The Nuremberg Code (1947)
Permissible Medical Experiments
All agree, however, that certain basic principles must be observed in order to satisfy moral, ethical and legal concepts:
3. The experiment should be so designed and based on the results of animal experimentation and a knowledge of the natural history of the disease or other problem under study that the anticipated results justify the performance of the experiment.
Permissible Medical Experiments
All agree, however, that certain basic principles must be observed in order to satisfy moral, ethical and legal concepts:
3. The experiment should be so designed and based on the results of animal experimentation and a knowledge of the natural history of the disease or other problem under study that the anticipated results justify the performance of the experiment.
๐1
The Nuremberg Code (1947)
Permissible Medical Experiments
All agree, however, that certain basic principles must be observed in order to satisfy moral, ethical and legal concepts:
4. The experiment should be so conducted as to avoid all unnecessary physical and mental suffering and injury.
Permissible Medical Experiments
All agree, however, that certain basic principles must be observed in order to satisfy moral, ethical and legal concepts:
4. The experiment should be so conducted as to avoid all unnecessary physical and mental suffering and injury.
The Nuremberg Code (1947)
Permissible Medical Experiments
All agree, however, that certain basic principles must be observed in order to satisfy moral, ethical and legal concepts:
5. No experiment should be conducted where there is an a priori reason to believe that death or disabling injury will occur; except, perhaps, in those experiments where the experimental physicians also serve as subjects.
Permissible Medical Experiments
All agree, however, that certain basic principles must be observed in order to satisfy moral, ethical and legal concepts:
5. No experiment should be conducted where there is an a priori reason to believe that death or disabling injury will occur; except, perhaps, in those experiments where the experimental physicians also serve as subjects.
The Nuremberg Code (1947)
Permissible Medical Experiments
All agree, however, that certain basic principles must be observed in order to satisfy moral, ethical and legal concepts:
6. The degree of risk to be taken should never exceed that determined by the humanitarian importance of the problem to be solved by the experiment.
Permissible Medical Experiments
All agree, however, that certain basic principles must be observed in order to satisfy moral, ethical and legal concepts:
6. The degree of risk to be taken should never exceed that determined by the humanitarian importance of the problem to be solved by the experiment.
The Nuremberg Code (1947)
Permissible Medical Experiments
All agree, however, that certain basic principles must be observed in order to satisfy moral, ethical and legal concepts:
7. Proper preparations should be made and adequate facilities provided to protect the experimental subject against even remote possibilities of injury, disability or death.
Permissible Medical Experiments
All agree, however, that certain basic principles must be observed in order to satisfy moral, ethical and legal concepts:
7. Proper preparations should be made and adequate facilities provided to protect the experimental subject against even remote possibilities of injury, disability or death.
The Nuremberg Code (1947)
Permissible Medical Experiments
All agree, however, that certain basic principles must be observed in order to satisfy moral, ethical and legal concepts:
8. The experiment should be conducted only by scientifically qualified persons. The highest degree of skill and care should be required through all stages of the experiment of those who conduct or engage in the experiment.
Permissible Medical Experiments
All agree, however, that certain basic principles must be observed in order to satisfy moral, ethical and legal concepts:
8. The experiment should be conducted only by scientifically qualified persons. The highest degree of skill and care should be required through all stages of the experiment of those who conduct or engage in the experiment.
The Nuremberg Code (1947)
Permissible Medical Experiments
All agree, however, that certain basic principles must be observed in order to satisfy moral, ethical and legal concepts:
9. During the course of the experiment the human subject should be at liberty to bring the experiment to an end if he has reached the physical or mental state where continuation of the experiment seems to him to be impossible.
Permissible Medical Experiments
All agree, however, that certain basic principles must be observed in order to satisfy moral, ethical and legal concepts:
9. During the course of the experiment the human subject should be at liberty to bring the experiment to an end if he has reached the physical or mental state where continuation of the experiment seems to him to be impossible.
