Forwarded from C V
🛻🚨 PERSONAL MEMORY: Jan 23 2022 beginning of Trucker Convoy to Ottawa from Langley BC 7am.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/E9JhHVNwkHGd
https://www.bitchute.com/video/E9JhHVNwkHGd
Bitchute
TRUCK & CAR CONVOY ON HIGHWAY ONE DRIVING TO OTTAWA 🇨🇦🚛
🇨🇦🚛 Live at the car and truck convoy rally in Langley British Columbia Canada!!🚛📣 Convoy to end all vaccine mandates and all mandates for everyone!!
❤7👍1
Forwarded from C V
YouTube
Tom MacDonald - CHARLIE
2 NEW ALBUMS OUT NOW only at https://hangovergangofficial.com (Autographed copies & merch bundles available while supplies last)
Rest In Peace Charlie Kirk
All proceeds from this song will be donated.
Get the song here: https://geo.itunes.apple.com/us/album/charlie…
Rest In Peace Charlie Kirk
All proceeds from this song will be donated.
Get the song here: https://geo.itunes.apple.com/us/album/charlie…
Forwarded from Fiona Rose Diamond (Fiona CoviLeaks)
‼️THEY’RE SELLING US A SOLUTION TO A PROBLEM THEY CREATED‼️
If you haven’t read Labour’s BritCard proposal (for a mandatory digital ID) you need to. It’s entirely focussed on cracking down on illegal migration, targeting rogue landlords who rent to illegal migrants, and employers who hire them, all of which are already covered by existing laws and enforcement systems. Instead of properly using the tools they already have, they’re pushing for you to accept a digital ID.
Let’s be clear: mass illegal migration is a real issue. It absolutely exists. But this isn’t just a failure of policy or enforcement; it’s entirely manufactured to justify a solution they’ve been planning for decades. This isn’t incompetence, it’s strategy. The chaos is the excuse. The control was always the goal.
Now, let’s break down the basic logic...
The facts (not speculation):
📛UK population (ONS): 68.3 million.
📛 Estimated "unauthorised/undocumented" residents: 800,000–1,200,000 =1.2%–1.8% of the population (midpoint 1.46%).
📛Legal foreign-born residents: 11 million (16–18%).
Legal migrants and foreign-born nationals who live and work in the UK already have eVisa's.
So: the “problem” the state says it needs a universal surveillance system to fix is about one and a half per cent of the country.
Now the rest, let's connect the dots:
They’re pushing a mandatory digital ID for 100% of the population; a permanent, interoperable platform tied into employment, housing, health and welfare - to “manage migration.” That’s not proportionate. It’s not targeted. It’s universal control dressed up as a technical fix. Ask yourself: why spend political capital and taxpayer pounds rolling out a nationwide identity system when the issue they point to as the excuse (the problem they created) is 1–2% of the population? Why convert your phone and your life into a state-issued wallet when the people they call “illegal” are in reality, such a small share?
Because the scheme does far more than “manage migration.”
📛It creates a permanent, searchable map of all our interactions with the state.
📛It normalises “papers please” checks for every GP visit, tenancy, job and benefit
📛It hands bureaucrats and contractors the keys to monitor, profile and control behaviour at scale.
Big Brother Watch warns this is exactly the risk: function creep, profiling, exclusion and a society increasingly run on checks and permissions, not rights. It’s a slippery slope from “right to work” checks to everyday conditional access.
Now read the likely script:
📛Amplify a public panic about illegal migration (loud headlines, images, fear).
📛Present universal digital ID as the panacea - “we need to control borders, so everyone must be on the system.”
📛Lock in infrastructure, laws, and data flows. Once the system exists and everyone uses it, expanding its reach is trivial.
📛Next stop: surveillance marketplaces, private sector hooks, social credit style nudges, and a default posture of compliance.
Why this stinks:
📛The state wants total visibility. Not because that’s the only way to stop dodgy employers or alleged traffickers, but because total visibility is power.
📛The tiny numerical scale of the “problem” does not justify universal loss of privacy and freedom.
📛History shows “temporary” ID rules become permanent. “For the few” always becomes “for everyone.”
📛Once your life is a digital record tied to state credentials, the balance between citizen and subject has already shifted.
‼️Call to action‼️
We will not trade our liberty for a checkbox. We will not let a 1–2% issue turn Britain into a papers-please state. Say it loud: scrap BritCard, resist mandatory digital ID. Protect everyone’s freedom, not the government’s control.
It gets far worse than this. If you accept the excuse they’re selling, you’ll be living in a real-world 1984 before you even realise it.
No one is coming to save you. This is entirely on you. Do not comply.
@FionaRoseDiamond
If you haven’t read Labour’s BritCard proposal (for a mandatory digital ID) you need to. It’s entirely focussed on cracking down on illegal migration, targeting rogue landlords who rent to illegal migrants, and employers who hire them, all of which are already covered by existing laws and enforcement systems. Instead of properly using the tools they already have, they’re pushing for you to accept a digital ID.
Let’s be clear: mass illegal migration is a real issue. It absolutely exists. But this isn’t just a failure of policy or enforcement; it’s entirely manufactured to justify a solution they’ve been planning for decades. This isn’t incompetence, it’s strategy. The chaos is the excuse. The control was always the goal.
Now, let’s break down the basic logic...
The facts (not speculation):
📛UK population (ONS): 68.3 million.
