🦠 Nanoparticle Protein Corona

Of all the weird and wacky peculiarities that nanoparticles possess, this perhaps is the scariest.

Not only does this phenomenon directly disrupt the body... it reveals the doorframe of a much deeper and darker synthetic biology reality.

When nanomaterials enter your body...
➡️ they coat themselves in a layer of the body's proteins.

Firstly, this is problematic because the nanoparticle is stealing your proteins.
These proteins are necessary for cellular repair, communication, transportation, digestion and almost every imaginable task in your body.

Even if a protein doesn't end up stuck to the particle, in the process of interaction it is damaged, disrupting its function.

Different particles bind to different proteins and nanomaterials can be programmed to attract particular proteins

It gets worse ...

Now the toxic nanomaterial is coated in proteins it is far more stealthy

It is no longer recognised by your defence-system as a toxic nanomaterial. It just looks like a jumble of protein.

Certain proteins in particular fool the body so effectively, this is exploited to keep nanoparticles in blood circulation or to make cells internalise toxic nanomaterials.

Nano researchers themselves refer to this as the 'stealth effect'.

And then it gets worse ...

The damage to proteins is only the start. Nanoparticles also bind to lipids, hormones, nutrients, toxins and genetic material.

The protein corona phenomenon reveals a much larger issue with nanomaterials; The marriage of convenience between the inherent stealth of nanotech and nanomaterials attracting and integrating with biological components.

If you're familiar with synthetic biology, the protein corona is just the start.

Learn more: @powerofthepulse

References:

Protein corona: https://www.nature.com/articles/ncomms11770

Silica nanoparticles: https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Morphological-overview-of-silica-nanoparticles-for-protein-corona-formation-displaying_fig1_362663516

'Spike protein' from 2011: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21130884/#&gid=article-figures&pid=fig-1-uid-0

Blood 1: https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Scanning-electron-microscopy-images-of-red-blood-cells-RBCs-A-RBCs-under-0-mmHg-on_fig2_326335613

Blood 2: https://medschool.co/test-findings/echinocytes

Blood 3: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/332533531/

Other 'spike protein' images: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spike_protein

Learn more: @powerofthepulse

🧳 Health Journey Starter Kit

So you're working on your health

But why are you starting with 15 new supplements, spray bottles and patches?

You're still eating gluten... still eating out... still eating/drinking out of plastic... still smearing your skin with endocrine disruptors and sniffing neurotoxic perfumes/soaps.

Cleaning up your food is just the bare minimum.

The Big Pharma model tells you that you don't need to stop openly poisoning yourself because they have a magic pill for everything.

You want to talk about natural-living, let's talk... there is no magic-pill for a forest destroyed by fire. There is no instant-fix for a chopped-up tree. There is no perfect cure-all for industrial waste in rivers.

How exactly do you expect to be healthy if you're choosing to put poison in your mouth daily?

We're not talking about chemtrails, nano-takeover of agriculture, organic-food-takeover. We're talking about the foods you willingly choose to eat.

The gut-brain axis and gut microbiome are super-trendy topics.
➡️ So what's the goofy guru solution? Buy this product and that product.

These products may or may not be amazing... HOWEVER:

No product will save you from a lifestyle of wilful self-poisoning.

Start with the inputs and your environment... not goofy guru 'protocols'.

Learn more: @powerofthepulse

On Fear & Understanding

Why is the dark so scary?

Isn't it the unknown? The possibility of what might be lurking?

Is it not our imagination that creates the most terrifying demons?

Have you ever noticed in Hollywood how the monster/psychopath is always far scarier as a faceless nameless entity... its goals unknown and its purpose left vague and menacing.
When the monster is revealed, it can often lose its power to grips us with cold fear.

This is what goofy gurus use when they speak about topics such as transhumanism, IoB, synthetic biology and self-spreading bioweapons...

It's always vague, expansive ambiguity.

Closely interrelated topics like nanotech, nano in blood, Body Area Networks and the sleeve-roll-up 🥕 get lazily ground together in a chaotic, formless mess leaving people more confused.

Often, this is because the goofy gurus themselves are confused because they haven't taken the time to study the material. Instead they opt to make the latest trendy shock-value headline, without the necessary research to legitimately explain the topic.

I vividly recall in mid-2023 an Aussie alternative-platform was interviewing numerous syn-bio goofy gurus saying
"I know you've explained this multiple times but people are still very confused with what you're saying"

Of course they're confused!

You don't shed light on a dark cavernous topic by throwing a towel on the lantern and then saying "look at my light" ... "we have a lantern, you should be able to see clearly"

If they just name the enemy and reveal it to the light... fear evaporates and understanding sets in.

Once you know what you're dealing with you know the solution.
You recognise the danger and severity of the problem and you're empowered to protect yourself.

The issue is that oftentimes, vague stories of the mysterious predator shrouded in silent menace is far far more sellable.

It's a story, it's fascinating, attractive, terrifying.
It's also misleading and inaccurate.

Learn to recognise ambiguity and vagueness. Ask yourself "what are they actually saying?".
Perhaps leave fantasy for entertainment, and when it comes to the real-life assault against us, focus on methodical, logical proof presented in a structured and systematic manner.

