ALL NEW STANDS TO BE EMAILED TO ME (FiFi) AT: astandintheparkuk@protonmail.com. Get them in by this afternoon to be included in this week's listings! xxx

Please feel free to print these off to promote your Stands! 🙌

It’s evident to me that the most likely reason for the serious adverse events is expression of spike protein which has independently been shown to trigger cell clumping over a decade ago.
Now add variable expression in different tissues plus widely varying sensitivity & that’s all that’s required to get some fatal SAEs.
If correct, all the EUA vaccines would be in the frame, with a potentially lesser concern about the Pfizer one as it’s only a portion of spike.

"The SARS-CoV-2 virus is more complicated than just a spike protein. There are, in fact, four different proteins that form the overall structure of the virus particle: spike, envelope (E), membrane (M) and nucleocapsid (N). In a natural infection, our immune system recognises all of these proteins to varying degrees. So how important are immune responses to these different proteins, and does it matter that the first vaccines will not replicate these?
Following SARS-CoV-2 infection, researchers have discovered that we actually make the most antibodies to the N protein – not the spike protein. This is the same for many different viruses that also have N proteins. But how N protein antibodies protect us from infection has been a long-standing mystery. This is because N protein is only found inside the virus particle, wrapped around the RNA. Therefore, N protein antibodies cannot block virus entry, will not be measured in neutralisation assays that test for this in the lab, and so have largely been overlooked."

"Our latest work from the MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology in Cambridge has revealed a new mechanism for how N protein antibodies can protect against viral disease. We have studied another virus containing an N protein called lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus and shown a surprising role for an unusual antibody receptor called TRIM21.
Whereas antibodies are typically thought to only work outside of cells, TRIM21 is only found inside cells. We have shown that N protein antibodies that get inside cells are recognised by TRIM21, which then shreds the associated N protein. Tiny fragments of N protein are then displayed on the surface of infected cells. T cells recognise these fragments, identify cells as infected, then kill the cell and consequently any virus."

"N protein is very similar between different coronaviruses – much more so than the spike protein. This means it’s possible that a protective immune response against SARS-CoV-2 N protein could also offer some protection against other related coronaviruses, such as Mers.
Another potential benefit that may arise from including N protein in SARS-CoV-2 vaccines is due to the low mutation rates seen in the N protein sequence. Some changes to the sequence of SARS-CoV-2 have been reported over the course of this pandemic, with the most significant changes occurring in the spike protein. There is some concern that if the spike sequence alters too much, then new vaccines will be required. This could be similar to the current need for annual updating of influenza vaccines. However, as the N protein sequence is much more stable than the spike, vaccines that include a component targeting the N protein are likely to be effective for longer."
https://theconversation.com/covid-vaccines-focus-on-the-spike-protein-but-heres-another-target-150315

"I investigate Sage’s subcommittees: SPI-M (Scientific Pandemic Influenza Group on Modelling) and SPI-B (Scientific Pandemic Insights Group on Behaviours), which play a vital role in how it functions. There is much overlap between the bodies with some members sitting in on all three, such as Patrick Vallance (Government Chief Scientific Adviser) and Chris Whitty (Chief Medical Officer), and was also the case with the now infamous Professor Neil Ferguson of Imperial College London.
At the heart of Sage is SPI-M. It’s been driving government policy ever since the ‘war’ on Covid-19 began. Only very few media outlets, such as TCW and the Daily Mail, have questioned the ‘dodgy data’ derived from its computerised type of modelling. Anyone who suggests it is not perfect is often branded a ‘Covid denier’.
The man who ran the show at SPI-M at the start of the pandemic was Neil Ferguson. He is also acting director of Vaccine Impact Modelling Consortium (VIMC) based at Imperial College, which is funded by GAVI-The Vaccine Alliance, in turn funded by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation as TCW reported here."
https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/sages-covert-coup-part-two-project-fear/