📛 Estimated "unauthorised/undocumented" residents: 800,000–1,200,000 =1.2%–1.8% of the population (midpoint 1.46%).
📛Legal foreign-born residents: 11 million (16–18%).
Legal migrants and foreign-born nationals who live and work in the UK already have eVisa's.
So: the “problem” the state says it needs a universal surveillance system to fix is about one and a half per cent of the country.
Now the rest, let's connect the dots:
They’re pushing a mandatory digital ID for 100% of the population; a permanent, interoperable platform tied into employment, housing, health and welfare - to “manage migration.” That’s not proportionate. It’s not targeted. It’s universal control dressed up as a technical fix. Ask yourself: why spend political capital and taxpayer pounds rolling out a nationwide identity system when the issue they point to as the excuse (the problem they created) is 1–2% of the population? Why convert your phone and your life into a state-issued wallet when the people they call “illegal” are in reality, such a small share?
Because the scheme does far more than “manage migration.”
📛It creates a permanent, searchable map of all our interactions with the state.
📛It normalises “papers please” checks for every GP visit, tenancy, job and benefit
📛It hands bureaucrats and contractors the keys to monitor, profile and control behaviour at scale.
Big Brother Watch warns this is exactly the risk: function creep, profiling, exclusion and a society increasingly run on checks and permissions, not rights. It’s a slippery slope from “right to work” checks to everyday conditional access.
Now read the likely script:
📛Amplify a public panic about illegal migration (loud headlines, images, fear).
📛Present universal digital ID as the panacea - “we need to control borders, so everyone must be on the system.”
📛Lock in infrastructure, laws, and data flows. Once the system exists and everyone uses it, expanding its reach is trivial.
📛Next stop: surveillance marketplaces, private sector hooks, social credit style nudges, and a default posture of compliance.
Why this stinks:
📛The state wants total visibility. Not because that’s the only way to stop dodgy employers or alleged traffickers, but because total visibility is power.
📛The tiny numerical scale of the “problem” does not justify universal loss of privacy and freedom.
📛History shows “temporary” ID rules become permanent. “For the few” always becomes “for everyone.”
📛Once your life is a digital record tied to state credentials, the balance between citizen and subject has already shifted.
‼️Call to action‼️
We will not trade our liberty for a checkbox. We will not let a 1–2% issue turn Britain into a papers-please state. Say it loud: scrap BritCard, resist mandatory digital ID. Protect everyone’s freedom, not the government’s control.
It gets far worse than this. If you accept the excuse they’re selling, you’ll be living in a real-world 1984 before you even realise it.
No one is coming to save you. This is entirely on you. Do not comply.
@FionaRoseDiamond
❤1
Forwarded from David Avocado Wolfe
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Social Credit Scores in China: listen to how brainwashed some of these communist Chinese are. Insane.
(1 min 33 sec)
Join: @davidavocadowolfe 🥑
(1 min 33 sec)
Join: @davidavocadowolfe 🥑
🤬1
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Making a Killing: FULL DOCUMENTARY FILM:
OneBC Caucus is proud to present Making a Killing: Reconciliation, Genocide, and Plunder in Canada. Making a Killing is a feature documentary film exposing the massive scandal behind the taking of wealth, land, and power from the Canadian public to benefit indigenous tribes. It debunks the worst lie in Canadian history: the lie that 215 bodies were found at the Kamloops Residential School and that Canadians committed a mass murder against indigenous children. Making a Killing is the first documentary film produced by an elected caucus.
OneBC Caucus is proud to present Making a Killing: Reconciliation, Genocide, and Plunder in Canada. Making a Killing is a feature documentary film exposing the massive scandal behind the taking of wealth, land, and power from the Canadian public to benefit indigenous tribes. It debunks the worst lie in Canadian history: the lie that 215 bodies were found at the Kamloops Residential School and that Canadians committed a mass murder against indigenous children. Making a Killing is the first documentary film produced by an elected caucus.
❤1
https://www.ctvnews.ca/sci-tech/article/following-australias-lead-denmark-plans-to-ban-social-media-for-children-younger-than-15/?taid=693ad585208680000161381d&utm_campaign=trueAnthem%3A+Trending+Content&utm_medium=trueAnthem&utm_source=twitter
Looks like they're rolling out digital id in Australia and Denmark. Canada soon I assume to access the internet
Looks like they're rolling out digital id in Australia and Denmark. Canada soon I assume to access the internet
CTVNews
Following Australia’s lead, Denmark plans to ban social media for children younger than 15
As Australia began enforcing a world-first social media ban for children under 16 years old this week, Denmark is planning to follow its lead and severely restrict social media access for young people.
🤬3
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Regarding the breaking news that the Federal Government has given land TITLE to the Musqueam Indigenous Tribe for all of Vancouver, BC and lower mainland.. Here is MSM showing the latest chaos about it. Now other indigenous bands are threatening to do something about Musqueam being given rights over them.
This is another brutal mess created by the unelected United Nations (UNDRIP/DRIPA) taken on by David Eby and the Federal Gov. There is a cover up as to the entire agreement about land rights as the Fed won't release all details to tax paying/mortgage paying property owners (as of now.) Not good.
This is another brutal mess created by the unelected United Nations (UNDRIP/DRIPA) taken on by David Eby and the Federal Gov. There is a cover up as to the entire agreement about land rights as the Fed won't release all details to tax paying/mortgage paying property owners (as of now.) Not good.