Learn more: @powerofthepulse

Finding a solution first requires precisely defining the problem.

Read the label.

Every. Single. Word.

Every. Single. Thing. You. Put. In/On. Your. Body

You can give this post a thumbs up... but chances are...

😶 you still have supplements with silica and cellulose in them
😐 you still have soap/shampoo products with PEG in them
🙈 you still have 'superior absorption' supplements (nano)
🤐 your favourite cream or lotion still has plastics and petrochemicals
😟 your deodorant has plastic instead of aluminium
😭 your chewable supplements and tablets still contain colorings and toxic binders

'Certified organic' does not mean it doesn't have toxins.
'All natural' does not mean it doesn't have toxins.
'No synthetics' does not mean it doesn't have toxins.
'No nasties' does not mean it doesn't have toxins.
'Ethically sourced' does not mean it doesn't have toxins.

https://t.me/powerofthepulse

Double Speak: "Common in Nature"

An irrelevant excuse both mainstream white-coats and goofy gurus use to convince you that 'aluminum is safe':
"Aluminum is one of the most common elements on the planet"

Sure aluminum is common.. and? How is that relevant to its safety?

This is a Red Herring Fallacy... 'Appeal to Nature'.

This quote perfectly highlights the irony:

"Aluminum is a ubiquitous neurotoxin highly enriched in our biosphere, and has been implicated in the etiology and pathology of multiple neurological diseases that involve inflammatory neural degeneration, behavioral impairment and cognitive decline."

📝 This study starts out by stating that aluminum is very common on earth.

📝 They also conclude that aluminum is toxic and is strongly linked to Alzheimer's and Down Syndrome.

Reference: Aluminum in neurological disease – a 36 year multicenter study

Learn more: @powerofthepulse

Monsanto's Zeolite Patent 😆

From 1976.

https://patents.google.com/patent/US4115424A/

Also refer to: https://t.me/powerofthepulse/632 & https://t.me/powerofthepulse/687

Learn more: @powerofthepulse

Nanotech Quote of the Day #33

I've been saying that nanotech is the new asbestos for years:

"silver [...] proves to be toxic to humans [...] when in nanoparticle form, its cytotoxicity being higher than that of asbestos"

📝 Cytotoxic means it kills cells. Note that it's more toxic than asbestos.

"Wick et al. (2007) concluded that Carbon Nanotube agglomerates evoke similar effects on cell morphology and cell performance as the asbestos reference."

📝 There are dozens more experiments that prove the same thing.

Funny how the asbestos story repeats itself...

The ostracized-few warning about the dangers, while corporate whales make a killing.

Decades later it comes out that they knew all along.

https://www.asbestos.com/featured-stories/cover-up/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Hardie_Industries

References:
Nanomaterials and nanoparticles: Sources and toxicity
Carbon nanotubes: Toxicological impact on human health and environment

Learn more: @powerofthepulse

Bill Gates Declares the End of the Smartphone Era and Unveils Its Surprising Replacement: Electronic Tattoos

"Microsoft founder Bill Gates has suggested that smartphones could soon be obsolete, replaced by an entirely new kind of technology. Forget everything you know about handheld devices—Gates envisions a future where electronic tattoos become the new norm."

We've been talking about this stuff for a long time: https://spectrum.ieee.org/turning-the-body-into-a-wire

And still do... just this week I presented Klaus Schwab's predictions from 2016 regarding 'Implantable Smart Phones' to a local community... then I saw this:

Links: 1 & 2

I've been working with local communities here to raise awareness for almost 3 years now.

People get overwhelmed, shocked and sometimes skeptical...

They eventually learn that everything we say is true. We're just ahead by a few years.

How do these electronic tattoos work?

It's all nanotech, particularly nanocarbon (yes, such as graphene).

Learn more: @powerofthepulse

The attention economy doesn't have a currency called 'integrity' or 'truth'.

The attention economy runs on shock-value, clickbait and controversy.

The truth of our situation is nuanced and intricate.

The attention economy doesn't like nuance.

People that don't know the real enemy are terrified.

Terrified people are easy to control.

We should be concerned but hopeful.

Not terrified.

Learn more: @powerofthepulse

⚠️ Nano vs Non-Nano Zeolite

Someone tried to take my information about Zeolite and put a spin on it.

They claim regular-sized Zeolite is the 'safe' option.

1️⃣ All Zeolite is Nano

Because of its internal nano-sized micropores... Zeolite is and always will be a nanomaterial.

No matter the OVERALL size of the particle...

This is not about the overall size, it's about the biological reactivity of those internal nanoscale dimensions that leads to chemical reactions causing inflammation.

Research the chemistry of oxidative stress... which will also help you understand ⬇️

2️⃣ Zeolite is a Toxic Nano Aluminum

What possible excuse can convince us aluminum is 'safe and effective'?

It's cognitive dissonance.

Zeolite isn't contaminated with aluminum, it IS aluminum. And that aluminum is in you, actively interacting with your body...

Zeolite FAQs: https://t.me/powerofthepulse/649
Zeolite is Nano: https://t.me/powerofthepulse/628
Nanoscale Trick: https://t.me/powerofthepulse/660

Learn more: @powerofthepulse