From 52,169 flu detections - to 69.

The 2020–2021 Canadian influenza season:

"Despite elevated respiratory virus testing this season, only 69 influenza viruses were detected, and influenza percent positivity did not exceed 0.1%. Historically, on average, 52,169 influenza viruses were detected within a season with the percent positivity ranging from 0.8%–25.1%."

"Decreased influenza circulation was also observed in other countries around the world. Laboratory data submitted to the World Health Organization’s FluNet program showed that during the 2020 Southern Hemisphere, 2020– 2021 Northern Hemisphere and 2021 Southern Hemisphere influenza seasons, Australia, Chile, South Africa, the United States and countries in Europe also experienced decreased influenza activity for the majority of their surveillance season."

["FluWatch surveillance is funded by the Public Health Agency of Canada."]

https://www.canada.ca/en/public-health/services/reports-publications/canada-communicable-disease-report-ccdr/monthly-issue/2021-47/issue-10-october-2021/national-influenza-annual-report-canada-2020-2021.html

Dec 19, 2021: "About forty No Vax doctors broke into the assembly of the Order of Doctors of Rome demonstrating against the requirement of the vaccine and suspension from work." [h/t / thanks AG]

https://www.ilgiornale.it/news/roma/roma-medici-no-vax-invadono-congresso-dellordine-1996961.html

"Currently, quarantining adds exponentially to the masses of healthcare workers who have already contracted Covid and had to go into isolation, a burden that threatens the integrity of the very healthcare system that these measures were designed to protect. Entire primary healthcare clinics have ground to a halt, and these policies have impaired almost every essential service, from police to government offices, to say nothing of the economic costs to individuals and to the country as a whole. Quarantining is always a drastic public health measure that incurs massive social, financial, psychological, and societal costs. While it can be a valid strategy for certain diseases, Covid-19 simply isn’t one of them. Ironically, we’d be better placed to tackle Covid without it. Current quarantine and contact tracing policies need to be abandoned — urgently."

Shabir A Madhi is the Dean, Faculty of Health Sciences and Professor of Vaccinology at University of the Witwatersrand, Jeremy Nel is an infectious diseases expert, University the Witwatersrand, Francois Venter is Professor of Medicine, University of the Witwatersrand.

https://www.dailymaverick.co.za/article/2021-12-15-covid-19-in-south-africa-its-time-to-ditch-quarantining-and-contact-tracing/

LL (h/t / thank you) writes: "The South African Gov is being advised to stop quarantine, asymptomatic testing, contact tracing and much more. The attached letter is from the MAC (Ministerial Advisory Committee) it’s like SAGE in the UK the twitter thread is by a South African Doctor."

https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1472603623704207364.html

The spectacle serves those that create it.

The spectacle serves those that own it.

The march in London on Saturday has gone mainstream. The Upday News App in the UK is using it as its opening picture. Upday is Europe's most popular news app with a reach of more than 25 million monthly users. The Spectacle has decided we now serve a purpose. The goal is probably to remove Boris and replace him with someone who is more believable after the next lockdown, which Boris will be the fall guy for.

The Spectacle is indicating who the next Prime Minister of the UK should be. Once in power, it will be the same narrative but from a less compromised leader.

"Covid: Impact of restrictions on hospitality is 'atrocious' says CEO of Night Time Industries"
https://youtu.be/tHJjGloIcFI

About that twitter ban.. Robin

Not believing in God is OK, but not believing in the almighty Vaccine makes you an infidel.

How times have changed..

Robin.

Attached is a letter that can be sent / handed to / emailed to CHEMISTS / PHARMACISTS, alerting them to the personal risk they may face for a failure to obtain fully informed consent before administering the Covid-19 experimental injections to members of the public.

In addition, it highlights the serious harm being reported after the Covid-19 injections and the vital role they can play in raising awareness of the risks and harm being done by the injections.

Please share and send to as many as possible.

Note: this can be sent to high street chemists but also to pharmacists inside supermarkets and other places. Also send to their head offices; details for Boots and Lloyds Pharmacies below:

Link to Boots The Chemist Head Office“Contact Us Page”: Boots HQ

Link to Lloyds Pharmacy Head Office “Contact us Page”: Lloyds HQ

Find all chemists involved in Covid-19 injections in your area here: NHS Post Code Checker

With minimal adaption this letter could also be sent to GP's / Doctors/ clinics etc

INFORMED CONSENT WEBSITE IS NOW LIVE

Further to Senior Employment Lawyer Anna De Buisseret’s recent update.

The Informed Consent website is now live.

The site contains lots of information and ways to get involved and more material will be added in time.

Link to the website: https://www.informed-consent-campaign.co.uk

Please also DONATE what you can to help the work of Anna De Buisseret and others as they help the people to fight this tyranny. There is a Donate button on the website.

