RattleTrap 1776 🇺🇸
161K subscribers
10.6K photos
1.31K videos
2.31K links
Download Telegram
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Respect for the Supreme Commander 🫡♟️🇺🇸
This is why they say, “the ending is not for everyone”…

Americans will not allow their little IQs to believe that these people are not the same.

That’s sad.

To want cleanout of corruption and evil, but cannot see it displayed right in front of them.

Literally. 🤦🏽🤷🏽‍♂️
Check their Daddy’s DNA 🔥🤣
I made this for ALL those who’ve struggled with family and friends who are all Military Industrial Complex Veterans and Attorneys who know “everything” but actually don’t know much ado at all.

You’ve all been CHALLENGED to explain WHY ALL these Laws and Orders from 2015 to 2025 fit into a chronological order and keep validating each other year by year.

If you wanna run with the big dawgs, you gotta know what we feed on.

👉🏻 ———

👉🏻 45——47 🫡♟️🇺🇸

Challenged:
https://rumble.com/v6tc779-challenge-by-derek-johnson-rattletrap1776-may-12-2025.html
Dear Military Industrial Complex,

Here’s all the Military Oaths in United States history.

1 June 1789
1st Cong., 1st sess.,
statute 1, chap. 1

Officer Oath: “I, A.B., do solemnly swear or affirm (as the case may be) that I will support the Constitution of the United States.”

The very first law of the United States identified the requirement for government officials to take an oath or affirmation according to Article 6 of the Constitution.

29 September 1789
1st Cong., 1st sess.,
statute 1, chap. 25

Enlisted Oath: “I, A.B., do solemnly swear or affirm (as the case may be) to bear true  faith and allegiance to the United States of America, and to serve them honestly and faithfully against all their enemies or opposers whatsoever, and to observe and obey the orders of the president of the United States of America, and the orders of officers appointed over me.”

This statute separated the military oath from the oath for other public officials.

It also created an oath for enlisted personnel distinct from the officer's oath, with an allegiance to the United States rather than the Constitution and a requirement to obey the orders of their chain of command.

The officer's oath mirrored the oath specified in statute 1, sec. 1 for members of Congress.

30 April 1790 1st
Cong., 2d sess.,
statute 2, chap. 10

Officer and Enlisted Oath: “I, A.B., do solemnly swear or affirm (as the case may be) to bear true faith and allegiance to the United States of America, and to serve them honestly and faithfully against all their enemies or opposers whomsoever, and to observe and obey the orders of the president of the United States of America, and the orders of the officers appointed over me, according to the articles of war.”

This statute, passed as the means to continue the military establishment, required both officers and enlisted personnel to take the same oath.

On 3 March 1795, the last phrase changed to 'according to the rules and articles of war.' Each new Congress would repeal the previous Congresses act and pass a new statute creating the military establishment, including a section on the oath.

In 1815 (13th Cong., 3d sess.), Congress no longer duplicated the previous military- establishment act and identified changes only to previous law establishing the military.

2 July 1862
37th Cong., 2d sess.,
chap. 128

Officer Oath: “I, A.B., do solemnly swear  (or affirm) that I have never voluntarily borne arms against the United States since I have been a citizen thereof; that I have voluntarily given no aid, countenance, counsel, or encouragement to persons engaged in armed hostility thereto; that I have neither sought nor accepted nor attempted to exercise the functions of any officers whatever, under any authority or pretended authority in hostility to the United States; that I have not yielded a voluntary support to any pretended government, authority, power or constitution within the United States, hostile or inimical thereto. And I do further swear (or affirm) that, to the best of my knowledge and ability, I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States, against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion, and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter, so help me God.”

The intent of this Civil War statute was to ensure that government officials were not supporting, or had not supported, the Confederacy. This Ironclad Test Oath greatly expanded and contained more detail than previous oaths. The statute also separated the officer oath from the enlisted oath, once again making the officer oath consistent with the oath of public officials.

11 July 1868 
40th Cong., 2d sess.,
chap. 139 

Officer Oath: “I, A.B.
, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter. So help me God.”

This statute was the first post-Civil War change to the oath.

The new oath deleted the background check of the 1862 version and established the exact wording of the current officer's oath.

Future legislative changes addressed the application of the oath but not the wording.

5 May 1950
81st Cong., 2d sess., 
chap. 169 (Public
Law 506)

Enlisted Oath: “I, ___, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the United States of America; that I will serve them honestly and faithfully against all their enemies whomsoever; and that I will obey the orders of the president of the United States and the orders of the officers appointed over me, according to regulations and the Uniform Code of Military Justice.”

This statute was the first post-World War II  legislation on the oath, establishing the Uniform Code of Military Justice to unify, consolidate, revise, and codify the Articles of War, the Articles of Government of the Navy, and the Disciplinary Laws of the Coast Guard. Section 8 identified a standard oath for all enlisted personnel.

5 October 1962
87th Cong., 2d sess.
(Public Law 87-751) 

Enlisted Oath: I, ___, do solemnly swear  (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same;  and that I will obey the orders of the president of the United States and the orders of  the officers appointed over me, according to regulations and the Uniform Code of Military Justice. So help me God. 

This legislation was enacted to make the enlisted oath more consistent with the officer oath, using the phrase 'support and defend the Constitution' and adding 'So help me God' at the end.

This was the last legislative change to the wording of either oath.

Subsequent legislation on the oath addressed administrative issues.

🫡♟️🇺🇸
“At the outbreak of the Civil War in April of 1861, a time of uncertain and shifting loyalties, President Abraham Lincoln ordered all federal civilian employees within the executive branch to take an expanded oath. At the conclusion of its emergency session that summer, Congress adopted legislation requiring executive branch employees to take the expanded oath in support of the Union. 

In July 1862 Congress added a new section to the oath, which became known as the "Ironclad Test Oath."

The Test Oath required civilian and military officials to swear or affirm that they had never aided or encouraged “persons engaged in armed hostility” against the United States.

Government employees who swore falsely would be prosecuted for perjury and forever denied federal employment. Congress also revised the rest of the oath with language that closely resembles the modern oath.”

That verbiage was: “Foreign and domestic.”

This phrase was added in 1862 as a direct result of the Civil War- specifically, to address the possibility of Union soldiers joining the Confederacy (most notably the forces commanded by Gen Robert E. Lee).

That is, people who had previously sworn allegiance to the United States were now fighting against it. 

‘Foreign’ being added had NOTHING to do with Congress declaring OFFENSE Wars in Nations that were never a threat to America.

Huge difference in Offense vs. Defense.

President Trump has proven to have the LARGEST Defense Budgets to pay our Soldiers without starting one single Foreign War, or even a Civil War for that matter…

When it sinks in… it’s going to hit.

That alone exposes the past President’s and Congresses for their incompetence and games.

🤫😶‍🌫️🫡♟️🇺🇸

Senate dot Gov:
https://www.senate.gov/about/origins-foundations/senate-and-constitution/oath-of-office.htm
Did you see the entrance the Saudi’s gave President Trump this trip?

They told everyone in 2022 who was the real ——— #46 🫡♟️🇺🇸
‘Bermuda, Bahama, coming from Jordan’ 🤣

Definitely does not stand a chance for 🎵

Peace in the Middle East 🎯
Libtards can’t stand it 🤣 They can eat 💩