The Nuremberg Code (1947)
Permissible Medical Experiments
All agree, however, that certain basic principles must be observed in order to satisfy moral, ethical and legal concepts:
10. During the course of the experiment the scientist in charge must be prepared to terminate the experiment at any stage, if he has probable cause to believe, in the exercise of the good faith, superior skill and careful judgment required of him, that a continuation of the experiment is likely to result in injury, disability, or death to the experimental subject.
Permissible Medical Experiments
All agree, however, that certain basic principles must be observed in order to satisfy moral, ethical and legal concepts:
10. During the course of the experiment the scientist in charge must be prepared to terminate the experiment at any stage, if he has probable cause to believe, in the exercise of the good faith, superior skill and careful judgment required of him, that a continuation of the experiment is likely to result in injury, disability, or death to the experimental subject.
CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY
Crimes against humanity are certain acts that are purposefully committed as part of a widespread or systematic policy, directed against civilians, in times of war or peace. They differ from war crimes because they are not isolated acts committed by individual soldiers but are acts committed in furtherance of a state or organizational policy. The first prosecution for crimes against humanity took place at the Nuremberg trials. Initially being considered for legal use, widely in International Law, following the Holocaust a global standard of human rights was articulated in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (1948). Political groups or states that violate or incite violation of human rights norms, as found in the Declaration, are an expression of the political pathologies associated with crimes against humanity.
Unlike war crimes, crimes against humanity can be committed during peace or war. They are not isolated or sporadic events but are part either of a government policy (although the perpetrators need not identify themselves with this policy) or of a wide practice of atrocities tolerated or condoned by a government or a de facto authority. War crimes, murder, massacres, dehumanization, genocide, ethnic cleansing, deportations, unethical human experimentation, extrajudicial punishments including summary executions, use of weapons of mass destruction, state terrorism or state sponsoring of terrorism, death squads, kidnappings and forced disappearances, use of child soldiers, unjust imprisonment, enslavement, torture, rape, political repression, racial discrimination, religious persecution and other human rights abuses may reach the threshold of crimes against humanity if they are part of a widespread or systematic practice.
Apartheid was recognized as a crime against humanity by the United Nations General Assembly in 1976.
M. Cherif Bassiouni argues that crimes against humanity are part of jus cogens and as such constitute a non-derogable rule of international law.
Crimes against humanity are certain acts that are purposefully committed as part of a widespread or systematic policy, directed against civilians, in times of war or peace. They differ from war crimes because they are not isolated acts committed by individual soldiers but are acts committed in furtherance of a state or organizational policy. The first prosecution for crimes against humanity took place at the Nuremberg trials. Initially being considered for legal use, widely in International Law, following the Holocaust a global standard of human rights was articulated in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (1948). Political groups or states that violate or incite violation of human rights norms, as found in the Declaration, are an expression of the political pathologies associated with crimes against humanity.
Unlike war crimes, crimes against humanity can be committed during peace or war. They are not isolated or sporadic events but are part either of a government policy (although the perpetrators need not identify themselves with this policy) or of a wide practice of atrocities tolerated or condoned by a government or a de facto authority. War crimes, murder, massacres, dehumanization, genocide, ethnic cleansing, deportations, unethical human experimentation, extrajudicial punishments including summary executions, use of weapons of mass destruction, state terrorism or state sponsoring of terrorism, death squads, kidnappings and forced disappearances, use of child soldiers, unjust imprisonment, enslavement, torture, rape, political repression, racial discrimination, religious persecution and other human rights abuses may reach the threshold of crimes against humanity if they are part of a widespread or systematic practice.
Apartheid was recognized as a crime against humanity by the United Nations General Assembly in 1976.
M. Cherif Bassiouni argues that crimes against humanity are part of jus cogens and as such constitute a non-derogable rule of international law.
CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY AND MEDICAL SCIENCE
In 1945 in Nuremberg, Germany, 23 physicians and scientists stood trial for war crimes committed before and during the second world war. The medical trial, and its more famous predecessor, the international military tribunal, have left us with defining statements of ethical principle. But, as several articles in this anniversary issue of the BMJ make clear, the records of these trials have also left us with a legacy we still shrink from confronting.
The international military tribunal convened on 20 November 1945. With allied judges presiding, it brought accusations of war crimes against 24 defendants, including Goring, von Ribbentrop, Hess, and Speer. Twelve were found guilty and sentenced to death, seven were found guilty and sentenced to variable terms of imprisonment, and three were acquitted. Two others, Krupp and Ley, did not go through the trial: Krupp sustained injuries in a car accident just before the proceedings, and Ley committed suicide before the trial began.
The medical trial followed on immediately, running from 25 October 1946 to 20 August 1947. Twenty three German physicians and scientists were accused of inflicting a range of vile and lethal procedures on vulnerable populations and inmates of concentration camps between 1933 and 1945. Witnesses from hospitals and camps throughout Germany and eastern Europe were brought to Nuremberg or deposed at other sites...
https://www.bmj.com/content/313/7070/1413.full
In 1945 in Nuremberg, Germany, 23 physicians and scientists stood trial for war crimes committed before and during the second world war. The medical trial, and its more famous predecessor, the international military tribunal, have left us with defining statements of ethical principle. But, as several articles in this anniversary issue of the BMJ make clear, the records of these trials have also left us with a legacy we still shrink from confronting.
The international military tribunal convened on 20 November 1945. With allied judges presiding, it brought accusations of war crimes against 24 defendants, including Goring, von Ribbentrop, Hess, and Speer. Twelve were found guilty and sentenced to death, seven were found guilty and sentenced to variable terms of imprisonment, and three were acquitted. Two others, Krupp and Ley, did not go through the trial: Krupp sustained injuries in a car accident just before the proceedings, and Ley committed suicide before the trial began.
The medical trial followed on immediately, running from 25 October 1946 to 20 August 1947. Twenty three German physicians and scientists were accused of inflicting a range of vile and lethal procedures on vulnerable populations and inmates of concentration camps between 1933 and 1945. Witnesses from hospitals and camps throughout Germany and eastern Europe were brought to Nuremberg or deposed at other sites...
https://www.bmj.com/content/313/7070/1413.full
Legal Letter to Chair of MHRA, Gross Negligence.pdf
239.4 KB
Attached is a legal letter sent today (17th December 2021) by PJH LAW to Stephen Lightfoot Chair of the MHRA
On behalf of the : Claimants: Dr Sam White, Andrew Doyle and Debbie Webb:
Summary of statements of evidence prepared for an Injunction Application.
Re: Request for Undertakings for breaches of legal obligations and breaches of duties of care.
โYour failure to investigate known concerns amounts to gross negligence in office, and renders you and the executive board liable for serious misconduct in office, mal or misfeasance in public office and, or, rendering all the office holders potentially liable for corporate manslaughter in that you have been wilfully blind to the known harms of the SARS-CoV-2 injections. You have taken no action."
Please Share with doctors, police, church leaders, schools, MP's, Councillors and everyone you can!
Let them know action is being taken against those supporting this
On behalf of the : Claimants: Dr Sam White, Andrew Doyle and Debbie Webb:
Summary of statements of evidence prepared for an Injunction Application.
Re: Request for Undertakings for breaches of legal obligations and breaches of duties of care.
โYour failure to investigate known concerns amounts to gross negligence in office, and renders you and the executive board liable for serious misconduct in office, mal or misfeasance in public office and, or, rendering all the office holders potentially liable for corporate manslaughter in that you have been wilfully blind to the known harms of the SARS-CoV-2 injections. You have taken no action."
Please Share with doctors, police, church leaders, schools, MP's, Councillors and everyone you can!
