We must not make this mistake again.
Best wishes,
Mike
I’ve been astonished by the number of people who uncritically accept this.
Of course, what matters is not the number of contacts, but the number of contacts which lead to INFECTION.
Now, this pivots on density of infectious individuals. I don’t accept that transmission of infective levels of virus occurs from people without symptoms, not at any frequency with which we need to be concerned.
Transmission is also far lower outside with massive air dilution than inside in still rebreathed air.
Consider the phenotype of a person infected with virus, but who has no symptoms. Because symptoms are a consequence of either substantial virus pathology in lungs & elsewhere, or of the body’s response to invasion, its logical to expect INFECTIOUS people have much virus in their airways also have SYMPTOMS. Not saying 100% match, but in the vast majority of infectious individuals, they will feel unwell. They’re much less likely to be walking around & able to bump into susceptible people.
In contrast, consider institutions. Hospitals & care homes are in contrast, with large numbers of people & patients especially & from time to time, residents, are there because they’re not only symptomatic, but ill, often seriously ill.
In short, I believe the virus was never anywhere near as prevalent in the community as in institutions. And that’s why lockdown did little except to damage society & the economy. lockdown did little to reduce INFECTIOUS contacts. Reduction in contacts which were most unlikely to lead to infection was an illogical step to have taken.
In parallel to this logical argument we have the empirical evidence that the bulk of infections were acquired in institutions & not random contacts in the community.
This isn’t a new concept, either: both SARS & MERS are considered largely as infectious diseases of INSTITUTIONS. Not the community.
I hope I’ve acknowledged the logical approach outlined by those favouring lockdown & believing it MUST work, while providing a coherent & internally consistent explanation why it is in fact not true. My explanation tallies with the great bulk of international literature in this point, that indiscriminate lockdowns are not associated with lower mortality, either of deaths attributed to Covid19 or all causes mortality.
We must not make this mistake again.
Best wishes,
Mike
VITAMIN D3 "Vitamin D3 is a secosteroid hormone produced in the skin in amounts estimated up to 25,000 international units (IUs) a day by the action of UVB radiation on 7-dehydrocholesterol. Vitamin D deficiency is common due to both lack of adequate sun exposure to the skin, and because vitamin D is present in very few food sources. Deficiency is strongly linked to increased risk for a multitude of diseases, several of which have historically been shown to improve dramatically with either adequate UVB exposure to the skin, or to oral or topical supplementation with vitamin D. These diseases include asthma, psoriasis, rheumatoid arthritis, rickets and tuberculosis. All patients in our hospital have been routinely screened on admission for vitamin D deficiency since July 2011, and offered supplementation to either correct or prevent deficiency. During this time, we have admitted over 4700 patients, the vast majority of whom agreed to supplementation with either 5000 or 10,000 IUs/day. Due to disease concerns, a few agreed to larger amounts, ranging from 20,000 to 50,000 IUs/day. There have been no cases of vitamin D3 induced hypercalcemia or any adverse events attributable to vitamin D3 supplementation in any patient...In summary, long-term supplementation with vitamin D3 in doses ranging from 5000 to 50,000 IUs/day appears to be safe."
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0960076018306228
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0960076018306228
❤1👍1
MEN over 40: take 4,000 IUs of vitamin D per day, unless you sun tan every day:
https://youtu.be/QrU1yrmNIqc
https://youtu.be/QrU1yrmNIqc
YouTube
Results of a Prostate Cancer/Vitamin D Trial: Effectiveness Safety Recommendations
Bruce W. Hollis, PhD, Medical University of South Carolina shares the results of a recent trial including identifying the vitamin D level needed to protect the prostate gland. Recorded on 12/09/2014. [3/2015] [Show ID: 29079]
Vitamin D for Public Health…
Vitamin D for Public Health…
Vera Sharav, Holocaust survivor, founder of the Alliance for Human Research Protection and biomedical activist, in her testimony to the German Corona Committee, compares the mandating of face masks to the yellow star imposed on Jews under the Third Reich:
https://youtu.be/r02j7HaKYe8
https://youtu.be/r02j7HaKYe8
"We do know that at least ninety-five per-cent of people who are recorded as dying of COVID19 had other serious medical conditions. Claiming that COVID19 was the primary/recordable cause of death in all of these cases is just ridiculous. Beyond ridiculous."