Related Posts:
Standing up for our children! : https://t.me/robinmg/12830
Anna De Buisseret’s recent update : https://t.me/robinmg/12825

Open letter from The BMJ to Mark Zuckerberg

Dear Mark Zuckerberg,
We are Fiona Godlee and Kamran Abbasi, editors of The BMJ, one of the world’s oldest and most influential general medical journals. We are writing to raise serious concerns about the “fact checking” being undertaken by third party providers on behalf of Facebook/Meta.
In September, a former employee of Ventavia, a contract research company helping carry out the main Pfizer covid-19 vaccine trial, began providing The BMJ with dozens of internal company documents, photos, audio recordings, and emails. These materials revealed a host of poor clinical trial research practices occurring at Ventavia that could impact data integrity and patient safety. We also discovered that, despite receiving a direct complaint about these problems over a year ago, the FDA did not inspect Ventavia’s trial sites.
The BMJ commissioned an investigative reporter to write up the story for our journal. The article was published on 2 November, following legal review, external peer review and subject to The BMJ’s usual high level editorial oversight and review.[1]
But from November 10, readers began reporting a variety of problems when trying to share our article. Some reported being unable to share it. Many others reported having their posts flagged with a warning about “Missing context ... Independent fact-checkers say this information could mislead people.” Those trying to post the article were informed by Facebook that people who repeatedly share “false information” might have their posts moved lower in Facebook’s News Feed. Group administrators where the article was shared received messages from Facebook informing them that such posts were “partly false.”
Readers were directed to a “fact check” performed by a Facebook contractor named Lead Stories.[2]
We find the “fact check” performed by Lead Stories to be inaccurate, incompetent and irresponsible.
-- It fails to provide any assertions of fact that The BMJ article got wrong
-- It has a nonsensical title: “Fact Check: The British Medical Journal Did NOT Reveal Disqualifying And Ignored Reports Of Flaws In Pfizer COVID-19 Vaccine Trials”
-- The first paragraph inaccurately labels The BMJ a “news blog”
-- It contains a screenshot of our article with a stamp over it stating “Flaws Reviewed,” despite the Lead Stories article not identifying anything false or untrue in The BMJ article
-- It published the story on its website under a URL that contains the phrase “hoax-alert”
We have contacted Lead Stories, but they refuse to change anything about their article or actions that have led to Facebook flagging our article.
We have also contacted Facebook directly, requesting immediate removal of the “fact checking” label and any link to the Lead Stories article, thereby allowing our readers to freely share the article on your platform.
There is also a wider concern that we wish to raise. We are aware that The BMJ is not the only high quality information provider to have been affected by the incompetence of Meta’s fact checking regime. To give one other example, we would highlight the treatment by Instagram (also owned by Meta) of Cochrane, the international provider of high quality systematic reviews of the medical evidence.[3] Rather than investing a proportion of Meta’s substantial profits to help ensure the accuracy of medical information shared through social media, you have apparently delegated responsibility to people incompetent in carrying out this crucial task. Fact checking has been a staple of good journalism for decades. What has happened in this instance should be of concern to anyone who values and relies on sources such as The BMJ.
We hope you will act swiftly: specifically to correct the error relating to The BMJ’s article and to review the processes that led to the error; and generally to reconsider your investment in and approach to fact checking overall.
Best wishes,
Fiona Godlee, editor in chief
Kamran Abbasi, incoming editor in chief
The BMJ

https://www.bmj.com/content/375/bmj.n2635/rr-80

COVID-19 Outbreak Reported on Royal Caribbean Cruise Despite Fully Vaccinated Adult Passengers

"Forty-eight people who were onboard the Royal Caribbean Symphony of the Seas cruise ship tested positive for COVID-19, although Royal Caribbean requires everyone aged 12 and older to show proof of vaccination in order to board their ships."

https://www.theepochtimes.com/mkt_morningbrief/covid-19-outbreak-reported-on-royal-caribbean-cruise-despite-fully-vaccinated-adult-passengers_4166411.html

Why so many have willingly been hypnotised

"MATTIAS Desmet is a lecturer in psychoanalytic psychotherapy at Ghent University. He has come to public attention with his explanation of that most curious of phenomena that we have witnessed this year: why people have given up their freedoms so willingly; and what the conditions are in any society that will cause a people to sacrifice them?

It’s a question Kate Dunlop raised in these pages last Friday. Wondering about people’s gullibility, she asked: ‘Is their willingness to be experimented on a question of trust, fear, or a resigned acceptance of the inevitable?’

Daniel Miller offered a brief explanation last Thursday in his article Time to bring this madness to end. He observed that ‘people have come to enjoy being humiliated and humiliating’ which, as an addiction, ‘overrides ethical and intellectual considerations’.

Compliance and active cooperation are part of an overriding theory articulated by Desmet in a number of interviews and podcasts he has given this year which you can find on YouTube. I have selected just one of these, an excellently presented interview conducted by Dr Chris Martensen which explores Desmet’s theory of ‘mass formation’, psychological distress and hypnosis. It is compelling.

You can watch it here."

https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/why-so-many-have-willingly-been-hypnotised/

If only Brian May would have read the Monotti Protocol..