Let them know action is being taken against those supporting this
Forwarded from freedomtirade
When the programming slips, for just a second....
Odysee video 4minutes:
https://odysee.com/@FreedomTirade:f/Doctor-Evil:9
This is not about your health,
it is about
BONUS BONUS
and the
NUREMBERG CODE VIOLATIONS
of
DOCTOR EVIL
Pursue HEALTH.... Resist TYRANNY
Odysee video 4minutes:
https://odysee.com/@FreedomTirade:f/Doctor-Evil:9
This is not about your health,
it is about
BONUS BONUS
and the
NUREMBERG CODE VIOLATIONS
of
DOCTOR EVIL
Pursue HEALTH.... Resist TYRANNY
UNESCO (๐United Nations Educational, ๐Scientific and Cultural Organisation) is the United Nations body responsible for coordinating international cooperation in education, ๐science, culture, and communication. Its goal is to help prevent war by building the defenses of peace in the minds of men and women.
UK National Commission for UNESCO
Founded in 1946 by the UK government and established under Article VII of UNESCOโs Constitution, ๐we are a vital part of UNESCOโs unique global network of 190+ national cooperating bodies known as National Commissions. We work to support the UK governmentโs Permanent Delegation to UNESCO and to strengthen the ties between the UKโs educational, academic, scientific, cultural, creative, and artistic communities and UNESCOโs global programmes and policies.
If you have a specific question or would like to talk to a member of our team, please fill out the form below and a member of the UK National Commission for UNESCO team will get back to you as soon as possible.
https://unesco.org.uk/contact/
Let's ask them a few questions as to why they have not released any statements as to the UK Parliament's and UK businesses and UK medical staff violations of Article 6 of the Universal Declaration of Bioethics & Human Rights?
๐https://t.me/robinmg/12496
My formal request to the UK National Commission for UNESCO to hold the UK Parliament and businesses to account:
t.me/robinmg/12896
UK National Commission for UNESCO
Founded in 1946 by the UK government and established under Article VII of UNESCOโs Constitution, ๐we are a vital part of UNESCOโs unique global network of 190+ national cooperating bodies known as National Commissions. We work to support the UK governmentโs Permanent Delegation to UNESCO and to strengthen the ties between the UKโs educational, academic, scientific, cultural, creative, and artistic communities and UNESCOโs global programmes and policies.
If you have a specific question or would like to talk to a member of our team, please fill out the form below and a member of the UK National Commission for UNESCO team will get back to you as soon as possible.
https://unesco.org.uk/contact/
Let's ask them a few questions as to why they have not released any statements as to the UK Parliament's and UK businesses and UK medical staff violations of Article 6 of the Universal Declaration of Bioethics & Human Rights?
๐https://t.me/robinmg/12496
My formal request to the UK National Commission for UNESCO to hold the UK Parliament and businesses to account:
t.me/robinmg/12896
Telegram
Robin Monotti + Dr Mike Yeadon + Cory Morningstar
UNESCO UNIVERSAL DECLARATION OF BIOETHICS & HUMAN RIGHTS, 2005.
Article 6:
1. Any ๐ฝ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐๐ฒ๐ป๐๐ถ๐๐ฒ, ๐ฑ๐ถ๐ฎ๐ด๐ป๐ผ๐๐๐ถ๐ฐ & ๐๐ต๐ฒ๐ฟ๐ฎ๐ฝ๐ฒ๐๐๐ถ๐ฐ medical intervention is only to be carried out with the prior, free & informed ๐๐ข๐ก๐ฆ๐๐ก๐ง of the person concerned based on adequate information.โฆ
Article 6:
1. Any ๐ฝ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐๐ฒ๐ป๐๐ถ๐๐ฒ, ๐ฑ๐ถ๐ฎ๐ด๐ป๐ผ๐๐๐ถ๐ฐ & ๐๐ต๐ฒ๐ฟ๐ฎ๐ฝ๐ฒ๐๐๐ถ๐ฐ medical intervention is only to be carried out with the prior, free & informed ๐๐ข๐ก๐ฆ๐๐ก๐ง of the person concerned based on adequate information.โฆ
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Norman Fenton is Professor of Risk Information Management at Queen Mary University of London and a Director of Agena, a company that specialises in risk management for critical systems. A mathematician by training with current focus on critical decision-making and, in particular, on quantifying uncertainty using causal, probabilistic models that combine data and knowledge (Bayesian networks). The approach can be summarized as 'smart data rather than big data'. Applications include law and forensics (expert witness in major criminal and civil cases), health, security, software reliability, transport safety and reliability, finance, and football prediction.