⬆️ Letter to Amnesty International

UK Government Report.
Pfizer vaccine adverse reactions

Execution date: March 4, 2021

* Blood disorders: 2,033
* Cardiac disorders: 1,032
* Congenital disorders: 3
* Hearing disorders: 713
* Endocrine disorders: 10
* Eye disorders: 1,242 (12 blinds)
* Gastrointestinal disorders: 9,360
* General disorders: 26,391
* Liver disorders: 17
* Immune system disorders: 466
* Infections: 1,863
* Injuries: 393
* Continued Investigations: 965
* Metabolic disorders: 525
* Muscle-tissue disorders: 11,565
* Neoplasms: 20
* Nervous System Disorders: 16,107
* Associated with pregnancy: 29
* Psychiatric disorders: 1,235
* Renal / urinary disorder: 187
* Syst. Reproductive: 338
* Respiratory disorders: 3,575
* Skin disorder: 6,042
* Vascular disorders: 992
* Dead: 212
* Medical and Surgical Procedures: 45
* https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/coronavirus-covid-19-vaccine-adverse-reactions
🚩What's disturbing is this is a weekly report😳

The clinical trail for the Pfizer inoculation will NOT be completed till January 27th 2023 Here is the link: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04368728

The Moderna human trials come to a close on December 2023. Here is the link: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03897881

The AstraZeneca human trials will reach completion in February 2023  https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04516746

A few words of reassurance: we will win this battle. I just don't know exactly when. The tragic reality of the adverse event deaths from the Astrazeneca Oxford vaccines is a huge dent in their armour. They will not recover from this fully, ever. They will deny the causation, they will blame a single batch, but the narrative now is irreversibly questioned in the corporate media too. I wish the vaccines worked and gave no adverse events but this was never going to be the case with just an emergency authorisation and not even one full year's safety trial period. So the battle has turned against their main weapon which is under question. The Monotti Protocol is mine, and I know it is safer and more effective than theirs.

Yet another reason why vitamin D is much better than mRNA gene editing:

"..we evaluated the neutralization potency of 99 individuals that received one or two doses of either BNT162b2 [Pfizer] or mRNA-1273 [Moderna] vaccines against pseudoviruses representing 10 globally circulating strains of SARS-CoV-2...a relatively small number of mutations can mediate potent escape from vaccine responses. While the clinical impact of neutralization resistance remains uncertain, these results highlight the potential for variants to escape from neutralizing humoral immunity and emphasize the need to develop broadly protective interventions against the evolving pandemic." [i.e. vitamin D & early treatments, see the Monotti Protocol]

in
"Multiple SARS-CoV-2 variants escape neutralization by vaccine-induced humoral immunity"

Wilfredo F. Garcia-Beltran 1

Evan C. Lam 1

Kerri St. Denis 1

A. John Iafrate

Vivek Naranbhai

Alejandro B. Balazs

https://www.cell.com/cell/fulltext/S0092-8674(21)00298-1

"In summary, an urgent concern – unless mitigated - is the potential harm from LFT-false positives
when screening secondary pupils. We should be grateful if the MHRA will consider a requirement
for PCR confirmation to mitigate the harm that is likely from these tests in screening asymptomatic
secondary school children in England."

MHRA-letter-RSS-school-testing.pdf

"The tediously common refrain from the conspiracy denier is, ‘there couldn’t be a conspiracy that big’.
The simple retort to such a self-professed expert on conspiracies is obvious: how big?
The biggest ‘medical’ corporations in the world can go for decades treating the settling of court cases as mere business expenses, for crimes ranging from the suppressing of adverse test events to multiple murders resulting from undeclared testing to colossal environmental crimes.
Governments perform the vilest and most unthinkable ‘experiments’ (crimes) on their own people without consequence.
Politicians habitually lie to our faces, without consequence.
And on and on. At what point, exactly, does a conspiracy become so big that ‘they’ just couldn’t get away with it, and why? I suggest it’s at the point where the cognitive ability of the conspiracy denier falters, and their unconscious survival instinct kicks in. The point at which the intellect becomes overwhelmed with the scope of events and the instinct is to settle back into the familiar comforting faith known and cultivated since the first moment one’s lips found the nipple. The faith that someone else is dealing with it – that where the world becomes unknown to us, a powerful and benevolent human authority exists in which we have only to place our faith unconditionally in order to guarantee eternal emotional security.
This dangerous delusion may be the central factor placing humanity’s physical security and future in the hands of sociopaths."
https://off-guardian.org/2021/03/12/on-the-psychology-of-the-conspiracy-denier/

This is the #MonottiProtocol. The main difference from a vaccine based strategy is that it relies on cell mediated immunity boosted by vitamin D rather than humoral immunity or antibodies which is what these vaccines are based on