MONOTTI PROTOCOL PART 3: TREATMENTS

Vitamin D has already been mentioned above in point 2. The recommended minimum dose during early treatment is 5,000 IUs per day as per the American Association of Physician’s guide to early treatment. Ideally this should be in calcifediol form if available, as it is more quickly circulated in the body than cholecalciferol or vitamin D3.
[I took 20,000 IUs of vitamin D3 daily during my "Delta variant" infection, @robinmg]

Lysine interrupts the replication of viruses, including COVID-19 coronavirus, by countering arginine, an amino acid that fosters the eruption of dormant viruses. 

Vitamin C is always a good idea for the treatment of all respiratory infections. Many doctors recommend 1g twice a day during treatment.

Zinc sulfate, gluconate or citrate is known to limit viral replication in human cells when aided in its entry into cells by a zinc ionophore, such as 
hydroxychloroquine the most effective option, 
quercetin, or
epigallocatechin gallate or EGCG.

Omega-3 supplementation improved the levels of several parameters of respiratory and renal function in critically ill patients with COVID-19.

Ivermectin prevents clinical deterioration, reduces olfactory deficit, and limits the inflammation of the upper and lower respiratory tracts.

Early administration of 
inhaled budesonide reduced the likelihood of needing urgent medical care and reduced time to recovery after early COVID-19.

NAC administration in combination with other antiviral agents may dramatically reduce hospital admission rate, mechanical ventilation and mortality.

Aspirin use is associated with decreased mechanical ventilation, intensive care unit admission, and mortality.

Azithromycin is known to reduce the length of the disease and the time required to test negative. Please note that azithromycin is considered as a bacteriostatic: it stops bacteria, and as antiviral at the same time. Alternatively use doxycycline.

https://nulluslocussinegenio.com/2021/03/23/the-monotti-protocol/

The Scheming of Bill Gates and Anthony Fauci

By Joseph Mercola

Mercola.com

December 18, 2021


Bill Gates and Anthony Fauci have become household names in the U.S., their largely sterling reputations protected by a heavily biased press. Less known is the deep partnership between the two — the culmination of which has created a formidable public-private partnership that wields incredible power over the American public, along with global health and food policies.

You can read all of the details in Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s bestselling book, “The Real Anthony Fauci,” which contains more than 2,200 footnotes backing up its data. It exposes the connection between Gates and Fauci, as well as how Gates patterned his rise to control after John Rockefeller’s empire.

In 1913, Rockefeller created the Rockefeller Foundation, which is largely responsible for creating the Big Pharma-controlled medical paradigm that exists today. The foundation imbued its philosophy, precepts and ideologies into the League of Nations Health Organization, which turned into the World Health Organization.

Now, Gates contributes to WHO via multiple avenues, including the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation (BMGF) as well as GAVI, which was founded by the Gates Foundation in partnership with WHO, the World Bank and various vaccine manufacturers. Together, this makes Gates WHO’s No. 1 funder.

How Gates Used Rockefeller’s Business Model

Inspired by Rockefeller’s business model, Bill and Melinda Gates donated $36 billion worth of Microsoft stock to the BMGF between 1994 and 2018. Gates also created a separate entity, Bill Gates Investments (BGI), which manages his personal wealth and his foundation’s corpus.

BGI predominantly invests in multinational food, agriculture, pharmaceutical, energy, telecom and tech companies with global operations. Federal tax laws require the BMGF to give away a portion of its foundation assets annually to qualify for tax exemption.

Gates strategically targets BMGF’s charitable gifts to give him control of the international health and agricultural agencies and the media, allowing him to dictate global health and food policies so as to increase profitability of the large multinationals in which he and his foundation hold large investment positions.

As was the case with Rockefeller, whose wealth only grew after his Standard Oil Company was forced to split into 34 different companies, Gates’ strategic gifts have only magnified his wealth. Gates’ personal net worth grew from $63 billion in 2000 to $129.6 billion in 2021,1 his wealth expanding by $23 billion during the 2020 lockdowns alone.2

How Gates Controls the WHO

How does a private citizen, not an elected official, gain so much control over a global health agency like WHO? When it was founded, WHO could decide how to distribute its contributions. Now, 70% of its budget is tied to specific projects, countries or regions, which are dictated by the funders.3 As such, Gates’ priorities are the backbone of WHO, and it wasn’t a coincidence when he said of WHO, “Our priorities, are your priorities.”4

As of 2018, the cumulative contributions from the Gates Foundation and GAVI made “Gates the unofficial top sponsor of the WHO, even before the Trump administration’s 2020 move to cut all his support to the organization,” according to Kennedy. “Plus, Gates also routes funding to WHO through SAGE [Strategic Advisory Group of Experts] and UNICEF and Rotary International bringing his total contributions to over $1 billion.”

These tax-deductible donations give Gates both leverage and control over international health policy, “which he largely directs to serve the profit interest of his pharma partners.”

Further, “Gate’s vaccine obsession has diverted WHO’s program contributions from poverty alleviation, nutrition and clean water to make vaccine uptake its preeminent public health metric. And Gates is not afraid to throw his weight around,” according to Kennedy. “… The sheer magnitude of his foundation’s financial contributions has made Bill Gates an unofficial — albeit unelected — leade