CV: https://www.normanfenton.com/full-cv
CV: https://www.normanfenton.com/full-cv
I have now submitted a formal request to the UK national commission for UNESCO take the UK Parliament and UK businesses to account for violations of the UNESCO Universal Declaration of Bioethics and Human Rights.
If I do not receive a response I will release my request to the public and encourage them to seek answers.
Robin Monotti Graziadei
Previous post:
https://t.me/robinmg/12893
If I do not receive a response I will release my request to the public and encourage them to seek answers.
Robin Monotti Graziadei
Previous post:
https://t.me/robinmg/12893
โค1
Forwarded from ๐ LOVE not fear
"Rock Media Bashing Eric Clapton's New Song Even Before It's Released"
https://youtu.be/pwqxjzneQm4
https://youtu.be/pwqxjzneQm4
YouTube
Rock Media Bashing Eric Clapton's New Song Even Before It's Released
You can't write songs with people who don't agree with us.
You can't talk about wonderful lockdowns and mandates in a negative way.
You can't appeal to folks who've stopped listening to us.
You can't talk about wonderful lockdowns and mandates in a negative way.
You can't appeal to folks who've stopped listening to us.
This looks interesting & Iโm very appreciative that others are forensically examining this wretched โtestโ.
Best wishes
Mike
https://www.bitchute.com/video/UqP6LjdfFyhv/
Best wishes
Mike
https://www.bitchute.com/video/UqP6LjdfFyhv/
Bitchute
New Documentary on The PCR Test Deception is Banned on YouTube - Share this Film with Skeptics
Film producer Rai Gbrym reached out to me last week about a new documentary he had just produced that exposes the fraud of the PCR test.
He had just posted it on YouTube and it already had thousands of views. I immediately downloaded the video so thatโฆ
He had just posted it on YouTube and it already had thousands of views. I immediately downloaded the video so thatโฆ
The Daily Expose points out that official statistics show FAR more people have NOT been vaccinated than mass media will have you believe!
Hold. The. Line.
PLEASE keep dropping seeds of doubt bombs, everywhere you go.
Itโs hard to overstate how CRUCIAL this act is, done in public, for it gives others permission to vocalise whatโs running through their minds.
Best wishes
Mike
Hold. The. Line.
PLEASE keep dropping seeds of doubt bombs, everywhere you go.
Itโs hard to overstate how CRUCIAL this act is, done in public, for it gives others permission to vocalise whatโs running through their minds.
Best wishes
Mike
๐1
This is both darkly funny & life-threateningly menacing, all at the same time.
The level of absurdity has been turned up to eleven.
Best wishes
Mike
The level of absurdity has been turned up to eleven.
Best wishes
Mike
Forwarded from Julian French
IMAGINE we were living in medieval times.... and youโd been invited to a royal banquet. ๐ ๐ท ๐ฒ
The ones in charge were extremely keen to get you to drink the wine. They were very insistent. ๐
Youโd probably assume the wine was poisoned.
โDrink this wonderful wine."
"No thank you."
"Be a good guest! Drink the wine. We uncorked it especially. It's a beautiful and rare vintage."
"No thank you. I appreciate the offer though."
"Drink the wine. It's very expensive but you can have a glass for free, and we'll give you an extra plate of supper."