https://drmalcolmkendrick.org/2021/03/20/covid19-hidden-figures-and-ooda/
https://drmalcolmkendrick.org/2021/03/20/covid19-hidden-figures-and-ooda/
Dr. Malcolm Kendrick
COVID19, hidden figures and OODA
20th March 2021 What figures about COVID19 do you believe? Indeed, what figures can you believe? Do you simply take them all at face value, and work from there? That would certainly be nice, but it…
WE HAVE ALMOST WON THIS:
"Covid rules on groups gathering outdoors 'not policeable' ahead of lockdown easing: Chairman of Metropolitan Police Federation says his members have no desire to carry out the law to the letter"
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2021/02/28/covid-rules-groups-gathering-outdoors-not-policeable-ahead-lockdown/
"Covid rules on groups gathering outdoors 'not policeable' ahead of lockdown easing: Chairman of Metropolitan Police Federation says his members have no desire to carry out the law to the letter"
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2021/02/28/covid-rules-groups-gathering-outdoors-not-policeable-ahead-lockdown/
The Telegraph
Covid rules on groups gathering outdoors 'not policeable' ahead of lockdown easing
Chairman of Metropolitan Police Federation says his members have no desire to carry out the law to the letter
We need another protest as they really do not get it.
https://twitter.com/PoliticsForAlI/status/1373573454159568897?s=19
https://twitter.com/PoliticsForAlI/status/1373573454159568897?s=19
Twitter
Politics For All
🚨BREAKING: Mary Ramsay, from Public Health England, says measures like masks and travel restrictions are likely to continue “certainly for a few years” before we “gradually go back to a more normal situation” Via @BBCNews
Frontiers | Editorial: Antidepressant Prescriptions in Children and Adolescents | Psychiatry
https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyt.2020.600283/full
https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyt.2020.600283/full
Frontiers
Editorial: Antidepressant Prescriptions in Children and Adolescents
The use of antidepressants in children and adolescents has a troubled history, for almost all principles of good evidence-based medicine were violated or compromised. It is a history characterised by systematically biased research, financial conflicts of…
BRISTOL KILL THE BILL PROTESTS. PLEASE ADD ANY VIDEO LINKS AND FOOTAGE IN THIS THREAD. I WOULD LIKE TO GET MORE INFO ON WHAT HAPPENED/WHAT IS HAPPENING/WHICH GROUP CALLED THE PROTEST ETC. NO NAMES PLEASE REMEMBER WE HAVE TO ASSUME THIS CHANNEL IS MONITORED.
London - Rally for Freedom - 20/03/2021
https://youtu.be/Er1RbeRk03E
https://youtu.be/Er1RbeRk03E
Russia makes its move: it unequivocally opposes vaccine passports for travel. Says it will certainly lead to forced vaccination
https://youtu.be/VtGyXDMMP3E
https://youtu.be/VtGyXDMMP3E
Uploaded a few inconvenient facts on my Instagram today. Take a look, this is just one of four:
https://www.instagram.com/p/CMt8nvwsbPV/?igshid=1w1azcrovdemz
https://www.instagram.com/p/CMt8nvwsbPV/?igshid=1w1azcrovdemz
Take a look at this thread. Confirms most of my research:
Thread by @BidoliNicola on Thread Reader App – Thread Reader App
https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1361669981302317057.html
Thread by @BidoliNicola on Thread Reader App – Thread Reader App
https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1361669981302317057.html
Threadreaderapp
Read and Share Twitter Threads easily!
Thread Reader helps you read and share the best of Twitter Threads
I think SARSCoV2 persists in the body, Nicola Bidoli calls it parasitic. I can think of two ways in which it can persist:
1 It continues replicating in the human bacterial microbiome, but when immune defenses are working well other bacteria in the microbiome keep it in check.
2 It is a retrovirus, or parts of it are. It persists in human cells but significant replication only occurs when immune defenses are down.
I think that both options are possible, as well as the possibility that both are true.
What do you think? How do you tell a retrovirus from a non retrovirus in terms of its microbiological properties and composition?
We already know there is research proving that SARSCoV2 replicates in the bacterial microbiome (Brogna et al, 2020). Of course what defends in you in both cases are:
1 Vitamin D 2,000 IUs per day minimum, 4,000 IUs for adults of normal size
2 Macrolides, bacteriostatics, antibiotics at the signs of high fever (over 38.8,°C approx)
1 It continues replicating in the human bacterial microbiome, but when immune defenses are working well other bacteria in the microbiome keep it in check.
2 It is a retrovirus, or parts of it are. It persists in human cells but significant replication only occurs when immune defenses are down.
I think that both options are possible, as well as the possibility that both are true.
What do you think? How do you tell a retrovirus from a non retrovirus in terms of its microbiological properties and composition?
We already know there is research proving that SARSCoV2 replicates in the bacterial microbiome (Brogna et al, 2020). Of course what defends in you in both cases are:
1 Vitamin D 2,000 IUs per day minimum, 4,000 IUs for adults of normal size
2 Macrolides, bacteriostatics, antibiotics at the signs of high fever (over 38.8,°C approx)