"No I'm fine as I am.โ
"Drink the wine and we'll feed your entire village for a week and reduce your taxes."
"Wow all that for wine? What's in it? Still, no thank you."
"We'll make you a Duke."
"Very generous but no thanks I'm content in my home."
โYou are not anti-wine are you????โ
โNo I just donโt feel like drinking this wine this evening.โ
"Drink the damn wine or we'll stop you working."
"Eh?"
You notice theyโre getting desperate now.
"We'll ban you from markets."
"Wow your tone has changed."
"Now you need to drink 3 glasses or we'll stop you riding your horse or seeing your family for the next year."
"Wait, what? 3 glasses? Can't see my family?"
"Did we say 3 glasses? We meant 3 bottles."
"3 bottles?"
"Yes...every few months we want you to drink 3 bottles of this particular wine we've prepared indefinitely for the next years."
"Years??"
Yes, or we'll try you for treason."
"Ok what is IN this damn wine that you are trying SO HARD to get everyone to drink it?"
"We can't tell you. Trade secret."
"It's poisoned isn't it?"
"No..it's...ummm...it's just really really good for you. It's um, special healing wine."
"Then why all the threats?"
"We just need you to... I mean we strongly encourage you to drink the wine so you don't miss out."
"But the Earl drank a glass and collapsed."
"Unrelated."
"No...like he was fine then had a glass then keeled over...he's still on the floor writhing. Look at him! His face is blue and he's clawing at his chest."
"Coincidence. Guards...please escort the Earl to his chambers. He's had too much wine."
"I knew it was the wine! What about the rest of the court? Half of them also collapsed after the wine."
"Those guests got ill from something else. Probably the chicken."
"All at the same time?"
"You sure do ask a lot of questions! Guards! Guards... get this man his wine."
"I don't want it. What if something happens to me after drinking it?"
"We're not liable for that."
"Not liable for the wine you produce? I definitely don't want it."
"Drink your wine so everyone else doesn't get a hangover."
"Huh? That makes no sense. Maybe if they didn't keep DRINKING they wouldn't get HUNGOVER in the first place?"
"Look at these paintings of people drinking wine all over the gallery. Look how happy they look."
"Paintings? Look, I don't drink wine. I don't want the wine. Even the idea of drinking this wine leaves a bad taste in my mouth."
"Ah no matter if you don't want to drink it.โ
"Ok good. Let's drop the subject now"
"You don't have to drink it. We can pump it directly into your veins. You won't even have to taste it"
"Wait, into my veins? Are you serious? I don't want your damn wine!"
"TAKE THE DAMN WINE NOW! WE'VE ALREADY PAID FOR A WHOLE CRATE FOR EACH MEMBER OF YOUR FAMILY! WE'VE SIGNED AN ONGOING CONTRACT WITH THE DISTILLARY! ANYONE WHO TALKS BADLY ABOUT THIS WINE WILL HAVE THEIR TONGUES CUT OUT! PEOPLE WHO ARE NOW DRUNK ON THE LAST BATCH WILL BE RECLASSIFIED AS SOBER AND MUST DRINK THE NEW BATCH! AND WE WANT YOUR KIDS TO DRINK THE WINE TOO! EVEN YOUR BABY. SWAP HER MILK BOTTLE FOR WINE! SHE'S OLD ENOUGH FOR WINE NOW! AND YOUR PREGNANT WIFE! SHE NEEDS IT TO KEEP HER HEALTHY! EVERYONE DRINK THE WINE!"
THIS is how absurd the conversation is getting now.
Anytime anyone tries so hard to pressure you into something: it's rarely if EVER because it serves YOUR best interests or because its good for you. More likely itโs in THEIR best interests.
The ones in charge were extremely keen to get you to drink the wine. They were very insistent. ๐
Youโd probably assume the wine was poisoned.
โDrink this wonderful wine."
"No thank you."
"Be a good guest! Drink the wine. We uncorked it especially. It's a beautiful and rare vintage."
"No thank you. I appreciate the offer though."
"Drink the wine. It's very expensive but you can have a glass for free, and we'll give you an extra plate of supper."
"No I'm fine as I am.โ
"Drink the wine and we'll feed your entire village for a week and reduce your taxes."
"Wow all that for wine? What's in it? Still, no thank you."
"We'll make you a Duke."
"Very generous but no thanks I'm content in my home."
โYou are not anti-wine are you????โ
โNo I just donโt feel like drinking this wine this evening.โ
"Drink the damn wine or we'll stop you working."
"Eh?"
You notice theyโre getting desperate now.
"We'll ban you from markets."
"Wow your tone has changed."
"Now you need to drink 3 glasses or we'll stop you riding your horse or seeing your family for the next year."
"Wait, what? 3 glasses? Can't see my family?"
"Did we say 3 glasses? We meant 3 bottles."
"3 bottles?"
"Yes...every few months we want you to drink 3 bottles of this particular wine we've prepared indefinitely for the next years."
"Years??"
Yes, or we'll try you for treason."
"Ok what is IN this damn wine that you are trying SO HARD to get everyone to drink it?"
"We can't tell you. Trade secret."
"It's poisoned isn't it?"
"No..it's...ummm...it's just really really good for you. It's um, special healing wine."
"Then why all the threats?"
"We just need you to... I mean we strongly encourage you to drink the wine so you don't miss out."
"But the Earl drank a glass and collapsed."
"Unrelated."
"No...like he was fine then had a glass then keeled over...he's still on the floor writhing. Look at him! His face is blue and he's clawing at his chest."
"Coincidence. Guards...please escort the Earl to his chambers. He's had too much wine."
"I knew it was the wine! What about the rest of the court? Half of them also collapsed after the wine."
"Those guests got ill from something else. Probably the chicken."
"All at the same time?"
"You sure do ask a lot of questions! Guards! Guards... get this man his wine."
"I don't want it. What if something happens to me after drinking it?"
"We're not liable for that."
"Not liable for the wine you produce? I definitely don't want it."
"Drink your wine so everyone else doesn't get a hangover."
"Huh? That makes no sense. Maybe if they didn't keep DRINKING they wouldn't get HUNGOVER in the first place?"
"Look at these paintings of people drinking wine all over the gallery. Look how happy they look."
"Paintings? Look, I don't drink wine. I don't want the wine. Even the idea of drinking this wine leaves a bad taste in my mouth."
"Ah no matter if you don't want to drink it.โ
"Ok good. Let's drop the subject now"
"You don't have to drink it. We can pump it directly into your veins. You won't even have to taste it"
"Wait, into my veins? Are you serious? I don't want your damn wine!"
"TAKE THE DAMN WINE NOW! WE'VE ALREADY PAID FOR A WHOLE CRATE FOR EACH MEMBER OF YOUR FAMILY! WE'VE SIGNED AN ONGOING CONTRACT WITH THE DISTILLARY! ANYONE WHO TALKS BADLY ABOUT THIS WINE WILL HAVE THEIR TONGUES CUT OUT! PEOPLE WHO ARE NOW DRUNK ON THE LAST BATCH WILL BE RECLASSIFIED AS SOBER AND MUST DRINK THE NEW BATCH! AND WE WANT YOUR KIDS TO DRINK THE WINE TOO! EVEN YOUR BABY. SWAP HER MILK BOTTLE FOR WINE! SHE'S OLD ENOUGH FOR WINE NOW! AND YOUR PREGNANT WIFE! SHE NEEDS IT TO KEEP HER HEALTHY! EVERYONE DRINK THE WINE!"
THIS is how absurd the conversation is getting now.
Anytime anyone tries so hard to pressure you into something: it's rarely if EVER because it serves YOUR best interests or because its good for you. More likely itโs in THEIR best interests.